Search (1530 results, page 1 of 77)

0.15430886 = product of:
  0.3086177 = sum of:
    0.3086177 = sum of:
      0.23032142 = weight(_text_:core in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.23032142 = score(doc=2408,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.8928101 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
      0.0782963 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0782963 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This paper discuesses the goals and outcome of the OCLC/NCSA Metadata Workshop held March 1-3, 1995 in Dublin Ohio. The resulting proposed "Dublin Core" Metadata Elements Set is described briefly. An attempt is made to map the Dublin Core data elements to USMARC; problems and outstanding questions are noted.

Date

13. 1.2007 18:31:22

Object

Dublin core

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58

0.14284264 = product of:
  0.28568527 = sum of:
    0.28568527 = sum of:
      0.23032142 = weight(_text_:core in 903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.23032142 = score(doc=903,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.8928101 = fieldWeight in 903, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=903)
      0.05536384 = weight(_text_:22 in 903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05536384 = score(doc=903,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 903, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=903)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Recently the view has developed that electronic resources require the same level of cataloguing as the physical resources found in libraries, with the effect that a number of guidelines for cataloguing Internet resources have appeared. Describes one such standard for resource description, the Dublin Core metadata set, the ongoing refinement of the metadata elements and the application of the Dublin Core metadata set

Object

Dublin Core

Source

Cataloguing Australia. 23(1997) nos.1/2, S.17-22

0.13688107 = product of:
  0.27376214 = sum of:
    0.27376214 = sum of:
      0.22531879 = weight(_text_:core in 2220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.22531879 = score(doc=2220,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.8734181 = fieldWeight in 2220, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2220)
      0.04844336 = weight(_text_:22 in 2220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04844336 = score(doc=2220,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2220, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2220)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Creation of more and better metadata, or resource descriptions, is the best means to solve the problems of massive recall and lack of precision associated with Internet information retrieval. Dublin Core Metadata workshops aim to develop the resource descriptions. Describes the 4th workshop held in Canberra March 1997 and the 5th held in Oct. 1997 in Helsinki. DC-4 dealt with element structure with qualifiers language, scheme and type; extensibility issues; and element refinement. DC-5 dealt with element refinement and stability; definition of sub-elements and resource types; and sharing of Dublin Core implementation experiences, one of which is the Nordic Metadata project. The Nordic countries are now well prepared to implement useful new tools built by the Internet metadata community

Object

Dublin Core

Source

Nordinfo Nytt. 1997, nos.3/4, S.10-22

0.124987304 = product of:
  0.24997461 = sum of:
    0.24997461 = sum of:
      0.20153125 = weight(_text_:core in 6128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.20153125 = score(doc=6128,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.7812089 = fieldWeight in 6128, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6128)
      0.04844336 = weight(_text_:22 in 6128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04844336 = score(doc=6128,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6128, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6128)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Discusses the goals and outcome of the OCLC/NCSA Metadata Workshop, held in Dublin, Ohio, 1-3 Mar 95, which resulted in the proposed 'Dublin Core' Metadata Elements. Describes an attempt to map the Dublin Core data elements to the USMARC format (with particular reference to USMARC field 856 for electronic locations), noting problems and outstanding questions. The USMARC format elements considered include: subject, title, author, other-agent, publisher, publication date, identifier, object-type, form, relation, language, source, coverage, and other issues

Object

Dublin Core

Series

Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4

0.10657784 = product of:
  0.21315569 = sum of:
    0.21315569 = sum of:
      0.14395088 = weight(_text_:core in 4907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14395088 = score(doc=4907,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.5580063 = fieldWeight in 4907, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4907)
      0.0692048 = weight(_text_:22 in 4907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0692048 = score(doc=4907,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4907, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4907)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Draws on parallels between outsourcing in business and in libraries to examine the difficulties and implications of outsourcing the catalogue department. Examines why cataloguing, in particular, has received outsourcing attention. 2 major reasons emerge: cataloguing is a non core activity, and catalogue departments are troublesome

Source

Journal of academic librarianship. 22(1996) no.1, S.33-43

0.10657784 = product of:
  0.21315569 = sum of:
    0.21315569 = sum of:
      0.14395088 = weight(_text_:core in 2275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14395088 = score(doc=2275,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.5580063 = fieldWeight in 2275, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2275)
      0.0692048 = weight(_text_:22 in 2275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0692048 = score(doc=2275,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2275, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2275)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Bericht über den Workshop, der am 22. u. 23.6.98 in der SUB Göttingen stattfand

