Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Leazer, G.H."
  1. Leazer, G.H.; Rohdy, M.: ¬The bibliographic control of monographs : a review and baseline study (1995) 0.04
    0.041970674 = product of:
      0.20985337 = sum of:
        0.20985337 = weight(_text_:books in 5384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20985337 = score(doc=5384,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.24756333 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051222645 = queryNorm
            0.8476755 = fieldWeight in 5384, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5384)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The acquisition of foreign research materials has been an important activity of US university libraries from the early 19th century to the present day. Assesses the extent of bibliographic control over foreign published books and reviews previous evaluations of national bibliographic utility hit rates and quality assessment studies of bibliographic records. These reviews suggest that the bibliographic control of general research books is better than the bibliographic control of foreign research books. However, the previous studies' varying sampling periods and techniques necessitate a baseline study to confirm the asserted difference of these 2 groups os books. Results of the baseline study reported here conforms a lack of bibliographic control for a substanbtial portion of foreign books, the presence of LCC, and the level of bibliographic description shows that the quality of bibliographic records for foreign books is lower than the quality of records for domestic books
  2. Leazer, G.H.; Furner, J.: Topological indices of textual identity networks (1999) 0.01
    0.01321952 = product of:
      0.0660976 = sum of:
        0.0660976 = weight(_text_:books in 6683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0660976 = score(doc=6683,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24756333 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051222645 = queryNorm
            0.2669927 = fieldWeight in 6683, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6683)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    A textual identity network is a set of documents that share common semantic or linguistic content. For example, the textual identity network of Ben-Hur includes the progenitor work, translations, screen play adaptations, and film performances. A network might also include successively numbered editions, simultaneous editions published in various countries, and other derivative forms. This network expresses how a work evolves over time and through a variety of media. Evolving textual identity can be expressed as a set of relationships among the members of the network. Several taxonomies of intertextual associations have been developed for use in information retrieval systems. The individual documents (books, films, computer files, etc.) contained in a textual identity network can be associated through a number of pairwise relationships, and the network can be studied as a system. This basic pattern makes textual networks ideal candidates for study using network analysis techniques, allowing summary measures that characterize networks. Topological indices provide high-level measures of network structure. This paper concludes on a discussion of how topological indices might be used in document retrieval
  3. Leazer, G.H.; Smiraglia, R.P.: Bibliographic families in the library catalog : a qualitative analysis and grounded theory (1999) 0.01
    0.006939962 = product of:
      0.03469981 = sum of:
        0.03469981 = weight(_text_:22 in 107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03469981 = score(doc=107,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17937298 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051222645 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 107, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=107)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  4. Borgman, C.L.; Smart, L.J.; Millwood, K.A.; Finley, J.R.; Champeny, L.; Gilliland, A.J.; Leazer, G.H.: Comparing faculty information seeking in teaching and research : implications for the design of digital libraries (2005) 0.01
    0.005551969 = product of:
      0.027759846 = sum of:
        0.027759846 = weight(_text_:22 in 3231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027759846 = score(doc=3231,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17937298 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051222645 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3231, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3231)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    3. 6.2005 20:40:22