Search (116 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  1. Knauth, M.: Bibliographies made easy : a look at PRO-CITE (1989) 0.11 
    0.110547565 = product of:
  0.27636892 = sum of:
    0.22121246 = weight(_text_:link in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22121246 = score(doc=2830,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.2711644 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.8157873 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
    0.055156462 = weight(_text_:22 in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055156462 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The PRO-CITE and BIBLIO-LINK software packages make the process of compiling bibliographies and internal data bases much easier than when all the steps in the process were manual (compiling, typing). The 2 programs work on records that have been downloaded from on-line data bases. BIBLIO-LINK analyses the downloaded records to determine document type and stores the data in the appropriate PRO-CITE workform, putting fields from the downloaded record into the correct PRO-CITE fields.
    Object
    BIBLIO-LINK
    Source
    Computers in libraries. 9(1989) no.4, S.22-24
  2. Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981) 0.04 
    0.040411443 = product of:
  0.20205721 = sum of:
    0.20205721 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20205721 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.43142503 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
  3. Dahlberg, I.: Conceptual definitions for INTERCONCEPT (1981) 0.03 
    0.027578233 = product of:
  0.13789116 = sum of:
    0.13789116 = weight(_text_:22 in 1630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13789116 = score(doc=1630,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1630, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1630)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    International classification. 8(1981), S.16-22
  4. Pietris, M.K.D.: LCSH update (1988) 0.03 
    0.027578233 = product of:
  0.13789116 = sum of:
    0.13789116 = weight(_text_:22 in 2798) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13789116 = score(doc=2798,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 2798, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=2798)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 13(1988), S.19-22
  5. Woods, W.A.: What's important about knowledge representation? (1983) 0.03 
    0.027578233 = product of:
  0.13789116 = sum of:
    0.13789116 = weight(_text_:22 in 6143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13789116 = score(doc=6143,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 6143, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=6143)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Computer. 16(1983) no.10, S.22-27
  6. Ridley, M.J.; Yannakoudakis, E.J.: ¬The DOCMATCH project (1989) 0.03 
    0.025543412 = product of:
  0.12771706 = sum of:
    0.12771706 = weight(_text_:link in 1552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12771706 = score(doc=1552,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2711644 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.47099498 = fieldWeight in 1552, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1552)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Outlines the ADONIS system: an experiment in which the contents of over 200 biomedical journals are scanned and stored on CD-ROM describes how the DOCMATCH project uses the Universal Standard Bibliographic Code to link bibliographic data bases to the ADONIS workstation, thus automating the ink from reference to full text data base. The DOCMATCH workstation at document supply centres divides orders into ADONIS material and non-ADONIS material so that the ADONIS workstation can then process the material automatically.
  7. Gehirn und Nervensystem : woraus sie bestehen - wie sie funktionieren - was sie leisten (1988) 0.02 
    0.023400906 = product of:
  0.11700453 = sum of:
    0.11700453 = weight(_text_:22 in 670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11700453 = score(doc=670,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 670, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=670)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 7.2000 18:22:27
  8. Lauf-Immesberger, K.: Tagung in Gütersloh : EDV Programme für Bibliotheken (1988) 0.02 
    0.022350488 = product of:
  0.111752436 = sum of:
    0.111752436 = weight(_text_:link in 5688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.111752436 = score(doc=5688,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2711644 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.4121206 = fieldWeight in 5688, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5688)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    On 23 June 88 Gütersloh City Library hosted an in-service training session on BASIS (Library Analytical System for Information Storage) programs for acquisitioning and cataloguing as well as on Gütersloh's own integrated book issue system called AVALON, organised through the Scool for Library & Documentation at Cologne Polytechnic. Discusses the programs installed at Gütersloh for BASIS in the early 70s by the North Rhine Westphalia Automation Working Group along with computer personnel and librarians, as well as link-up possibilities with main frame computers issuing book overdues, time and staff implications, the development of AVALON wich, though integrated into BASIS, can still be installed without BASIS, and a glimpse at possible library applications and the requirements of hardware and software linked with this.
  9. Garfield, E.: Citation indexes for science (1985) 0.02 
    0.022121247 = product of:
  0.11060623 = sum of:
    0.11060623 = weight(_text_:link in 3632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11060623 = score(doc=3632,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.2711644 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.40789366 = fieldWeight in 3632, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3632)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Indexes in general seek to provide a "key" to a body of literature intending to help the user in identifying, verifying, and/or locating individual or related items. The most common devices for collocation in indexes are authors' names and subjects. A different approach to collocating related items in an index is provided by a method called "citation indexing." Citation indexes attempt to link items through citations or references, in other works, by bringing together items cited in a particular work and the works citing a particular item. Citation indexing is based an the concept that there is a significant intellectual link between a document and each bibliographic item cited in it and that this link is useful to the scholar because an author's references