Search (13 results, page 1 of 1)

Zerbst, H.-J.; Kaptein, O.: Gegenwärtiger Stand und Entwicklungstendenzen der Sacherschließung : Auswertung einer Umfrage an deutschen wissenschaftlichen und Öffentlichen Bibliotheken (1993) 0.08
```
0.08464328 = product of:
  0.2116082 = sum of:
    0.1631398 = weight(_text_:3a in 7394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1631398 = score(doc=7394,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.43541256 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051357865 = queryNorm
        0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 7394, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7394)
    0.048468396 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 7394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.048468396 = score(doc=7394,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23732872 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051357865 = queryNorm
        0.20422474 = fieldWeight in 7394, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7394)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
```
Abstract

Ergebnis einer Umfrage aus dem Frühjahr 1993. A. Wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken: Versandt wurde der Fragebogen an die Mitglieder der Sektion IV des DBV. Fragen: (1a) Um welchen Bestand handelt es sich, der sachlich erschlossen wird? (1b) Wie groß ist dieser Bestand? (1c) Wird dieser Bestand vollständig oder nur in Auswahl (einzelne Fächer, Lehrbücher, Dissertationen o.ä.) sachlich erschlossen? (1d) Seit wann bestehen die jetzigen Sachkataloge? (2) Auf welche Art wird der Bestand zur Zeit sachlich erschlossen? (3a) Welche Klassifikation wird angewendet? (3b) Gibt es alphabetisches SyK-Register bzw. einen Zugriff auf die Klassenbeschreibungen? (3c) Gibt es ergänzende Schlüssel für die Aspekte Ort, Zeit, Form? (4) Falls Sie einen SWK führen (a) nach welchem Regelwerk? (b) Gibt es ein genormtes Vokabular oder einen Thesaurus (ggf. nur für bestimmte Fächer)? (5) In welcher Form existieren die Sachkataloge? (6) Ist die Bibliothek an einer kooperativen Sacherschließung, z.B. in einem Verbund beteiligt? [Nein: 79%] (7) Nutzen Sie Fremdleistungen bei der Sacherschließung? [Ja: 46%] (8) Welche sachlichen Suchmöglichkeiten gibt es für Benutzer? (9) Sind zukünftige Veränderungen bei der Sacherschließung geplant? [Ja: 73%]. - B. Öffentliche Bibliotheken: Die Umfrage richtete sich an alle ÖBs der Sektionen I, II und III des DBV. Fragen: (1) Welche Sachkataloge führen Sie? (2) Welche Klassifikationen (Systematiken) liegen dem SyK zugrunde? [ASB: 242; KAB: 333; SfB: 4 (???); SSD: 11; Berliner: 18] (3) Führen Sie ein eigenes Schlagwort-Register zum SyK bzw. zur Klassifikation (Systematik)? (4) Führen Sie den SWK nach ...? [RSWK: 132 (= ca. 60%) anderen Regeln: 93] (5) Seit wann bestehen die jetzigen Sachkataloge? (6) In welcher Form existiern die Sachkataloge? (7) In welchem Umfang wird der Bestand erschlossen? (8) Welche Signaturen verwenden Sie? (9) Ist die Bibliothek an einer kooperativen Sacherschließung, z.B. einem Verbund, beteiligt? [Nein: 96%] (10) Nutzen Sie Fremdleistungen bei der Sacherschließung? [Ja: 70%] (11) Woher beziehen Sie diese Fremdleistungen? (12) Verfügen Sie über ein Online-Katalogsystem mit OPAC? [Ja: 78; Nein: 614] (13) Sind zukünftig Veränderungen bei der Sacherschließung geplant? [Nein: 458; Ja: 237]; RESÜMEE für ÖB: "(i) Einführung von EDV-Katalogen bleibt auch in den 90er Jahren ein Thema, (ii) Der Aufbau von SWK wird in vielen Bibliotheken in Angriff genommen, dabei spielt die Fremddatenübernahme eine entscheidende Rolle, (iii) RSWK werden zunehmend angewandt, Nutzung der SWD auch für andere Regeln wirkt normierend, (iv) Große Bewegung auf dem 'Systematik-Markt' ist in absehbarer Zeit nicht zu erwarten, (v) Für kleinere Bibliotheken wird der Zettelkatalog auf absehbare Zeit noch die herrschende Katalogform sein, (vi) Der erhebliche Nachholbedarf in den neuen Bundesländern wird nur in einem größeren Zeitraum zu leisten sein. ??? SPEZIALBIBIOTHEKEN ???

Lerch, I.: ¬Das Dokumentationshilfsmittel Thesaurus (1982) 0.04

0.041974865 = product of:
  0.20987432 = sum of:
    0.20987432 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 2339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20987432 = score(doc=2339,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.23732872 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051357865 = queryNorm
        0.88431907 = fieldWeight in 2339, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2339)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract: Die Entwicklung des Konzepts "Thesaurus" zwischen 1945 und 1979 wird auf der Grundlage der Literatur zur Dokumentation diskutiert. Diesem Konzept wird die Struktur verschiedener technischer Thesauri aus demselben Zeitabschnitt gegenübergestellt
Theme: Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus

Roberts, N.: Historical studies in documentation : the pre-history of the information retrieval thesaurus (1984) 0.04

0.038774718 = product of:
  0.19387358 = sum of:
    0.19387358 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 5140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19387358 = score(doc=5140,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23732872 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051357865 = queryNorm
        0.81689894 = fieldWeight in 5140, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5140)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Schulte-Albert, H.G.: Classification and thesaurus construction : 1645-1668 (1994) 0.04

0.038774718 = product of:
  0.19387358 = sum of:
    0.19387358 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 2009) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19387358 = score(doc=2009,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23732872 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051357865 = queryNorm
        0.81689894 = fieldWeight in 2009, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2009)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Krooks, D.A.; Lancaster, F.W.: ¬The evolution of guidelines for thesaurus construction (1993) 0.03

0.033579893 = product of:
  0.16789946 = sum of:
    0.16789946 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 7128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16789946 = score(doc=7128,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.23732872 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051357865 = queryNorm
        0.7074553 = fieldWeight in 7128, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7128)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract: This piece of research traces the evolution of guidelines and principles for the construction of information retrieval thesauri from 1959 to 1993. We conclude that the majority of the basic problems of thesaurus construction has already been identified and solved by 1967 and that Eugene Wall, more than any other individual, has profoundly influenced the entire development in this area
Theme: Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus

Amirhosseini, M.; Avidan, G.: ¬A dialectic perspective on the evolution of thesauri and ontologies (2021) 0.02
```
0.020987432 = product of:
  0.10493716 = sum of:
    0.10493716 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10493716 = score(doc=592,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.23732872 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051357865 = queryNorm
        0.44215953 = fieldWeight in 592, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=592)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
```
Abstract

The purpose of this article is to identify the most important factors and features in the evolution of thesauri and ontologies through a dialectic model. This model relies on a dialectic process or idea which could be discovered via a dialectic method. This method has focused on identifying the logical relationship between a beginning proposition, or an idea called a thesis, a negation of that idea called the antithesis, and the result of the conflict between the two ideas, called a synthesis. During the creation of knowledge organization systems (KOSs), the identification of logical relations between different ideas has been made possible through the consideration and use of the most influential methods and tools such as dictionaries, Roget's Thesaurus, thesaurus, micro-, macro- and metathesauri, ontology, lower, middle and upper level ontologies. The analysis process has adapted a historical methodology, more specifically a dialectic method and documentary method as the reasoning process. This supports our arguments and synthesizes a method for the analysis of research results. Confirmed by the research results, the principle of unity has shown to be the most important factor in the development and evolution of the structure of knowledge organization systems and their types. There are various types of unity when considering the analysis of logical relations. These include the principle of unity of alphabetical order, unity of science, semantic unity, structural unity and conceptual unity. The results have clearly demonstrated a movement from plurality to unity in the assembling of the complex structure of knowledge organization systems to increase information and knowledge storage and retrieval performance.

Theme

Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus

Steierwald, U.: Wissen und System : zu Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz' Theorie einer Universalbibliothek (1995) 0.02

0.016699877 = product of:
  0.08349938 = sum of:
    0.08349938 = weight(_text_:22 in 6041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08349938 = score(doc=6041,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051357865 = queryNorm
        0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6041, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6041)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Series: Kölner Arbeiten zum Bibliotheks- und Dokumentationswesen; H.22

Sveistrup, H.: ¬Der neue Realkatalog der SUB Hamburg (1947) 0.01

0.011133251 = product of:
  0.055666253 = sum of:
    0.055666253 = weight(_text_:22 in 6607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055666253 = score(doc=6607,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051357865 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6607, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6607)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source: Probleme des Wiederaufbaus im wissenschaftlichen Bibliothekswesen: aus d. Verhandlungen des 1. Bibliothekartagung der britischen Zone in Hamburg vom 22.-24.10.1946

Riplinger, T.: ¬Die Bedeutung der Methode Eppelsheimer für Theorie und Praxis der bibliothekarischen und der dokumentarischen Sacherschließung (2004) 0.01

0.011133251 = product of:
  0.055666253 = sum of:
    0.055666253 = weight(_text_:22 in 2521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055666253 = score(doc=2521,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051357865 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2521, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2521)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date: 22. 3.2008 13:33:51

Hartmann, F.: Paul Otlets Hypermedium : Dokumentation als Gegenidee zur Bibliothek (2015) 0.01

0.011133251 = product of:
  0.055666253 = sum of:
    0.055666253 = weight(_text_:22 in 1432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055666253 = score(doc=1432,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051357865 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1432, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1432)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date: 22. 8.2016 15:58:46

Moneda Corrochano, M. de la; López-Huertas, M.J.; Jiménez-Contreras, E.: Spanish research in knowledge organization (2002-2010) (2013) 0.01

0.009741595 = product of:
  0.048707973 = sum of:
    0.048707973 = weight(_text_:22 in 3363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.048707973 = score(doc=3363,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051357865 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3363, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3363)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date: 22. 2.2013 12:10:07

Vom Buch zur Datenbank : Paul Otlets Utopie der Wissensvisualisierung (2012) 0.01

0.006958282 = product of:
  0.03479141 = sum of:
    0.03479141 = weight(_text_:22 in 3074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03479141 = score(doc=3074,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051357865 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3074, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3074)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date: 22. 8.2016 16:06:54

Pettee, J.: ¬The subject approach to books and the development of the dictionary catalog (1985) 0.01

0.0055666254 = product of:
  0.027833126 = sum of:
    0.027833126 = weight(_text_:22 in 3624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027833126 = score(doc=3624,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051357865 = queryNorm
        0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3624, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3624)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Footnote: Original in: Pettee, J.: The history and theory of the alphabetical subject approach to books. New York: Wilson 1946. S.22-25.

Search (13 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications