Search (694 results, page 1 of 35)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.10 
    0.09669168 = product of:
  0.4834584 = sum of:
    0.4834584 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.4834584 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.43010932 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  2. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.08 
    0.080576405 = product of:
  0.402882 = sum of:
    0.402882 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.402882 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.43010932 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  3. Capra, R.; Khanova, J.; Ramdeen, S.: Work and personal e-mail use by university employees : PIM practices across domain boundaries (2013) 0.06 
    0.06451463 = product of:
  0.32257313 = sum of:
    0.32257313 = weight(_text_:mail in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.32257313 = score(doc=749,freq=28.0), product of:
        0.28137597 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.5462847 = idf(docFreq=468, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        1.1464132 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
          5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
            28.0 = termFreq=28.0
          5.5462847 = idf(docFreq=468, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    In this article, we present findings from a survey of nearly 600 university employees' e-mail use. The study provides a detailed comparison of use patterns between work and personal e-mail accounts. Our results suggest that users engage in more "keeping" behaviors with work e-mail than with personal e-mail-respondents reported more frequent use of keeping actions and larger inbox sizes for their work accounts. However, we found correlations between individual respondents' e-mail behaviors in the two contexts, indicating that personal preferences can play a role. We also report results pointing to e-mail as an important boundary management artifact. We show evidence that the use of multiple e-mail accounts may be a work-personal boundary placement strategy, but also observe that a fair amount of boundary permeation occurs through e-mail. To our knowledge, this study is one of the first to compare e-mail use in both work and personal contexts across the same sample. Our findings extend prior research on personal information management regarding e-mail use, and help inform the role of e-mail in managing work-personal boundaries. The results have implications for the design of e-mail systems, organizational e-mail policies, user training, and understanding the impacts of technology on daily life.
  4. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.06 
    0.056403484 = product of:
  0.2820174 = sum of:
    0.2820174 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2820174 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.43010932 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
  5. Kozak, M.; Iefremova, O.; Szkola, J.; Sas, D.: Do researchers provide public or institutional E-mail accounts as correspondence E-mails in scientific articles? (2015) 0.05 
    0.048768476 = product of:
  0.24384238 = sum of:
    0.24384238 = weight(_text_:mail in 2226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24384238 = score(doc=2226,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.28137597 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.5462847 = idf(docFreq=468, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.86660695 = fieldWeight in 2226, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          5.5462847 = idf(docFreq=468, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2226)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Whether one should use a public e-mail account (e.g., Gmail, Yahoo!) or an institutional one (e.g., @wsiz.rzeszow.pl, @medicine.ox.ac.uk) as an address for correspondence is an important aspect of scientific communication. Some authors consider that public e-mail services are unprofessional and insecure, whereas others say that, in a dynamically changing working environment, public e-mail addresses allow readers to contact authors long after they have changed their workplace. To shed light on this issue, we analyzed how often authors of scientific papers provided e-mail addresses that were either public or institution based. We selected from the Web of Science database 1,000 frequently cited and 1,000 infrequently cited articles (all of the latter were noncited articles) published in 2000, 2005, and 2010, and from these we analyzed 26,937 e-mail addresses. The results showed that approximately three fourths of these addresses were institutional, but there was an increasing trend toward using public e-mail addresses over the period studied. No significant differences were found between frequently and infrequently cited papers in this respect. Further research is now needed to access the motivations and perceptions of scholars when it comes to their use of either public or institutional e-mail accounts.
  6. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.05 
    0.04834584 = product of:
  0.2417292 = sum of:
    0.2417292 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2417292 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.43010932 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  7. Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019) 0.05 
    0.04834584 = product of:
  0.2417292 = sum of:
    0.2417292 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2417292 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.43010932 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Footnote
    https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
  8. Bergman, O.; Whittaker, S.; Falk, N.: Shared files : the retrieval perspective (2014) 0.05 
    0.048231583 = product of:
  0.12057896 = sum of:
    0.0862113 = weight(_text_:mail in 1495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0862113 = score(doc=1495,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28137597 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.5462847 = idf(docFreq=468, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.30639184 = fieldWeight in 1495, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.5462847 = idf(docFreq=468, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1495)
    0.034367654 = weight(_text_:22 in 1495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034367654 = score(doc=1495,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1495, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1495)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    People who are collaborating can share files in two main ways: performing Group Information Management (GIM) using a common repository or performing Personal Information Management (PIM) by distributing files as e-mail attachments and storing them in personal repositories. There is a trend toward using common repositories with many organizations encouraging workers to use GIM to avoid duplication of files and management. So far, PIM and GIM have been studied by different research communities, so their effectiveness for file retrieval has not yet been systematically compared. We compared PIM and GIM in a large-scale elicited personal information retrieval study. We asked 275 users to retrieve 860 of their own shared files, testing the effect of sharing method on success and efficiency of retrieval. Participants preferred PIM over GIM. More important, PIM retrieval was more successful: Participants using GIM failed to find 22% of their files compared with 13% failures using PIM. This may be because active organization aids retrieval: When using personally created folders, the failure percentage was 65% lower than when using default folders (e.g., My Documents), and more than 5 times lower than when using folders created by others for GIM. Theoretical reasons for this are discussed.