to earlier writings identify relevant information to the subject of his current work. One of the major differences between the citation index and the traditional subject index is that the former, while listing current literature, also provides a retrospec tive view of past literature. While each issue of a traditional index is normally concerned only with the current literature, the citation index brings back retrospective literature in the form of cited references, thereby linking current scholarly works with earlier works. The advantages of the citation index have been considered to be its value as a tool for tracing the history of ideas or discoveries, for associating ideas between current and past work, and for evaluating works of individual authors or library collections. The concept of citation indexing is not new. It has been applied to legal literature since 1873 in a legal reference tool called Shepard's Citations. In the 1950s Eugene Garfield, a documentation consultant and founder and President of the Institute for Scientific Information (Philadelphia), developed the technique of citation indexing for scientific literature. This new application was facilitated by the availability of computer technology, resulting in a series of services: Science Citation Index (1955- ), Social Sciences Citation Index (1966- ), and the Arts & Humanities Index (1976- ). All three appear in printed versions and as machine-readable databases. In the following essay, the first in a series of articles and books elucidating the citation indexing system, Garfield traces the origin and beginning of this idea, its advantages, and the methods of preparing such indexes.
  10. Junginger, F.: Regeln für den Schlagwortkatalog: RSWK : Ergänzungen und Berichtigungen Nr.1 (1988) 0.02 
    0.022062585 = product of:
  0.110312924 = sum of:
    0.110312924 = weight(_text_:22 in 195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.110312924 = score(doc=195,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 195, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=195)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 22(1988), S.552-563
  11. Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval (1986) 0.02 
    0.022062585 = product of:
  0.110312924 = sum of:
    0.110312924 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.110312924 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476
  12. Tell, B.V.: Cataloging rules and database production : implications for manpower training in a developing country (1989) 0.02 
    0.022062585 = product of:
  0.110312924 = sum of:
    0.110312924 = weight(_text_:22 in 435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.110312924 = score(doc=435,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 435, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=435)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 14(1989), S.22-27
  13. Grundsätze der Universellen Dezimalklassifikation (DK) und Regeln für ihre Revision und Veröffentlichung (1981) 0.02 
    0.022062585 = product of:
  0.110312924 = sum of:
    0.110312924 = weight(_text_:22 in 1175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.110312924 = score(doc=1175,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1175, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1175)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    DK-Mitteilungen. 25(1981) Nr.4, S.15-22
  14. Hermes, H.J.: ¬Die DK: eine todkranke Klassifikation? (1983) 0.02 
    0.022062585 = product of:
  0.110312924 = sum of:
    0.110312924 = weight(_text_:22 in 1176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.110312924 = score(doc=1176,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1176, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1176)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    DK-Mitteilungen. 27(1983) Nr.6, S.19-22
  15. Kashyap, M.M.: Algorithms for analysis and representation of subject contents in a documentary language (1983) 0.02 
    0.022062585 = product of:
  0.110312924 = sum of:
    0.110312924 = weight(_text_:22 in 1955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.110312924 = score(doc=1955,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1955, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1955)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Library herald. 22(1983), S.1-29
  16. Gehirn und Bewußtsein (1989) 0.02 
    0.022062585 = product of:
  0.110312924 = sum of:
    0.110312924 = weight(_text_:22 in 2507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.110312924 = score(doc=2507,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2507, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2507)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 7.2000 18:21:08
  17. Stock, W.G.: Wissenschaftsinformatik : Fundierung, Gegenstand und Methoden (1980) 0.02 
    0.022062585 = product of:
  0.110312924 = sum of:
    0.110312924 = weight(_text_:22 in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.110312924 = score(doc=2808,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Ratio. 22(1980), S.155-164
  18. Dorfmüller, K.: Klassifikationsprobleme bei Musikalien : Sachstandsbericht (1) AIBM-Subkommission für Klassifikation (1980) 0.02 
    0.022062585 = product of:
  0.110312924 = sum of:
    0.110312924 = weight(_text_:22 in 3076) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.110312924 = score(doc=3076,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3076, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3076)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Forum Musikbibliothek. 1980, H.4, S.18-22
  19. Bauer, G.: Wissensdarstellung für eine effektive Mensch-Rechner-Interaktion (1985) 0.02 
    0.022062585 = product of:
  0.110312924 = sum of:
    0.110312924 = weight(_text_:22 in 3136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.110312924 = score(doc=3136,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3136, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3136)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Rechentechnik/Datenverarbeitung. 22(1985) H.2, S.33-35
  20. Piternick, A.B.: What's in a name? : use of names and titles in subject searching (1985) 0.02 
    0.022062585 = product of:
  0.110312924 = sum of:
    0.110312924 = weight(_text_:22 in 4482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.110312924 = score(doc=4482,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17819946 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05088753 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4482, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4482)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Database. 8(1985) no.4, S.22-28

Authors

Languages

  • e 72
  • d 42
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 88
  • m 19
  • s 4
  • u 2
  • x 2
  • ? 1
  • b 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications