Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

0.014263753 = product of:
  0.028527506 = sum of:
    0.028527506 = product of:
      0.05705501 = sum of:
        0.05705501 = weight(_text_:2004 in 1362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05705501 = score(doc=1362,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21705271 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051607955 = queryNorm
            0.26286247 = fieldWeight in 1362, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1362)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

RSWK

Wissensorganisation / Open Access / Kongress 2004 (SWB)

Subject

Wissensorganisation / Open Access / Kongress 2004 (SWB)

0.012352772 = product of:
  0.024705544 = sum of:
    0.024705544 = product of:
      0.04941109 = sum of:
        0.04941109 = weight(_text_:2004 in 440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04941109 = score(doc=440,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.21705271 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051607955 = queryNorm
            0.22764558 = fieldWeight in 440, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=440)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

The chapter by Wilson and Maceviciûtè should have been the first in the book, as it offers an informative, clearly laid out, research-based picture for IM. The chapter offers IM definitions, as mentioned earlier, and also covers a couple of major studies concerned with mapping diversity of content and topics studied in the IM field. RefViz, a visualization tool and an addition to EndNote, was used to map 462 articles published between 1999 and 2004 that had the term information management in their title. Figure 2.1 (Visualization of the IM literature), presents the map's 18 groups or clusters of documents. Two studies by Wilson also are presented. A study completed in 2004 covered the years 2000 to 2004 and reviewed five journals with articles about information activities. The 2004 study analyzed 190 articles from 383 authors. Wilson developed a number of categories about information activities as part of the 2000 and 2004 studies that indicate the scope of the articles analyzed and IM's diversity of subject matter. The remainder of the chapter presents comparative data between the 2000 and 2004 research studies. Joyce Kirk provides a hierarchy of five IM definitions. "IM as IT systems" and "information resource management" are two of these definitions. While it is difficult to clearly recognize any of the hierarchy statements as a definition for IM, what can be had from this hierarchy is the realization, as cviu te' and Wilson state in chapter 2, that IM "is used as an abbreviation for the management of IT, information systems management, management information systems, etc." (p. 20). Perhaps, the critical usefulness of the chapter resides not so much in that it offers any ready to apply definitions for IM but rather in that it provides an overall review about information. The latter can be helpful for a book intended as an information research reader and as an introduction to IM. WidenWulff examined 15 Finnish insurance businesses and developed scales for the measurement of open and closed organizations, and also presented learning organization attributes in different information environments. A 1999 study by Aiki Tibar about critical success factors (CSF) and information needs of successful Estonian companies is the centerpiece of the chapter. The study's findings are presented in relation to previous and more recent research on CSF. The study's methodology was qualitative in nature, involving semistructured interviews with managers and engineers from 25 of the most successful companies in Estonia; these companies were selected in a contest in 1998 as being included in the top 50 most successful companies. In terms of findings, IM was a CFS that was mentioned the most frequently.

0.0121107865 = product of:
  0.024221573 = sum of:
    0.024221573 = product of:
      0.048443146 = sum of:
        0.048443146 = weight(_text_:22 in 2749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048443146 = score(doc=2749,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.18072227 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051607955 = queryNorm
            0.268053 = fieldWeight in 2749, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2749)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Classification

658.4/038 22

Date

22. 3.2009 18:43:51

DDC

658.4/038 22

0.0069921655 = product of:
  0.013984331 = sum of:
    0.013984331 = product of:
      0.027968662 = sum of:
        0.027968662 = weight(_text_:22 in 320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027968662 = score(doc=320,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18072227 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051607955 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 320, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=320)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 5.2007 10:37:38