Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Diodato, V."
  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Henry, G.; Diodato, V.: ¬The rates of assignment of thesaurus terms in the ERIC information retrieval system : an analysis of hierarchies and levels (1991) 0.03 
    0.03392788 = product of:
  0.1696394 = sum of:
    0.1696394 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1696394 = score(doc=291,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23732872 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051357865 = queryNorm
        0.7147866 = fieldWeight in 291, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=291)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  2. Diodato, V.; Henry, G.: ¬The rates of assignment of narrower terms in the Thesaurus of ERIC Descriptors (1993) 0.03 
    0.03392788 = product of:
  0.1696394 = sum of:
    0.1696394 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 3921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1696394 = score(doc=3921,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.23732872 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051357865 = queryNorm
        0.7147866 = fieldWeight in 3921, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3921)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Is there a link between the use of an indexing term and its physical similarity to its narrower terms? This analysis covered 1.296 terms, each with at least one narrower term in the ERIC thesaurus. It measured the postings per document of the entry terms and their narrower terms. There was almost no correlation between how often a term is assigned and how many similar looking narrower terms it has. Nevertheless, there were some sets of narrower terms that had much higher postings per document rates than their entry terms. Many of these narrower terms were much newer to the thesaurus than were their entry terms
    Object
    ERIC Thesaurus
  3. Diodato, V.: Dictionary of bibliometrics (1994) 0.02 
    0.01948319 = product of:
  0.09741595 = sum of:
    0.09741595 = weight(_text_:22 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09741595 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051357865 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of library and information science 22(1996) no.2, S.116-117 (L.C. Smith)
  4. Diodato, V.: Duplicate entries versus see cross references in back-of-the book indexes (1994) 0.01 
    0.011133251 = product of:
  0.055666253 = sum of:
    0.055666253 = weight(_text_:22 in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055666253 = score(doc=1427,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051357865 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Considers whether, when there is a choice, a back-of-book indexer should use a duplicate entry or a see reference. Guidelines suggest that it is preferable to use the duplicate entry if it would not add to the length or complexity of the index. Studies 1.100 see references in 202 back-of-book indexes and concludes that 22% of the see references should have been replaced by duplicate entries. Failure to select a duplicate entry instead of a see reference occurs most frequently in science and techology books and in indexes with no subheadings

Types

Themes