Search (59 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  1. Bourne, R.: MARC harmonization : progress and problems (1997) 0.07
    0.073149405 = product of:
      0.18287352 = sum of:
        0.12771706 = weight(_text_:link in 873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12771706 = score(doc=873,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2711644 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05088753 = queryNorm
            0.47099498 = fieldWeight in 873, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=873)
        0.055156462 = weight(_text_:22 in 873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055156462 = score(doc=873,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05088753 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 873, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=873)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    LASER link. 1997, Spring/Summer, S.22-24
  2. Parent, I.: IFLA study on functional requirements for bibliographic records : an Anglo-American perspective (1995) 0.03
    0.025543412 = product of:
      0.12771706 = sum of:
        0.12771706 = weight(_text_:link in 3080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12771706 = score(doc=3080,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2711644 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05088753 = queryNorm
            0.47099498 = fieldWeight in 3080, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3080)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a view on the work of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records Study Group on behalf of the Anglo-American cataloguing tradition. The study is examining the fundamental aspects of record design using the entity-attribute-relationship model to link data elements to the function that a user can perform while accessing a bibliographic record. The data and functions are being linked by UNIMARC fields
  3. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.02
    0.023400906 = product of:
      0.11700453 = sum of:
        0.11700453 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11700453 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05088753 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
  4. Riemer, J.J.: Adding 856 Fields to authority records : rationale and implications (1998) 0.02
    0.022350488 = product of:
      0.111752436 = sum of:
        0.111752436 = weight(_text_:link in 3715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.111752436 = score(doc=3715,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2711644 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05088753 = queryNorm
            0.4121206 = fieldWeight in 3715, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3715)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses ways of applying MARC Field 856 (Electronic Location and Access) to authority records in online union catalogues. In principle, each catalogue site location can be treated as the electronic record of the work concerned and the MARC Field 856 can then refer to this location as if it were referring to the location of a primary record. Although URLs may become outdated, the fact that they are located in specifically defined MARC Fields makes the data contained amenable to the same link maintenance software ae used for the electronic records themselves. Includes practical examples of typical union catalogue records incorporating MARC Field 856
  5. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.02
    0.022062585 = product of:
      0.110312924 = sum of:
        0.110312924 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.110312924 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05088753 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  6. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.02
    0.019304762 = product of:
      0.09652381 = sum of:
        0.09652381 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09652381 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05088753 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  7. Geißelmann, F.: Arbeitsergebnisse der Arbeitsgruppe Codes (2000) 0.02
    0.019304762 = product of:
      0.09652381 = sum of:
        0.09652381 = weight(_text_:22 in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09652381 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05088753 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    26. 8.2000 19:22:35
  8. Weber, R.: "Functional requirements for bibliographic records" und Regelwerksentwicklung (2001) 0.02
    0.019304762 = product of:
      0.09652381 = sum of:
        0.09652381 = weight(_text_:22 in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09652381 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05088753 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 13(2001) H.3, S.20-22
  9. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004) 0.02
    0.019304762 = product of:
      0.09652381 = sum of:
        0.09652381 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09652381 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05088753 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
  10. McBride, J.L.: Faceted subject access for music through USMARC : a case for linked fields (2000) 0.02
    0.01915756 = product of:
      0.0957878 = sum of:
        0.0957878 = weight(_text_:link in 5403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0957878 = score(doc=5403,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2711644 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05088753 = queryNorm
            0.35324624 = fieldWeight in 5403, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5403)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The USMARC Format for Bibliographic Description contains three fields (045, 047, and 048) designed to facilitate subject access to music materials. The fields cover three of the main aspects of subject description for music: date of composition, form or genre, and number of instruments or voices, respectively. The codes are rarely used for subject access, because of the difficulty of coding them and because false drops would result in retrieval of bibliographic records where more than one musical work is present, a situation that occurs frequently with sound recordings. It is proposed that the values of the fields be converted to natural language and that subfield 8 be used to link all access fields in a bibliographic record for greater precision in retrieval. This proposal has implications beyond music cataloging, especially for metadata and any bibliographic records describing materials containing many works and subjects.
