Search (21 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Kataloganreicherung"
  1. Wormell, I.: SAP: a new way to produce subject description of books (1981) 0.04 
    0.042302463 = product of:
  0.21151231 = sum of:
    0.21151231 = weight(_text_:books in 389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21151231 = score(doc=389,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24756333 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051222645 = queryNorm
        0.85437655 = fieldWeight in 389, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=389)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  2. Settel, B.; Cochrane, P.A.: Augmenting subject descriptions for books in online catalogs (1982) 0.04 
    0.042302463 = product of:
  0.21151231 = sum of:
    0.21151231 = weight(_text_:books in 390) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21151231 = score(doc=390,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24756333 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051222645 = queryNorm
        0.85437655 = fieldWeight in 390, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=390)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  3. Diodato, V.: Tables of contents and book indexes : how well do they match readers' descriptions of books? (1986) 0.04 
    0.041970674 = product of:
  0.20985337 = sum of:
    0.20985337 = weight(_text_:books in 376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20985337 = score(doc=376,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.24756333 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051222645 = queryNorm
        0.8476755 = fieldWeight in 376, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=376)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The author collected information about tables of content and index terms in 125 books borrowed by patrons in a medium-sized academic library. To learn how useful the term would be as subject terms in a library catalog, he determined which of these terms were the same as the words used by the patrons to describe the books. For 72,4% of the books assigned LCSH, the patron's term matched the LCheading. The patron's term matched the table of contents term for (1,3% of the books with tables of contents. If the catalog had included terms from the tables of contents and the indexes in addition to the LCSH, the success rate would have been 97,3%. One problem in using terms from books in a library catalog is that many books lack indexes and/or tables of context
  4. Atherton, P.: Books are for use : Final report of the Subject Access Project to the Council of Library Resources (1978) 0.04 
    0.037014652 = product of:
  0.18507326 = sum of:
    0.18507326 = weight(_text_:books in 844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18507326 = score(doc=844,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24756333 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051222645 = queryNorm
        0.74757946 = fieldWeight in 844, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=844)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  5. Weintraub, T.S.; Shimoguchi, W.: Catalog record contents enhancement (1993) 0.03 
    0.03205563 = product of:
  0.16027816 = sum of:
    0.16027816 = weight(_text_:books in 4650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16027816 = score(doc=4650,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.24756333 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051222645 = queryNorm
        0.64742285 = fieldWeight in 4650, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4650)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Contents enhancement of catalog records may increase access to books in collections and aid in effective resource sharing by providing more detailed descriptions about library holdings in the catalog. A sample of monographs in San Diego State Univ. Library was studied to determine the extent to which information in books from parts of the collection could be represented better by content notes, and to determine how much of this information has subject or analytical applications. The study revealed that approximately 23% of the books contain discrete content information not already represented in catalog records that could be added. Of those, 52% would be citation-based enhancements and 48% would be subject-based. Nearly 65% would require fewer than 25 enhancements, with an average of 8.03 enhancements per book for the total population
  6. Enhancing USMARC records with table of contents (1992) 0.03 
    0.02643904 = product of:
  0.1321952 = sum of:
    0.1321952 = weight(_text_:books in 2124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1321952 = score(doc=2124,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24756333 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051222645 = queryNorm
        0.5339854 = fieldWeight in 2124, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2124)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Considers methods of enriching bibliographic USMARC records for OPACs via a subject enhancement process involving the inclusion of subject information derived from the books' contents tables
  7. Wormell, I.: Indizacion SAP para la exploracion del amplio contexto tematico de libros y para el accesso a entidades semanticos mas pequenas (1994) 0.03 
    0.026173312 = product of:
  0.13086656 = sum of:
    0.13086656 = weight(_text_:books in 4652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13086656 = score(doc=4652,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.24756333 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051222645 = queryNorm
        0.5286185 = fieldWeight in 4652, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4652)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Describes an approach to indexing which seeks to eliminate the shortcoming of the representation of information in existing bibliographic catalogues: Subject Access Project (SAP) indexing which has been used successfully at Lund University and elsewhere. Existing catalogue records have been enriched with terms selected from lists of contents and indexes in books thus facilitating access to specific parts of documents and smaller semantic entites such as chapter titles, subject titles and data in graphic or tabulated form available in a wide range of publications
    Content
    SAP indexing for exploring the full thematic context of books and for access to smaller semantic entites
  8. Tseng, Y.-H.: Automatic cataloguing and searching for retrospective data by use of OCR text (2001) 0.02 
    0.022434268 = product of:
  0.11217134 = sum of:
