Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Bar-Ilan, J."
  1. Bar-Ilan, J.; Peritz, B.C.: Evolution, continuity, and disappearance of documents on a specific topic an the Web : a longitudinal study of "informetrics" (2004) 0.03
    0.027907882 = product of:
      0.055815764 = sum of:
        0.055815764 = product of:
          0.11163153 = sum of:
            0.11163153 = weight(_text_:2004 in 2886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11163153 = score(doc=2886,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.21705271 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051607955 = queryNorm
                0.51430607 = fieldWeight in 2886, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2886)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 55(2004) no.11, S.980-990
    Year
    2004
  2. Bar-Ilan, J.: Web links and search engine ranking : the case of Google and the query "Jew" (2006) 0.02
    0.017829692 = product of:
      0.035659384 = sum of:
        0.035659384 = product of:
          0.07131877 = sum of:
            0.07131877 = weight(_text_:2004 in 6104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07131877 = score(doc=6104,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21705271 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051607955 = queryNorm
                0.32857808 = fieldWeight in 6104, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6104)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The World Wide Web has become one of our more important information sources, and commercial search engines are the major tools for locating information; however, it is not enough for a Web page to be indexed by the search engines-it also must rank high on relevant queries. One of the parameters involved in ranking is the number and quality of links pointing to the page, based on the assumption that links convey appreciation for a page. This article presents the results of a content analysis of the links to two top pages retrieved by Google for the query "jew" as of July 2004: the "jew" entry on the free online encyclopedia Wikipedia, and the home page of "Jew Watch," a highly anti-Semitic site. The top results for the query "jew" gained public attention in April 2004, when it was noticed that the "Jew Watch" homepage ranked number 1. From this point on, both sides engaged in "Googlebombing" (i.e., increasing the number of links pointing to these pages). The results of the study show that most of the links to these pages come from blogs and discussion links, and the number of links pointing to these pages in appreciation of their content is extremely small. These findings have implications for ranking algorithms based on link counts, and emphasize the huge difference between Web links and citations in the scientific community.
  3. Bar-Ilan, J.: ¬The use of Web search engines in information science research (2003) 0.02
    0.015128995 = product of:
      0.03025799 = sum of:
        0.03025799 = product of:
          0.06051598 = sum of:
            0.06051598 = weight(_text_:2004 in 4271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06051598 = score(doc=4271,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21705271 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051607955 = queryNorm
                0.27880776 = fieldWeight in 4271, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4271)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 38(2004), S.231-288
  4. Bar-Ilan, J.; Levene, M.; Mat-Hassan, M.: Methods for evaluating dynamic changes in search engine rankings : a case study (2006) 0.01
    0.010085997 = product of:
      0.020171994 = sum of:
        0.020171994 = product of:
          0.04034399 = sum of:
            0.04034399 = weight(_text_:2004 in 616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04034399 = score(doc=616,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21705271 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051607955 = queryNorm
                0.18587184 = fieldWeight in 616, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=616)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The objective of this paper is to characterize the changes in the rankings of the top ten results of major search engines over time and to compare the rankings between these engines. Design/methodology/approach - The papers compare rankings of the top-ten results of the search engines Google and AlltheWeb on ten identical queries over a period of three weeks. Only the top-ten results were considered, since users do not normally inspect more than the first results page returned by a search engine. The experiment was repeated twice, in October 2003 and in January 2004, in order to assess changes to the top-ten results of some of the queries during the three months interval. In order to assess the changes in the rankings, three measures were computed for each data collection point and each search engine. Findings - The findings in this paper show that the rankings of AlltheWeb were highly stable over each period, while the rankings of Google underwent constant yet minor changes, with occasional major ones. Changes over time can be explained by the dynamic nature of the web or by fluctuations in the search engines' indexes. The top-ten results of the two search engines had surprisingly low overlap. With such small overlap, the task of comparing the rankings of the two engines becomes extremely challenging. Originality/value - The paper shows that because of the abundance of information on the web, ranking search results is of extreme importance. The paper compares several measures for computing the similarity between rankings of search tools, and shows that none of the measures is fully satisfactory as a standalone measure. It also demonstrates the apparent differences in the ranking algorithms of two widely used search engines.
  5. Bronstein, J.; Gazit, T.; Perez, O.; Bar-Ilan, J.; Aharony, N.; Amichai-Hamburger, Y.: ¬An examination of the factors contributing to participation in online social platforms (2016) 0.01
    0.008740207 = product of:
      0.017480414 = sum of:
        0.017480414 = product of:
          0.03496083 = sum of:
            0.03496083 = weight(_text_:22 in 3364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03496083 = score(doc=3364,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18072227 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051607955 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3364, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3364)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  6. Zhitomirsky-Geffet, M.; Bar-Ilan, J.: Towards maximal unification of semantically diverse ontologies for controversial domains (2014) 0.01
    0.0069921655 = product of:
      0.013984331 = sum of:
        0.013984331 = product of:
          0.027968662 = sum of:
            0.027968662 = weight(_text_:22 in 1634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027968662 = score(doc=1634,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18072227 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051607955 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1634, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1634)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  7. Zhitomirsky-Geffet, M.; Bar-Ilan, J.; Levene, M.: Testing the stability of "wisdom of crowds" judgments of search results over time and their similarity with the search engine rankings (2016) 0.01
    0.0069921655 = product of:
      0.013984331 = sum of:
        0.013984331 = product of:
          0.027968662 = sum of:
            0.027968662 = weight(_text_:22 in 3071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027968662 = score(doc=3071,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18072227 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051607955 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3071, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3071)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22