Search (88 results, page 1 of 5)

0.08183463 = product of:
  0.16366926 = sum of:
    0.16366926 = sum of:
      0.122146375 = weight(_text_:core in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.122146375 = score(doc=2623,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.47348404 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
      0.04152288 = weight(_text_:22 in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04152288 = score(doc=2623,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Object

Dublin Core

Source

Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas

0.061073188 = product of:
  0.122146375 = sum of:
    0.122146375 = product of:
      0.24429275 = sum of:
        0.24429275 = weight(_text_:core in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24429275 = score(doc=4689,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051078856 = queryNorm
            0.9469681 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

SKOS Core provides a model for expressing the basic structure and content of concept schemes such as thesauri, classification schemes, subject heading lists, taxonomies, 'folksonomies', other types of controlled vocabulary, and also concept schemes embedded in glossaries and terminologies. The SKOS Core Vocabulary is an application of the Resource Description Framework (RDF), that can be used to express a concept scheme as an RDF graph. Using RDF allows data to be linked to and/or merged with other data, enabling data sources to be distributed across the web, but still be meaningfully composed and integrated. This document is a guide using the SKOS Core Vocabulary, for readers who already have a basic understanding of RDF concepts. This edition of the SKOS Core Guide [SKOS Core Guide] is a W3C Public Working Draft. It is the authoritative guide to recommended usage of the SKOS Core Vocabulary at the time of publication.

Source

http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-swbp-skos-core-guide-20051102/

0.057580356 = product of:
  0.11516071 = sum of:
    0.11516071 = product of:
      0.23032142 = sum of:
        0.23032142 = weight(_text_:core in 3362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23032142 = score(doc=3362,freq=32.0), product of:
            0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051078856 = queryNorm
            0.8928101 = fieldWeight in 3362, product of:
              5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
                32.0 = termFreq=32.0
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3362)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the construction of a core ontology for food. To construct the core ontology, the authors propose here an approach called, yet another methodology for ontology plus (YAMO+). The goal is to exhibit the construction of a core ontology for a domain, which can be further extended and converted into application ontologies. Design/methodology/approach To motivate the construction of the core ontology for food, the authors have first articulated a set of application scenarios. The idea is that the constructed core ontology can be used to build application-specific ontologies for those scenarios. As part of the developmental approach to core ontology, the authors have proposed a methodology called YAMO+. It is designed following the theory of analytico-synthetic classification. YAMO+ is generic in nature and can be applied to build core ontologies for any domain. Findings Construction of a core ontology needs a thorough understanding of the domain and domain requirements. There are various challenges involved in constructing a core ontology as discussed in this paper. The proposed approach has proven to be sturdy enough to face the challenges that the construction of a core ontology poses. It is observed that core ontology is amenable to conversion to an application ontology. Practical implications The constructed core ontology for domain food can be readily used for developing application ontologies related to food. The proposed methodology YAMO+ can be applied to build core ontologies for any domain. Originality/value As per the knowledge, the proposed approach is the first attempt based on the study of the state of the art literature, in terms of, a formal approach to the design of a core ontology. Also, the constructed core ontology for food is the first one as there is no such ontology available on the web for domain food.

0.04836425 = product of:
  0.0967285 = sum of:
    0.0967285 = sum of:
      0.057580356 = weight(_text_:core in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.057580356 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.22320253 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
      0.03914815 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03914815 = score(doc=2654,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.21886435 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

