-
Mayr, P.; Umstätter, W.: ¬Eine bibliometrische Zeitschriftenanalyse mit Jol Scientrometrics und NfD bzw. IWP (2008)
0.02
0.017650494 = product of:
0.03530099 = sum of:
0.03530099 = product of:
0.07060198 = sum of:
0.07060198 = weight(_text_:2004 in 2302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07060198 = score(doc=2302,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21705271 = queryWeight, product of:
4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
0.051607955 = queryNorm
0.32527572 = fieldWeight in 2302, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2302)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In der Studie sind 3.889 Datensätze analysiert worden, die im Zeitraum 1976-2004 in der Datenbank Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA) im Forschungsbereich der Informetrie nachgewiesen sind und das Wachstum auf diesem Gebiet belegen. Die Studie zeigt anhand einer Bradford-Verteilung (power law) die Kernzeitschriften in diesem Feld und bestätigt auf der Basis dieses LISA-Datensatzes, dass die Gründung einer neuen Zeitschrift, "Journals of Informetrics" (JoI), 2007 etwa zur rechten Zeit erfolgte. Im Verhältnis dazu wird die Entwicklung der Zeitschrift Scientometrics betrachtet und auch die der "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) bzw. "Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis" (IWP).
-
Momeni, F.; Mayr, P.: Analyzing the research output presented at European Networked Knowledge Organization Systems workshops (2000-2015) (2016)
0.01
0.012607496 = product of:
0.025214992 = sum of:
0.025214992 = product of:
0.050429985 = sum of:
0.050429985 = weight(_text_:2004 in 3106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050429985 = score(doc=3106,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21705271 = queryWeight, product of:
4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
0.051607955 = queryNorm
0.2323398 = fieldWeight in 3106, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3106)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In this paper we analyze a major part of the research output of the Networked Knowledge Organization Systems (NKOS) community in the period 2000 to 2015 from a network analytical perspective. We fo- cus on the paper output presented at the European NKOS workshops in the last 15 years. Our open dataset, the "NKOS bibliography", includes 14 workshop agendas (ECDL 2000-2010, TPDL 2011-2015) and 4 special issues on NKOS (2001, 2004, 2006 and 2015) which cover 171 papers with 218 distinct authors in total. A focus of the analysis is the visualization of co-authorship networks in this interdisciplinary eld. We used standard network analytic measures like degree and betweenness centrality to de- scribe the co-authorship distribution in our NKOS dataset. We can see in our dataset that 15% (with degree=0) of authors had no co-authorship with others and 53% of them had a maximum of 3 cooperations with other authors. 32% had at least 4 co-authors for all of their papers. The NKOS co-author network in the "NKOS bibliography" is a typical co- authorship network with one relatively large component, many smaller components and many isolated co-authorships or triples.
-
Daniel, F.; Maier, C.; Mayr, P.; Wirtz, H.-C.: ¬Die Kunden dort bedienen, wo sie sind : DigiAuskunft besteht Bewährungsprobe / Seit Anfang 2006 in Betrieb (2006)
0.01
0.01223629 = product of:
0.02447258 = sum of:
0.02447258 = product of:
0.04894516 = sum of:
0.04894516 = weight(_text_:22 in 5991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04894516 = score(doc=5991,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18072227 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051607955 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5991, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5991)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 8. 7.2006 21:06:22
-
Mayr, P.; Petras, V.: Building a Terminology Network for Search : the KoMoHe project (2008)
0.01
0.01223629 = product of:
0.02447258 = sum of:
0.02447258 = product of:
0.04894516 = sum of:
0.04894516 = weight(_text_:22 in 2618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04894516 = score(doc=2618,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18072227 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051607955 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2618, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2618)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Reichert, S.; Mayr, P.: Untersuchung von Relevanzeigenschaften in einem kontrollierten Eyetracking-Experiment (2012)
0.01
0.0104882475 = product of:
0.020976495 = sum of:
0.020976495 = product of:
0.04195299 = sum of:
0.04195299 = weight(_text_:22 in 328) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04195299 = score(doc=328,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18072227 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051607955 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 328, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=328)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2012 19:25:54
-
Mayr, P.: Google Scholar als akademische Suchmaschine (2009)
0.01
