Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  1. Hider, P.: ¬The search value added by professional indexing to a bibliographic database (2017) 0.01
    0.012117098 = product of:
      0.06058549 = sum of:
        0.06058549 = weight(_text_:thesaurus in 3868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06058549 = score(doc=3868,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23732872 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051357865 = queryNorm
            0.2552809 = fieldWeight in 3868, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6210785 = idf(docFreq=1182, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3868)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Gross et al. (2015) have demonstrated that about a quarter of hits would typically be lost to keyword searchers if contemporary academic library catalogs dropped their controlled subject headings. This paper reports on an analysis of the loss levels that would result if a bibliographic database, namely the Australian Education Index (AEI), were missing the subject descriptors and identifiers assigned by its professional indexers, employing the methodology developed by Gross and Taylor (2005), and later by Gross et al. (2015). The results indicate that AEI users would lose a similar proportion of hits per query to that experienced by library catalog users: on average, 27% of the resources found by a sample of keyword queries on the AEI database would not have been found without the subject indexing, based on the Australian Thesaurus of Education Descriptors (ATED). The paper also discusses the methodological limitations of these studies, pointing out that real-life users might still find some of the resources missed by a particular query through follow-up searches, while additional resources might also be found through iterative searching on the subject vocabulary. The paper goes on to describe a new research design, based on a before - and - after experiment, which addresses some of these limitations. It is argued that this alternative design will provide a more realistic picture of the value that professionally assigned subject indexing and controlled subject vocabularies can add to literature searching of a more scholarly and thorough kind.
  2. Reichert, S.; Mayr, P.: Untersuchung von Relevanzeigenschaften in einem kontrollierten Eyetracking-Experiment (2012) 0.01
    0.008349938 = product of:
      0.04174969 = sum of:
        0.04174969 = weight(_text_:22 in 328) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04174969 = score(doc=328,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051357865 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 328, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=328)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2012 19:25:54
  3. Pal, S.; Mitra, M.; Kamps, J.: Evaluation effort, reliability and reusability in XML retrieval (2011) 0.01
    0.006958282 = product of:
      0.03479141 = sum of:
        0.03479141 = weight(_text_:22 in 4197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03479141 = score(doc=4197,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051357865 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4197, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4197)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:20:56
  4. Chu, H.: Factors affecting relevance judgment : a report from TREC Legal track (2011) 0.01
    0.006958282 = product of:
      0.03479141 = sum of:
        0.03479141 = weight(_text_:22 in 4540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03479141 = score(doc=4540,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051357865 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4540, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4540)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    12. 7.2011 18:29:22
  5. Wildemuth, B.; Freund, L.; Toms, E.G.: Untangling search task complexity and difficulty in the context of interactive information retrieval studies (2014) 0.01
    0.006958282 = product of:
      0.03479141 = sum of:
        0.03479141 = weight(_text_:22 in 1786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03479141 = score(doc=1786,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051357865 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1786, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1786)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    6. 4.2015 19:31:22
  6. Ravana, S.D.; Taheri, M.S.; Rajagopal, P.: Document-based approach to improve the accuracy of pairwise comparison in evaluating information retrieval systems (2015) 0.01
    0.006958282 = product of:
      0.03479141 = sum of:
        0.03479141 = weight(_text_:22 in 2587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03479141 = score(doc=2587,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051357865 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2587, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2587)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  7. Rajagopal, P.; Ravana, S.D.; Koh, Y.S.; Balakrishnan, V.: Evaluating the effectiveness of information retrieval systems using effort-based relevance judgment (2019) 0.01
    0.006958282 = product of:
      0.03479141 = sum of:
        0.03479141 = weight(_text_:22 in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03479141 = score(doc=5287,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1798465 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051357865 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22