In order to transfer the Chinese Classified Thesaurus (CCT) into a machine-processable format and provide CCT-based Web services, a pilot study has been conducted in which a variety of selected CCT classes and mapped thesaurus entries are encoded with SKOS. OWL and RDFS are also used to encode the same contents for the purposes of feasibility and cost-benefit comparison. CCT is a collected effort led by the National Library of China. It is an integration of the national standards Chinese Library Classification (CLC) 4th edition and Chinese Thesaurus (CT). As a manually created mapping product, CCT provides for each of the classes the corresponding thesaurus terms, and vice versa. The coverage of CCT includes four major clusters: philosophy, social sciences and humanities, natural sciences and technologies, and general works. There are 22 main-classes, 52,992 sub-classes and divisions, 110,837 preferred thesaurus terms, 35,690 entry terms (non-preferred terms), and 59,738 pre-coordinated headings (Chinese Classified Thesaurus, 2005) Major challenges of encoding this large vocabulary comes from its integrated structure. CCT is a result of the combination of two structures (illustrated in Figure 1): a thesaurus that uses ISO-2788 standardized structure and a classification scheme that is basically enumerative, but provides some flexibility for several kinds of synthetic mechanisms Other challenges include the complex relationships caused by differences of granularities of two original schemes and their presentation with various levels of SKOS elements; as well as the diverse coordination of entries due to the use of auxiliary tables and pre-coordinated headings derived from combining classes, subdivisions, and thesaurus terms, which do not correspond to existing unique identifiers. The poster reports the progress, shares the sample SKOS entries, and summarizes problems identified during the SKOS encoding process. Although OWL Lite and OWL Full provide richer expressiveness, the cost-benefit issues and the final purposes of encoding CCT raise questions of using such approaches.

Source

Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas

0.04071546 = product of:
  0.08143092 = sum of:
    0.08143092 = product of:
      0.16286184 = sum of:
        0.16286184 = weight(_text_:core in 1075) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16286184 = score(doc=1075,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051078856 = queryNorm
            0.6313121 = fieldWeight in 1075, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1075)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Object

Dublin core

Source

DC-2013: International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata: Online Proceedings [http://dcevents.dublincore.org/index.php/IntConf/dc-2013/schedConf/presentations]

0.040563382 = product of:
  0.081126764 = sum of:
    0.081126764 = product of:
      0.2433803 = sum of:
        0.2433803 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2433803 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.43304712 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051078856 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.

0.03598772 = product of:
  0.07197544 = sum of:
    0.07197544 = product of:
      0.14395088 = sum of:
        0.14395088 = weight(_text_:core in 2836) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14395088 = score(doc=2836,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051078856 = queryNorm
            0.5580063 = fieldWeight in 2836, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2836)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Faceted classification, at its core, implies orthogonality - that every facet axis exists at right angles to (i.e., independently of) every other facet axis. That's why a faceted classification is sometimes represented with a chart. This set of desserts has been classified by their confection types and, orthogonally, by their flavors.

0.031166283 = product of:
  0.062332567 = sum of:
    0.062332567 = product of:
      0.12466513 = sum of:
        0.12466513 = weight(_text_:core in 841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12466513 = score(doc=841,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051078856 = queryNorm
            0.48324767 = fieldWeight in 841, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=841)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Conceptualization is at the core of developing domain ontologies. This paper reports a study for developing an ontology for a micro-domain - Test Blanket Module (TBM), an integral part of thermonuclear or fusion reactors. Sample data downloaded from yielded 1115 unique DEI (indexer-assigned) descriptors assigned to 548 records on TBM. The frequencies of occurrence of all the unique descriptors, the corresponding co-word DEI descriptors (AN numbers) were identified On the basis of their research linkages the descriptors were grouped into four quadrants. It was found, that the descriptors in the 2nd and 3rd quadrants were at the core of the selected subject. A total of 31 core descriptors from these were selected for conceptualization and for each the co-occurring descriptors and their frequencies of co-occurrence with the selected descriptor were noted. Only descriptor pairs that co-occurred 10 times or higher were considered. Comparison of Co-Word Word Blocks (CWWBs) and word blocks (INISWB) from the INIS thesaurus showed differences. Co-words were used to semantically enrich descriptors transforming them into more comprehensive concepts; these were used as building blocks for conceptualization and for domain ontology. This method could be replicated to generate semantic networks (which could form an Ontological layer on any subject of study) and also in query expansion during search and retrieval in interdisciplinary subject domains.

