Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"McIlwaine, I.C."
  1. McIlwaine, I.C.; Williamson, N.J.: Class 61 - Medicine : restructuring progress 2000 (2000) 0.02
    0.01948319 = product of:
      0.09741595 = sum of:
        0.09741595 = weight(_text_:22 in 1012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09741595 = score(doc=1012,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051357865 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1012, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1012)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 22(2000), S.49-75
  2. McIlwaine, I.C.: ¬A feasibility study on the restructuring of the Universal Decimal Classification into a fully-facetd classification system (1994) 0.02
    0.01696394 = product of:
      0.0848197 = sum of:
        0.0848197 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 7738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0848197 = score(doc=7738,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23732872 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051357865 = queryNorm
            0.3573933 = fieldWeight in 7738, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7738)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    An exploratory and experimental study for the purpose of testing a methodology which might be used to restructure the UDC class by class. The study uses the facet framework established in the Bliss Bibliographic Classification, 2nd ed., as the basis for the restructuring and the research is being carried out using the discipline 'medical sciences'. A thesaurus will be derived from the restructured scheme which will act as an index to it. In a broader context this research is an attempt to see how far it is possible to take the knowledge base of one classification scheme and impose the structure of another scheme on it
  3. McIlwaine, I.C.: New wine in old bottles : problems of maintaining classification schemes (1996) 0.01
    0.012117098 = product of:
      0.06058549 = sum of:
        0.06058549 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 5168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06058549 = score(doc=5168,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23732872 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051357865 = queryNorm
            0.2552809 = fieldWeight in 5168, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5168)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Editors of long-standing classifications have to adopt their schemes to totally different circumstances from those they were originally designed to suit. The need to retrieve information accurately in an online environment and a world dominated by the Internet is vital and contrasts with the basic linear approach for which these classifications were intended. The latter need still has to be satisfied, so ways of achieving both goals must be explored. The need for greater synthesis, clearly defined factes, with distinctive notation and a closely adhered to citation order is essential. An expressive notation is attractive in an online environmen. Modern educational approaches make traditional structures meaningless and the current economic climate and expense of developing new publication formats is reducing revision budgets. Co-operation between editors and the use of one scheme, e.g. DDC, as a switching language between other schemes, e.g., UDC, thesauri and subject headings lists are one way forward. Existing co-operative projects and future plans between the editors of DDC, UDC and BC2 are discussed and the complementing of classification by a thesaurus is recommended
  4. McIlwaine, I.C.: ¬The Universal Decimal Classification : some factors concerning its origins, development, and influence (1997) 0.01
    0.012117098 = product of:
      0.06058549 = sum of:
        0.06058549 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06058549 = score(doc=141,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23732872 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051357865 = queryNorm
            0.2552809 = fieldWeight in 141, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=141)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Outlines the bibliographic enterprise envisaged by Otlet and LaFontaine, which resulted in the UDC being developed in 1895, and the subsequent history of the scheme. Relationship with DDC from which it was derived deteriorated in the early 20th century and changes in funding, location, and editorship of Duyvis from 1929-59 had a profound effect on the scheme's development and management. Lloyd, Duyvis successor, reformed the revision structure, and further management changes from 1975 to the present day, culminated in the formation of the UDC Consortium in 1992. Notes the subsequent creation of a machine-readable Master Reference File and speedier revision procedures. Examines the scheme's structure, development, and influence on classification theory, problems caused by longevity and lack of standrad procedures, and highlights proposals for their reform to improve the scheme's suitability for an automated world. Explores research projects in 1960s which foreshadowed possibilities today, such as a complementary thesaurus and individualisation of single concepts notationally. Emphasizes the value of classification in a multilingual environment and outlines the future developments
  5. McIlwaine, I.C.: Trends in knowledge organization research (2003) 0.01
    0.011133251 = product of:
      0.055666253 = sum of:
        0.055666253 = weight(_text_:22 in 2289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055666253 = score(doc=2289,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051357865 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2289, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2289)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    10. 6.2004 19:22:56
  6. McIlwaine, I.C.: UDC: the present state and future prospects (1995) 0.01
    0.009741595 = product of:
      0.048707973 = sum of:
        0.048707973 = weight(_text_:22 in 1899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048707973 = score(doc=1899,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051357865 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1899, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1899)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 22(1995) no.2, S.64-69
  7. McIlwaine, I.C.: Brian Vickery : 11th September 1918-17 th October 2009 (2010) 0.01
    0.006958282 = product of:
      0.03479141 = sum of:
        0.03479141 = weight(_text_:22 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03479141 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051357865 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2010 19:32:06