Object

Dublin core

0.087265596 = product of:
  0.17453119 = sum of:
    0.17453119 = product of:
      0.34906238 = sum of:
        0.34906238 = weight(_text_:core in 7214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.34906238 = score(doc=7214,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051078856 = queryNorm
            1.3530935 = fieldWeight in 7214, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7214)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Object

Dublin Core

0.087265596 = product of:
  0.17453119 = sum of:
    0.17453119 = product of:
      0.34906238 = sum of:
        0.34906238 = weight(_text_:core in 546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.34906238 = score(doc=546,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051078856 = queryNorm
            1.3530935 = fieldWeight in 546, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=546)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Object

Dublin Core

0.086370535 = product of:
  0.17274107 = sum of:
    0.17274107 = product of:
      0.34548214 = sum of:
        0.34548214 = weight(_text_:core in 4226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.34548214 = score(doc=4226,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051078856 = queryNorm
            1.3392152 = fieldWeight in 4226, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4226)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Bericht über den 7. Dublin Core Workshop vom 25.-27.10.99 in der DDB in Frankfurt

Object

Dublin Core

0.085262276 = product of:
  0.17052455 = sum of:
    0.17052455 = sum of:
      0.11516071 = weight(_text_:core in 8474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11516071 = score(doc=8474,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.44640505 = fieldWeight in 8474, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8474)
      0.05536384 = weight(_text_:22 in 8474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05536384 = score(doc=8474,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 8474, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8474)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Today's increasing use of electronic documents raises the question: will it be necessary to change the core concepts of author and work within the tradition of Anglo-American Cataloging Rules when dealing with electronic documents? Describes the current definition of author and work as given in the traditional AACR and presents 2 systems working with electronic documents, electronic office systems and groupware

Source

New library world. 95(1994) no.1115, S.22-25

0.085262276 = product of:
  0.17052455 = sum of:
    0.17052455 = sum of:
      0.11516071 = weight(_text_:core in 3363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11516071 = score(doc=3363,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.44640505 = fieldWeight in 3363, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3363)
      0.05536384 = weight(_text_:22 in 3363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05536384 = score(doc=3363,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3363, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3363)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

For about 10 years, systems such as STATUS, CAIRS and INMAGIC have offered the ability to search for any word in a collection of unstructured text. Until recently, only librarians and documentalists have been interested, but free text retrieval is increasingly valued in the business world in general and all 3 systems are striving for a wider market by adding other features to their established core competence. Illustrates this trend with particualr reference to: STATUS/IQ; CAIRS; TMS and DB/TextWorks (the successor to InMagic Plus)

Date

22. 2.1996 10:18:16

0.085262276 = product of:
  0.17052455 = sum of:
    0.17052455 = sum of:
      0.11516071 = weight(_text_:core in 2237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11516071 = score(doc=2237,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.44640505 = fieldWeight in 2237, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2237)
      0.05536384 = weight(_text_:22 in 2237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05536384 = score(doc=2237,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2237, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2237)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Discusses the possibilities and difficulties encountered when using a thematic index to search contemporary art databanks. Jaconde and Videomuseum, 2 French databanks, are used as examples. the core problems found in the study are the methods and limits of indexing in both systems. A thematic index should be developed that is better adapted to 20th century art, based on the complementary and reciprocal relationship between text and image, and which fully exploits hypertext

Date

1. 8.1996 22:01:00

0.085262276 = product of:
  0.17052455 = sum of:
    0.17052455 = sum of:
      0.11516071 = weight(_text_:core in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11516071 = score(doc=6095,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.44640505 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
      0.05536384 = weight(_text_:22 in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05536384 = score(doc=6095,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Libraries, their collections, and bibliographic control are essential components of the provision of access to recorded knowledge. Cataloging is a primary method of bibliographic control. Full or traditional cataloging is very expensive, but relying on keyword searching is inadequate. Alternatives for a solution to cataloging needs for electronic resources including the use of metadata and the Dublin Core are examined. Many questions exist regarding the long-term future of today's electronic documents. Recommendations are made for preserving recorded knowledge and information in the electronic resources for future generations

