-
Zhang, J.; Yu, Q.; Zheng, F.; Long, C.; Lu, Z.; Duan, Z.: Comparing keywords plus of WOS and author keywords : a case study of patient adherence research (2016)
0.09
0.089730985 = product of:
0.17946197 = sum of:
0.17946197 = product of:
0.35892394 = sum of:
0.35892394 = weight(_text_:plus in 2857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.35892394 = score(doc=2857,freq=16.0), product of:
0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
1.157144 = fieldWeight in 2857, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2857)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Bibliometric analysis based on literature in the Web of Science (WOS) has become an increasingly popular method for visualizing the structure of scientific fields. Keywords Plus and Author Keywords are commonly selected as units of analysis, despite the limited research evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of Keywords Plus. This study was conceived to evaluate the efficacy of Keywords Plus as a parameter for capturing the content and scientific concepts presented in articles. Using scientific papers about patient adherence that were retrieved from WOS, a comparative assessment of Keywords Plus and Author Keywords was performed at the scientific field level and the document level, respectively. Our search yielded more Keywords Plus terms than Author Keywords, and the Keywords Plus terms were more broadly descriptive. Keywords Plus is as effective as Author Keywords in terms of bibliometric analysis investigating the knowledge structure of scientific fields, but it is less comprehensive in representing an article's content.
-
Száva-Kováts, E.: Indirect-collective referencing (ICR) in the elite journal literature of physics : I: a literature science study on the journal level (2001)
0.04
0.037012145 = product of:
0.07402429 = sum of:
0.07402429 = product of:
0.14804858 = sum of:
0.14804858 = weight(_text_:plus in 5180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14804858 = score(doc=5180,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.4772975 = fieldWeight in 5180, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5180)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In the second bibliometric paper SzavaKovtas uses ``indirectcollective references, ICR'' to mean such instances as those in which an author refers to, ``the references contained therein,'' when referring to another source. Having previously shown a high instance of occurrences in Physical Reviews, he now uses the January 1997 issues of 40 journals from the ISI physics category plus two optics journals, an instrumentation journal, and a physics journal launched in 1997, to locate ICR. The phenomena exists in all but one of the sampled journals and in the next, but unsampled, issue of that journal. Overall 17% of papers sampled display ICR with little fluctuation within internal categories.
-
Abt, H.A.; Garfield, E.: Is the relationship between numbers of references and paper lengths the same for all sciences? (2002)
0.03
0.031724695 = product of:
0.06344939 = sum of:
0.06344939 = product of:
0.12689878 = sum of:
0.12689878 = weight(_text_:plus in 5223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12689878 = score(doc=5223,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.40911216 = fieldWeight in 5223, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5223)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- It has been shown in the physical sciences that a paper's length is related to its number of references in a linear manner. Abt and Garfield here look at the life and social sciences with the thought that if the relation holds the citation counts will provide a measure of relative importance across these disciplines. In the life sciences 200 research papers from 1999-2000 were scanned in each of 10 journals to produce counts of 1000 word normalized pages. In the social sciences an average of 70 research papers in nine journals were scanned for the two-year period. Papers of average length in the various sciences have the same average number of references within plus or minus 17%. A look at the 30 to 60 papers over the two years in 18 review journals indicates twice the references of research papers of the same length.
