Search (60 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Wissensrepräsentation"
  1. Franzen, W.: Idealismus statt Realismus? : Realismus plus Skeptizismus! (1992) 0.06 
    0.06344939 = product of:
  0.12689878 = sum of:
    0.12689878 = product of:
      0.25379756 = sum of:
        0.25379756 = weight(_text_:plus in 4612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25379756 = score(doc=4612,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.8182243 = fieldWeight in 4612, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4612)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  2. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.04 
    0.0399137 = product of:
  0.0798274 = sum of:
    0.0798274 = product of:
      0.23948218 = sum of:
        0.23948218 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23948218 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4261112 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  3. Hepp, M.; Bruijn, J. de: GenTax : a generic methodology for deriving OWL and RDF-S ontologies from hierarchical classifications, thesauri, and inconsistent taxonomies (2007) 0.04 
    0.03738791 = product of:
  0.07477582 = sum of:
    0.07477582 = product of:
      0.14955164 = sum of:
        0.14955164 = weight(_text_:plus in 4692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14955164 = score(doc=4692,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.4821433 = fieldWeight in 4692, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4692)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Hierarchical classifications, thesauri, and informal taxonomies are likely the most valuable input for creating, at reasonable cost, non-toy ontologies in many domains. They contain, readily available, a wealth of category definitions plus a hierarchy, and they reflect some degree of community consensus. However, their transformation into useful ontologies is not as straightforward as it appears. In this paper, we show that (1) it often depends on the context of usage whether an informal hierarchical categorization schema is a classification, a thesaurus, or a taxonomy, and (2) present a novel methodology for automatically deriving consistent RDF-S and OWL ontologies from such schemas. Finally, we (3) demonstrate the usefulness of this approach by transforming the two e-business categorization standards eCl@ss and UNSPSC into ontologies that overcome the limitations of earlier prototypes. Our approach allows for the script-based creation of meaningful ontology classes for a particular context while preserving the original hierarchy, even if the latter is not a real subsumption hierarchy in this particular context. Human intervention in the transformation is limited to checking some conceptual properties and identifying frequent anomalies, and the only input required is an informal categorization plus a notion of the target context. In particular, the approach does not require instance data, as ontology learning approaches would usually do.
  4. Hannech, A.: Système de recherche d'information étendue basé sur une projection multi-espaces (2018) 0.03 
    0.02991033 = product of:
  0.05982066 = sum of:
    0.05982066 = product of:
      0.11964132 = sum of:
        0.11964132 = weight(_text_:plus in 4472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11964132 = score(doc=4472,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.38571465 = fieldWeight in 4472, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=4472)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Depuis son apparition au début des années 90, le World Wide Web (WWW ou Web) a offert un accès universel aux connaissances et le monde de l'information a été principalement témoin d'une grande révolution (la révolution numérique). Il est devenu rapidement très populaire, ce qui a fait de lui la plus grande et vaste base de données et de connaissances existantes grâce à la quantité et la diversité des données qu'il contient. Cependant, l'augmentation et l'évolution considérables de ces données soulèvent d'importants problèmes pour les utilisateurs notamment pour l'accès aux documents les plus pertinents à leurs requêtes de recherche. Afin de faire face à cette explosion exponentielle du volume de données et faciliter leur accès par les utilisateurs, différents modèles sont proposés par les systèmes de recherche d'information (SRIs) pour la représentation et la recherche des documents web. Les SRIs traditionnels utilisent, pour indexer et récupérer ces documents, des mots-clés simples qui ne sont pas sémantiquement liés. Cela engendre des limites en termes de la pertinence et de la facilité d'exploration des résultats. Pour surmonter ces limites, les techniques existantes enrichissent les documents en intégrant des mots-clés externes provenant de différentes sources. Cependant, ces systèmes souffrent encore de limitations qui sont liées aux techniques d'exploitation de ces sources d'enrichissement. Lorsque les différentes sources sont utilisées de telle sorte qu'elles ne peuvent être distinguées par le système, cela limite la flexibilité des modèles d'exploration qui peuvent être appliqués aux résultats de recherche retournés par ce système. Les utilisateurs se sentent alors perdus devant ces résultats, et se retrouvent dans l'obligation de les filtrer manuellement pour sélectionner l'information pertinente. S'ils veulent aller plus loin, ils doivent reformuler et cibler encore plus leurs requêtes de recherche jusqu'à parvenir aux documents qui répondent le mieux à leurs attentes. De cette façon, même si les systèmes parviennent à retrouver davantage des résultats pertinents, leur présentation reste problématique. Afin de cibler la recherche à des besoins d'information plus spécifiques de l'utilisateur et améliorer la pertinence et l'exploration de ses résultats de recherche, les SRIs avancés adoptent différentes techniques de personnalisation de données qui supposent que la recherche actuelle d'un utilisateur est directement liée à son profil et/ou à ses expériences de navigation/recherche antérieures. Cependant, cette hypothèse ne tient pas dans tous les cas, les besoins de l'utilisateur évoluent au fil du temps et peuvent s'éloigner de ses intérêts antérieurs stockés dans son profil.
