Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Dahlberg, I."
  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Dahlberg, I.: Conceptual definitions for INTERCONCEPT (1981) 0.03
    0.027833128 = product of:
      0.13916564 = sum of:
        0.13916564 = weight(_text_:22 in 1630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13916564 = score(doc=1630,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051357865 = queryNorm
            0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1630, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1630)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    International classification. 8(1981), S.16-22
  2. Dahlberg, I.: ¬A faceted classification of general concepts (2011) 0.02
    0.017136168 = product of:
      0.085680835 = sum of:
        0.085680835 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.085680835 = score(doc=4824,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23732872 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051357865 = queryNorm
            0.36102176 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    General concepts are all those form-categorial concepts which - attached to a specific concept of a classification system or thesaurus - can help to widen, sometimes even in a syntactical sense, the understanding of a case. In some existing universal classification systems such concepts have been named "auxiliaries" or "common isolates" as in the Colon Classification (CC). However, by such auxiliaries, different kinds of such concepts are listed, e.g. concepts of space and time, concepts of races and languages and concepts of kinds of documents, next to them also concepts of kinds of general activities, properties, persons, and institutions. Such latter kinds form part of the nine aspects ruling the facets in the Information Coding Classification (ICC) through the principle of using a Systematiser for the subdivision of subject groups and fields. Based on this principle and using and extending existing systems of such concepts, e.g. which A. Diemer had presented to the German Thesaurus Committee as well as those found in the UDC, in CC and attached to the Subject Heading System of the German National Library, a faceted classification is proposed for critical assessment, necessary improvement and possible later use in classification systems and thesauri.
  3. De Luca, E.W.; Dahlberg, I.: Including knowledge domains from the ICC into the multilingual lexical linked data cloud (2014) 0.01
    0.009840497 = product of:
      0.049202483 = sum of:
        0.049202483 = weight(_text_:22 in 1493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049202483 = score(doc=1493,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051357865 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1493, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1493)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2014 19:01:18
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  4. Dahlberg, I.: How to improve ISKO's standing : ten desiderata for knowledge organization (2011) 0.01
    0.008568084 = product of:
      0.042840417 = sum of:
        0.042840417 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 4300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042840417 = score(doc=4300,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23732872 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051357865 = queryNorm
            0.18051088 = fieldWeight in 4300, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4300)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Content
    1. Recognize the units in an order system (classification system, thesaurus, ontology, etc.) as concepts/knowledge units, analyse their essential characteristics, and use these characteristics when creating a Knowledge Order System. 2. Recognize the units in an order system (classification system, thesaurus, ontology, etc.) as concepts/knowledge units, analyse their essential characteristics, and use these characteristics when creating a Knowledge Order System. 3. An ISKO group should elaborate a curriculum for the various KO activities to be published after approval by the ISKO Executive Board (EB). Together with this, the qualifying titles of different professionals (teacher, professor, system designer etc.) should also be discussed by the ISKO EB, adopted and proposed for acknowledgement by official institutions; and, 2) It may be possible for ISKO to establish its own Academy and also take care of teaching with the elaborated curricula. 4. Every national ISKO Chapter and the General Secretariat should make efforts to employ a paid expert for the necessary secretarial work, and seek financial support therefore from national or international organizations, in order to become more professionalised. 5. The ISKO Executive Board should decide to elaborate and publish an order system of all KO-relevant concepts to serve as a model and perhaps sometimes as a standard for similar work in other scientific disciplines and knowledge fields.