-
Nicholls, P.T.: Empirical validation of Lotka's law (1986)
0.03
0.02723855 = product of:
0.0544771 = sum of:
0.0544771 = product of:
0.1089542 = sum of:
0.1089542 = weight(_text_:22 in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1089542 = score(doc=5509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 22(1986), S.417-419
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.03
0.02723855 = product of:
0.0544771 = sum of:
0.0544771 = product of:
0.1089542 = sum of:
0.1089542 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1089542 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Fiala, J.: Information flood : fiction and reality (1987)
0.03
0.02723855 = product of:
0.0544771 = sum of:
0.0544771 = product of:
0.1089542 = sum of:
0.1089542 = weight(_text_:22 in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1089542 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Thermochimica acta. 110(1987), S.11-22
-
Case, D.O.; Higgins, G.M.: How can we investigate citation behavior? : A study of reasons for citing literature in communication (2000)
0.03
0.026437245 = product of:
0.05287449 = sum of:
0.05287449 = product of:
0.10574898 = sum of:
0.10574898 = weight(_text_:plus in 4775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10574898 = score(doc=4775,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.3409268 = fieldWeight in 4775, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4775)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Authors' motivation for citing documents are addressed through a literature review and an empirical study. Replicating an investigation in psychology, the works of 2 highly-cited authors in the discipline of communication were identified, and all of the authros who cited them during the period 1995-1997 were surveyed. The instrument posed 32 questions about why a certain document was cited, plus questions about the citer's relationship to the cited author and document. Most findings were similar to the psychology study, including a tendency to cite 'concept markers' representing a genre of work. Authors in communication were more likely to have an interpersonal connection to cited authors, and to cite literatire reviews - their most common reason for citation. 3 types of judgements about cited works were found to best predict citation: (1) that the work was novel, well-known, and a concept-marker; (2) that citing it might promote the authority of one's own work; and (3) that the work deserved criticism. Suggestions are made for further research, especially regarding the anomalous role of creativity in cited works
-
Frandsen, T.F.; Rousseau, R.; Rowlands, I.: Diffusion factors (2006)
0.03
0.026437245 = product of:
0.05287449 = sum of:
0.05287449 = product of:
0.10574898 = sum of:
0.10574898 = weight(_text_:plus in 5587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10574898 = score(doc=5587,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.3409268 = fieldWeight in 5587, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5587)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to clarify earlier work on journal diffusion metrics. Classical journal indicators such as the Garfield impact factor do not measure the breadth of influence across the literature of a particular journal title. As a new approach to measuring research influence, the study complements these existing metrics with a series of formally described diffusion factors. Design/methodology/approach - Using a publication-citation matrix as an organising construct, the paper develops formal descriptions of two forms of diffusion metric: "relative diffusion factors" and "journal diffusion factors" in both their synchronous and diachronous forms. It also provides worked examples for selected library and information science and economics journals, plus a sample of health information papers to illustrate their construction and use. Findings - Diffusion factors capture different aspects of the citation reception process than existing bibliometric measures. The paper shows that diffusion factors can be applied at the whole journal level or for sets of articles and that they provide a richer evidence base for citation analyses than traditional measures alone. Research limitations/implications - The focus of this paper is on clarifying the concepts underlying diffusion factors and there is unlimited scope for further work to apply these metrics to much larger and more comprehensive data sets than has been attempted here. Practical implications - These new tools extend the range of tools available for bibliometric, and possibly webometric, analysis. Diffusion factors might find particular application in studies where the research questions focus on the dynamic aspects of innovation and knowledge transfer. Originality/value - This paper will be of interest to those with theoretical interests in informetric distributions as well as those interested in science policy and innovation studies.
-
Milojevic, S.; Sugimoto, C.R.; Yan, E.; Ding, Y.: ¬The cognitive structure of Library and Information Science : analysis of article title words (2011)
0.03
0.026437245 = product of:
0.05287449 = sum of:
0.05287449 = product of:
0.10574898 = sum of:
0.10574898 = weight(_text_:plus in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10574898 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.3409268 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This study comprises a suite of analyses of words in article titles in order to reveal the cognitive structure of Library and Information Science (LIS). The use of title words to elucidate the cognitive structure of LIS has been relatively neglected. The present study addresses this gap by performing (a) co-word analysis and hierarchical clustering, (b) multidimensional scaling, and (c) determination of trends in usage of terms. The study is based on 10,344 articles published between 1988 and 2007 in 16 LIS journals. Methodologically, novel aspects of this study are: (a) its large scale, (b) removal of non-specific title words based on the "word concentration" measure (c) identification of the most frequent terms that include both single words and phrases, and (d) presentation of the relative frequencies of terms using "heatmaps". Conceptually, our analysis reveals that LIS consists of three main branches: the traditionally recognized library-related and information-related branches, plus an equally distinct bibliometrics/scientometrics branch. The three branches focus on: libraries, information, and science, respectively. In addition, our study identifies substructures within each branch. We also tentatively identify "information seeking behavior" as a branch that is establishing itself separate from the three main branches. Furthermore, we find that cognitive concepts in LIS evolve continuously, with no stasis since 1992. The most rapid development occurred between 1998 and 2001, influenced by the increased focus on the Internet. The change in the cognitive landscape is found to be driven by the emergence of new information technologies, and the retirement of old ones.
