Search (269 results, page 1 of 14)

0.15031722 = product of:
  0.30063444 = sum of:
    0.30063444 = sum of:
      0.25911155 = weight(_text_:core in 1087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.25911155 = score(doc=1087,freq=18.0), product of:
          0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          1.0044112 = fieldWeight in 1087, product of:
            4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
              18.0 = termFreq=18.0
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1087)
      0.04152288 = weight(_text_:22 in 1087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04152288 = score(doc=1087,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1087, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1087)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The Core Standard for Rare Books, known as the DCRB Core standard, was approved by the Program for Cooperative Cataloging for use beginning in January 1999. Comparable to the core standards for other types of materials, the DCRB Core standard provides requirements for an intermediate level of bibliographic description for the cataloging of rare books. While the Core Standard for Books seems to have found a place in general cataloging practice, the DCRB Core standard appears to have met with resistance among rare book cataloging practitioners. This study investigates the extent to which such resistance exists by examining all of the DCRB Core records in the OCLC (Online Computer Library Center) Online Union Catalog (WorldCat) and the Research Libraries Croup Union Catalog (RLIN) databases that were created during the standard's first five years. The study analyzes the content of the records for adherence to the standard and investigates the ways in which the flexibility of the standard and cataloger's judgment augmented many records with more than the mandatory elements of description and access.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Object

DCRB Core standard

0.14284264 = product of:
  0.28568527 = sum of:
    0.28568527 = sum of:
      0.23032142 = weight(_text_:core in 903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.23032142 = score(doc=903,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.8928101 = fieldWeight in 903, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=903)
      0.05536384 = weight(_text_:22 in 903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05536384 = score(doc=903,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 903, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=903)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Recently the view has developed that electronic resources require the same level of cataloguing as the physical resources found in libraries, with the effect that a number of guidelines for cataloguing Internet resources have appeared. Describes one such standard for resource description, the Dublin Core metadata set, the ongoing refinement of the metadata elements and the application of the Dublin Core metadata set

Object

Dublin Core

Source

Cataloguing Australia. 23(1997) nos.1/2, S.17-22

0.12526436 = product of:
  0.25052872 = sum of:
    0.25052872 = sum of:
      0.21592632 = weight(_text_:core in 153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.21592632 = score(doc=153,freq=18.0), product of:
          0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.83700943 = fieldWeight in 153, product of:
            4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
              18.0 = termFreq=18.0
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=153)
      0.0346024 = weight(_text_:22 in 153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0346024 = score(doc=153,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 153, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=153)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

In January 1999, the Program for Cooperative Cataloging approved the core bibliographic standard for rare books, called the DCRB Core standard. Like the other core standards, the DCRB Core provides the framework within which catalogers can create bibliographic records that are less than full, but are as reliable as full-level records in description and authorized headings. In the three years since its approval, there is little evidence that the standard has been widely used. This study reports the results of a survey sent to forty-three participants who indicated in a preliminary query that they do use the DCRB Core or that they have made the decision not to use it. In the thirty-seven surveys that were returned, only about 16% of the respondents said they have used the standard to create bibliographic records for their rare books. The libraries that do not use the core standard find it inferior or lacking in a number of ways. Several of those libraries, however, are planning to use the standard in the future or are seriously planning to investigate using it. Such intent may indicate that the time is approaching when more libraries will find reasons to implement the standard. One impetus may come from the findings of a recent survey of the special collections departments of member libraries of the Association of Research Libraries that emphasize the size of the backlogs in those departments. If faster accessibility to specific portions of the backlogs would benefit users more than having fulllevel cataloging, application of the DCRB Core standard could facilitate reducing those backlogs.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Object

DCRB Core standard

0.10657784 = product of:
  0.21315569 = sum of:
    0.21315569 = sum of:
      0.14395088 = weight(_text_:core in 4907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14395088 = score(doc=4907,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.5580063 = fieldWeight in 4907, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4907)
      0.0692048 = weight(_text_:22 in 4907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0692048 = score(doc=4907,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4907, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4907)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Draws on parallels between outsourcing in business and in libraries to examine the difficulties and implications of outsourcing the catalogue department. Examines why cataloguing, in particular, has received outsourcing attention. 2 major reasons emerge: cataloguing is a non core activity, and catalogue departments are troublesome

