Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Li, J."
  1. Lin, X.; Li, J.; Zhou, X.: Theme creation for digital collections (2008) 0.07
    0.07460449 = product of:
      0.14920898 = sum of:
        0.14920898 = sum of:
          0.10076562 = weight(_text_:core in 2635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10076562 = score(doc=2635,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051078856 = queryNorm
              0.39060444 = fieldWeight in 2635, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2635)
          0.04844336 = weight(_text_:22 in 2635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04844336 = score(doc=2635,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051078856 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2635, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2635)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  2. Zhu, Q.; Kong, X.; Hong, S.; Li, J.; He, Z.: Global ontology research progress : a bibliometric analysis (2015) 0.06
    0.06045531 = product of:
      0.12091062 = sum of:
        0.12091062 = sum of:
          0.07197544 = weight(_text_:core in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07197544 = score(doc=2590,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051078856 = queryNorm
              0.27900314 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
          0.048935182 = weight(_text_:22 in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048935182 = score(doc=2590,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051078856 = queryNorm
              0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to analyse the global scientific outputs of ontology research, an important emerging discipline that has huge potential to improve information understanding, organization, and management. Design/methodology/approach - This study collected literature published during 1900-2012 from the Web of Science database. The bibliometric analysis was performed from authorial, institutional, national, spatiotemporal, and topical aspects. Basic statistical analysis, visualization of geographic distribution, co-word analysis, and a new index were applied to the selected data. Findings - Characteristics of publication outputs suggested that ontology research has entered into the soaring stage, along with increased participation and collaboration. The authors identified the leading authors, institutions, nations, and articles in ontology research. Authors were more from North America, Europe, and East Asia. The USA took the lead, while China grew fastest. Four major categories of frequently used keywords were identified: applications in Semantic Web, applications in bioinformatics, philosophy theories, and common supporting technology. Semantic Web research played a core role, and gene ontology study was well-developed. The study focus of ontology has shifted from philosophy to information science. Originality/value - This is the first study to quantify global research patterns and trends in ontology, which might provide a potential guide for the future research. The new index provides an alternative way to evaluate the multidisciplinary influence of researchers.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    17. 9.2018 18:22:23
  3. Zhao, S.X.; Zhang, P.L.; Li, J.; Tan, A.M.; Ye, F.Y.: Abstracting the core subnet of weighted networks based on link strengths (2014) 0.03
    0.030536594 = product of:
      0.061073188 = sum of:
        0.061073188 = product of:
          0.122146375 = sum of:
            0.122146375 = weight(_text_:core in 1256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.122146375 = score(doc=1256,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051078856 = queryNorm
                0.47348404 = fieldWeight in 1256, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1256)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Most measures of networks are based on the nodes, although links are also elementary units in networks and represent interesting social or physical connections. In this work we suggest an option for exploring networks, called the h-strength, with explicit focus on links and their strengths. The h-strength and its extensions can naturally simplify a complex network to a small and concise subnetwork (h-subnet) but retains the most important links with its core structure. Its applications in 2 typical information networks, the paper cocitation network of a topic (the h-index) and 5 scientific collaboration networks in the field of "water resources," suggest that h-strength and its extensions could be a useful choice for abstracting, simplifying, and visualizing a complex network. Moreover, we observe that the 2 informetric models, the Glänzel-Schubert model and the Hirsch model, roughly hold in the context of the h-strength for the collaboration networks.
  4. Li, J.; Shi, D.: Sleeping beauties in genius work : when were they awakened? (2016) 0.01
    0.01038072 = product of:
      0.02076144 = sum of:
        0.02076144 = product of:
          0.04152288 = sum of:
            0.04152288 = weight(_text_:22 in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04152288 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051078856 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2016 14:13:32
  5. Zheng, R.; Li, J.; Chen, H.; Huang, Z.: ¬A framework for authorship identification of online messages : writing-style features and classification techniques (2006) 0.01
    0.0086506 = product of:
      0.0173012 = sum of:
        0.0173012 = product of:
          0.0346024 = sum of:
            0.0346024 = weight(_text_:22 in 5276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0346024 = score(doc=5276,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051078856 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5276, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5276)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:14:37