Search (684 results, page 1 of 35)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Medeiros, N.: Metadata : semantics plus structure plus syntax (2000) 0.12 
    0.11964132 = product of:
  0.23928264 = sum of:
    0.23928264 = product of:
      0.47856528 = sum of:
        0.47856528 = weight(_text_:plus in 3899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.47856528 = score(doc=3899,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            1.5428586 = fieldWeight in 3899, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3899)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  2. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.10 
    0.10025631 = sum of:
  0.0798274 = product of:
    0.23948218 = sum of:
      0.23948218 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.23948218 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.4261112 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05026075 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.02042891 = product of:
    0.04085782 = sum of:
      0.04085782 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04085782 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05026075 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  3. Kilgour, F.G.; Moran, B.B.: Surname plus recallable title word searches for known items by scholars (2000) 0.06 
    0.05982066 = product of:
  0.11964132 = sum of:
    0.11964132 = product of:
      0.23928264 = sum of:
        0.23928264 = weight(_text_:plus in 4296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23928264 = score(doc=4296,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.7714293 = fieldWeight in 4296, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4296)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This experiment searches an online library catalog employing author surnames, plus title words of books in citations of 8 scholarly works whose authors selected the title words used as being recallable. Searches comprising surname together with two recallable title words, or one if only one was available, yielded a single-screen miniature catalog (minicat) 99.0% of the time
  4. Greisdorf, H.; O'Connor, B.: Nodes of topicality modeling user notions of on topic documents (2003) 0.05 
    0.05287449 = product of:
  0.10574898 = sum of:
    0.10574898 = product of:
      0.21149796 = sum of:
        0.21149796 = weight(_text_:plus in 5175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21149796 = score(doc=5175,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.6818536 = fieldWeight in 5175, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5175)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Griesdorf and O'Connor attempt to determine the aspects of a retrieved item that provide a questioner with evidence that the item is in fact on the topic searched independent of its relevance. To this end they collect data from 32 participants, 11 from the business community as well as 21 doctoral students at the University of North Texas each of whom were asked to state if they considered material that approaches a topic in each of 14 specific manners as " on topic" or "off topic." Chi-square indicates that the observed values are significantly different from expected values and the chi-square residuals for on topic judgements exceed plus or minus two in eight cases and plus two in five cases. The positive values which indicate a percentage of response greater than that from chance suggest that documents considered topical are only related to the problem at hand, contain terms that were in the query, and describe, explain or expand the topic of the query. The chi-square residuals for off topic judgements exceed plus or minus two in ten cases and plus two in four cases. The positive values suggest that documents considered not topical exhibit a contrasting, contrary, or confounding point of view, or merely spark curiosity. Such material might well be relevant, but is not judged topical. This suggests that topical appropriateness may best be achieved using the Bruza, et alia, left compositional monotonicity approach.
  5. Kilgour, F.G.: Known-item online searches employed by scholars using surnames plus first, or last, or first and last title words (2001) 0.05 
    0.052343078 = product of:
  0.104686156 = sum of:
    0.104686156 = product of:
      0.20937231 = sum of:
        0.20937231 = weight(_text_:plus in 6932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20937231 = score(doc=6932,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.67500067 = fieldWeight in 6932, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6932)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This experiment explores the effectiveness of retrieving the listing of a known-item book from the 3.6 million entry onine catalog at the library of the University of Michigan using various combinations of author's name plus first and last title words. The principal finding was that 98.9% of the time a 1 to 20 line miniature catalog (minicat) was displayed that contained either the entry sought or a not-in-database (NID) reply when the search comprised all three words.
  6. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.05 
    0.04656598 = product of:
  0.09313196 = sum of:
    0.09313196 = product of:
      0.27939588 = sum of:
        0.27939588 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.27939588 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4261112 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  7. Khurshid, Z.: Analytical cataloging of full-text journal databases at a Middle East university (2001) 0.04 
    0.04229959 = product of:
  0.08459918 = sum of:
    0.08459918 = product of:
      0.16919836 = sum of:
        0.16919836 = weight(_text_:plus in 5429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16919836 = score(doc=5429,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.5454829 = fieldWeight in 5429, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5429)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    With the availability of full-text journals in CD-ROM and aggregator databases, libraries need to provide bibliographic and online access to these titles through the OPAC. The article reviews the experience of the King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals Library in providing analytical cataloging to the journal-title level of full-text CD-ROM databases, including Business Periodicals Ondisc (BPO), IEEE/ IEE Electronic Library (IEL), Applied Science & Technology Plus (AS&TP), and Readers' Guide Abstracts (RGA).
