Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  • × theme_ss:"Inhaltsanalyse"
  1. White, M.D.; Marsh, E.E.: Content analysis : a flexible methodology (2006) 0.05 
    0.048382755 = product of:
  0.12095688 = sum of:
    0.079317115 = weight(_text_:books in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.079317115 = score(doc=5589,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24756333 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051222645 = queryNorm
        0.3203912 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
    0.041639768 = weight(_text_:22 in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041639768 = score(doc=5589,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17937298 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051222645 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Content analysis is a highly flexible research method that has been widely used in library and information science (LIS) studies with varying research goals and objectives. The research method is applied in qualitative, quantitative, and sometimes mixed modes of research frameworks and employs a wide range of analytical techniques to generate findings and put them into context. This article characterizes content analysis as a systematic, rigorous approach to analyzing documents obtained or generated in the course of research. It briefly describes the steps involved in content analysis, differentiates between quantitative and qualitative content analysis, and shows that content analysis serves the purposes of both quantitative research and qualitative research. The authors draw on selected LIS studies that have used content analysis to illustrate the concepts addressed in the article. The article also serves as a gateway to methodological books and articles that provide more detail about aspects of content analysis discussed only briefly in the article.
    Source
    Library trends. 55(2006) no.1, S.22-45
  2. Sauperl, A.: Subject determination during the cataloging process : the development of a system based on theoretical principles (2002) 0.00 
    0.0041639768 = product of:
  0.020819884 = sum of:
    0.020819884 = weight(_text_:22 in 2293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020819884 = score(doc=2293,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17937298 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051222645 = queryNorm
        0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 2293, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2293)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    27. 9.2005 14:22:19
  3. Bade, D.: ¬The creation and persistence of misinformation in shared library catalogs : language and subject knowledge in a technological era (2002) 0.00 
    0.0027759846 = product of:
  0.013879923 = sum of:
    0.013879923 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013879923 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17937298 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051222645 = queryNorm
        0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05

Authors

Types