  9. Kang, H.; Plaisant, C.; Elsayed, T.; Oard, D.W.: Making sense of archived e-mail : exploring the Enron collection with NetLens (2010) 0.05 
    0.04626584 = product of:
  0.2313292 = sum of:
    0.2313292 = weight(_text_:mail in 3446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2313292 = score(doc=3446,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.28137597 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.5462847 = idf(docFreq=468, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.82213557 = fieldWeight in 3446, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          5.5462847 = idf(docFreq=468, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3446)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Informal communications media pose new challenges for information-systems design, but the nature of informal interaction offers new opportunities as well. This paper describes NetLens-E-mail, a system designed to support exploration of the content-actor network in large e-mail collections. Unique features of NetLens-E-mail include close coupling of orientation, specification, restriction, and expansion, and introduction and incorporation of a novel capability for iterative projection between content and actor networks within the same collection. Scenarios are presented to illustrate the intended employment of NetLens-E-mail, and design walkthroughs with two domain experts provide an initial basis for assessment of the suitability of the design by scholars and analysts.
  10. Zilberman, P.; Katz, G.; Shabtai, A.; Elovici, Y.: Analyzing group E-mail exchange to detect data leakage (2013) 0.05 
    0.045618735 = product of:
  0.22809367 = sum of:
    0.22809367 = weight(_text_:mail in 1050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22809367 = score(doc=1050,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.28137597 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.5462847 = idf(docFreq=468, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.81063664 = fieldWeight in 1050, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          5.5462847 = idf(docFreq=468, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1050)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Today's organizations spend a great deal of time and effort on e-mail leakage prevention. However, there are still no satisfactory solutions; addressing mistakes are not detected and in some cases correct recipients are wrongly marked as potential mistakes. In this article we present a new approach for preventing e-mail addressing mistakes in organizations. The approach is based on an analysis of e-mail exchanges among members of an organization and the identification of groups based on common topics. When a new e-mail is about to be sent, each recipient is analyzed. A recipient is approved if the e-mail's content belongs to at least one common topic to both the sender and the recipient. This can be applied even if the sender and recipient have never communicated directly before. The new approach was evaluated using the Enron e-mail data set and was compared with a well known method for the detection of e-mail addressing mistakes. The results show that the proposed approach is capable of detecting 87% of nonlegitimate recipients while incorrectly classifying only 0.5% of the legitimate recipients. These results outperform previous work, which reports a detection rate of 82% without reference to the false positive rate.
  11. Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010) 0.04 
    0.040288202 = product of:
  0.201441 = sum of:
    0.201441 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.201441 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.43010932 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
  12. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.04 
    0.040288202 = product of:
  0.201441 = sum of:
    0.201441 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.201441 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.43010932 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  13. Piros, A.: Az ETO-jelzetek automatikus interpretálásának és elemzésének kérdései (2018) 0.04 
    0.040288202 = product of:
  0.201441 = sum of:
    0.201441 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.201441 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.43010932 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>
  14. Frodl, C; Scheven, E.; Werner, C.: Veröffentlichung der 6. RSWK-Ergänzungslieferung (2010) 0.04 
    0.038585268 = product of:
  0.096463166 = sum of:
    0.06896904 = weight(_text_:mail in 4048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06896904 = score(doc=4048,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28137597 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.5462847 = idf(docFreq=468, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.24511346 = fieldWeight in 4048, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.5462847 = idf(docFreq=468, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4048)