Source

Journal of academic librarianship. 22(1996) no.1, S.33-43

0.10657784 = product of:
  0.21315569 = sum of:
    0.21315569 = sum of:
      0.14395088 = weight(_text_:core in 2275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14395088 = score(doc=2275,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.5580063 = fieldWeight in 2275, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2275)
      0.0692048 = weight(_text_:22 in 2275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0692048 = score(doc=2275,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2275, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2275)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Bericht über den Workshop, der am 22. u. 23.6.98 in der SUB Göttingen stattfand

Object

Dublin core

0.085262276 = product of:
  0.17052455 = sum of:
    0.17052455 = sum of:
      0.11516071 = weight(_text_:core in 8474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11516071 = score(doc=8474,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.44640505 = fieldWeight in 8474, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8474)
      0.05536384 = weight(_text_:22 in 8474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05536384 = score(doc=8474,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 8474, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8474)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Today's increasing use of electronic documents raises the question: will it be necessary to change the core concepts of author and work within the tradition of Anglo-American Cataloging Rules when dealing with electronic documents? Describes the current definition of author and work as given in the traditional AACR and presents 2 systems working with electronic documents, electronic office systems and groupware

Source

New library world. 95(1994) no.1115, S.22-25

0.085262276 = product of:
  0.17052455 = sum of:
    0.17052455 = sum of:
      0.11516071 = weight(_text_:core in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11516071 = score(doc=6095,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.44640505 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
      0.05536384 = weight(_text_:22 in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05536384 = score(doc=6095,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Libraries, their collections, and bibliographic control are essential components of the provision of access to recorded knowledge. Cataloging is a primary method of bibliographic control. Full or traditional cataloging is very expensive, but relying on keyword searching is inadequate. Alternatives for a solution to cataloging needs for electronic resources including the use of metadata and the Dublin Core are examined. Many questions exist regarding the long-term future of today's electronic documents. Recommendations are made for preserving recorded knowledge and information in the electronic resources for future generations

Source

Journal of Internet cataloging. 2(1999) no.1, S.5-22

0.08183463 = product of:
  0.16366926 = sum of:
    0.16366926 = sum of:
      0.122146375 = weight(_text_:core in 4458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.122146375 = score(doc=4458,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.47348404 = fieldWeight in 4458, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4458)
      0.04152288 = weight(_text_:22 in 4458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04152288 = score(doc=4458,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4458, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4458)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

12. 3.2000 19:25:22

Object

Dublin core

0.07460449 = product of:
  0.14920898 = sum of:
    0.14920898 = sum of:
      0.10076562 = weight(_text_:core in 2323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10076562 = score(doc=2323,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.39060444 = fieldWeight in 2323, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2323)
      0.04844336 = weight(_text_:22 in 2323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04844336 = score(doc=2323,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2323, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2323)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Information technology (IT) encompassing an integrated library system, computer hardware and software, CDROM, Internet, and other domains, including MARC 21 formats, CORC, and metadata standards (Dublin Core, TEI, XML, RDF) has produced far-reaching changes in the job functions of catalogers. Libraries are now coming up with a new set of recruiting requirements for these positions. This paper aims to review job advertisements published in American Libraries (AL) and College and Research Libraries News (C&RL NEWS) to assess the impact of the use of IT in libraries an job requirements and qualifications for catalogers.

Source

Information technology and libraries. 22(2003) no. March, S.18-21

0.07460449 = product of:
  0.14920898 = sum of:
    0.14920898 = sum of:
      0.10076562 = weight(_text_:core in 158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10076562 = score(doc=158,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.39060444 = fieldWeight in 158, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=158)
      0.04844336 = weight(_text_:22 in 158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04844336 = score(doc=158,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 158, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=158)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The role of cataloging education within the library profession is a topic of considerable interest and debate. Fifty-five heads of reference and sixty-five heads of cataloging in Association of Research Librarians institutions responded to a survey based upon the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Educational Policy Statement, Appendix: Knowledge and Skills, Intellectual Access and Information Organization, concerning the importance of cataloging competencies for all entry-level academic librarians. The survey found that practitioners agreed upon a definite set of core cataloging competencies that all entry-level academic librarians should possess. This finding holds larger implications for library education for academic librarians and for the profession as a whole.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.07460449 = product of:
  0.14920898 = sum of:
    0.14920898 = sum of:
      0.10076562 = weight(_text_:core in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10076562 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.39060444 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
      0.04844336 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04844336 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Creativity is now a core requirement for successful organizations. Libraries, like all organizations, need to produce and utilize new ideas to improve user service and experiences. With changes in cataloging such as Resource Description and Access (RDA), the opportunity to rethink cataloging practices is here now. Everyone has creative potential, although catalogers may have both a personality and work environment that make it more difficult. To be able to maximize creative capacity, catalogers need the proper work environment, support from their organization, and a plan for accomplishing creative goals. Given that environment, catalogers may create ideas that will shape the future. (RDA).

