Search (15 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Inhaltsanalyse"
  1. White, M.D.; Marsh, E.E.: Content analysis : a flexible methodology (2006) 0.05
    0.048382755 = product of:
      0.12095688 = sum of:
        0.079317115 = weight(_text_:books in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.079317115 = score(doc=5589,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24756333 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051222645 = queryNorm
            0.3203912 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
        0.041639768 = weight(_text_:22 in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041639768 = score(doc=5589,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17937298 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051222645 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Content analysis is a highly flexible research method that has been widely used in library and information science (LIS) studies with varying research goals and objectives. The research method is applied in qualitative, quantitative, and sometimes mixed modes of research frameworks and employs a wide range of analytical techniques to generate findings and put them into context. This article characterizes content analysis as a systematic, rigorous approach to analyzing documents obtained or generated in the course of research. It briefly describes the steps involved in content analysis, differentiates between quantitative and qualitative content analysis, and shows that content analysis serves the purposes of both quantitative research and qualitative research. The authors draw on selected LIS studies that have used content analysis to illustrate the concepts addressed in the article. The article also serves as a gateway to methodological books and articles that provide more detail about aspects of content analysis discussed only briefly in the article.
    Source
    Library trends. 55(2006) no.1, S.22-45
  2. Merrill, W.S.: Code for classifiers : principles governing the consistent placing of books in a system of classification (1969) 0.04
    0.037014652 = product of:
      0.18507326 = sum of:
        0.18507326 = weight(_text_:books in 1640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18507326 = score(doc=1640,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24756333 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051222645 = queryNorm
            0.74757946 = fieldWeight in 1640, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1640)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  3. Langridge, D.W.: Subject analysis : principles and procedures (1989) 0.03
    0.026173312 = product of:
      0.13086656 = sum of:
        0.13086656 = weight(_text_:books in 2021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13086656 = score(doc=2021,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24756333 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051222645 = queryNorm
            0.5286185 = fieldWeight in 2021, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2021)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    LCSH
    Classification / Books
    Subject
    Classification / Books
  4. Kessel, K.: Who's afraid of the big, bad uktena mster? : subject cataloging for images (2016) 0.02
    0.021151232 = product of:
      0.105756156 = sum of:
        0.105756156 = weight(_text_:books in 3003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.105756156 = score(doc=3003,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24756333 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051222645 = queryNorm
            0.42718828 = fieldWeight in 3003, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3003)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    This article describes the difference between cataloging images and cataloging books, the obstacles to including subject data in image cataloging records and how these obstacles can be overcome to make image collections more accessible. I call for participants to help create a subject authority reference resource for non-Western art. This article is an expanded and revised version of a presentation for the 2016 Joint ARLIS/VRA conference in Seattle.
  5. Svenonius, E.; McGarry, D.: Objectivity in evaluating subject heading assignment (1993) 0.02
    0.018507326 = product of:
      0.09253663 = sum of:
        0.09253663 = weight(_text_:books in 5612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09253663 = score(doc=5612,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24756333 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051222645 = queryNorm
            0.37378973 = fieldWeight in 5612, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5612)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Recent papers have called attention to discrepancies in the assignment of LCSH. While philosophical arguments can be made that subject analysis, if not a logical impossibility, at least is point-of-view dependent, subject headings continue to be assigned and continue to be useful. The hypothesis advanced in the present project is that to a considerable degree there is a clear-cut right and wrong to LCSH subject heading assignment. To test the hypothesis, it was postulated that the assignment of a subject heading is correct if it is supported by textual warrant (at least 20% of the book being cataloged is on the topic) and is constructed in accordance with the LoC Subject Cataloging Manual: Subject Headings. A sample of 100 books on scientific subjects was used to test the hypothesis
  6. Shatford, S.: Describing a picture : a thousand words are seldom cost effective (1984) 0.02
    0.018507326 = product of:
      0.09253663 = sum of:
        0.09253663 = weight(_text_:books in 330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09253663 = score(doc=330,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24756333 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051222645 = queryNorm
            0.37378973 = fieldWeight in 330, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=330)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    This paper is an attempt to develop some concepts and objectives to use as theoretical basis for the descriptive cataloging of pictures. Although the basic objectives to be met when describing books and pictures are similar, the means used to achieve these objectives may be different. The purpose of developing a theoretical basis for picture cataloging is to provide the reader with the means of evaluating, adapting, and applying presently existing codes and formats, or for devising new codes and formats; this paper does not attempt to construct an actual code, nor to present methodical evaluations of present practices.