0.030536594 = product of:
  0.061073188 = sum of:
    0.061073188 = product of:
      0.122146375 = sum of:
        0.122146375 = weight(_text_:core in 1662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.122146375 = score(doc=1662,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051078856 = queryNorm
            0.47348404 = fieldWeight in 1662, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1662)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The creation of the World Wide Web has had a profound impact an the ease with which information can be distributed and presented. Now with more and more information becoming available, there is an increasing demand for targeted global search, comparative studies, data transfer and data migration between heterogeneous sources of cultural and scholarly contents. This requires interoperability not only at the encoding level - a task solved well by XML for instance - but also at the more complex semantics level, where lie the characteristics of the domain. In the meanwhile, the reality of semantic interoperability is getting frustrating. In the cultural area alone, dozens of "standard" and hundreds of proprietary metadata and data structures exist, as well as hundreds of terminology systems. Core systems like the Dublin Core represent a common denominator by far too small to fulfil advanced requirements. Overstretching its already limited semantics in order to capture complex contents leads to further loss of meaning.

0.028790178 = product of:
  0.057580356 = sum of:
    0.057580356 = product of:
      0.11516071 = sum of:
        0.11516071 = weight(_text_:core in 3063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11516071 = score(doc=3063,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051078856 = queryNorm
            0.44640505 = fieldWeight in 3063, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3063)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The Resource Description Framework (RDF) integrates a variety of applications from library catalogs and world-wide directories to syndication and aggregation of news, software, and content to personal collections of music, photos, and events using XML as an interchange syntax. The RDF specifications provide a lightweight ontology system to support the exchange of knowledge on the Web. The W3C Semantic Web Activity Statement explains W3C's plans for RDF, including the RDF Core WG, Web Ontology and the RDF Interest Group.

0.028790178 = product of:
  0.057580356 = sum of:
    0.057580356 = product of:
      0.11516071 = sum of:
        0.11516071 = weight(_text_:core in 1510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11516071 = score(doc=1510,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051078856 = queryNorm
            0.44640505 = fieldWeight in 1510, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1510)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Starting from an unsolved problem of information retrieval this paper presents an ontology-based model for indexing and retrieval. The model combines the methods and experiences of cognitive-to-interpret indexing languages with the strengths and possibilities of formal knowledge representation. The core component of the model uses inferences along the paths of typed relations between the entities of a knowledge representation for enabling the determination of hit quantities in the context of retrieval processes. The entities are arranged in aspect-oriented facets to ensure a consistent hierarchical structure. The possible consequences for indexing and retrieval are discussed.

0.027042255 = product of:
  0.05408451 = sum of:
    0.05408451 = product of:
      0.16225353 = sum of:
        0.16225353 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16225353 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.43304712 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051078856 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.

0.027042255 = product of:
  0.05408451 = sum of:
    0.05408451 = product of:
      0.16225353 = sum of:
        0.16225353 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16225353 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.43304712 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051078856 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.

0.025447162 = product of:
  0.050894324 = sum of:
    0.050894324 = product of:
      0.10178865 = sum of:
        0.10178865 = weight(_text_:core in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10178865 = score(doc=266,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051078856 = queryNorm
            0.39457005 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

We present a survey of the current state of Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS) vocabularies on the Web. Candidate vocabularies were gathered through collections and web crawling, with 478 identified as complying to a given definition of a SKOS vocabulary. Analyses were then conducted that included investigation of the use of SKOS constructs; the use of SKOS semantic relations and lexical labels; and the structure of vocabularies in terms of the hierarchical and associative relations, branching factors and the depth of the vocabularies. Even though SKOS concepts are considered to be the core of SKOS vocabularies, our findings were that not all SKOS vocabularies published explicitly declared SKOS concepts in the vocabularies. Almost one-third of th SKOS vocabularies collected fall into the category of term lists, with no use of any SKOS semantic relations. As concept labelling is core to SKOS vocabularies, a surprising find is that not all SKOS vocabularies use SKOS lexical labels, whether skos:prefLabel or skos:altLabel, for their concepts. The branching factors and maximum depth of the vocabularies have no direct relationship to the size of the vocabularies. We also observed some common modelling slips found in SKOS vocabularies. The survey is useful when considering, for example, converting artefacts such as OWL ontologies into SKOS, where a definition of typicality of SKOS vocabularies could be used to guide the conversion. Moreover, the survey results can serve to provide a better understanding of the modelling styles of the SKOS vocabularies published on the Web, especially when considering the creation of applications that utilize these vocabularies.

