-
Negrini, G.; Zozi, P.: Ontological analysis of the literary work of art (2003)
0.03
0.02518492 = product of:
0.1259246 = sum of:
0.1259246 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 2687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1259246 = score(doc=2687,freq=6.0), product of:
0.23732872 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.051357865 = queryNorm
0.5305915 = fieldWeight in 2687, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2687)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Ontological structures can aid the understanding and modelling of works of art. Ontology of the aesthetic object, and particularly of the literary work, has been analysed by Hartmann and Ingarden. Application of Dahlberg's ontical 'systematifier' model enabled us to organize the entire structure of the Thesaurus of Italian Literature, and to highlight a number of significant aspects of the literary work. After describing the conclusions arising from the experience of compiling the thesaurus, the paper briefly outlines Hartmann's and Ingarden's theories of levels and seeks to identify commonalities between the ontological analysis of the two theories and the conclusions of the thesaurus.
-
Araghi, G.F.: ¬A new scheme for library classification (2004)
0.02
0.01696394 = product of:
0.0848197 = sum of:
0.0848197 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 5659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0848197 = score(doc=5659,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23732872 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.051357865 = queryNorm
0.3573933 = fieldWeight in 5659, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5659)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- This proposed new classification scheme is based on two main elements: hierarchism and binary theory. Hence, it is called Universal Binary Classification (UBC). Some advantages of this classification are highlighted including are subject heading development, construction of a thesaurus and all terms with meaningful features arranged in tabular form that can help researchers, through a semantic process, to find what they need. This classification scheme is fully consistent with the classification of knowledge. The classification of knowledge is also based on hierarchism and binary principle. Finally, a survey on randomly selected books in McLennan Library of McGill University is presented to compare the codes of this new classification with the currently employed Library of Congress Classification (LCC) numbers in the discipline of Library and Information Sciences.
-
Lin, W.-Y.C.: ¬The concept and applications of faceted classifications (2006)
0.01
0.011133251 = product of:
0.055666253 = sum of:
0.055666253 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055666253 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051357865 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 27. 5.2007 22:19:35
-
Facets: a fruitful notion in many domains : special issue on facet analysis (2008)
0.01
0.010493716 = product of:
0.05246858 = sum of:
0.05246858 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 3262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05246858 = score(doc=3262,freq=6.0), product of:
0.23732872 = queryWeight, product of:
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.051357865 = queryNorm
0.22107977 = fieldWeight in 3262, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3262)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Footnote
- Several of the papers are clearly written as primers and neatly address the second agenda item: attracting others to the study and use of facet analysis. The most valuable papers are written in clear, approachable language. Vickery's paper (p. 145-160) is a clarion call for faceted classification and facet analysis. The heart of the paper is a primer for central concepts and techniques. Vickery explains the value of using faceted classification in document retrieval. Also provided are potential solutions to thorny interface and display issues with facets. Vickery looks to complementary themes in knowledge organization, such as thesauri and ontologies as potential areas for extending the facet concept. Broughton (p. 193-210) describes a rigorous approach to the application of facet analysis in the creation of a compatible thesaurus from the schedules of the 2nd edition of the Bliss Classification (BC2). This discussion of exemplary faceted thesauri, recent standards work, and difficulties encountered in the project will provide valuable guidance for future research in this area. Slavic (p. 257-271) provides a challenge to make faceted classification come 'alive' through promoting the use of machine-readable formats for use and exchange in applications such as Topic Maps and SKOS (Simple Knowledge Organization Systems), and as supported by the standard BS8723 (2005) Structured Vocabulary for Information Retrieval. She also urges designers of faceted classifications to get involved in standards work. Cheti and Paradisi (p. 223-241) outline a basic approach to converting an existing subject indexing tool, the Nuovo Soggetario, into a faceted thesaurus through the use of facet analysis. This discussion, well grounded in the canonical literature, may well serve as a primer for future efforts. Also useful for those who wish to construct faceted thesauri is the article by Tudhope and Binding (p. 211-222). This contains an outline of basic elements to be found in exemplar faceted thesauri, and a discussion of project FACET (Faceted Access to Cultural heritage Terminology) with algorithmically-based semantic query expansion in a dataset composed of items from the National Museum of Science and Industry indexed with AAT (Art and Architecture Thesaurus). This paper looks to the future hybridization of ontologies and facets through standards developments such as SKOS because of the "lightweight semantics" inherent in facets.
-
Olson, H.A.: Sameness and difference : a cultural foundation of classification (2001)
0.01
0.009741595 = product of:
0.048707973 = sum of:
0.048707973 = weight(_text_:22 in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048707973 = score(doc=166,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051357865 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Slavic, A.: On the nature and typology of documentary classifications and their use in a networked environment (2007)
0.01
0.008349938 = product of:
0.04174969 = sum of:
0.04174969 = weight(_text_:22 in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04174969 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051357865 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 22.12.2007 17:22:31
-
Beghtol, C.: Naïve classification systems and the global information society (2004)
0.01
0.006958282 = product of:
0.03479141 = sum of:
0.03479141 = weight(_text_:22 in 3483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03479141 = score(doc=3483,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051357865 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3483, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3483)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Pages
- S.19-22
-
Qin, J.: Evolving paradigms of knowledge representation and organization : a comparative study of classification, XML/DTD and ontology (2003)
0.01
0.0055666254 = product of:
0.027833126 = sum of:
0.027833126 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027833126 = score(doc=2763,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051357865 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 12. 9.2004 17:22:35
-
Wang, Z.; Chaudhry, A.S.; Khoo, C.S.G.: Using classification schemes and thesauri to build an organizational taxonomy for organizing content and aiding navigation (2008)
0.01
0.0055666254 = product of:
0.027833126 = sum of:
0.027833126 = weight(_text_:22 in 2346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027833126 = score(doc=2346,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051357865 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2346, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2346)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 7.11.2008 15:22:04