    0.027494125 = weight(_text_:22 in 4048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027494125 = score(doc=4048,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.177656 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4048, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4048)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    § 14 regelt die Anordnung der Schlagwörter in einer Schlagwortfolge. Sie wurde auf eine formale Reihenfolge vereinfacht; bei Zusammentreffen von mehreren Schlagwörtern der gleichen Kategorie soll eine sinnvolle Reihenfolge gewählt werden. § 15 macht grundsätzliche Aussagen zur Anzeige und zum Retrieval von Schlagwortfolgen. Außerdem wurde § 106 dahingehend geändert, dass in Zukunft der Homonymenzusatz bei Personen nur eine der SWD zu entnehmende Bezeichnung sein soll; die Unterscheidung von engen und weiten Berufsbezeichnungen mit einer zugelassenen Liste wird aufgegeben. In § 731 wird hinsichtlich der Kirchenbauten präzisiert, welche Bezeichnungen als Individualnamen gelten. Die Expertengruppe Sacherschließung hat die Änderungen an den RSWK auf ihren Sitzungen am 20. April 2009 bzw. 16. November 2009 beschlossen. Der Standardisierungsausschuss hat auf seiner 18. Sitzung am 25. November 2009 einer Veröffentlichung und Inkraftsetzung zum 1. Januar 2010 zugestimmt. Die Anpassungen des Regelwerks, die sich aus den geänderten §§ 13-15 ergeben, sollen Anfang 2010 veröffentlicht werden. Die Papierausgabe des Grundwerks in der 3., überarbeiteten und erweiterten Auflage sowie die 1. bis 4. Ergänzungslieferung der "Regeln für den Schlagwortkatalog" können Sie beziehen über die: Deutsche Nationalbibliothek, Bibliografische Dienste Adickesallee 1, 60322 Frankfurt am Main Fax: 069/1525-1636, E-Mail: c.junker@d-nb.de Die 5. Ergänzungslieferung steht in elektronischer Form unter der oben genannten Webseite zur Verfügung.
    Date
    22. 1.2010 15:12:33
  15. Tashiro, H.; Lau, A.; Mori, J.; Fujii, N.; Kajikawa, Y.: E-mail networks and leadership performance (2012) 0.04 
    0.035837363 = product of:
  0.17918682 = sum of:
    0.17918682 = weight(_text_:mail in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17918682 = score(doc=77,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.28137597 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.5462847 = idf(docFreq=468, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.6368235 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.5462847 = idf(docFreq=468, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Online communication is an indispensable tool for communication and management. The network structure of communication is considered to affect team and individual performances, but it has not been not empirically tested. In this article, we collected a set of 1-month e-mail logs of a company and conducted an e-mail network analysis. We calculated the network centralities of 72 managerial candidates, and investigated the relationship between positions in the network and leadership performance with partial least squares structural equation modeling. Betweenness and in-degree network centralities of those middle managers are correlated with their leadership performance; on the other hand, for this management group, out-degree has no correlation, and PageRank is a negative indicator of leadership. Leaders with high performance are trusted in their communities as a hub of the information channel of the communication network.
  16. Kalman, Y.M.; Ravid, G.: Filing, piling, and everything in between : the dynamics of E-mail inbox management (2015) 0.03 
    0.03448452 = product of:
  0.1724226 = sum of:
    0.1724226 = weight(_text_:mail in 2336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1724226 = score(doc=2336,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.28137597 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.5462847 = idf(docFreq=468, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.6127837 = fieldWeight in 2336, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          5.5462847 = idf(docFreq=468, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2336)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Managing the constant flow of incoming messages is a daily challenge faced by knowledge workers who use technologies such as e-mail and other digital communication tools. This study focuses on the most ubiquitous of these technologies, e-mail, and unobtrusively explores the ongoing inbox-management activities of thousands of users worldwide over a period of 8 months. The study describes the dynamics of these inboxes throughout the day and the week as users strive to handle incoming messages, read them, classify them, respond to them in a timely manner, and archive them for future reference, all while carrying out the daily tasks of knowledge workers. It then tests several hypotheses about the influence of specific inbox-management behaviors in mitigating the causes of e-mail overload, and proposes a continuous index that quantifies one of these inbox-management behaviors. This inbox clearing index (ICI) expands on the widely cited trichotomous classification of users into frequent filers, spring cleaners, and no filers, as suggested by Whittaker and Sidner (1996). We propose that the ICI allows shifting the focus, from classifying users to characterizing a diversity of user behaviors and measuring the relationships between these behaviors and desired outcomes.
  17. Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016) 0.03 
    0.03223056 = product of:
  0.1611528 = sum of:
    0.1611528 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1611528 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.43010932 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
  18. Yuan, Y.C.; Zhao, X.; Liao, Q.; Chi, C.: ¬The use of different information and communication technologies to support knowledge sharing in organizations : from e-mail to micro-blogging (2013) 0.03 
    0.029261088 = product of:
  0.14630544 = sum of:
    0.14630544 = weight(_text_:mail in 1008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14630544 = score(doc=1008,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.28137597 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.5462847 = idf(docFreq=468, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.5199642 = fieldWeight in 1008, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.5462847 = idf(docFreq=468, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1008)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Previous research has revealed the following three challenges for knowledge sharing: awareness of expertise distribution, motivation for sharing, and network ties. In this case study, we examine how different generations of information and communication technologies (ICTs), ranging from e-mail to micro-blogging, can help address these challenges. Twenty-one interviews with employees from a multinational company revealed that although people think social media can better address these challenges than older tools, the full potential of social media for supporting knowledge sharing has yet to be achieved. When examining the interconnections among different ICTs, we found that employees? choice of a combination of ICTs, as affected by their functional backgrounds, could create "technological divides" among them and separate resources. This finding indicates that having more ICTs is not necessarily better. ICT integration, as well as support for easy navigation, is crucial for effective knowledge search and sharing. Adaptation to local culture is also needed to ensure worldwide participation in knowledge sharing.
  19. Zapilko, B.: InFoLiS (2017) 0.03 
    0.029261088 = product of:
  0.14630544 = sum of:
    0.14630544 = weight(_text_:mail in 1031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14630544 = score(doc=1031,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.28137597 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.5462847 = idf(docFreq=468, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.5199642 = fieldWeight in 1031, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.5462847 = idf(docFreq=468, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1031)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Die von der DFG geförderte InFoLiS-Projektreihe wurde dieses Jahr erfolgreich abgeschlossen. Die Projekte wurden von GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, der Universitätsbibliothek Mannheim und der Hochschule der Medien Stuttgart durchgeführt. Ziel der Projekte InFoLiS I und InFoLiS II war die Entwicklung von Verfahren zur Verknüpfung von Forschungsdaten und Literatur. Diese Verknüpfung kann einen erheblichen Mehrwert für Recherchesystem in Informationsinfrastrukturen wie Bibliotheken und Forschungsdatenzentren für die Recherche der Nutzerinnen und Nutzer darstellen. Die Projektergebnisse im Einzelnen sind: - Entwicklung von Verfahren für die automatische Verknüpfung von Publikationen und Forschungsdaten - Integration dieser Verknüpfungen in die Recherchesysteme der Projektpartner - Automatische Verschlagwortung von Forschungsdaten - Überführung der entwickelten Verfahren in eine Linked Open Data-basierte nachnutzbare Infrastruktur mit Webservices und APIs - Anwendung der Verfahren auf einer disziplinübergreifenden und mehrsprachigen Datenbasis - Nachnutzbarkeit der Links durch die Verwendung einer Forschungsdatenontologie Weitere Informationen finden sich auf der Projekthomepage [http://infolis.github.io/]. Sämtliche Projektergebnisse inklusive Quellcode stehen Open Source auf unserer GitHub-Seite [http://www.github.com/infolis/] für eine Nachnutzung zur Verfügung. Bei Interesse an einer Nachnutzung oder Weiterentwicklung Kontakt-E-Mail (benjamin.zapilko@gesis.org<mailto:benjamin.zapilko@gesis.org>).
    Source
    Mail an Inetbib vom 17.11.2017
  20. Ruano-Ordás, D.; Fdez-Riverola, F.; Méndez, J.R.: Using evolutionary computation for discovering spam patterns from e-mail samples (2018) 0.03 
    0.029261088 = product of:
  0.14630544 = sum of:
    0.14630544 = weight(_text_:mail in 5088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14630544 = score(doc=5088,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.28137597 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.5462847 = idf(docFreq=468, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050732337 = queryNorm
        0.5199642 = fieldWeight in 5088, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.5462847 = idf(docFreq=468, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5088)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    One of the most relevant problems affecting the efficient use of e-mail to communicate worldwide is the spam phenomenon. Spamming involves flooding Internet with undesired messages aimed to promote illegal or low value products and services. Beyond the existence of different well-known machine learning techniques, collaborative schemes and other complementary approaches, some popular anti-spam frameworks such as SpamAssassin or Wirebrush4SPAM enabled the possibility of using regular expressions to effectively improve filter performance. In this work, we provide a review of existing proposals to automatically generate fully functional regular expressions from any input dataset combining spam and ham messages. Due to configuration difficulties and the low performance achieved by analysed schemes, in this work we introduce DiscoverRegex, a novel automatic spam pattern-finding tool. Patterns generated DiscoverRegex outperform those created by existing approaches (able to avoid FP errors) whilst minimising the computational resources required for its proper operation. DiscoverRegex source code is publicly available at https://github.com/sing-group/DiscoverRegex.

Authors

Languages

  • e 488
  • d 197
  • a 1
  • hu 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 596
  • el 69
  • m 44
  • s 15
  • x 12
  • r 8
  • b 5
  • n 2
  • i 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications