Search (33 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Dokumentenmanagement"
  1. Reed, B.: Metadata: core record or core business? (1997) 0.05
    0.05038281 = product of:
      0.10076562 = sum of:
        0.10076562 = product of:
          0.20153125 = sum of:
            0.20153125 = weight(_text_:core in 1764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.20153125 = score(doc=1764,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051078856 = queryNorm
                0.7812089 = fieldWeight in 1764, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1764)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Raises critical questions about the way archivists should be managing the metadata associated with records management and recordkeeping processes in order to maintain records in their context through time in complex and rapidly changing environments. Explores some current models for specifying record metadata, drawing on the outcomes of research projects and standards activities. Speculates on the potential value of defining a core set of record metadata. The mapping of the overlap between the metadata specified in the Pittsburgh University and British Columbia University projects, and the Australian Records Management Standards, reveals a possible core set of record metadada, analysis of which has shown that it would essentially enable the descriptions of the records as passive objects
  2. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.04
    0.040563382 = product of:
      0.081126764 = sum of:
        0.081126764 = product of:
          0.2433803 = sum of:
            0.2433803 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2433803 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.43304712 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051078856 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  3. Pemberton, J.M.: Who put the 'management' in records management? (1995) 0.04
    0.03598772 = product of:
      0.07197544 = sum of:
        0.07197544 = product of:
          0.14395088 = sum of:
            0.14395088 = weight(_text_:core in 4560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14395088 = score(doc=4560,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051078856 = queryNorm
                0.5580063 = fieldWeight in 4560, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4560)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    There is confusion about the conceptual origins of records management. It is often wrongly associated with archival management. Records management however should be associated with management as its core paradigm is that of information management. Traces the rise of management and the emergence of management information, prior to the 2nd World War
  4. Holzheid, G.: Dublin Core, SGML und die Zukunft der Erschließung am Beispiel einer Studie zur Optimierung des Dokumentenmanagements einer großen Nichtregierungsorganisation (2005) 0.04
    0.035626028 = product of:
      0.071252055 = sum of:
        0.071252055 = product of:
          0.14250411 = sum of:
            0.14250411 = weight(_text_:core in 2192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14250411 = score(doc=2192,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051078856 = queryNorm
                0.5523981 = fieldWeight in 2192, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2192)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Immer mehr Informationsobjekte werden in digitaler Form publiziert. In der vorliegenden Arbeit werden die Auswirkungen der Digitalisierung auf bibliothekarische Erschließungsmethoden dargestellt: einerseits die Funktion der Auszeichnungssprachen SGML, HTML und XML als Erschließungsinstrumente, andererseits der von bibliothekarischer Seite entwickelte Metadatenstandard Dublin Core. Am Praxisbeispiel "Dokumentenmanagement einer Nichtregierungsorganisation" wird untersucht, ob die Erschließung verbessert werden könnte durch z.B. Optimierung der Volltextindizierung, standardisierte Metadaten oder Integration von Metadaten und Suchmaschinentechnologie. Mithilfe einer Benutzerbefragung werden diese Ansätze an der Praxis gemessen und konkrete Empfehlungen entwickelt. Diese Veröffentlichung geht zurück auf eine Master-Arbeit im postgradualen Fernstudiengang Master of Arts (Library and Information Science) an der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. Online-Version: http://www.ib.hu-berlin.de/~kumlau/handreichungen/h136/.
