Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

0.068818584 = product of:
  0.13763717 = sum of:
    0.13763717 = sum of:
      0.09568417 = weight(_text_:2004 in 2558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09568417 = score(doc=2558,freq=5.0), product of:
          0.21705271 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051607955 = queryNorm
          0.4408338 = fieldWeight in 2558, product of:
            2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
              5.0 = termFreq=5.0
            4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2558)
      0.04195299 = weight(_text_:22 in 2558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04195299 = score(doc=2558,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18072227 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051607955 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2558, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2558)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

14. 8.2004 19:17:22

Source

Information processing and management. 40(2004) no.1, S.21-30

Year

2004

0.027907882 = product of:
  0.055815764 = sum of:
    0.055815764 = product of:
      0.11163153 = sum of:
        0.11163153 = weight(_text_:2004 in 2531) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11163153 = score(doc=2531,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.21705271 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051607955 = queryNorm
            0.51430607 = fieldWeight in 2531, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2531)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Information processing and management. 40(2004) no.4, S.603-618

Year

2004

0.017480414 = product of:
  0.03496083 = sum of:
    0.03496083 = product of:
      0.06992166 = sum of:
        0.06992166 = weight(_text_:22 in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06992166 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18072227 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051607955 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

14. 2.2012 12:53:22

0.015128995 = product of:
  0.03025799 = sum of:
    0.03025799 = product of:
      0.06051598 = sum of:
        0.06051598 = weight(_text_:2004 in 2011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06051598 = score(doc=2011,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21705271 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051607955 = queryNorm
            0.27880776 = fieldWeight in 2011, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2011)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

In an earlier paper [Egghe, L. (2004). A universal method of information retrieval evaluation: the "missing" link M and the universal IR surface. Information Processing and Management, 40, 21-30] we showed that, given an IR system, and if P denotes precision, R recall, F fallout and M miss (re-introduced in the paper mentioned above), we have the following relationship between P, R, F and M: P/(1-P)*(1-R)/R*F/(1-F)*(1-M)/M = 1. In this paper we prove the (more difficult) converse: given any four rational numbers in the interval ]0, 1[ satisfying the above equation, then there exists an IR system such that these four numbers (in any order) are the precision, recall, fallout and miss of this IR system. As a consequence we show that any three rational numbers in ]0, 1[ represent any three measures taken from precision, recall, fallout and miss of a certain IR system. We also show that this result is also true for two numbers instead of three.

0.0104882475 = product of:
  0.020976495 = sum of:
    0.020976495 = product of:
      0.04195299 = sum of:
        0.04195299 = weight(_text_:22 in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04195299 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18072227 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051607955 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.3, S.165-170

0.010085997 = product of:
  0.020171994 = sum of:
    0.020171994 = product of:
      0.04034399 = sum of:
        0.04034399 = weight(_text_:2004 in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04034399 = score(doc=81,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21705271 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051607955 = queryNorm
            0.18587184 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Papers written by several authors can be classified according to the countries of the author affiliations. The empirical part of this paper consists of two datasets. One dataset consists of 1,035 papers retrieved via the search "pedagog*" in the years 2004 and 2005 (up to October) in Academic Search Elite which is a case where phi(m) = the number of papers with m =1, 2,3 ... authors is decreasing, hence most of the papers have a low number of authors. Here we find that #, m = the number of times a country occurs j times in a m-authored paper, j =1, ..., m-1 is decreasing and that # m, m is much higher than all the other #j, m values. The other dataset consists of 3,271 papers retrieved via the search "enzyme" in the year 2005 (up to October) in the same database which is a case of a non-decreasing phi(m): most papers have 3 or 4 authors and we even find many papers with a much higher number of authors. In this case we show again that # m, m is much higher than the other #j, m values but that #j, m is not decreasing anymore in j =1, ..., m-1, although #1, m is (apart from # m, m) the largest number amongst the #j,m. The combinatorial part gives a proof of the fact that #j,m decreases for j = 1, m-1, supposing that all cases are equally possible. This shows that the first dataset is more conform with this model than the second dataset. Explanations for these findings are given. From the data we also find the (we think: new) distribution of number of papers with n =1, 2,3,... countries (i.e. where there are n different countries involved amongst the m (a n) authors of a paper): a fast decreasing function e.g. as a power law with a very large Lotka exponent.