Search (76 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  1. Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996) 0.15
    0.15430886 = product of:
      0.3086177 = sum of:
        0.3086177 = sum of:
          0.23032142 = weight(_text_:core in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.23032142 = score(doc=2408,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051078856 = queryNorm
              0.8928101 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
          0.0782963 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0782963 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051078856 = queryNorm
              0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper discuesses the goals and outcome of the OCLC/NCSA Metadata Workshop held March 1-3, 1995 in Dublin Ohio. The resulting proposed "Dublin Core" Metadata Elements Set is described briefly. An attempt is made to map the Dublin Core data elements to USMARC; problems and outstanding questions are noted.
    Date
    13. 1.2007 18:31:22
    Object
    Dublin core
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
  2. ¬The core bibliographic record for music and sound recordings (1998) 0.06
    0.064376794 = product of:
      0.12875359 = sum of:
        0.12875359 = product of:
          0.25750718 = sum of:
            0.25750718 = weight(_text_:core in 3801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.25750718 = score(doc=3801,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051078856 = queryNorm
                0.9981921 = fieldWeight in 3801, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3801)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the background to the creation of a core bibliographic record for music and sound recordings, provides a definition of a core bibliographic record and presents the core record for printed and manuscript music and the core record for sound recordings which were prepared by the International Association of Music Libraries, Archives and Documentation Centres Working Group in Perugia, 1-6 Sep 1996
  3. Andresen, L.: After MARC - what then? (2004) 0.06
    0.06394671 = product of:
      0.12789342 = sum of:
        0.12789342 = sum of:
          0.086370535 = weight(_text_:core in 4751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.086370535 = score(doc=4751,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051078856 = queryNorm
              0.3348038 = fieldWeight in 4751, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4751)
          0.04152288 = weight(_text_:22 in 4751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04152288 = score(doc=4751,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051078856 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4751, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4751)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The article discusses the future of the MARC formats and outlines how future cataloguing practice and bibliographic records might look. Background and basic functionality of the MARC formats are outlined, and it is pointed out that MARC is manifest in several different formats. This is illustrated through a comparison between the MARC21 format and the Danish MARC format "danMARC2". It is argued that present cataloguing codes and MARC formats are based primarily on the Paris principles and that "functional requirements for bibliographic records" (FRBR) would serve as a more solid and user-oriented platform for future development of cataloguing codes and formats. Furthermore, it is argued that MARC is a library-specific format, which results in neither exchange with library external sectors nor inclusion of other texts being facilitated. XML could serve as the technical platform for a model for future registrations, consisting of some core data and different supplements of data necessary for different sectors and purposes.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.40-51
  4. Wu, C.-J.: Mapping the Dublin Core to the Chinese MARC (1998) 0.06
    0.062332567 = product of:
      0.12466513 = sum of:
        0.12466513 = product of:
          0.24933027 = sum of:
            0.24933027 = weight(_text_:core in 6269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24933027 = score(doc=6269,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051078856 = queryNorm
                0.96649534 = fieldWeight in 6269, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6269)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses how to map the Dublin Core to the Chinese MARC that is used by most of the libraries in Taiwan
    Object
    Dublin core
  5. Medeiros, N.: Making room for MARC in a Dublin Core world (1999) 0.06
    0.061073188 = product of:
      0.122146375 = sum of:
        0.122146375 = product of:
          0.24429275 = sum of:
            0.24429275 = weight(_text_:core in 350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24429275 = score(doc=350,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051078856 = queryNorm
                0.9469681 = fieldWeight in 350, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=350)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Object
    Dublin core
  6. LeVan, R.R.: Dublin Core and Z39.50 (2001) 0.06
    0.061073188 = product of:
      0.122146375 = sum of:
        0.122146375 = product of:
          0.24429275 = sum of:
            0.24429275 = weight(_text_:core in 1047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24429275 = score(doc=1047,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051078856 = queryNorm
                0.9469681 = fieldWeight in 1047, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1047)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Object
    Dublin Core
  7. SKOS Core Guide (2005) 0.06
    0.061073188 = product of:
      0.122146375 = sum of:
        0.122146375 = product of:
          0.24429275 = sum of:
            0.24429275 = weight(_text_:core in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24429275 = score(doc=4689,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051078856 = queryNorm
                0.9469681 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    SKOS Core provides a model for expressing the basic structure and content of concept schemes such as thesauri, classification schemes, subject heading lists, taxonomies, 'folksonomies', other types of controlled vocabulary, and also concept schemes embedded in glossaries and terminologies. The SKOS Core Vocabulary is an application of the Resource Description Framework (RDF), that can be used to express a concept scheme as an RDF graph. Using RDF allows data to be linked to and/or merged with other data, enabling data sources to be distributed across the web, but still be meaningfully composed and integrated. This document is a guide using the SKOS Core Vocabulary, for readers who already have a basic understanding of RDF concepts. This edition of the SKOS Core Guide [SKOS Core Guide] is a W3C Public Working Draft. It is the authoritative guide to recommended usage of the SKOS Core Vocabulary at the time of publication.
