Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Nicolaisen, J."
  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  1. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.02 
    0.022207877 = product of:
  0.111039385 = sum of:
    0.111039385 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.111039385 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17937298 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051222645 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  2. Nicolaisen, J.: ¬The J-shaped distribution of citedness (2002) 0.02 
    0.021151232 = product of:
  0.105756156 = sum of:
    0.105756156 = weight(_text_:books in 3765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.105756156 = score(doc=3765,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24756333 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051222645 = queryNorm
        0.42718828 = fieldWeight in 3765, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3765)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    A new approach for investigating the correlation between research quality and citation counts is presented and applied to a case study of the relationship between peer evaluations reflected in scholarly book reviews and the citation frequencies of reviewed books. Results of the study designate a J-shaped distribution between the considered variables, presumably caused by a skewed allocation of negative citations. The paper concludes with suggestions for further research.

Themes