-
Seadle, M.: Copyright in a networked world : ethics and infringement (2004)
0.09
0.09175811 = product of:
0.18351622 = sum of:
0.18351622 = sum of:
0.1275789 = weight(_text_:2004 in 2833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1275789 = score(doc=2833,freq=5.0), product of:
0.21705271 = queryWeight, product of:
4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
0.051607955 = queryNorm
0.5877784 = fieldWeight in 2833, product of:
2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
5.0 = termFreq=5.0
4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2833)
0.055937324 = weight(_text_:22 in 2833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055937324 = score(doc=2833,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18072227 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051607955 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2833, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2833)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.106-110
- Year
- 2004
-
Miller, S.: Privacy, data bases and computers (1998)
0.01
0.013984331 = product of:
0.027968662 = sum of:
0.027968662 = product of:
0.055937324 = sum of:
0.055937324 = weight(_text_:22 in 3027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055937324 = score(doc=3027,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18072227 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051607955 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3027, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3027)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.1999 15:57:43
-
Hammwöhner, R.: Anmerkungen zur Grundlegung der Informationsethik (2006)
0.01
0.013984331 = product of:
0.027968662 = sum of:
0.027968662 = product of:
0.055937324 = sum of:
0.055937324 = weight(_text_:22 in 6063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055937324 = score(doc=6063,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18072227 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051607955 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6063, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6063)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13.10.2006 10:22:03
-
O'Neil, R.M.: Free speech in cyberspace (1998)
0.01
0.013984331 = product of:
0.027968662 = sum of:
0.027968662 = product of:
0.055937324 = sum of:
0.055937324 = weight(_text_:22 in 248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055937324 = score(doc=248,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18072227 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051607955 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 248, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=248)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.1999 15:50:50
-
Helbing, D.: ¬Das große Scheitern (2019)
0.01
0.013984331 = product of:
0.027968662 = sum of:
0.027968662 = product of:
0.055937324 = sum of:
0.055937324 = weight(_text_:22 in 5599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055937324 = score(doc=5599,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18072227 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051607955 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5599, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5599)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 25.12.2019 14:19:22
-
Kuhlen, R.: Informationsethik (2004)
0.01
0.013953941 = product of:
0.027907882 = sum of:
0.027907882 = product of:
0.055815764 = sum of:
0.055815764 = weight(_text_:2004 in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055815764 = score(doc=2905,freq=5.0), product of:
0.21705271 = queryWeight, product of:
4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
0.051607955 = queryNorm
0.25715303 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
5.0 = termFreq=5.0
4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Informationsethik ist Ethik von und für Menschen, deren Verhalten und Werte sich allerdings immer mehr in der Infosphere, in den Informationsumgebungen, entwickeln. Diese wiederum werden immer mehr von dem geprägt, was Telemediatisierung aller, auch und gerade der intellektuellen Lebenswelten genannt werden kann, also die Durchdringung dieser Lebenswelten mit Informations-, Kommunikations-, und Multi-/Hypermedia-Technologien. Daher kann in einem ersten Zugriff Informationsethik bestimmt werden als ein offenes Ensemble von Aussagen über normatives Verhalten gegenüber Wissen und Information, das sich in fortschreitend telemediatisierten Lebenswelten und in der Auseinandersetzung mit den in bisherigen Lebenswelten gültigen Werten und normativen Verhalten entwickelt. Die Abhängigkeit von dem Telemediatisierungsprozess könnte dazu verleiten, Informationsethik mit Computerethik oder Netzethik gleichzusetzen. Nicht alles, was am Thema Computer ethisch relevant sein könnte, sollte die Informationsethik für sich reklamieren - so wie die Informationswissenschaft ja auch einen spezifischeren Begriff von Information hat als die Informatik (vgl. Kap. A 1). Informationsethik ist Ethik in elektronischen Räumen. Das klingt spektakulär, ist aber doch keine Cyberethik, keine Ethik von epers(ons) (electronic personas), durch die in der virtuellen Realität z.B. Rechte und Pflichten von intelligenten Informationsassistenten (Cyborgs, Bots, Agenten) geregelt werden könnten. Solche Rechte von epers, wie z.B. "epers' rights include those of privacy, autonomy and anonymity" wurden und werden durchaus formuliert, so in einer ACM-Konferenz zum Thema Ethics in the Computer Age von 1995. Referenziert werden konnte diese Cyber-/Eper-Ethik auf die drei Asimovschen Gesetze für Roboter, die sich aber letztlich, anders als die Cyborgs and anders als die den Menschen ablösenden Maschinen von Hans Moravec, noch nicht von ihren Schöp fern, den Menschen, emanzipieren durften, sondern, im Sinne der ersten beiden Asimovschen Roboter-Gesetze, sich an den Interessen der Menschen auszurichten hatten. Erst dann, wenn diesen Interessen Genüge geleistet ist, dürften die Roboter auch an sich