Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Information Gateway"
  • × theme_ss:"Wissensrepräsentation"
  1. Kruk, S.R.; Westerki, A.; Kruk, E.: Architecture of semantic digital libraries (2009) 0.02
    0.021592634 = product of:
      0.043185268 = sum of:
        0.043185268 = product of:
          0.086370535 = sum of:
            0.086370535 = weight(_text_:core in 3379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.086370535 = score(doc=3379,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051078856 = queryNorm
                0.3348038 = fieldWeight in 3379, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3379)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The main motivation of this chapter was to gather existing requirements and solutions, and to present a generic architectural design of semantic digital libraries. This design is meant to answer a number of requirements, such as interoperability or ability to exchange resources and solutions, and set up the foundations for the best practices in the new domain of semantic digital libraries. We start by presenting the library from different high-level perspectives, i.e., user (see Sect. 2) and metadata (see Sect. 1) perspective; this overview narrows the scope and puts emphasis on certain aspects related to the system perspective, i.e., the architecture of the actual digital library management system. We conclude by presenting the system architecture from three perspectives: top-down layered architecture (see Sect. 3), vertical architecture of core services (see Sect. 4), and stack of enabling infrastructures (see Sect. 5); based upon the observations and evaluation of the contemporary state of the art presented in the previous sections, these last three subsections will describe an in-depth model of the digital library management system.
  2. Semantic digital libraries (2009) 0.01
    0.014395089 = product of:
      0.028790178 = sum of:
        0.028790178 = product of:
          0.057580356 = sum of:
            0.057580356 = weight(_text_:core in 3371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057580356 = score(doc=3371,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051078856 = queryNorm
                0.22320253 = fieldWeight in 3371, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3371)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Libraries have always been an inspiration for the standards and technologies developed by semantic web activities. However, except for the Dublin Core specification, semantic web and social networking technologies have not been widely adopted and further developed by major digital library initiatives and projects. Yet semantic technologies offer a new level of flexibility, interoperability, and relationships for digital repositories. Kruk and McDaniel present semantic web-related aspects of current digital library activities, and introduce their functionality; they show examples ranging from general architectural descriptions to detailed usages of specific ontologies, and thus stimulate the awareness of researchers, engineers, and potential users of those technologies. Their presentation is completed by chapters on existing prototype systems such as JeromeDL, BRICKS, and Greenstone, as well as a look into the possible future of semantic digital libraries. This book is aimed at researchers and graduate students in areas like digital libraries, the semantic web, social networks, and information retrieval. This audience will benefit from detailed descriptions of both today's possibilities and also the shortcomings of applying semantic web technologies to large digital repositories of often unstructured data.