-
Su, Y.; Han, L.-F.: ¬A new literature growth model : variable exponential growth law of literature (1998)
0.02
0.024075704 = product of:
0.048151407 = sum of:
0.048151407 = product of:
0.096302815 = sum of:
0.096302815 = weight(_text_:22 in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.096302815 = score(doc=3690,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:22:35
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.02
0.024075704 = product of:
0.048151407 = sum of:
0.048151407 = product of:
0.096302815 = sum of:
0.096302815 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.096302815 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Diodato, V.: Dictionary of bibliometrics (1994)
0.02
0.023833731 = product of:
0.047667462 = sum of:
0.047667462 = product of:
0.095334925 = sum of:
0.095334925 = weight(_text_:22 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.095334925 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Journal of library and information science 22(1996) no.2, S.116-117 (L.C. Smith)
-
Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990)
0.02
0.023833731 = product of:
0.047667462 = sum of:
0.047667462 = product of:
0.095334925 = sum of:
0.095334925 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.095334925 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:55:29
-
Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : II. Resilience to ambiguity (1990)
0.02
0.023833731 = product of:
0.047667462 = sum of:
0.047667462 = product of:
0.095334925 = sum of:
0.095334925 = weight(_text_:22 in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.095334925 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:55:55
-
Lewison, G.: ¬The work of the Bibliometrics Research Group (City University) and associates (2005)
0.02
0.02042891 = product of:
0.04085782 = sum of:
0.04085782 = product of:
0.08171564 = sum of:
0.08171564 = weight(_text_:22 in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08171564 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2007 17:02:22
-
Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014)
0.02
0.02042891 = product of:
0.04085782 = sum of:
0.04085782 = product of:
0.08171564 = sum of:
0.08171564 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08171564 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 18. 3.2014 19:13:22
-
Raan, A.F.J. van: Statistical properties of bibliometric indicators : research group indicator distributions and correlations (2006)
0.01
0.014445423 = product of:
0.028890846 = sum of:
0.028890846 = product of:
0.057781693 = sum of:
0.057781693 = weight(_text_:22 in 5275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057781693 = score(doc=5275,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 5275, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5275)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 16:20:22
-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009)
0.01
0.014445423 = product of:
0.028890846 = sum of:
0.028890846 = product of:
0.057781693 = sum of:
0.057781693 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057781693 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:22:35
-
Li, T.-C.: Reference sources in periodicals : research note (1995)
0.01
0.013619275 = product of:
0.02723855 = sum of:
0.02723855 = product of:
0.0544771 = sum of:
0.0544771 = weight(_text_:22 in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0544771 = score(doc=5092,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Presents a list of 53 periodicals in 22 subject fields which regularly provide bibliographies of theses, research in progress and patents in their particular subject field. The fields of business, economics, history and literature have most periodical listings of dissertations and theses. Also lists 63 periodicals in 25 sub-disciplines which provide rankings or ratings. Rankings and ratings information predominates in the fields of business, sports and games, finance and banking, and library and information science
-
Pichappan, P.; Sangaranachiyar, S.: Ageing approach to scientific eponyms (1996)
0.01
0.013619275 = product of:
0.02723855 = sum of:
0.02723855 = product of:
0.0544771 = sum of:
0.0544771 = weight(_text_:22 in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0544771 = score(doc=80,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05026075 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Report presented at the 16th National Indian Association of Special Libraries and Information Centres Seminar Special Interest Group Meeting on Informatrics in Bombay, 19-22 Dec 94