denken und Rechte und Freiheiten für sich reklamieren. Für Martha M. Smith in ihrem Information-Ethics-Artikel aus dem 32. Band der Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) ist Informationsethik "concerned with the ethical conflicts and issues that arise in the use of information, information technologies, and information systems", und zwar will sie dabei vor allem professionelle Aspekte angesprochen sehen, nicht Fragen persönlicher Ethik. Letztere können wir hier im Jahr 2004 nicht mehr so deutlich ausgrenzen, zumal die Bereiche professioneller Fachinformation und informationeller Alltagswelten auf den Publikumsmärkten durch die Telemediatisierung, durch die Ubiquität des Internet ineinander übergehen. Der Universalisierung der Informationsethik haben auch die drei UNESCO-INFOethics-Konferenzen (1997, 1990 und 2000) Rechnung getragen, bei denen das Ethos der Informationsspezialisten nur am Rande eine Rolle spielte. Vielmehr spiegelten die INFOethics-Themen die ethischen (und - im Sinne einer auf Aristoteles bezogenen Trias - zugleich die politischen und ökonomischen) Herausforderungen der (globalen) Informationsgesellschaft wider - die UNESCO bevorzugt eher den Plural und Wissensgesellschaften
- Year
- 2004
-
Chaves Guimaraes, J.A.; Fernández-Molina, J.C.; Pinho, F.A.; Oliveira Milani, S.: Ethics in the knowledge organization environment : an overview of values and problems in the LIS literature (2008)
0.01
0.012607496 = product of:
0.025214992 = sum of:
0.025214992 = product of:
0.050429985 = sum of:
0.050429985 = weight(_text_:2004 in 2513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050429985 = score(doc=2513,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21705271 = queryWeight, product of:
4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
0.051607955 = queryNorm
0.2323398 = fieldWeight in 2513, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2513)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Reflections on Information Science have been focused mostly on information access and dissemination, not on ethical aspects of knowledge organization and representation (KOR). This leads us to investigate the existence of ethical values - and problems - which have impact on this field, especially since they are not discussed, although they are revealed in everyday practice. Therefore, and trying to contribute to a further reflection on the lack of literature on ethics in KOR, this paper analyses the Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology JASIST, Journal of Documentation, Knowledge Organization, Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, The Indexer and Ethics and Information Technology in the period between 1995 and 2004. The results reveal two complementary dimensions: one concerning the respect of diversity and the other concerning the specificity warrant. The latter, which may prove the relevance of the theoretical principles announced by Hudon (1997), Beghtol (2002, 2005) and Garcia Gutierrez (2002), relative to a transcultural ethics of mediation that reflects diversity (fitted with a precision that, many times, passes by the dimension of multilingualism), making use of tools that may provide cultural warrant to knowledge representation.
-
Aghemo, A.: Etica professionale e servizio di informazione (1993)
0.01
0.01223629 = product of:
0.02447258 = sum of:
0.02447258 = product of:
0.04894516 = sum of:
0.04894516 = weight(_text_:22 in 2453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04894516 = score(doc=2453,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18072227 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051607955 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2453, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2453)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 4.1996 13:22:31
-
Lengauer, E.: Analytische Rechtsethik im Kontext säkularer Begründungsdiskurse zur Würde biologischer Entitäten (2008)
0.01
0.01223629 = product of:
0.02447258 = sum of:
0.02447258 = product of:
0.04894516 = sum of:
0.04894516 = weight(_text_:22 in 1697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04894516 = score(doc=1697,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18072227 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051607955 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1697, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1697)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17. 3.2008 15:17:22
-
Van der Walt, M.S.: Ethics in indexing and clssification (2006)
0.01
0.010085997 = product of:
0.020171994 = sum of:
0.020171994 = product of:
0.04034399 = sum of:
0.04034399 = weight(_text_:2004 in 5876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04034399 = score(doc=5876,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21705271 = queryWeight, product of:
4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
0.051607955 = queryNorm
0.18587184 = fieldWeight in 5876, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5876)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Wissensorganisation und Verantwortung: Gesellschaftliche, ökonomische und technische Aspekte. Proceedings der 9. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Duisburg, 5.-7. November 2004. Hrsg. von H.P. Ohly u.a
-
Frohmann, B.: Subjectivity and information ethics (2008)
0.01
0.010085997 = product of:
0.020171994 = sum of:
0.020171994 = product of:
0.04034399 = sum of:
0.04034399 = weight(_text_:2004 in 1360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04034399 = score(doc=1360,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21705271 = queryWeight, product of:
4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
0.051607955 = queryNorm