    Source
    http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-swbp-skos-core-guide-20051102/
  8. Plassard, M.-F.: ¬The IFLA Core Programme for Universal Bibliographic Control and International MARC (UBCIM) : recent developments and current state (1994) 0.04
    0.04071546 = product of:
      0.08143092 = sum of:
        0.08143092 = product of:
          0.16286184 = sum of:
            0.16286184 = weight(_text_:core in 732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16286184 = score(doc=732,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051078856 = queryNorm
                0.6313121 = fieldWeight in 732, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=732)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The IFLA Core Programme for Universal Bibliographic Control and International MARC (UBCIM) seeks to coordinate activities aimed at the development of systems and standards of bibliographic control at the national level and to facilitate the international exchange of bibliographic data; one of its early achievement being the establishment of ISBD. Summarizes the aims and goals of the UBCIM Programme and some of its activities: UNIMARC, Project UNIBASE (UNIMARC demo database); UNIMARC workshops; Europeans UNIMARC projects; and publications
  9. Plassard, M.-F.: IFLA Core Programme for Universal Bibliographic Control and International MARC (UBCIM) and Division of Bibliographic Control reports on activities 1994-1995 : IFLA core programme for Universal Bibliographic Control and International MARC (UBCIM) (1996) 0.04
    0.04071546 = product of:
      0.08143092 = sum of:
        0.08143092 = product of:
          0.16286184 = sum of:
            0.16286184 = weight(_text_:core in 4902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16286184 = score(doc=4902,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051078856 = queryNorm
                0.6313121 = fieldWeight in 4902, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4902)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  10. Lupovici, C.: ¬L'¬information secondaire du document primaire : format MARC ou SGML? (1997) 0.04
    0.035626028 = product of:
      0.071252055 = sum of:
        0.071252055 = product of:
          0.14250411 = sum of:
            0.14250411 = weight(_text_:core in 892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14250411 = score(doc=892,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051078856 = queryNorm
                0.5523981 = fieldWeight in 892, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=892)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Secondary information, e.g. MARC based bibliographic records, comprises structured data for identifying, tagging, retrieving and management of primary documents. SGML, the standard format for coding content and structure of primary documents, was introduced in 1986 as a publishing tool but is now being applied to bibliographic records. SGML now comprises standard definitions (DTD) for books, serials, articles and mathematical formulae. A simplified version (HTML) is used for Web pages. Pilot projects to develop SGML as a standard for bibliographic exchange include the Dublin Core, listing 13 descriptive elements for Internet documents; the French GRISELI programme using SGML for exchanging grey literature and US experiments on reformatting USMARC for use with SGML-based records
    Object
    Dublin Core
  11. Doerr, M.; Gradmann, S.; Hennicke, S.; Isaac, A.; Meghini, C.; Van de Sompel, H.: ¬The Europeana Data Model (EDM) (2010) 0.03
    0.030536594 = product of:
      0.061073188 = sum of:
        0.061073188 = product of:
          0.122146375 = sum of:
            0.122146375 = weight(_text_:core in 3967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.122146375 = score(doc=3967,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051078856 = queryNorm
                0.47348404 = fieldWeight in 3967, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3967)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Europeana Data Model (EDM) is a new approach towards structuring and representing data delivered to Europeana by the various contributing cultural heritage institutions. The model aims at greater expressivity and flexibility in comparison to the current Europeana Semantic Elements (ESE), which it is destined to replace. The design principles underlying the EDM are based on the core principles and best practices of the Semantic Web and Linked Data efforts to which Europeana wants to contribute. The model itself builds upon established standards like RDF(S), OAI-ORE, SKOS, and Dublin Core. It acts as a common top-level ontology which retains original data models and information perspectives while at the same time enabling interoperability. The paper elaborates on the aforementioned aspects and the design principles which drove the development of the EDM.