  11. Byrne, D.J.: MARC manual : understanding and using MARC records (1998) 0.02
    0.016546939 = product of:
      0.08273469 = sum of:
        0.08273469 = weight(_text_:22 in 6077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08273469 = score(doc=6077,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05088753 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6077, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6077)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    2. 8.2001 16:22:33
  12. Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996) 0.02
    0.015600604 = product of:
      0.07800302 = sum of:
        0.07800302 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07800302 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05088753 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    13. 1.2007 18:31:22
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
  13. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.02
    0.015600604 = product of:
      0.07800302 = sum of:
        0.07800302 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07800302 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05088753 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
  14. Paulus, W.; Weishaupt, K.: Bibliotheksdaten werden mehr wert : LibLink wertet bibliothekarische Dienstleistung auf (1996) 0.01
    0.013789116 = product of:
      0.06894558 = sum of:
        0.06894558 = weight(_text_:22 in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06894558 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05088753 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    29. 9.1996 18:58:22
  15. Hoffmann, L.: ¬Die Globalisierung macht vor der Katalogisierung nicht Halt : Mit AACR2 zum Global Player? (2003) 0.01
    0.013789116 = product of:
      0.06894558 = sum of:
        0.06894558 = weight(_text_:22 in 1544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06894558 = score(doc=1544,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05088753 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1544, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1544)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2016 12:15:46
  16. Murphy, C.: Curriculum-enhanced MARC (CEMARC) : a new cataloging format for school librarians (1995) 0.01
    0.013650528 = product of:
      0.06825264 = sum of:
        0.06825264 = weight(_text_:22 in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06825264 = score(doc=5100,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05088753 = queryNorm
            0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    11. 9.1996 19:22:20
    Source
    Literacy: traditional, cultural, technological. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the International Association of School Librarianship (selected papers), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh University, School of Library and Information Science, 17-22 Jul 94
  17. Oehlschläger, S.: Aus der 50. Sitzung der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Verbundsysteme am 24. und 25. April 2006 in Köln (2006) 0.01
    0.011175244 = product of:
      0.055876218 = sum of:
        0.055876218 = weight(_text_:link in 5183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055876218 = score(doc=5183,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2711644 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05088753 = queryNorm
            0.2060603 = fieldWeight in 5183, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5183)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Content
    Inhalt: - Zusammenarbeit der Verbundsysteme, Verbesserung von Datentausch und Fremddatennutzung - - MARC21 als Austauschformat Die Arbeiten im Rahmen des Projektes Umstieg auf MARC 21 liegen im Zeitplan. Der gegenwärtige Schwerpunkt der Arbeit ist die Erstellung einer Konkordanz MAB2 - MARC 21, die laufend mit der Expertengruppe Datenformate zurückgekoppelt wird und den Verbünden nach ihrer Fertigstellung vorgelegt wird. Es wird erwartet, dass zum 1. Januar 2007 ein Stand erreicht ist, an dem die Verbünde die erforderlichen Schritte ihres Umstiegs konkret terminieren können. Ab Herbst soll eine Arbeitsgruppe aus Vertretern der Verbünde den Umstieg auf operativer Ebene konkret planen. Damit der Umstieg als gut vorbereiteter, konzertierter und flächendeckend durchgeführter Schritt vollzogen werden kann, sollen die Verbundzentralen entsprechende Kapazitäten einplanen. - - Matchkey Kooperative Neukatalogisierung - - Catalogue Enrichment Nach einem Beschluss in der 49. Sitzung wurde eine Arbeitsgruppe Catalogue enrichment unter Federführung des HBZ gegründet. Das HBZ hat einen Entwurf zu einer Referenzdatenbank für Kataloganreicherungen vorgelegt, der gegenwärtig diskutiert wird. Die Mitglieder der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Verbundsysteme haben sich darauf geeinigt, eine Bestandsaufnahme sowie eine Mengen- und Inhaltsabschätzung dessen zu machen, was sie in die Referenzdatenbank einspeisen können. Das HBZ wird ein Konzept für ein Daten- und Schnittstellenmodell vorlegen und einen Prototyp der Datenbank aufsetzen. Die Deutsche Bibliothek hat zugesagt, mit Verlegern über zusätzliche Daten wie Inhaltsverzeichnisse, Abstracts, Cover o.ä. zu verhandeln mit dem Ziel, diese Informationseinheiten zu übernehmen, ggf. selbst zu erstellen und über ihre Datendienste auszuliefern statt wie bisher nur als Link auf Drittsystemen zur Verfügung zu stellen. Der Deutsche Bibliotheksverband (DBV) steht mit dem Börsenverein des Deutschen Buchhandels in Kontakt und hat bereits eine prinzipielle Zusage erreicht; derzeit wird eine entsprechende Vereinbarung angestrebt. - - Normdaten-Onlineschnittstelle
  18. Bales, K.: ¬The USMARC formats and visual materials (1989) 0.01
    0.011031292 = product of:
      0.055156462 = sum of:
        0.055156462 = weight(_text_:22 in 2861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055156462 = score(doc=2861,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05088753 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2861, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2861)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    4.12.1995 22:40:20
  19. Gopinath, M.A.: Standardization for resource sharing databases (1995) 0.01
    0.011031292 = product of:
      0.055156462 = sum of:
        0.055156462 = weight(_text_:22 in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055156462 = score(doc=4414,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05088753 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    It is helpful and essential to adopt standards for bibliographic information, project description and institutional information which are shareable for access to information resources within a country. Describes a strategy for adopting international standards of bibliographic information exchange for developing a resource sharing facilitation database in India. A list of 22 ISO standards for information processing is included
  20. Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004) 0.01
    0.011031292 = product of:
      0.055156462 = sum of:
        0.055156462 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055156462 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05088753 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68