Search (57 results, page 1 of 3)

0.073265046 = product of:
  0.14653009 = sum of:
    0.14653009 = product of:
      0.29306018 = sum of:
        0.29306018 = weight(_text_:plus in 3725) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.29306018 = score(doc=3725,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.94480413 = fieldWeight in 3725, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3725)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Reports the responses of 32 Chinese, Taiwanese, Japanese, and Korean participants to the possible extensions to an OPAC of OCLC CJK Plus. Korean and Taiwanese participants are less satisfied with the system than are Japanese and Chinese. Unfamiliarity with the CJK word division, diacritics, Romanization, and lack of local standard keyboard support were the major reasons for this dissatisfaction. More comprehensive studies of each CJK language, and more user interface studies, are needed if a better system is to emerge

Object

OCLC CJK PLus

0.06410692 = product of:
  0.12821384 = sum of:
    0.12821384 = product of:
      0.25642768 = sum of:
        0.25642768 = weight(_text_:plus in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25642768 = score(doc=3061,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.8267036 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This article reports the findings of an experiment using a simulated title pages, author surnames, and title words, one-third of which were selected by each of the 3 authors, to determine the frequency of one-screen displays when used to search for known items in an implied Boolean retrieval system. Searches comprising surname plus one significant title word produced one-screen displays 78% of time; surname plus 2 words 97% of the time; and surname plus 3 words 98,5%. Three quarters of the significant words were nouns

0.05982066 = product of:
  0.11964132 = sum of:
    0.11964132 = product of:
      0.23928264 = sum of:
        0.23928264 = weight(_text_:plus in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23928264 = score(doc=3726,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.7714293 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Outlines the problems of automated cataloguing systems for Chinese, Japanese and Korean (CJK) language materials. Describes the systems developed by the Research Library Information Network and OCLC in the 1980s, and the second generation system, CJK Plus, released by OCLC in 1993. Outlines how the latter system is being used by the East Asiatic Library at University of Colorado at Boulder

Object

OCLC CJK Plus

0.05982066 = product of:
  0.11964132 = sum of:
    0.11964132 = product of:
      0.23928264 = sum of:
        0.23928264 = weight(_text_:plus in 4296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23928264 = score(doc=4296,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.7714293 = fieldWeight in 4296, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4296)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This experiment searches an online library catalog employing author surnames, plus title words of books in citations of 8 scholarly works whose authors selected the title words used as being recallable. Searches comprising surname together with two recallable title words, or one if only one was available, yielded a single-screen miniature catalog (minicat) 99.0% of the time

0.05287449 = product of:
  0.10574898 = sum of:
    0.10574898 = product of:
      0.21149796 = sum of:
        0.21149796 = weight(_text_:plus in 3841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21149796 = score(doc=3841,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.6818536 = fieldWeight in 3841, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3841)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Describes ILLINET Online Plus: the extended OPAC developed by Illinois Univ. at Urbana-Champaign Library. Describes in detail the component of the information workstation designed to provide improved access to local periodical index databases (the BRS/SEARCH interface)

0.052343078 = product of:
  0.104686156 = sum of:
    0.104686156 = product of:
      0.20937231 = sum of:
        0.20937231 = weight(_text_:plus in 6932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20937231 = score(doc=6932,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.67500067 = fieldWeight in 6932, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6932)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This experiment explores the effectiveness of retrieving the listing of a known-item book from the 3.6 million entry onine catalog at the library of the University of Michigan using various combinations of author's name plus first and last title words. The principal finding was that 98.9% of the time a 1 to 20 line miniature catalog (minicat) was displayed that contained either the entry sought or a not-in-database (NID) reply when the search comprised all three words.

0.04229959 = product of:
  0.08459918 = sum of:
    0.08459918 = product of:
      0.16919836 = sum of:
        0.16919836 = weight(_text_:plus in 2160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16919836 = score(doc=2160,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.5454829 = fieldWeight in 2160, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2160)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Arizona State University installed the Tandem-based CARL integrated library system in 1987. This software supports all the traditional functions of an integrated system plus the ability to act as a platform for creating or loading multiple databases. The functionality of CARL software for this purpose is described, a brief rundown of databases loaded at ASU is provided, and the criteria for selecting databases is given. Public response and library instruction issues for locally loaded databases are briefly examined as is the future of the electronic library

0.04229959 = product of:
  0.08459918 = sum of:
    0.08459918 = product of:
      0.16919836 = sum of:
        0.16919836 = weight(_text_:plus in 3826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16919836 = score(doc=3826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.5454829 = fieldWeight in 3826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3826)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Reports the findings of an experiment simulating use of a university OPAC by academic library users. Examines how effective are online searches by university library users employing surname plus first title word, or last title word, or first and last title words in producing miniature catalogues of i screen. The searches were known item searches for books

