-
Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999)
0.02
0.016655907 = product of:
0.083279535 = sum of:
0.083279535 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.083279535 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17937298 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051222645 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
-
Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999)
0.02
0.016655907 = product of:
0.083279535 = sum of:
0.083279535 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.083279535 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17937298 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051222645 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
-
Spiteri, L.: ¬A simplified model for facet analysis : Ranganathan 101 (1998)
0.02
0.015863424 = product of:
0.079317115 = sum of:
0.079317115 = weight(_text_:books in 3842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.079317115 = score(doc=3842,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24756333 = queryWeight, product of:
4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
0.051222645 = queryNorm
0.3203912 = fieldWeight in 3842, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3842)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Ranganathan's canons, principles, and postulates can easily confuse readers, especially because he revised and added to them in various editions of his many books. The Classification Research Group, who drew on Ranganathan's work as their basis for classification theory but developed it in their own way, has never clearly organized all their equivalent canons and principles. In this article Spiteri gathers the fundamental rules from both systems and compares and contrasts them. She makes her own clearer set of principles for constructing facets, stating the subject of a document, and designing notation. Spiteri's "simplified model" is clear and understandable, but certainly not simplistic. The model does not include methods for making a faceted system, but will serve as a very useful guide in how to turn initial work into a rigorous classification. Highly recommended
-
Connaway, L.S.; Sievert, M.C.: Comparison of three classification systems for information on health insurance (1996)
0.01
0.011103938 = product of:
0.055519693 = sum of:
0.055519693 = weight(_text_:22 in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055519693 = score(doc=7242,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17937298 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051222645 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 22. 4.1997 21:10:19
-
Belayche, C.: ¬A propos de la classification de Dewey (1997)
0.01
0.011103938 = product of:
0.055519693 = sum of:
0.055519693 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055519693 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17937298 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051222645 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.175, S.22-23
-
Winske, E.: ¬The development and structure of an urban, regional, and local documents classification scheme (1996)
0.01
0.009715946 = product of:
0.04857973 = sum of:
0.04857973 = weight(_text_:22 in 7241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04857973 = score(doc=7241,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17937298 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051222645 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7241, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7241)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Footnote
- Paper presented at conference on 'Local documents, a new classification scheme' at the Research Caucus of the Florida Library Association Annual Conference, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 22 Apr 95
-
Kwasnik, B.H.: ¬The role of classification in knowledge representation (1999)
0.01
0.0083279535 = product of:
0.041639768 = sum of:
0.041639768 = weight(_text_:22 in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041639768 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17937298 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051222645 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Library trends. 48(1999) no.1, S.22-47
-
Molholt, P.: Qualities of classification schemes for the Information Superhighway (1995)
0.01
0.006939962 = product of:
0.03469981 = sum of:
0.03469981 = weight(_text_:22 in 5562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03469981 = score(doc=5562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17937298 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051222645 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5562)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 21(1995) no.2, S.19-22