  8. Tennis, J.T.: Epistemology, theory, and methodology in knowledge organization : toward a classification, metatheory, and research framework (2008) 0.04 
    0.04229959 = product of:
  0.08459918 = sum of:
    0.08459918 = product of:
      0.16919836 = sum of:
        0.16919836 = weight(_text_:plus in 2132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16919836 = score(doc=2132,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.5454829 = fieldWeight in 2132, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2132)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper proposes a preliminary classification of knowledge organization research, divided among epistemology, theory, and methodology plus three sphere of research: design, study, and critique. This work is situated in a metatheoretical framework, drawn from sociological thought. Example works are presented along with preliminary classification. The classification is then briefly described as a comparison tool which can be used to demonstrate overlap and divergence in cognate discourses of knowledge organization (such as ontology engineering).
  9. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.04 
    0.0399137 = product of:
  0.0798274 = sum of:
    0.0798274 = product of:
      0.23948218 = sum of:
        0.23948218 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23948218 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4261112 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  10. Hawking, D.; Robertson, S.: On collection size and retrieval effectiveness (2003) 0.04 
    0.038521126 = product of:
  0.07704225 = sum of:
    0.07704225 = product of:
      0.1540845 = sum of:
        0.1540845 = weight(_text_:22 in 4109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1540845 = score(doc=4109,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4109, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4109)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    14. 8.2005 14:22:22
  11. Hepp, M.; Bruijn, J. de: GenTax : a generic methodology for deriving OWL and RDF-S ontologies from hierarchical classifications, thesauri, and inconsistent taxonomies (2007) 0.04 
    0.03738791 = product of:
  0.07477582 = sum of:
    0.07477582 = product of:
      0.14955164 = sum of:
        0.14955164 = weight(_text_:plus in 4692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14955164 = score(doc=4692,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.4821433 = fieldWeight in 4692, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4692)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Hierarchical classifications, thesauri, and informal taxonomies are likely the most valuable input for creating, at reasonable cost, non-toy ontologies in many domains. They contain, readily available, a wealth of category definitions plus a hierarchy, and they reflect some degree of community consensus. However, their transformation into useful ontologies is not as straightforward as it appears. In this paper, we show that (1) it often depends on the context of usage whether an informal hierarchical categorization schema is a classification, a thesaurus, or a taxonomy, and (2) present a novel methodology for automatically deriving consistent RDF-S and OWL ontologies from such schemas. Finally, we (3) demonstrate the usefulness of this approach by transforming the two e-business categorization standards eCl@ss and UNSPSC into ontologies that overcome the limitations of earlier prototypes. Our approach allows for the script-based creation of meaningful ontology classes for a particular context while preserving the original hierarchy, even if the latter is not a real subsumption hierarchy in this particular context. Human intervention in the transformation is limited to checking some conceptual properties and identifying frequent anomalies, and the only input required is an informal categorization plus a notion of the target context. In particular, the approach does not require instance data, as ontology learning approaches would usually do.
  12. Dittmann, H.; Hardy, J.: Learn Library of Congress Classification (2000) 0.04 
    0.037012145 = product of:
  0.07402429 = sum of:
    0.07402429 = product of:
      0.14804858 = sum of:
        0.14804858 = weight(_text_:plus in 6826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14804858 = score(doc=6826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.4772975 = fieldWeight in 6826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6826)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Enthält die Kapitel: Introduction to classification - Introduction to LCC - Structure of LCC - Building a call number - Tables - Shelving - Classification Plus - More practice - Excercises - Answers
  13. Száva-Kováts, E.: Indirect-collective referencing (ICR) in the elite journal literature of physics : I: a literature science study on the journal level (2001) 0.04 
    0.037012145 = product of:
  0.07402429 = sum of:
    0.07402429 = product of:
      0.14804858 = sum of:
        0.14804858 = weight(_text_:plus in 5180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14804858 = score(doc=5180,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.4772975 = fieldWeight in 5180, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5180)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In the second bibliometric paper SzavaKovtas uses ``indirectcollective references, ICR'' to mean such instances as those in which an author refers to, ``the references contained therein,'' when referring to another source. Having previously shown a high instance of occurrences in Physical Reviews, he now uses the January 1997 issues of 40 journals from the ISI physics category plus two optics journals, an instrumentation journal, and a physics journal launched in 1997, to locate ICR. The phenomena exists in all but one of the sampled journals and in the next, but unsampled, issue of that journal. Overall 17% of papers sampled display ICR with little fluctuation within internal categories.
