-
Száva-Kováts, E.: Indirect-collective referencing (ICR) in the elite journal literature of physics : I: a literature science study on the journal level (2001)
0.04
0.037012145 = product of:
0.07402429 = sum of:
0.07402429 = product of:
0.14804858 = sum of:
0.14804858 = weight(_text_:plus in 5180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14804858 = score(doc=5180,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.4772975 = fieldWeight in 5180, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5180)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In the second bibliometric paper SzavaKovtas uses ``indirectcollective references, ICR'' to mean such instances as those in which an author refers to, ``the references contained therein,'' when referring to another source. Having previously shown a high instance of occurrences in Physical Reviews, he now uses the January 1997 issues of 40 journals from the ISI physics category plus two optics journals, an instrumentation journal, and a physics journal launched in 1997, to locate ICR. The phenomena exists in all but one of the sampled journals and in the next, but unsampled, issue of that journal. Overall 17% of papers sampled display ICR with little fluctuation within internal categories.
-
Abt, H.A.; Garfield, E.: Is the relationship between numbers of references and paper lengths the same for all sciences? (2002)
0.03
0.031724695 = product of:
0.06344939 = sum of:
0.06344939 = product of:
0.12689878 = sum of:
0.12689878 = weight(_text_:plus in 5223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12689878 = score(doc=5223,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.40911216 = fieldWeight in 5223, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5223)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- It has been shown in the physical sciences that a paper's length is related to its number of references in a linear manner. Abt and Garfield here look at the life and social sciences with the thought that if the relation holds the citation counts will provide a measure of relative importance across these disciplines. In the life sciences 200 research papers from 1999-2000 were scanned in each of 10 journals to produce counts of 1000 word normalized pages. In the social sciences an average of 70 research papers in nine journals were scanned for the two-year period. Papers of average length in the various sciences have the same average number of references within plus or minus 17%. A look at the 30 to 60 papers over the two years in 18 review journals indicates twice the references of research papers of the same length.
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.03
0.02723855 = product of:
0.0544771 = sum of:
0.0544771 = product of:
0.1089542 = sum of:
0.1089542 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1089542 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992)
0.03
0.02723855 = product of:
0.0544771 = sum of:
0.0544771 = product of:
0.1089542 = sum of:
0.1089542 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1089542 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 7. 2.2005 14:10:22
-
Case, D.O.; Higgins, G.M.: How can we investigate citation behavior? : A study of reasons for citing literature in communication (2000)
0.03
0.026437245 = product of:
0.05287449 = sum of:
0.05287449 = product of:
0.10574898 = sum of:
0.10574898 = weight(_text_:plus in 4775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10574898 = score(doc=4775,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.3409268 = fieldWeight in 4775, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4775)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Authors' motivation for citing documents are addressed through a literature review and an empirical study. Replicating an investigation in psychology, the works of 2 highly-cited authors in the discipline of communication were identified, and all of the authros who cited them during the period 1995-1997 were surveyed. The instrument posed 32 questions about why a certain document was cited, plus questions about the citer's relationship to the cited author and document. Most findings were similar to the psychology study, including a tendency to cite 'concept markers' representing a genre of work. Authors in communication were more likely to have an interpersonal connection to cited authors, and to cite literatire reviews - their most common reason for citation. 3 types of judgements about cited works were found to best predict citation: (1) that the work was novel, well-known, and a concept-marker; (2) that citing it might promote the authority of one's own work; and (3) that the work deserved criticism. Suggestions are made for further research, especially regarding the anomalous role of creativity in cited works
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.02
0.024075704 = product of:
0.048151407 = sum of:
0.048151407 = product of:
0.096302815 = sum of:
0.096302815 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.096302815 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002)
0.02
0.017024094 = product of:
0.03404819 = sum of:
0.03404819 = product of:
0.06809638 = sum of:
0.06809638 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06809638 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009)
0.01
0.014445423 = product of:
0.028890846 = sum of:
0.028890846 = product of:
0.057781693 = sum of:
0.057781693 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057781693 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:22:35
-
Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013)
0.01
0.013619275 = product of:
0.02723855 = sum of:
0.02723855 = product of:
0.0544771 = sum of:
0.0544771 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0544771 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17.12.2013 11:02:22
-
Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001)
0.01
0.011916866 = product of:
0.023833731 = sum of:
0.023833731 = product of:
0.047667462 = sum of:
0.047667462 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047667462 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 16.12.2001 14:01:22
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.; Goodrum, G.: ¬The diffusion of theories : a functional approach (2006)
0.01
0.011916866 = product of:
0.023833731 = sum of:
0.023833731 = product of:
0.047667462 = sum of:
0.047667462 = weight(_text_:22 in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047667462 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:20:01
-
Tay, A.: ¬The next generation discovery citation indexes : a review of the landscape in 2020 (2020)
0.01
0.011916866 = product of:
0.023833731 = sum of:
0.023833731 = product of:
0.047667462 = sum of:
0.047667462 = weight(_text_:22 in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047667462 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17.11.2020 12:22:59
-
Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996)
0.01
0.010214455 = product of:
0.02042891 = sum of:
0.02042891 = product of:
0.04085782 = sum of:
0.04085782 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04085782 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
-
Snyder, H.; Bonzi, S.: Patterns of self-citation across disciplines : 1980-1989 (1998)
0.01
0.010214455 = product of:
0.02042891 = sum of:
0.02042891 = product of:
0.04085782 = sum of:
0.04085782 = weight(_text_:22 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04085782 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:33:24
-
wst: Cut-and-paste-Wissenschaft (2003)
0.01
0.010214455 = product of:
0.02042891 = sum of:
0.02042891 = product of:
0.04085782 = sum of:
0.04085782 = weight(_text_:22 in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04085782 = score(doc=1270,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- "Mikhail Simkin und Vwani Roychowdhury von der University of Califomia, Los Angeles, haben eine in der wissenschaftlichen Gemeinschaft verbreitete Unsitte erstmals quantitativ erfasst. Die Wissenschaftler analysierten die Verbreitung von Druckfehlern in den Literaturlisten wissenschaftlicher Arbeiten (www.arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0212043). 78 Prozent aller zitierten Aufsätze - so schätzen die Forscher - haben die zitierenden Wissenschaftler demnach nicht gelesen, sondern nur per 'cut and paste' von einer Vorlage in ihre eigene Literaturliste übernommen. Das könne man beispielsweise abschätzen aus der Analyse fehlerhafter Seitenangaben in der Literaturliste eines 1973 veröffentlichten Aufsatzes über die Struktur zweidimensionaler Kristalle: Dieser Aufsatz ist rund 4300 mal zitiert worden. In 196 Fällen enthalten die Zitate jedoch Fehler in der Jahreszahl, dem Band der Zeitschrift oder der Seitenzahl, die als Indikatoren für cut and paste genommen werden können, denn man kann, obwohl es Milliarden Möglichkeiten gibt, nur 45 verschiedene Arten von Druckfehlern unterscheiden. In erster Näherung ergibt sich eine Obergrenze für die Zahl der `echten Leser' daher aus der Zahl der unterscheidbaren Druckfehler (45) geteilt durch die Gesamtzahl der Publikationen mit Druckfehler (196), das macht etwa 22 Prozent."
-
Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006)
0.01
0.010214455 = product of:
0.02042891 = sum of:
0.02042891 = product of:
0.04085782 = sum of:
0.04085782 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04085782 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 3. 1.2007 17:22:03
-
H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008)
0.01
0.010214455 = product of:
0.02042891 = sum of:
0.02042891 = product of:
0.04085782 = sum of:
0.04085782 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04085782 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 4.2008 19:04:22
-
Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006)
0.01
0.010214455 = product of:
0.02042891 = sum of:
0.02042891 = product of:
0.04085782 = sum of:
0.04085782 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04085782 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26.12.2007 19:22:05
-
Ma, N.; Guan, J.; Zhao, Y.: Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis (2008)
0.01
0.010214455 = product of:
0.02042891 = sum of:
0.02042891 = product of:
0.04085782 = sum of:
0.04085782 = weight(_text_:22 in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04085782 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 31. 7.2008 14:22:05
-
Ding, Y.; Zhang, G.; Chambers, T.; Song, M.; Wang, X.; Zhai, C.: Content-based citation analysis : the next generation of citation analysis (2014)
0.01
0.010214455 = product of:
0.02042891 = sum of:
0.02042891 = product of:
0.04085782 = sum of:
0.04085782 = weight(_text_:22 in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04085782 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 16:52:04
