Search (10 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Theorie verbaler Dokumentationssprachen"
  1. Ruge, G.: ¬A spreading activation network for automatic generation of thesaurus relationships (1991) 0.02
    0.019431893 = product of:
      0.09715946 = sum of:
        0.09715946 = weight(_text_:22 in 4506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09715946 = score(doc=4506,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17937298 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051222645 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4506, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4506)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    8.10.2000 11:52:22
  2. Mikacic, M.: Statistical system for subject designation (SSSD) for libraries in Croatia (1996) 0.02
    0.015703341 = product of:
      0.0785167 = sum of:
        0.0785167 = weight(_text_:22 in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0785167 = score(doc=2943,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17937298 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051222645 = queryNorm
            0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    31. 7.2006 14:22:21
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.1, S.77-93
  3. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility (1996) 0.01
    0.013879924 = product of:
      0.06939962 = sum of:
        0.06939962 = weight(_text_:22 in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06939962 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17937298 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051222645 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Pages
    S.11-22
  4. Szostak, R.: Facet analysis using grammar (2017) 0.01
    0.01321952 = product of:
      0.0660976 = sum of:
        0.0660976 = weight(_text_:books in 3866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0660976 = score(doc=3866,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24756333 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051222645 = queryNorm
            0.2669927 = fieldWeight in 3866, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3866)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Basic grammar can achieve most/all of the goals of facet analysis without requiring the use of facet indicators. Facet analysis is thus rendered far simpler for classificationist, classifier, and user. We compare facet analysis and grammar, and show how various facets can be represented grammatically. We then address potential challenges in employing grammar as subject classification. A detailed review of basic grammar supports the hypothesis that it is feasible to usefully employ grammatical construction in subject classification. A manageable - and programmable - set of adjustments is required as classifiers move fairly directly from sentences in a document (or object or idea) description to formulating a subject classification. The user likewise can move fairly quickly from a query to the identification of relevant works. A review of theories in linguistics indicates that a grammatical approach should reduce ambiguity while encouraging ease of use. This paper applies the recommended approach to a small sample of recently published books. It finds that the approach is feasible and results in a more precise subject description than the subject headings assigned at present. It then explores PRECIS, an indexing system developed in the 1970s. Though our approach differs from PRECIS in many important ways, the experience of PRECIS supports our conclusions regarding both feasibility and precision.
  5. Degez, D.: Compatibilité des langages d'indexation mariage, cohabitation ou fusion? : Quelques examples concrèts (1998) 0.01
    0.009715946 = product of:
      0.04857973 = sum of:
        0.04857973 = weight(_text_:22 in 2245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04857973 = score(doc=2245,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17937298 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051222645 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2245, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2245)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  6. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Thesaural relationships (2001) 0.01
    0.009715946 = product of:
      0.04857973 = sum of:
        0.04857973 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04857973 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17937298 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051222645 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:45:57
  7. Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2010) 0.01
    0.009715946 = product of:
      0.04857973 = sum of:
        0.04857973 = weight(_text_:22 in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04857973 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17937298 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051222645 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  8. Maniez, J.: Fusion de banques de donnees documentaires at compatibilite des languages d'indexation (1997) 0.01
    0.0083279535 = product of:
      0.041639768 = sum of:
        0.041639768 = weight(_text_:22 in 2246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041639768 = score(doc=2246,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17937298 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051222645 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2246, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2246)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  9. Jia, J.: From data to knowledge : the relationships between vocabularies, linked data and knowledge graphs (2021) 0.01
    0.006939962 = product of:
      0.03469981 = sum of:
        0.03469981 = weight(_text_:22 in 106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03469981 = score(doc=106,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17937298 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051222645 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 106, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=106)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2021 14:24:32
  10. Mooers, C.N.: ¬The indexing language of an information retrieval system (1985) 0.00
    0.004857973 = product of:
      0.024289865 = sum of:
        0.024289865 = weight(_text_:22 in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024289865 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17937298 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051222645 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Footnote
    Original in: Information retrieval today: papers presented at an Institute conducted by the Library School and the Center for Continuation Study, University of Minnesota, Sept. 19-22, 1962. Ed. by Wesley Simonton. Minneapolis, Minn.: The Center, 1963. S.21-36.