    0.11217134 = weight(_text_:books in 5421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11217134 = score(doc=5421,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.24756333 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051222645 = queryNorm
        0.45310158 = fieldWeight in 5421, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5421)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    This article describes our efforts in supporting information retrieval from OCR degraded text. In particular, we report our approach to an automatic cataloging and searching contest for books in multiple languages. In this contest, 500 books in English, German, French, and Italian published during the 1770s to 1970s are scanned into images and OCRed to digital text. The goal is to use only automatic ways to extract information for sophisticated searching. We adopted the vector space retrieval model, an n-gram indexing method, and a special weighting scheme to tackle this problem. Although the performance by this approach is slightly inferior to the best approach, which is mainly based on regular expression match, one advantage of our approach is that it is less language dependent and less layout sensitive, thus is readily applicable to other languages and document collections. Problems of OCR text retrieval for some Asian languages are also discussed in this article, and solutions are suggested
  9. Mandel, C.: Enriching the library catalog record for subject access (1985) 0.02 
    0.021151232 = product of:
  0.105756156 = sum of:
    0.105756156 = weight(_text_:books in 1067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.105756156 = score(doc=1067,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24756333 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051222645 = queryNorm
        0.42718828 = fieldWeight in 1067, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1067)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    This paper analyzes proposals for augmenting library bibliographic records for improved subject searching in online catalogs. Possible fields for enrichment are described and their likely value assessed. The assessment determines that the main value of enriched records would be to provide access to parts of books. The paper presents arguments for and against adding book content indexing to the online catalog and analyzes the feasibility of eleven alternatives for providing such information
  10. Beatty, S.: ESP at ADFA after five years (1991) 0.02 
    0.021151232 = product of:
  0.105756156 = sum of:
    0.105756156 = weight(_text_:books in 4245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.105756156 = score(doc=4245,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24756333 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051222645 = queryNorm
        0.42718828 = fieldWeight in 4245, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4245)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Since Dec 86, the Australian Defence Force Academy (ADFA) library has been enriching bibliographic records by adding terms from either the contents pages or indexes of books. 40.000 records are now enriched, representing about 25% coverage of the ADFA database of 210.000 titles. Evaluates the retrieval effectiveness of the enriched data in an OPAC, in comparison with title and LCSH, using 90 topics from 6 different subject areas
  11. DeHart, F.E.; Matthews, K.: Subject enhancements and OPACs : planning ahead (1990) 0.02 
    0.021151232 = product of:
  0.105756156 = sum of:
    0.105756156 = weight(_text_:books in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.105756156 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24756333 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051222645 = queryNorm
        0.42718828 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    As librarians plan ahead to make subject enhancements available to online searchers in various possible file locations and formats, they may want to base their decisions on implications for online searching. This paper explores some of these implications with respect to unique and misleading terminology in tables of contents, Choice abstracts, and reviews from Computing reviews for thirty-six books on information and computer science chosen from the 1987 issues of Choice. It also discusses possible interacting functions in the search process served by these subject enhancements, assigned LCSH, and book title terminology
  12. Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978) 0.02 
    0.019431893 = product of:
  0.09715946 = sum of:
    0.09715946 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09715946 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17937298 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051222645 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
  13. Ingwersen, P.; Wormell, I.: Modern indexing and retrieval techniques matching different types of information needs (1989) 0.02 
    0.019431893 = product of:
  0.09715946 = sum of:
    0.09715946 = weight(_text_:22 in 7322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09715946 = score(doc=7322,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17937298 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051222645 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7322, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7322)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 14(1989), S.17-22
  14. Syracuse, R.O.; Poyer, R.K.: Enhancing access to the library's collections : a view from an academy health center library (1991) 0.02 
    0.018507326 = product of:
  0.09253663 = sum of:
    0.09253663 = weight(_text_:books in 516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09253663 = score(doc=516,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24756333 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051222645 = queryNorm
        0.37378973 = fieldWeight in 516, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=516)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    With the advent of online public access catalogs, catalog librarians and their staffs have been freed from the labor-intensive processes involved in the creation and maintenance of card catalogs. At the Medical University of South Carolina Library, this new found time has been devoted to enhancing access to the library's collections. Enhancements discussed include the creation of bibliographic records for vertical file materials, the National Library of Medicine bibliographies, and reserve items, as well as providing subject access to individual chapters in books and articles in monographic serials.