Date

29. 5.2015 11:08:22

0.07052124 = product of:
  0.14104249 = sum of:
    0.14104249 = product of:
      0.28208497 = sum of:
        0.28208497 = weight(_text_:core in 4629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28208497 = score(doc=4629,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051078856 = queryNorm
            1.0934646 = fieldWeight in 4629, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4629)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The core record standard for books was developed in 1993 under the auspices of the Library of Congress inspired Cooperative Cataloging Council (CCC). Even though core record standards for other formats continue to be developed by CCC's successor, the Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC) and core records have begun to make their presence known in the bibliographic utilities, there remains a certain amount of wariness surrounding the utility of this new cataloguing tool. Introduces the core record concept and explores issues associated with the implementation of core level cataloguing

0.064376794 = product of:
  0.12875359 = sum of:
    0.12875359 = product of:
      0.25750718 = sum of:
        0.25750718 = weight(_text_:core in 4632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25750718 = score(doc=4632,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051078856 = queryNorm
            0.9981921 = fieldWeight in 4632, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4632)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Over the past 18 months, Colorado State University Libraries has used the Library of Congress inspired Program in Cooperative Cataloging's (PCC) core record standard when cataloguing non depository and pre-1976 federal documents. Describes the libraries' decision to use the core standard, describes the core cataloguing standard, noting especially PCC's emphasis on the importance of the cataloguer's judgement in applying the standard and comments on the libraries' use and assessment of core cataloguing

0.064376794 = product of:
  0.12875359 = sum of:
    0.12875359 = product of:
      0.25750718 = sum of:
        0.25750718 = weight(_text_:core in 3801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25750718 = score(doc=3801,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051078856 = queryNorm
            0.9981921 = fieldWeight in 3801, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3801)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Describes the background to the creation of a core bibliographic record for music and sound recordings, provides a definition of a core bibliographic record and presents the core record for printed and manuscript music and the core record for sound recordings which were prepared by the International Association of Music Libraries, Archives and Documentation Centres Working Group in Perugia, 1-6 Sep 1996

0.06394671 = product of:
  0.12789342 = sum of:
    0.12789342 = sum of:
      0.086370535 = weight(_text_:core in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.086370535 = score(doc=2766,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.3348038 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
      0.04152288 = weight(_text_:22 in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04152288 = score(doc=2766,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This study assesses the current state of responsibilities and skill sets required of cataloging professionals. It identifies emerging roles and competencies focusing on the digital environment and relates these to the established knowledge of traditional cataloging standards and practices. We conducted a content analysis of 349 job descriptions advertised in AutoCAT in 2005-2006. Multivariate techniques of cluster and multidimensional-scaling analyses were applied to the data. Analysis of job titles, required and preferred qualifications/skills, and responsibilities lends perspective to the roles that cataloging professionals play in the digital environment. Technological advances increasingly demand knowledge and skills related to electronic resource management, metadata creation, and computer and Web applications. Emerging knowledge and skill sets are increasingly being integrated into the core technical aspects of cataloging such as bibliographic and authority control and integrated library-system management. Management of cataloging functions is also in high demand. The results of the study provide insight on current and future curriculum design of library and information-science programs.