  14. Buzydlowski, J.W.; White, H.D.; Lin, X.: Term Co-occurrence Analysis as an Interface for Digital Libraries (2002) 0.04 
    0.035383914 = product of:
  0.07076783 = sum of:
    0.07076783 = product of:
      0.14153565 = sum of:
        0.14153565 = weight(_text_:22 in 1339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14153565 = score(doc=1339,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.804159 = fieldWeight in 1339, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1339)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 2.2003 17:25:39
    22. 2.2003 18:16:22
  15. Hemminger, B.M.: Introduction to the special issue on bioinformatics (2005) 0.03 
    0.033705987 = product of:
  0.067411974 = sum of:
    0.067411974 = product of:
      0.13482395 = sum of:
        0.13482395 = weight(_text_:22 in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13482395 = score(doc=4189,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 14:19:22
  16. Ackermann, E.: Piaget's constructivism, Papert's constructionism : what's the difference? (2001) 0.03 
    0.03326142 = product of:
  0.06652284 = sum of:
    0.06652284 = product of:
      0.1995685 = sum of:
        0.1995685 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1995685 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4261112 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.
  17. Abt, H.A.; Garfield, E.: Is the relationship between numbers of references and paper lengths the same for all sciences? (2002) 0.03 
    0.031724695 = product of:
  0.06344939 = sum of:
    0.06344939 = product of:
      0.12689878 = sum of:
        0.12689878 = weight(_text_:plus in 5223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12689878 = score(doc=5223,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.40911216 = fieldWeight in 5223, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5223)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    It has been shown in the physical sciences that a paper's length is related to its number of references in a linear manner. Abt and Garfield here look at the life and social sciences with the thought that if the relation holds the citation counts will provide a measure of relative importance across these disciplines. In the life sciences 200 research papers from 1999-2000 were scanned in each of 10 journals to produce counts of 1000 word normalized pages. In the social sciences an average of 70 research papers in nine journals were scanned for the two-year period. Papers of average length in the various sciences have the same average number of references within plus or minus 17%. A look at the 30 to 60 papers over the two years in 18 review journals indicates twice the references of research papers of the same length.
  18. Mah, Y.M.: Cataloging plus : philosophy and practice at a small college library (2000) 0.03 
    0.031724695 = product of:
  0.06344939 = sum of:
    0.06344939 = product of:
      0.12689878 = sum of:
        0.12689878 = weight(_text_:plus in 5389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12689878 = score(doc=5389,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.40911216 = fieldWeight in 5389, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5389)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  19. Ruan, L.: Providing better subject access to nonprint fire emergency materials for Illinois firefighters : its history, use and future (2001) 0.03 
    0.031724695 = product of:
  0.06344939 = sum of:
    0.06344939 = product of:
      0.12689878 = sum of:
        0.12689878 = weight(_text_:plus in 5414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12689878 = score(doc=5414,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.40911216 = fieldWeight in 5414, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5414)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The Illinois Fire Service Institute Library (FSI Library) has the most comprehensive and popular nonprint fire emergency collection in Illinois. Besides providing descriptive cataloging for nonprint materials, the Library assigns in-depth subject terms and modified Library of Congress Classification to the catalog records. The Library reviewed its subject list and found numerous inconsistencies and duplications, because catalog records are acquired from sources using different subject vocabularies. The Library began a project in August 1999 to map the Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH), Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) from the National Library of Medicine, and other fire vocabulary systems. The project developers created FireTalk, a new FSI thesaurus with a mix of LCSH, MeSH terms (identified as such), plus more specific fire science terms. FireTalk is used with the Library's Online Public Access Catalog at the Institute's website to enhance retrieval of relevant bibliographic citations and facilitate multiple database searching.
  20. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Overview of ISO NP 25964 : structured vocabularies for information retrieval (2007) 0.03 
    0.031724695 = product of:
  0.06344939 = sum of:
    0.06344939 = product of:
      0.12689878 = sum of:
        0.12689878 = weight(_text_:plus in 535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12689878 = score(doc=535,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.40911216 = fieldWeight in 535, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=535)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    ISO 2788 and ISO 5964, the international standards for monolingual and multilingual thesauri respectively dated 1986 and 1985, are very much in need of revision. A proposal to revise them was recently approved by the relevant subcommittee, ISO TC46/SC9. The work will be based on BS 8723, a five part standard of which Parts 1 and 2 were published in 2005, Parts 3 and 4 are scheduled for publication in 2007, and Part 5 is still in draft. This subsession will address aspects of the whole revision project. It is conceived as a panel session starting with a brief overview from the project leader. Then there are three presentations of 15 minutes, plus 5 minutes each for specific questions. At the end we have 20 minutes for questions to any or all of the panel, and discussion of issues from the workshop participants.

Authors

Types

  • a 574
  • m 67
  • el 47
  • s 32
  • b 24
  • x 2
  • i 1
  • n 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications