Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  • × author_ss:"Dextre Clarke, S.G."
  1. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: ¬The Information Retrieval Thesaurus (2019) 0.04
    0.0384706 = product of:
      0.192353 = sum of:
        0.192353 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 5210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.192353 = score(doc=5210,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.23732872 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051357865 = queryNorm
            0.81049186 = fieldWeight in 5210, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5210)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    In the post-war period before computers were readily available, urgent demand for scientific and industrial develop-ment stimulated research and development (R&D) that led to the birth of the information retrieval thesaurus. This article traces the early history, speciation and progressive improvement of the thesaurus to reach the state now conveyed by guidelines in inter-national and national standards. Despite doubts about the effec-tiveness of the thesaurus throughout this period, and notwith-standing the dominance of Google and other search engines in the information retrieval (IR) scene today, the thesaurus still plays a complementary part in the organization of knowledge and in-formation resources. Success today depends on interoperability, and is opening up opportunities in linked data applications. At the same time, the IR demand from workers in the knowledge society drives interest in hybrid forms of knowledge organization system (KOS) that may pool the genes of thesauri with those of ontologies and classification schemes.
    Object
    Information Retrieval Thesaurus
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  2. Dextre Clarke, S.G.; Vernau, J.: ¬The thesaurus debate continues : guest editorial (2016) 0.03
    0.033579893 = product of:
      0.16789946 = sum of:
        0.16789946 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 2822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16789946 = score(doc=2822,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.23732872 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051357865 = queryNorm
            0.7074553 = fieldWeight in 2822, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2822)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Content
    Einführung in ein Special issue: The Great Debate: "This House Believes that the Traditional Thesaurus has no Place in Modern Information Retrieval." [19 February 2015, 14:00-17:30 preceded by ISKO UK AGM and followed by networking, wine and nibbles; vgl.: http://www.iskouk.org/content/great-debate].
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  3. Dextre Clarke, S.G.; Vernau, J.: Questions and answers on current developments inspired by the thesaurus tradition : points of view (2016) 0.03
    0.033579893 = product of:
      0.16789946 = sum of:
        0.16789946 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 2914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16789946 = score(doc=2914,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.23732872 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051357865 = queryNorm
            0.7074553 = fieldWeight in 2914, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2914)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Content
    Resumee zu einem Special issue: The Great Debate: "This House Believes that the Traditional Thesaurus has no Place in Modern Information Retrieval." [19 February 2015, 14:00-17:30 preceded by ISKO UK AGM and followed by networking, wine and nibbles; vgl.: http://www.iskouk.org/content/great-debate].
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  4. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Origins and trajectory of the long thesaurus debate (2016) 0.03
    0.029680712 = product of:
      0.14840356 = sum of:
        0.14840356 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 2913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14840356 = score(doc=2913,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.23732872 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051357865 = queryNorm
            0.62530804 = fieldWeight in 2913, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2913)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The information retrieval thesaurus emerged in the 1950s, settled down to a more-or-less standard format in the 1970s and has continued to evolve marginally since then. Throughout its whole lifetime, doubts have been expressed about its efficacy with emphasis latterly on cost-effectiveness. Prolonged testing of different styles of index language in the 1970s failed to settle the doubts. The arena occupied by the debate has moved from small isolated databases in the post-war era to diverse situations nowadays with the whole Internet at one extreme and small in-house collections at the other. Sophisticated statistical techniques now dominate the retrieval landscape on the Internet but leave opportunities for the thesaurus and other knowledge organization techniques in niches such as image libraries and corporate intranets. The promise of an ontology-driven semantic web with linked data resources opens another opportunity. Thus much scope remains for research to establish the usefulness of the thesaurus in these places and to inspire its continuing evolution.
    Content
    Beitrag in einem Special issue: The Great Debate: "This House Believes that the Traditional Thesaurus has no Place in Modern Information Retrieval." [19 February 2015, 14:00-17:30 preceded by ISKO UK AGM and followed by networking, wine and nibbles; vgl.: http://www.iskouk.org/content/great-debate].
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  5. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Teil 1 der Thesaurus-Norm ISO 25964 veröffentlicht (2012) 0.03
    0.029382406 = product of:
      0.14691202 = sum of:
        0.14691202 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14691202 = score(doc=176,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.23732872 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051357865 = queryNorm
            0.6190234 = fieldWeight in 176, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=176)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Die neue internationale Thesaurus-Norm ISO 25964-1 ersetzt die Normen ISO 2788 und ISO 5964. Ihr englischer Titel lautet "Information and documentation - Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies - Part 1: Thesauri for information retrieval". Die Norm umfasst ein- und mehrsprachige Thesauri und berück sichtigt die Notwendigkeit von Datenaustausch, Vernetzung und Interoperabilität. Zu den Inhalten gehören - Konstruktion ein- und mehrsprachiger Thesauri - Unterschied zwischen Begriff und Benennung und ihren Beziehungen - Facettenanalyse und Layout - Einsatz von Thesauri in computergestützten und vernetzten Systemen - Management und Pflege von Thesauri - Richtlinien für Thesaurusmanagement-Software - Datenmodell für ein- und mehrsprachige Thesauri - Empfehlungen
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus

Languages