  5. Day, I.: ¬The role of records management in 'business information' service (1997) 0.03
    0.028790178 = product of:
      0.057580356 = sum of:
        0.057580356 = product of:
          0.11516071 = sum of:
            0.11516071 = weight(_text_:core in 356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11516071 = score(doc=356,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051078856 = queryNorm
                0.44640505 = fieldWeight in 356, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=356)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The traditional compartementalization of the information profession into records managers, archivists, librarians and IT specialists is not in the best intersts of users, particularly in a business or corporate environment. Discusses the potential for integrating information services, the reasons for doing so, the benefits to be gained and the challenges such a strategy presents for all of the information specialists involved. Whilst records managers will need to develop and maintain their core skills, they are perhaps in the best posotion to lead such an integrated process
  6. Kampffmeyer, U.; Wasniewski, A.: MoReq2010 - Der europäische Records-Management-Standard (2011) 0.03
    0.028790178 = product of:
      0.057580356 = sum of:
        0.057580356 = product of:
          0.11516071 = sum of:
            0.11516071 = weight(_text_:core in 4904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11516071 = score(doc=4904,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051078856 = queryNorm
                0.44640505 = fieldWeight in 4904, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4904)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Am 8. Juni 2011 veröffentlichte das DLM Forum die Core Services und Plug-in-Module für die Modular Requirements for Record Systems (MoReq2010®)-Spezifikation für elektronische Records-Management- Systeme (ERMS). Kaum veröffentlicht, spalten sich die Meinungen hinsichtlich Funktionalität und Nützlichkeit des neuen Standards. Ist eine Neu-Vermessung der ERM-Systeme notwendig oder wird mit MoReq2010 lediglich ein weiterer Records Management-Standard übers Knie gebrochen?
  7. Modelle und Konzepte der Beitragsdokumentation und Filmarchivierung im Lokalfernsehsender Hamburg I : Endbericht (1996) 0.03
    0.02768192 = product of:
      0.05536384 = sum of:
        0.05536384 = product of:
          0.11072768 = sum of:
            0.11072768 = weight(_text_:22 in 7383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11072768 = score(doc=7383,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051078856 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7383, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7383)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1997 19:46:30
  8. Hughes, C.: Modern records management : key skills and core competencies (2005) 0.02
    0.024933027 = product of:
      0.049866054 = sum of:
        0.049866054 = product of:
          0.09973211 = sum of:
            0.09973211 = weight(_text_:core in 4516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09973211 = score(doc=4516,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051078856 = queryNorm
                0.38659814 = fieldWeight in 4516, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4516)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Key Features - Fills the gap in the literature addressing competencies for records managers - Emerging legislation and regulatory frameworks and recent corporate scandals haue provided opportunities for records managers to increase their profile and involvement at the strategic level of their organisation. This book provides information an the required competencies to support and enable this higher profile - The author is a highly experienced practitioner, and also has a post-graduate qualification in the area - The use of case studies of practicing records managers provides real-life examples of the diversity of the contemporary records manager The Author Ceri Hughes is Associate Director of Global Knowledge Management at KPMG Financial Advisory Services. She is an active member of the Records Management Society of Great Britain, served four years an the Society's executive and is currently the Immediate Past Chair, having chaired the Society 2001-2003. Readership Records management and knowledge management practitioners. Data protection/Privacy/ Freedom of Information professionals. Information management sector training professionals. Records management students Contents Part 1: The role of the records manager - Records management in the modern environment: Records managers-'basement to boardroom': evaluating the range of roles: Records management in the knowledge economy Part 2: Skills and competencies - Core competencies: Core skills: Adding value Part 3: Records management and career progression - Continuing professional development: Higher education: Professional networks: Continuing career development Part 4: Conclusions - Conclusion: Useful directory
  9. Cox, R.J.: Access in the digital information age and the archival mission : the United States (1998) 0.02
    0.02422168 = product of:
      0.04844336 = sum of:
        0.04844336 = product of:
          0.09688672 = sum of:
            0.09688672 = weight(_text_:22 in 3177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09688672 = score(doc=3177,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051078856 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3177, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3177)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    2. 3.1999 9:22:24
  10. Smith, C.: Building an Internet archive system for the British Broadcasting Corporation (2005) 0.02
    0.021592634 = product of:
      0.043185268 = sum of:
        0.043185268 = product of:
          0.086370535 = sum of:
            0.086370535 = weight(_text_:core in 5593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.086370535 = score(doc=5593,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051078856 = queryNorm
                0.3348038 = fieldWeight in 5593, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5593)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The amount of digital content produced at academic research institutions is large, and libraries and archives at these institutions have a responsibility to bring this digital material under curatorial control in order to manage and preserve it over time. But this is a daunting task with few proven models, requiring new technology, policies, procedures, core staff competencies, and cost models. The MIT Libraries are working with the DSpace(TM) open-source digital repository platform to explore the problem of capturing research and teaching material in any digital format and preserving it over time. By collaborating on this problem with other research institutions using the DSpace platform in the United States, the United Kingdom, Europe, and other parts of the world, as well as with other important efforts in the digital preservation arena, we are beginning to see ways of managing arbitrary digital content that might make digital preservation an achievable goal.
  11. Electronic recordkeeping issues and perspectives (1994) 0.02
    0.02076144 = product of:
      0.04152288 = sum of:
        0.04152288 = product of:
          0.08304576 = sum of:
            0.08304576 = weight(_text_:22 in 1001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08304576 = score(doc=1001,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051078856 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1001, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1001)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Archives and manuscripts. 22(1994) no.1, S.14-135
  12. Parer, D.; Parrott, K.: Management practices in the electronic records environment (1994) 0.02
    0.0173012 = product of:
      0.0346024 = sum of:
        0.0346024 = product of:
          0.0692048 = sum of:
            0.0692048 = weight(_text_:22 in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0692048 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051078856 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Archives and manuscripts. 22(1994) no.1, S.106-122
  13. Rosman, G.; Meer, K.v.d.; Sol, H.G.: ¬The design of document information systems (1996) 0.02
    0.0173012 = product of:
      0.0346024 = sum of:
        0.0346024 = product of:
          0.0692048 = sum of:
            0.0692048 = weight(_text_:22 in 7750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0692048 = score(doc=7750,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051078856 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 7750, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7750)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.4, S.287-297
  14. Martin, P.; Vaillant, S.: ¬Le records management : Concept nouveau? Pratique ancienne? (1998) 0.02
    0.017127315 = product of:
      0.03425463 = sum of:
        0.03425463 = product of:
          0.06850926 = sum of:
            0.06850926 = weight(_text_:22 in 2430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06850926 = score(doc=2430,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051078856 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 2430, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2430)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
    31.12.1998 15:32:22
  15. Barbat, P.; Neste, E. van den; Drouhet, G.: Records management et archivistique française (1998) 0.02
    0.017127315 = product of:
      0.03425463 = sum of:
        0.03425463 = product of:
          0.06850926 = sum of:
            0.06850926 = weight(_text_:22 in 2988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06850926 = score(doc=2988,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051078856 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 2988, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2988)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
    21. 2.1999 15:22:35
  16. Heijst, A.L.M. v.: Records management : the art of making choices (1995) 0.01
    0.01384096 = product of:
      0.02768192 = sum of:
        0.02768192 = product of:
          0.05536384 = sum of:
            0.05536384 = weight(_text_:22 in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05536384 = score(doc=3355,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051078856 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1996 9:30:18
  17. Boyle, J.: ¬A blueprint for managing documents (1997) 0.01
    0.01384096 = product of:
      0.02768192 = sum of:
        0.02768192 = product of:
          0.05536384 = sum of:
            0.05536384 = weight(_text_:22 in 814) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05536384 = score(doc=814,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051078856 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 814, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=814)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Byte. 22(1997) no.5, S.75-76,78,80
  18. Gonzalez, A.C.: Analisis y diseno de sistemas de gestion electronica de documentacion en grandes entidades (1997) 0.01
    0.01384096 = product of:
      0.02768192 = sum of:
        0.02768192 = product of:
          0.05536384 = sum of:
            0.05536384 = weight(_text_:22 in 2923) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05536384 = score(doc=2923,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051078856 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2923, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2923)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    11. 2.1999 21:02:22
  19. McLeod, J.; Hare, C.H.; Webster, B.: Records management today (1998) 0.01
    0.01384096 = product of:
      0.02768192 = sum of:
        0.02768192 = product of:
          0.05536384 = sum of:
            0.05536384 = weight(_text_:22 in 3627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05536384 = score(doc=3627,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051078856 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3627, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3627)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    15. 5.1999 20:22:49
  20. ¬Das papierlose Archiv : Abspecken mit digitaler Speicherverwaltung (1995) 0.01
    0.01211084 = product of:
      0.02422168 = sum of:
        0.02422168 = product of:
          0.04844336 = sum of:
            0.04844336 = weight(_text_:22 in 1788) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04844336 = score(doc=1788,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051078856 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1788, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1788)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Facts: Testmagazin für die Büro- & Kommunikationswelt. 1995, H.5, S.22-34

Languages

Types

  • a 27
  • m 3
  • s 2
  • r 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…