Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Molholt, P."
  1. Molholt, P.: Qualities of classification schemes for the Information Superhighway (1995) 0.04 
    0.03815076 = product of:
  0.0953769 = sum of:
    0.06058549 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 5562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06058549 = score(doc=5562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23732872 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051357865 = queryNorm
        0.2552809 = fieldWeight in 5562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5562)
    0.03479141 = weight(_text_:22 in 5562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03479141 = score(doc=5562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051357865 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5562)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    For my segment of this program I'd like to focus on some basic qualities of classification schemes. These qualities are critical to our ability to truly organize knowledge for access. As I see it, there are at least five qualities of note. The first one of these properties that I want to talk about is "authoritative." By this I mean standardized, but I mean more than standardized with a built in consensus-building process. A classification scheme constructed by a collaborative, consensus-building process carries the approval, and the authority, of the discipline groups that contribute to it and that it affects... The next property of classification systems is "expandable," living, responsive, with a clear locus of responsibility for its continuous upkeep. The worst thing you can do with a thesaurus, or a classification scheme, is to finish it. You can't ever finish it because it reflects ongoing intellectual activity... The third property is "intuitive." That is, the system has to be approachable, it has to be transparent, or at least capable of being transparent. It has to have an underlying logic that supports the classification scheme but doesn't dominate it... The fourth property is "organized and logical." I advocate very strongly, and agree with Lois Chan, that classification must be based on a rule-based structure, on somebody's world-view of the syndetic structure... The fifth property is "universal" by which I mean the classification scheme needs be useable by any specific system or application, and be available as a language for multiple purposes.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 21(1995) no.2, S.19-22
  2. Molholt, P.; Petersen, T.: ¬The role of The Art and Architecture Thesaurus in communicating about visual art (1993) 0.04 
    0.037932523 = product of:
  0.1896626 = sum of:
    0.1896626 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 3146) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1896626 = score(doc=3146,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.23732872 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051357865 = queryNorm
        0.7991557 = fieldWeight in 3146, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3146)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The paper addresses the ways in which computerization and a thesaurus like the Art and Architecture Thesaurus (AAT) influenece the organization, description, and understanding of the visual arts. It discusses these issues from the point of view of the AAT and considers how its structure and content serve as a bridging mechanism between the many different manifestations of the visual arts and the different types of organizations serving the viewers of art, whether as students, scholars, collection managers, or the enjoying public. This paper shows how a knowledge base like the AAT helps this variety of users develop approaches to the visual arts and suggests that the special nature of dealing with image rather than text influences how the thesaurus is structured and applied
    Object
    Art and architecture thesaurus
  3. Molholt, P.: ¬The Art and Architecture Thesaurus : Controlling relatiosnhips through rules and structures (2001) 0.03 
    0.033579893 = product of:
  0.16789946 = sum of:
    0.16789946 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 1152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16789946 = score(doc=1152,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.23732872 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051357865 = queryNorm
        0.7074553 = fieldWeight in 1152, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1152)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The Art and Architecture Thesaurus (AAT) staff developed a set of associative, interconcept relationships to interconnect terminology contained in 33 hierarchies. Each of the 20 relationships is tightly defined and is applied under strict rules. The result benefits the user by providing reliable, standardized links between concepts. This chapter describes the logic, methodology, and impact of the AAT approach to relationships.
    Object
    Art and Architecture Thesaurus
  4. Molholt, P.: Standardizing and codifying related term links for improved information retrieval (1990) 0.03 
    0.027417867 = product of:
  0.13708933 = sum of:
    0.13708933 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 4794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13708933 = score(doc=4794,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.23732872 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051357865 = queryNorm
        0.5776348 = fieldWeight in 4794, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4794)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Presents the results of a survey of literature in the fields of information science, linguistics, and computer science research of lexical-semantic relations in information retrieval systems. Discusses these findings in the context of proposed research on the related terms structure for the Art and Architecture Thesaurus
    Object
    Art and Architecture Thesaurus
  5. Molholt, P.: Standardization of interconcept links and their usage (1996) 0.03 
    0.027417867 = product of:
  0.13708933 = sum of:
    0.13708933 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 5158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13708933 = score(doc=5158,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.23732872 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051357865 = queryNorm
        0.5776348 = fieldWeight in 5158, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5158)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Object
    Art and architecture thesaurus
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus

Years

Themes