Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalalgorithmen"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Keen, E.M.: Designing and testing an interactive ranked retrieval system for professional searchers (1994) 0.03 
    0.026437245 = product of:
  0.05287449 = sum of:
    0.05287449 = product of:
      0.10574898 = sum of:
        0.10574898 = weight(_text_:plus in 1066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10574898 = score(doc=1066,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.3409268 = fieldWeight in 1066, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1066)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Reports 3 explorations of ranked system design. 2 tests used a 'cystic fibrosis' test collection with 100 queries. Experiment 1 compared a Boolean with a ranked interactive system using a subject qualified trained searcher, and reporting recall and precision results. Experiment 2 compared 15 different ranked match algorithms in a batch mode using 2 test collections, and included some new proximate pairs and term weighting approaches. Experiment 3 is a design plan for an interactive ranked prototype offering mid search algorithm choices plus other manual search devices (such as obligatory and unwanted terms), as influenced by thinking aloud comments from experiment 1. Concludes that, in Boolean versus ranked using inverse collection frequency, the searcher inspected more records on ranked than Boolean and so achieved a higher recall but lower precision; however, the presentation order of the relevant records, was, on average, very similar in both systems. Concludes also that: query reformulation was quite strongly practised in ranked searching but does not appear to have been effective; the term pairs proximate weithing methods in experiment 2 enhanced precision on both test collections when used with inverse collection frequency weighting (ICF); and the design plan for an interactive prototype adds to a selection of match algorithms other devices, such as obligatory and unwanted term marking, evidence for this being found from think aloud comments
  2. Robertson, S.E.; Sparck Jones, K.: Simple, proven approaches to text retrieval (1997) 0.03 
    0.026437245 = product of:
  0.05287449 = sum of:
    0.05287449 = product of:
      0.10574898 = sum of:
        0.10574898 = weight(_text_:plus in 4532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10574898 = score(doc=4532,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.3409268 = fieldWeight in 4532, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4532)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This technical note describes straightforward techniques for document indexing and retrieval that have been solidly established through extensive testing and are easy to apply. They are useful for many different types of text material, are viable for very large files, and have the advantage that they do not require special skills or training for searching, but are easy for end users. The document and text retrieval methods described here have a sound theoretical basis, are well established by extensive testing, and the ideas involved are now implemented in some commercial retrieval systems. Testing in the last few years has, in particular, shown that the methods presented here work very well with full texts, not only title and abstracts, and with large files of texts containing three quarters of a million documents. These tests, the TREC Tests (see Harman 1993 - 1997; IP&M 1995), have been rigorous comparative evaluations involving many different approaches to information retrieval. These techniques depend an the use of simple terms for indexing both request and document texts; an term weighting exploiting statistical information about term occurrences; an scoring for request-document matching, using these weights, to obtain a ranked search output; and an relevance feedback to modify request weights or term sets in iterative searching. The normal implementation is via an inverted file organisation using a term list with linked document identifiers, plus counting data, and pointers to the actual texts. The user's request can be a word list, phrases, sentences or extended text.
  3. Faloutsos, C.: Signature files (1992) 0.01 
    0.013619275 = product of:
  0.02723855 = sum of:
    0.02723855 = product of:
      0.0544771 = sum of:
        0.0544771 = weight(_text_:22 in 3499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0544771 = score(doc=3499,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3499, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3499)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    7. 5.1999 15:22:48
  4. Chang, C.-H.; Hsu, C.-C.: Integrating query expansion and conceptual relevance feedback for personalized Web information retrieval (1998) 0.01 
    0.011916866 = product of:
  0.023833731 = sum of:
    0.023833731 = product of:
      0.047667462 = sum of:
        0.047667462 = weight(_text_:22 in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047667462 = score(doc=1319,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  5. Joss, M.W.; Wszola, S.: ¬The engines that can : text search and retrieval software, their strategies, and vendors (1996) 0.01 
    0.010214455 = product of:
  0.02042891 = sum of:
    0.02042891 = product of:
      0.04085782 = sum of:
        0.04085782 = weight(_text_:22 in 5123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04085782 = score(doc=5123,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5123, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5123)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    12. 9.1996 13:56:22
  6. Kelledy, F.; Smeaton, A.F.: Signature files and beyond (1996) 0.01 
    0.010214455 = product of:
  0.02042891 = sum of:
    0.02042891 = product of:
      0.04085782 = sum of:
        0.04085782 = weight(_text_:22 in 6973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04085782 = score(doc=6973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6973)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  7. Burgin, R.: ¬The retrieval effectiveness of 5 clustering algorithms as a function of indexing exhaustivity (1995) 0.01 
    0.008512047 = product of:
  0.017024094 = sum of:
    0.017024094 = product of:
      0.03404819 = sum of:
        0.03404819 = weight(_text_:22 in 3365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03404819 = score(doc=3365,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3365, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3365)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 2.1996 11:20:06
  8. Efthimiadis, E.N.: User choices : a new yardstick for the evaluation of ranking algorithms for interactive query expansion (1995) 0.01 
    0.008512047 = product of:
  0.017024094 = sum of:
    0.017024094 = product of:
      0.03404819 = sum of:
        0.03404819 = weight(_text_:22 in 5697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03404819 = score(doc=5697,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5697, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5697)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 2.1996 13:14:10

Authors

Types

Themes