0.04229959 = product of:
  0.08459918 = sum of:
    0.08459918 = product of:
      0.16919836 = sum of:
        0.16919836 = weight(_text_:plus in 409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16919836 = score(doc=409,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.5454829 = fieldWeight in 409, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=409)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The academic library user demands a variety of information, but moving between the online catalogue and other databases can be difficult, confusing and cumbersome. Information services at Sunderland University, UK, has employed Pac Plus for Windows, an Ameritech Library Services online public catalogue product, to provide an alternative to, but not replace, the existing front end of the public catalogue, and to facilitate the provision of access to full text examination papers, module guides and selected journal content papers. Looks at the scanning and set up implications, advantages, user reactions and future developments

0.037012145 = product of:
  0.07402429 = sum of:
    0.07402429 = product of:
      0.14804858 = sum of:
        0.14804858 = weight(_text_:plus in 637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14804858 = score(doc=637,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.4772975 = fieldWeight in 637, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=637)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This article reprots the findings of an experiment employing a simulated scholarly use of an OPAC to determine the frequency of one-screen displays when a scholar searches for a known-item with so-called 'keywords' in an implied boolean system. The experiment revealed that a 'keyword' search formula comprising surname plus first and last title words produced a single screen 92.8% of the time, thereby reducing the failure of traditional title searching to produce single screens by nearly one half; such a formula also enables a scholar to search successfully with abbreviated, unsearchable bibliographic citations. Additional research should be carried out, for if it is further demonstrated that replacing traditional bibliographic catalog entries with transcribed title pages provides an improved known-item OPAC, users would benefit and libraries would enjoy huge savings

0.031724695 = product of:
  0.06344939 = sum of:
    0.06344939 = product of:
      0.12689878 = sum of:
        0.12689878 = weight(_text_:plus in 7327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12689878 = score(doc=7327,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.40911216 = fieldWeight in 7327, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7327)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Describes the design and continuing development of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Library Information Workstation, which provides the primary, in-library user acces to ILLINET Online Plus, the library's extended OPAC system. Briefly describes the automated library information resources and information processing environment as they have influenced the design and development of the Library Information Workstation. Discusses its philosophy and approach in the context of relevant information access issues and user needs and requirements. Features of the current Library Information Workstation implementation are then described using illustrations focused particularly on integrated access to local (resident on individual workstations) information fields and an integrated end user interface for bibliographic database searching. Ongoing development plans also are discussed briefly

0.02723855 = product of:
  0.0544771 = sum of:
    0.0544771 = product of:
      0.1089542 = sum of:
        0.1089542 = weight(_text_:22 in 7403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1089542 = score(doc=7403,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7403, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7403)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Program. 22(1988), S.21-31

0.02723855 = product of:
  0.0544771 = sum of:
    0.0544771 = product of:
      0.1089542 = sum of:
        0.1089542 = weight(_text_:22 in 7483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1089542 = score(doc=7483,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7483, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7483)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Program. 22(1988), S.133-142

0.017024094 = product of:
  0.03404819 = sum of:
    0.03404819 = product of:
      0.06809638 = sum of:
        0.06809638 = weight(_text_:22 in 6437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06809638 = score(doc=6437,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6437, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6437)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 22(1993) no.2, S.23-26

0.017024094 = product of:
  0.03404819 = sum of:
    0.03404819 = product of:
      0.06809638 = sum of:
        0.06809638 = weight(_text_:22 in 1942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06809638 = score(doc=1942,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1942, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1942)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

16. 8.1998 11:22:08

0.013619275 = product of:
  0.02723855 = sum of:
    0.02723855 = product of:
      0.0544771 = sum of:
        0.0544771 = weight(_text_:22 in 3098) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0544771 = score(doc=3098,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3098, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3098)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Canadian journal of information science. 16(1991) no.4, S.2-22

0.013619275 = product of:
  0.02723855 = sum of:
    0.02723855 = product of:
      0.0544771 = sum of:
        0.0544771 = weight(_text_:22 in 3860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0544771 = score(doc=3860,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3860, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3860)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

OCLC micro. 7(1991) no.6, S.19-22

0.013619275 = product of:
  0.02723855 = sum of:
    0.02723855 = product of:
      0.0544771 = sum of:
        0.0544771 = weight(_text_:22 in 8477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0544771 = score(doc=8477,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 8477, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8477)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

LASIE. 28(1997) no.4, S.22-34

0.013619275 = product of:
  0.02723855 = sum of:
    0.02723855 = product of:
      0.0544771 = sum of:
        0.0544771 = weight(_text_:22 in 3099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0544771 = score(doc=3099,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3099, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3099)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

School library journal. 41(1995) no.7, S.22-25

0.013619275 = product of:
  0.02723855 = sum of:
    0.02723855 = product of:
      0.0544771 = sum of:
        0.0544771 = weight(_text_:22 in 4165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0544771 = score(doc=4165,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4165, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4165)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Program. 22(1988), S.1-20