  7. Andersson, R.; Holst, E.: Indexes and other depictions of fictions : a new model for analysis empirically tested (1996) 0.02
    0.015863424 = product of:
      0.079317115 = sum of:
        0.079317115 = weight(_text_:books in 473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.079317115 = score(doc=473,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24756333 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051222645 = queryNorm
            0.3203912 = fieldWeight in 473, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=473)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    In this study descriptions of a novel by 100 users at 2 Swedish public libraries, Malmö and Molndal, Mar-Apr 95, were compared to the index terms used for the novels at these libraries. Describes previous systems for fiction indexing, the 2 libraries, and the users interviewed. Compares the AMP system with their own model. The latter operates with terms under the headings phenomena, frame and author's intention. The similarities between the users' and indexers' descriptions were sufficiently close to make it possible to retrieve fiction in accordance with users' wishes in Molndal, and would have been in Malmö, had more books been indexed with more terms. Sometimes the similarities were close enough for users to retrieve fiction on their own
  8. Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980) 0.01
    0.013879924 = product of:
      0.06939962 = sum of:
        0.06939962 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06939962 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17937298 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051222645 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:44
  9. Beghtol, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval (1992) 0.01
    0.011103938 = product of:
      0.055519693 = sum of:
        0.055519693 = weight(_text_:22 in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055519693 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17937298 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051222645 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:08
  10. Hauff-Hartig, S.: Automatische Transkription von Videos : Fernsehen 3.0: Automatisierte Sentimentanalyse und Zusammenstellung von Kurzvideos mit hohem Aufregungslevel KI-generierte Metadaten: Von der Technologiebeobachtung bis zum produktiven Einsatz (2021) 0.01
    0.011103938 = product of:
      0.055519693 = sum of:
        0.055519693 = weight(_text_:22 in 251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055519693 = score(doc=251,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17937298 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051222645 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 251, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=251)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2021 12:43:05
  11. Raieli, R.: ¬The semantic hole : enthusiasm and caution around multimedia information retrieval (2012) 0.01
    0.009814587 = product of:
      0.049072936 = sum of:
        0.049072936 = weight(_text_:22 in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049072936 = score(doc=4888,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17937298 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051222645 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:02:10
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.1, S.13-22
  12. Weimer, K.H.: ¬The nexus of subject analysis and bibliographic description : the case of multipart videos (1996) 0.01
    0.0083279535 = product of:
      0.041639768 = sum of:
        0.041639768 = weight(_text_:22 in 6525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041639768 = score(doc=6525,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17937298 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051222645 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6525, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6525)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.5-18
  13. Chen, S.-J.; Lee, H.-L.: Art images and mental associations : a preliminary exploration (2014) 0.01
    0.0083279535 = product of:
      0.041639768 = sum of:
        0.041639768 = weight(_text_:22 in 1416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041639768 = score(doc=1416,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17937298 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051222645 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1416, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1416)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  14. Sauperl, A.: Subject determination during the cataloging process : the development of a system based on theoretical principles (2002) 0.00
    0.0041639768 = product of:
      0.020819884 = sum of:
        0.020819884 = weight(_text_:22 in 2293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020819884 = score(doc=2293,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17937298 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051222645 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 2293, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2293)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    27. 9.2005 14:22:19
  15. Bade, D.: ¬The creation and persistence of misinformation in shared library catalogs : language and subject knowledge in a technological era (2002) 0.00
    0.0027759846 = product of:
      0.013879923 = sum of:
        0.013879923 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013879923 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17937298 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051222645 = queryNorm
            0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05