Source

Journal of Internet cataloging. 2(1999) no.1, S.5-22

0.085262276 = product of:
  0.17052455 = sum of:
    0.17052455 = sum of:
      0.11516071 = weight(_text_:core in 344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11516071 = score(doc=344,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.44640505 = fieldWeight in 344, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=344)
      0.05536384 = weight(_text_:22 in 344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05536384 = score(doc=344,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 344, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=344)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The IFLA Programme for UAP is one of the core programmes within IFLA and is particularly concerned with document supply and interloans activities. Briefly notes 3 aspects of its work: practical support for libraries actively involved in international lending; collecting and disseminating information in the field; and conducting research projects

Date

9. 2.1997 18:44:22

0.08183463 = product of:
  0.16366926 = sum of:
    0.16366926 = sum of:
      0.122146375 = weight(_text_:core in 3042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.122146375 = score(doc=3042,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.47348404 = fieldWeight in 3042, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3042)
      0.04152288 = weight(_text_:22 in 3042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04152288 = score(doc=3042,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3042, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3042)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

NewsAgent for Libraries is one of the projects funded by the eLib programme in the UK. Following a brief historical account of the original ideas behind the project, describes the main stages in developing the project: which aims to create a user configurable electronic news and current awareness service for library and information professionals with a mixture of content streams, including metadata. Users' interests are specified by profiles which are then matched with incoming records so that users are alerted by electronic mail of items of potential interest. Examples of creating profiles and of some of the 'input feeds' in the project are given as well as an example of the use of the Dublic Core metadata format for describing resources covered in NewsAgent

Date

22. 2.1999 17:50:10

Object

Dublin Core

0.08143092 = product of:
  0.16286184 = sum of:
    0.16286184 = product of:
      0.32572368 = sum of:
        0.32572368 = weight(_text_:core in 3304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.32572368 = score(doc=3304,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051078856 = queryNorm
            1.2626241 = fieldWeight in 3304, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3304)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Object

Dublin Core

0.07479908 = product of:
  0.14959817 = sum of:
    0.14959817 = product of:
      0.29919633 = sum of:
        0.29919633 = weight(_text_:core in 4404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.29919633 = score(doc=4404,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051078856 = queryNorm
            1.1597944 = fieldWeight in 4404, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4404)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Bericht über den Deutschen dublin Core Tag am 28.10.1999 in der Deutschen Bibliothek in Frankfurt am Main

Object

Dublin Core

0.07479908 = product of:
  0.14959817 = sum of:
    0.14959817 = product of:
      0.29919633 = sum of:
        0.29919633 = weight(_text_:core in 501) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.29919633 = score(doc=501,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051078856 = queryNorm
            1.1597944 = fieldWeight in 501, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=501)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

AGLS (Australian Government Locator Service) is used for electronic and non-electronic sources. Relation with Dublin Core

Object

Dublin Core

0.07460449 = product of:
  0.14920898 = sum of:
    0.14920898 = sum of:
      0.10076562 = weight(_text_:core in 2092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10076562 = score(doc=2092,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.39060444 = fieldWeight in 2092, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2092)
      0.04844336 = weight(_text_:22 in 2092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04844336 = score(doc=2092,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2092, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2092)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The architecture of multilingual software systems is sometimes centred around an intermediate language. The question is analyzed to what extent this approach can be useful for multilingual thesauri, in particular regarding the functionality the thesaurus is designed to fulfil. Both the runtime use, and the construction and maintenance of the system is taken into consideration. Using the perspective of general language technology enables to draw on experience from a broader range of fields beyond thesaurus design itself as well as to consider the possibility of using a thesaurus as a knowledge module in various systems which process natural language. Therefore the features which thesauri and other natural-language processing systems have in common are emphasized, especially at the level of systems design and their core functionality

Source

Knowledge organization. 22(1995) nos.3/4, S.136-140

0.07460449 = product of:
  0.14920898 = sum of:
    0.14920898 = sum of:
      0.10076562 = weight(_text_:core in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10076562 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25797358 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.39060444 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.0504966 = idf(docFreq=769, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.04844336 = weight(_text_:22 in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04844336 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17886946 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051078856 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Reports results of a bibliometric study of the literature of Qigong: a relaxation technique used to teach patients to control their heart rate, blood pressure, temperature and other involuntary functions through controlles breathing. All articles indexed in the MEDLINE CD-ROM database, between 1965 and 1995 were identified using 'breathing exercises' MeSH term. The articles were analyzed for geographical and language distribution and a ranking exercise enabled a core list of periodicals to be identified. In addition, the study shed light on the changing frequency of the MeSH terms and evaluated the research areas by measuring the information from these respective MeSH headings

Source

International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.3, S.38-44