0.18587184 = fieldWeight in 1360, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1360)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In A Brief History of Information Ethics, Thomas Froehlich (2004) quickly surveyed under several broad categories some of the many issues that constitute information ethics: under the category of librarianship - censorship, privacy, access, balance in collections, copyright, fair use, and codes of ethics; under information science, which Froehlich sees as closely related to librarianship - confidentiality, bias, and quality of information; under computer ethics - intellectual property, privacy, fair representation, nonmaleficence, computer crime, software reliability, artificial intelligence, and e-commerce; under cyberethics (issues related to the Internet, or cyberspace) - expert systems, artificial intelligence (again), and robotics; under media ethics - news, impartiality, journalistic ethics, deceit, lies, sexuality, censorship (again), and violence in the press; and under intercultural information ethics - digital divide, and the ethical role of the Internet for social, political, cultural, and economic development. Many of the debates in information ethics, on these and other issues, have to do with specific kinds of relationships between subjects. The most important subject and a familiar figure in information ethics is the ethical subject engaged in moral deliberation, whether appearing as the bearer of moral rights and obligations to other subjects, or as an agent whose actions are judged, whether by others or by oneself, according to the standards of various moral codes and ethical principles. Many debates in information ethics revolve around conflicts between those acting according to principles of unfettered access to information and those finding some information offensive or harmful. Subjectivity is at the heart of information ethics. But how is subjectivity understood? Can it be understood in ways that broaden ethical reflection to include problems that remain invisible when subjectivity is taken for granted and when how it is created remains unquestioned? This article proposes some answers by investigating the meaning and role of subjectivity in information ethics.[In an article on cyberethics (2000), I asserted that there was no information ethics in any special sense beyond the application of general ethical principles to information services. Here, I take a more expansive view.]
-
Reed, G.M.; Sanders, J.W.: ¬The principle of distribution (2008)
0.01
0.008740207 = product of:
0.017480414 = sum of:
0.017480414 = product of:
0.03496083 = sum of:
0.03496083 = weight(_text_:22 in 1868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03496083 = score(doc=1868,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18072227 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051607955 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1868, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1868)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 6.2008 12:22:41
-
Homan, P.A.: Library catalog notes for "bad books" : ethics vs. responsibilities (2012)
0.01
0.008740207 = product of:
0.017480414 = sum of:
0.017480414 = product of:
0.03496083 = sum of:
0.03496083 = weight(_text_:22 in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03496083 = score(doc=420,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18072227 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051607955 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27. 9.2012 14:22:00
-
Information ethics : privacy, property, and power (2005)
0.01
0.0061802594 = product of:
0.012360519 = sum of:
0.012360519 = product of:
0.024721038 = sum of:
0.024721038 = weight(_text_:22 in 2392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024721038 = score(doc=2392,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18072227 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051607955 = queryNorm
0.13679022 = fieldWeight in 2392, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2392)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Classification
- 323.44/5 22 (GBV;LoC)
- DDC
- 323.44/5 22 (GBV;LoC)
-
"Code of Ethics" verabschiedet (2007)
0.01
0.006118145 = product of:
0.01223629 = sum of:
0.01223629 = product of:
0.02447258 = sum of:
0.02447258 = weight(_text_:22 in 459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02447258 = score(doc=459,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18072227 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051607955 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 459, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=459)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Im Rahmen des 3. Leipziger Kongresses für Information und Bibliothek 19.-22. März 2007 hat Bibliothek & Information Deutschland (BID) die im folgenden wiedergegebenen "Ethischen Grundsätze der Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufe" verabschiedet und der Presse und Fachöffentlichkeit vorgestellt. Damit folgt Deutschland den rund 40 Ländern weltweit, die bereits einen "Code of Ethics" veröffentlicht haben. Diese ethischen Richtlinien sind auf der IFLA/FAIFE-Website gesammelt unter www.ifla.org/faife/ethics/codes.htm.
-
"Code of Ethics" verabschiedet (2007)
0.01
0.0052441237 = product of:
0.0104882475 = sum of:
0.0104882475 = product of:
0.020976495 = sum of:
0.020976495 = weight(_text_:22 in 462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020976495 = score(doc=462,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18072227 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051607955 = queryNorm
0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 462, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=462)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Im Rahmen des 3. Leipziger Kongresses für Information und Bibliothek 19.-22. März 2007 hat Bibliothek & Information Deutschland (BID) die im folgenden wiedergegebenen "Ethischen Grundsätze der Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufe" verabschiedet und der Presse und Fachöffentlichkeit vorgestellt. Damit folgt Deutschland den rund 40 Ländern weltweit, die bereits einen "Code of Ethics" veröffentlicht haben. Diese ethischen Richtlinien sind auf der IFLA/FAIFE-Website gesammelt unter www.ifla.org/faife/ethics/codes.htm.