  12. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.03
    0.029361112 = product of:
      0.058722224 = sum of:
        0.058722224 = product of:
          0.11744445 = sum of:
            0.11744445 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11744445 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051078856 = queryNorm
                0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
  13. Duncan, D.: IFLA Core Programme for Universal Bibliographic Control and International MARC (UBCIM) and Division of Bibliographic Control reports on activities 1994-1995 : Section on Classification and Indexing (1996) 0.03
    0.028790178 = product of:
      0.057580356 = sum of:
        0.057580356 = product of:
          0.11516071 = sum of:
            0.11516071 = weight(_text_:core in 4927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11516071 = score(doc=4927,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051078856 = queryNorm
                0.44640505 = fieldWeight in 4927, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4927)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  14. German, L.: Bibliographic utilities (2009) 0.03
    0.028790178 = product of:
      0.057580356 = sum of:
        0.057580356 = product of:
          0.11516071 = sum of:
            0.11516071 = weight(_text_:core in 3858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11516071 = score(doc=3858,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051078856 = queryNorm
                0.44640505 = fieldWeight in 3858, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3858)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Bibliographic utilities have been in existence for more than 40 years. From the beginning, they were designed to promote resource sharing among their members. The core of a bibliographic utility is the database of bibliographic records. The structure of the bibliographic record is based upon Machine Readable Cataloging (MARC). Other services have evolved from the utilities' bibliographic database.
  15. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.03
    0.02768192 = product of:
      0.05536384 = sum of:
        0.05536384 = product of:
          0.11072768 = sum of:
            0.11072768 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11072768 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051078856 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  16. Becker, H.-J.; Hengel, C.; Neuroth, H.; Weiß, B.; Wessel, C.: ¬Die Virtuelle Fachbibliothek als Schnittstelle für eine fachübergreifende Suche in den einzelnen Virtuellen Fachbibliotheken : Definition eines Metadaten-Kernsets (VLib Application Profile) (2002) 0.03
    0.025447162 = product of:
      0.050894324 = sum of:
        0.050894324 = product of:
          0.10178865 = sum of:
            0.10178865 = weight(_text_:core in 2856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10178865 = score(doc=2856,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051078856 = queryNorm
                0.39457005 = fieldWeight in 2856, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2856)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Der folgende Beitrag beschäftigt sich nicht mit einer konkreten Virtuellen Fachbibliothek, sondern mit dem übergreifenden Themenkomplex "Metadaten" und der Fragestellung, wie Metadaten für eine fachübergreifende Suche über alle Virtuellen Fachbibliotheken eingesetzt werden können. Im Rahmen des Aufbaus der Virtuellen Fachbibliotheken hat die Projektkoordinierung Unterarbeitsgruppen zur Lösung spezifischer Fragestellungen ins Leben gerufen. Der Arbeitsbereich "Metadaten" ist von dem von der DFG geförderten Projekt META-LIB (Metadaten-Initiative deutscher Bibliotheken) mit den Teilprojekten an Der Deutschen Bibliothek und der SUB Göttingen übernommen worden. META-LIB erhielt die Aufgabe, "Empfehlungen zur Definition eines Metadaten-Core-Sets für die verteilte Suche über die Virtuellen Fachbibliotheken" zu entwickeln. Im folgenden werden die Empfehlungen vorgestellt. Sie basieren auf den Ergebnissen und der Auswertung von Antworteng eines Internet-Fragebogens, in dem die Datenelemente erfragt wurden, die in den einzelnen Virtuellen Fachbibliotheken zur Erschließung verwendet bzw. benötigt werden. Für die Formulierung der Empfehlungen und zur Abstimmung sind zwei MetadatenWorkshops (am 16. Mai 2001 in der SUB Göttingen und am 9./10. August 2001 in der Deutschen Bibliothek Frankfurt am Main) durchgeführt worden, deren Ergebnisse und Diskussionen als Grundlage dienen.
    Object
    Dublin Core
  17. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.02
    0.02422168 = product of:
      0.04844336 = sum of:
        0.04844336 = product of:
          0.09688672 = sum of:
            0.09688672 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09688672 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051078856 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  18. Geißelmann, F.: Arbeitsergebnisse der Arbeitsgruppe Codes (2000) 0.02
    0.02422168 = product of:
      0.04844336 = sum of:
        0.04844336 = product of:
          0.09688672 = sum of:
            0.09688672 = weight(_text_:22 in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09688672 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051078856 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26. 8.2000 19:22:35
  19. Weber, R.: "Functional requirements for bibliographic records" und Regelwerksentwicklung (2001) 0.02
    0.02422168 = product of:
      0.04844336 = sum of:
        0.04844336 = product of:
          0.09688672 = sum of:
            0.09688672 = weight(_text_:22 in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09688672 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051078856 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 13(2001) H.3, S.20-22
  20. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004) 0.02
    0.02422168 = product of:
      0.04844336 = sum of:
        0.04844336 = product of:
          0.09688672 = sum of:
            0.09688672 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09688672 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051078856 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 67
  • s 5
  • el 3
  • b 2
  • m 1
  • n 1
  • More… Less…