0.025191406 = product of:
  0.05038281 = sum of:
    0.05038281 = product of:
      0.10076562 = sum of:
        0.10076562 = weight(_text_:core in 3149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10076562 = score(doc=3149,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051078856 = queryNorm
            0.39060444 = fieldWeight in 3149, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3149)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Topic Maps is an international standard technology for describing knowledge structures and using them to improve the findability of information. It is based on a formal model that subsumes those of traditional finding aids such as indexes, glossaries, and thesauri, and extends them to cater for the additional complexities of digital information. Topic Maps is increasingly used in enterprise information integration, knowledge management, e-learning, and digital libraries, and as the foundation for Web-based information delivery solutions. This entry provides a comprehensive treatment of the core concepts, as well as describing the background and current status of the standard and its relationship to traditional knowledge organization techniques.

0.025191406 = product of:
  0.05038281 = sum of:
    0.05038281 = product of:
      0.10076562 = sum of:
        0.10076562 = weight(_text_:core in 3717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10076562 = score(doc=3717,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051078856 = queryNorm
            0.39060444 = fieldWeight in 3717, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3717)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Semantic Interoperability for Linked Data, proc. DC2009: International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Seoul, Korea, October 12-17, 2009

0.025191406 = product of:
  0.05038281 = sum of:
    0.05038281 = product of:
      0.10076562 = sum of:
        0.10076562 = weight(_text_:core in 4656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10076562 = score(doc=4656,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051078856 = queryNorm
            0.39060444 = fieldWeight in 4656, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4656)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

The 2005 Working Drafts of the SKOS Core Vocabulary Specification (aka "SKOS 2005") have been superseded by 2009 versions ("SKOS 2009").

0.025191406 = product of:
  0.05038281 = sum of:
    0.05038281 = product of:
      0.10076562 = sum of:
        0.10076562 = weight(_text_:core in 2777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10076562 = score(doc=2777,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051078856 = queryNorm
            0.39060444 = fieldWeight in 2777, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2777)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The presented ontology-based model for indexing and retrieval combines the methods and experiences of traditional indexing languages with their cognitively interpreted entities and relationships with the strengths and possibilities of formal knowledge representation. The core component of the model uses inferences along the paths of typed relations between the entities of a knowledge representation for enabling the determination of result sets in the context of retrieval processes. A proposal for a general, but condensed, inventory of typed relations is given. The entities are arranged in aspect-oriented facets to ensure a consistent hierarchical structure. The possible consequences for indexing and retrieval are discussed.

0.021592634 = product of:
  0.043185268 = sum of:
    0.043185268 = product of:
      0.086370535 = sum of:
        0.086370535 = weight(_text_:core in 5703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.086370535 = score(doc=5703,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051078856 = queryNorm
            0.3348038 = fieldWeight in 5703, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5703)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Presented at the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications in October 2006

0.021592634 = product of:
  0.043185268 = sum of:
    0.043185268 = product of:
      0.086370535 = sum of:
        0.086370535 = weight(_text_:core in 3379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.086370535 = score(doc=3379,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051078856 = queryNorm
            0.3348038 = fieldWeight in 3379, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3379)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The main motivation of this chapter was to gather existing requirements and solutions, and to present a generic architectural design of semantic digital libraries. This design is meant to answer a number of requirements, such as interoperability or ability to exchange resources and solutions, and set up the foundations for the best practices in the new domain of semantic digital libraries. We start by presenting the library from different high-level perspectives, i.e., user (see Sect. 2) and metadata (see Sect. 1) perspective; this overview narrows the scope and puts emphasis on certain aspects related to the system perspective, i.e., the architecture of the actual digital library management system. We conclude by presenting the system architecture from three perspectives: top-down layered architecture (see Sect. 3), vertical architecture of core services (see Sect. 4), and stack of enabling infrastructures (see Sect. 5); based upon the observations and evaluation of the contemporary state of the art presented in the previous sections, these last three subsections will describe an in-depth model of the digital library management system.