Date

22. 3.2009 19:20:24

0.06394671 = product of:
  0.12789342 = sum of:
    0.12789342 = sum of:
      0.086370535 = weight(_text_:core in 2603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.086370535 = score(doc=2603,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.3348038 = fieldWeight in 2603, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2603)
      0.04152288 = weight(_text_:22 in 2603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04152288 = score(doc=2603,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2603, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2603)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This comprehensive annotated webliography describes online cataloging resources that are free to use, currently updated, and of high quality. The major aim of this webliography is to provide assistance for catalogers who are new to the profession, unfamiliar with cataloging specific formats, or unable to access costly print and subscription resources. The annotated resources include general websites and webpages, databases, workshop presentations, streaming media, and local documentation. The scope of the webliography is limited to resources reflecting traditional cataloging practices using the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd edition, RDA: Resource Description and Access, and MAchine Readable Cataloging (MARC) standards. Non-MARC metadata schemas like Dublin Core are not covered. Most components of cataloging are represented in this webliography, such as authority control, classification, subject headings, and genre terms. Guidance also is provided for cataloging miscellaneous formats including sound and videorecordings, streaming media, e-books, video games, graphic novels, kits, rare materials, maps, serials, realia, government documents, and music.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.057580356 = product of:
  0.11516071 = sum of:
    0.11516071 = product of:
      0.23032142 = sum of:
        0.23032142 = weight(_text_:core in 968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23032142 = score(doc=968,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051078856 = queryNorm
            0.8928101 = fieldWeight in 968, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=968)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Using a set of bibliographic records from the OCLC database, records meeting PCC core standard are compared with those meeting PCC full standard. Significant statistical differences are derived for occurrence of specific name and subject access points in core and full records. Implications for OPAC access may inform libraries' policies regarding incorporation of core records in copy cataloging procedures

0.05328892 = product of:
  0.10657784 = sum of:
    0.10657784 = sum of:
      0.07197544 = weight(_text_:core in 5582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07197544 = score(doc=5582,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.27900314 = fieldWeight in 5582, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5582)
      0.0346024 = weight(_text_:22 in 5582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0346024 = score(doc=5582,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5582, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5582)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Enthält die Beiträge: JOHNSON, P.: Selecting electronic resources: developing a local decision-making matrix: MANDEL, C.A. u. R. WOLVEN: Intellectual access to digital documents: joining proven principles with new technologies; CAPLAN, P. u. R. GUENTHER: Metadata for Internet resources: the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC; BRUGGER, J.M.: Cataloging for digital libraries; SEAMAN, D.M.: Selection, access, and control in a library of electronic texts; MARTIN, G.: Control of electronic resources in Australia; HILLMANN, D.I.: 'Parallel universes' or meaningful relationships: envisioning a future for the OPAC and the net; McMILLAN, D.I.: Electronic theses and dissertations: merging perspectives; NICHOLSON, D. u. M. STEELE: CATRIONA: a distributed, locally-oriented, Z39.50 OPAC-based approach to cataloguing the Internet; MORGAN, E.L.: Possible solutions for incorporating digital information mediums into traditional library cataloguing services; DAVIS-BROWN, B. u. D. WILLIAMSON: Cataloging at the Library of Congress in the digital age; DILLON, M. u. E. JUL: Cataloging Internet resources: the convergence of libraries and Internet resources

Series

Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4

0.05328892 = product of:
  0.10657784 = sum of:
    0.10657784 = sum of:
      0.07197544 = weight(_text_:core in 187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07197544 = score(doc=187,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.27900314 = fieldWeight in 187, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=187)
      0.0346024 = weight(_text_:22 in 187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0346024 = score(doc=187,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 187, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=187)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The formal charge for the IFLA study involving international bibliography standards was to delineate the functions that are performed by the bibliographic record with respect to various media, applications, and user needs. The method used was the entity relationship analysis technique. Three groups of entities that are the key objects of interest to users of bibliographic records were defined. The primary group contains four entities: work, expression, manifestation, and item. The second group includes entities responsible for the intellectual or artistic content, production, or ownership of entities in the first group. The third group includes entities that represent concepts, objects, events, and places. In the study we identified the attributes associated with each entity and the relationships that are most important to users. The attributes and relationships were mapped to the functional requirements for bibliographic records that were defined in terms of four user tasks: to find, identify, select, and obtain. Basic requirements for national bibliographic records were recommended based on the entity analysis. The recommendations of the study are compared with two standards, AACR (Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules) and the Dublin Core, to place them into pragmatic context. The results of the study are being used in the review of the complete set of ISBDs as the initial benchmark in determining data elements for each format.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.050894324 = product of:
  0.10178865 = sum of:
    0.10178865 = product of:
      0.2035773 = sum of:
        0.2035773 = weight(_text_:core in 911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2035773 = score(doc=911,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051078856 = queryNorm
            0.7891401 = fieldWeight in 911, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=911)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Discusses the organization of Internet resources for access, including the non permanancy and volatility of resources. Examines the developments of the Dublin Core metadata set, cataloguing practices to new technologies, and dicusses the practicalities of such a system

Object

Dublin Core