Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Gopinath, M.A."
  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Gopinath, M.A.; Prasad, K.N.: Compatibility of the principles for design of thesaurus and classification scheme (1976) 0.04
    0.0411268 = product of:
      0.205634 = sum of:
        0.205634 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.205634 = score(doc=2943,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23732872 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051357865 = queryNorm
            0.8664522 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  2. Gopinath, M.A.: Symbiosis between classification and thesaurus (1987) 0.03
    0.027417867 = product of:
      0.13708933 = sum of:
        0.13708933 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13708933 = score(doc=524,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23732872 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051357865 = queryNorm
            0.5776348 = fieldWeight in 524, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=524)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Varieties of vocabulary control devices have been emerging to improving the efficiency of information retrieval. One form or other of the classificatory and thesaural approaches have been adopted in all these devices. The relational structure and control these devices are all complimentary. They all appear to be a kind of extension of the same basic format. The symbiotic relation in the procedure for construction of a classification scheme and a thesaurus are presented in this paper.
  3. Aptagiri, D.V.; Gopinath, M.A.; Prasad, A.R.D.: ¬A frame based knowledge representation paradigm for automating POPSI (1995) 0.01
    0.011133251 = product of:
      0.055666253 = sum of:
        0.055666253 = weight(_text_:22 in 2887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055666253 = score(doc=2887,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051357865 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2887, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2887)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 22(1995) nos.3/4, S.162-167
  4. Gopinath, M.A.: Standardization for resource sharing databases (1995) 0.01
    0.011133251 = product of:
      0.055666253 = sum of:
        0.055666253 = weight(_text_:22 in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055666253 = score(doc=4414,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051357865 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    It is helpful and essential to adopt standards for bibliographic information, project description and institutional information which are shareable for access to information resources within a country. Describes a strategy for adopting international standards of bibliographic information exchange for developing a resource sharing facilitation database in India. A list of 22 ISO standards for information processing is included