  15. Beck, C.: ¬Die Qualität der Fremddatenanreicherung FRED (2021) 0.02 
    0.015863424 = product of:
  0.079317115 = sum of:
    0.079317115 = weight(_text_:books in 377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.079317115 = score(doc=377,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24756333 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051222645 = queryNorm
        0.3203912 = fieldWeight in 377, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=377)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Das Projekt Fremddatenanreicherung (FRED) der Zentralbibliothek Zürich und der Universitätsbibliotheken Basel und Bern wurde schon verschiedentlich in Präsentationen vorgestellt und in der Literatur (Bucher et al. 2018) behandelt, wobei allerdings nur das Projekt vorgestellt und statistische Werte zur quantitativen Datenanreicherung sowie die Kooperation innerhalb des Projekts, also bei der Implementierung von FRED, dargestellt wurden. Der vorliegende Beitrag versucht weiterführend, die Qualität dieser Fremddatenanreicherung mittels einer subjektiven Beschreibung und Bewertung zu untersuchen. Zudem werden abschließend ein paar Fragen zum weiteren Einsatz von FRED in der völlig veränderten Bibliothekslandschaft der Schweiz mit der Swiss Library Service Platform (SLSP) ab 2021 aufgeworfen. Die Untersuchung erfolgt mittels einer Stichprobe aus Printbüchern für zwei sozialwissenschaftliche Fächer, stellt aber nur eine Art Beobachtung dar, deren Ergebnisse nicht repräsentativ für die Datenanreicherung durch FRED sind. Nicht behandelt wird im Folgenden die zeitweilig in Zürich, Basel und Bern erfolgte Datenanreicherung von E-Books. Auch ist die Qualität der geleisteten intellektuellen Verschlagwortung in den Verbünden, aus denen FRED schöpft, kein Thema. Es geht hier nur, aber immerhin, um die mit FRED erzielten Resultate im intellektuellen Verschlagwortungsumfeld des Frühjahres 2020.
  16. Lam, V.-T.: Enhancing subject access to monographs in Online Public Access Catalogs : table of contents added to bibliographic records (2000) 0.01 
    0.0083279535 = product of:
  0.041639768 = sum of:
    0.041639768 = weight(_text_:22 in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041639768 = score(doc=1187,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17937298 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051222645 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  17. Leissing, U.; Rädler, K.; Hauer, M.: Query-Expansion durch Fachthesauri : Erfahrungsbericht zu dandelon.com, Vorarlberger Parlamentsinformationssystem und vorarlberg.at (2010) 0.01 
    0.0083279535 = product of:
  0.041639768 = sum of:
    0.041639768 = weight(_text_:22 in 3728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041639768 = score(doc=3728,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17937298 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051222645 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3728, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3728)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  18. Rädler, K.: Kataloganreicherung mit digitalen Inhaltsverzeichnissen eröffnet neue Geschäftsfelder : Erfahrungen aus der Vorarlberger Landesbibliothek (2008) 0.01 
    0.006939962 = product of:
  0.03469981 = sum of:
    0.03469981 = weight(_text_:22 in 1942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03469981 = score(doc=1942,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17937298 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051222645 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1942, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1942)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 6.2008 17:14:24
  19. Hauer, M.: Collaborative Catalog Enrichment : Digitalisierung und Information Retrieval (2011) 0.01 
    0.006939962 = product of:
  0.03469981 = sum of:
    0.03469981 = weight(_text_:22 in 160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03469981 = score(doc=160,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17937298 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051222645 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 160, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=160)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    ¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a
  20. Barnes, S.; McCue, J.: Linking library records to bibliographic databases : an analysis of common data elements in BIOSIS, Agricola, and the OPAC (1991) 0.01 
    0.005551969 = product of:
  0.027759846 = sum of:
    0.027759846 = weight(_text_:22 in 520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027759846 = score(doc=520,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17937298 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051222645 = queryNorm
        0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 520, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=520)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    8. 1.2007 17:22:25

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 20
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Themes