0.010085997 = product of:
0.020171994 = sum of:
0.020171994 = product of:
0.04034399 = sum of:
0.04034399 = weight(_text_:2004 in 3023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04034399 = score(doc=3023,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21705271 = queryWeight, product of:
4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
0.051607955 = queryNorm
0.18587184 = fieldWeight in 3023, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3023)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Neben den klassischen Informationsanbietern Bibliothek, Fachinformation und den Verlagen sind Internetsuchmaschinen inzwischen fester Bestandteil bei der Recherche nach wissenschaftlicher Information. Scirus (Elsevier, 2004) und Google Scholar sind zwei Beispiele für Suchdienste kommerzieller Suchmaschinen-Unternehmen, die eine Einschränkung auf den wissenschaftlichen Dokumentenraum anstreben und nennenswerte Dokumentzahlen in allen Disziplinen generieren. Der Vergleich der Treffermengen für beliebige Suchthemen zeigt, dass die Wahl des Suchsystems, des Dokumentenpools und der Dokumenttypen entscheidenden Einfluss auf die Relevanz und damit letztlich auch die Akzeptanz des Suchergebnisses hat. Tabelle 1 verdeutlicht die Mengenunterschiede am Beispiel der Trefferergebnisse für die Suchbegriffe "search engines" bzw. "Suchmaschinen" in der allgemeinen Internetsuchmaschine Google, der wissenschaftlichen Suchmaschine Google Scholar (GS) und der größten fachübergreifenden bibliographischen Literaturdatenbank Web of Science (WoS). Der Anteil der Dokumente, die in diesem Fall eindeutig der Wissenschaft zuzuordnen sind (siehe GS und insbesondere WoS in Tabelle 1), liegt gegenüber der allgemeinen Websuche lediglich im Promille-Bereich. Dieses Beispiel veranschaulicht, dass es ausgesprochen problematisch sein kann, fachwissenschaftliche Fragestellungen ausschließlich mit Internetsuchmaschinen zu recherchieren. Der Anteil der fachwissenschaftlich relevanten Dokumente in diesem Trefferpool ist i. d. R. sehr gering. Damit sinkt die Wahrscheinlichkeit, wissenschaftlich relevantes (z. B. einen Zeitschriftenaufsatz) auf den ersten Trefferseiten zu finden, deutlich ab.
-
Mayr, P.; Petras, V.; Walter, A.-K.: Results from a German terminology mapping effort : intra- and interdisciplinary cross-concordances between controlled vocabularies (2007)
0.01
0.008825247 = product of:
0.017650494 = sum of:
0.017650494 = product of:
0.03530099 = sum of:
0.03530099 = weight(_text_:2004 in 542) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03530099 = score(doc=542,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21705271 = queryWeight, product of:
4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
0.051607955 = queryNorm
0.16263786 = fieldWeight in 542, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=542)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In 2004, the German Federal Ministry for Education and Research funded a major terminology mapping initiative at the GESIS Social Science Information Centre in Bonn (GESIS-IZ), which will find its conclusion this year. The task of this terminology mapping initiative was to organize, create and manage 'crossconcordances' between major controlled vocabularies (thesauri, classification systems, subject heading lists) centred around the social sciences but quickly extending to other subject areas. Cross-concordances are intellectually (manually) created crosswalks that determine equivalence, hierarchy, and association relations between terms from two controlled vocabularies. Most vocabularies have been related bilaterally, that is, there is a cross-concordance relating terms from vocabulary A to vocabulary B as well as a cross-concordance relating terms from vocabulary B to vocabulary A (bilateral relations are not necessarily symmetrical). Till August 2007, 24 controlled vocabularies from 11 disciplines will be connected with vocabulary sizes ranging from 2,000 - 17,000 terms per vocabulary. To date more than 260,000 relations are generated. A database including all vocabularies and cross-concordances was built and a 'heterogeneity service' developed, a web service, which makes the cross-concordances available for other applications. Many cross-concordances are already implemented and utilized for the German Social Science Information Portal Sowiport (www.sowiport.de), which searches bibliographical and other information resources (incl. 13 databases with 10 different vocabularies and ca. 2.5 million references).
-
Lauser, B.; Johannsen, G.; Caracciolo, C.; Hage, W.R. van; Keizer, J.; Mayr, P.: Comparing human and automatic thesaurus mapping approaches in the agricultural domain (2008)
0.01
0.008740207 = product of:
0.017480414 = sum of:
0.017480414 = product of:
0.03496083 = sum of:
0.03496083 = weight(_text_:22 in 2627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03496083 = score(doc=2627,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18072227 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051607955 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2627, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2627)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