    Dans d'autres cas, le profil de l'utilisateur peut être mal exploité pour extraire ou inférer ses nouveaux besoins en information. Ce problème est beaucoup plus accentué avec les requêtes ambigües. Lorsque plusieurs centres d'intérêt auxquels est liée une requête ambiguë sont identifiés dans le profil de l'utilisateur, le système se voit incapable de sélectionner les données pertinentes depuis ce profil pour répondre à la requête. Ceci a un impact direct sur la qualité des résultats fournis à cet utilisateur. Afin de remédier à quelques-unes de ces limitations, nous nous sommes intéressés dans ce cadre de cette thèse de recherche au développement de techniques destinées principalement à l'amélioration de la pertinence des résultats des SRIs actuels et à faciliter l'exploration de grandes collections de documents. Pour ce faire, nous proposons une solution basée sur un nouveau concept d'indexation et de recherche d'information appelé la projection multi-espaces. Cette proposition repose sur l'exploitation de différentes catégories d'information sémantiques et sociales qui permettent d'enrichir l'univers de représentation des documents et des requêtes de recherche en plusieurs dimensions d'interprétations. L'originalité de cette représentation est de pouvoir distinguer entre les différentes interprétations utilisées pour la description et la recherche des documents. Ceci donne une meilleure visibilité sur les résultats retournés et aide à apporter une meilleure flexibilité de recherche et d'exploration, en donnant à l'utilisateur la possibilité de naviguer une ou plusieurs vues de données qui l'intéressent le plus. En outre, les univers multidimensionnels de représentation proposés pour la description des documents et l'interprétation des requêtes de recherche aident à améliorer la pertinence des résultats de l'utilisateur en offrant une diversité de recherche/exploration qui aide à répondre à ses différents besoins et à ceux des autres différents utilisateurs. Cette étude exploite différents aspects liés à la recherche personnalisée et vise à résoudre les problèmes engendrés par l'évolution des besoins en information de l'utilisateur. Ainsi, lorsque le profil de cet utilisateur est utilisé par notre système, une technique est proposée et employée pour identifier les intérêts les plus représentatifs de ses besoins actuels dans son profil. Cette technique se base sur la combinaison de trois facteurs influents, notamment le facteur contextuel, fréquentiel et temporel des données. La capacité des utilisateurs à interagir, à échanger des idées et d'opinions, et à former des réseaux sociaux sur le Web, a amené les systèmes à s'intéresser aux types d'interactions de ces utilisateurs, au niveau d'interaction entre eux ainsi qu'à leurs rôles sociaux dans le système. Ces informations sociales sont abordées et intégrées dans ce travail de recherche. L'impact et la manière de leur intégration dans le processus de RI sont étudiés pour améliorer la pertinence des résultats.
  5. Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005) 0.03 
    0.02660913 = product of:
  0.05321826 = sum of:
    0.05321826 = product of:
      0.15965478 = sum of:
        0.15965478 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15965478 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4261112 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
  6. Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016) 0.03 
    0.02660913 = product of:
  0.05321826 = sum of:
    0.05321826 = product of:
      0.15965478 = sum of:
        0.15965478 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15965478 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4261112 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
  7. Frâncu, V.: Subjects in FRBR and poly-hierarchical thesauri as possible knowledge organization tools (2006) 0.03 
    0.026437245 = product of:
  0.05287449 = sum of:
    0.05287449 = product of:
      0.10574898 = sum of:
        0.10574898 = weight(_text_:plus in 259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10574898 = score(doc=259,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.3409268 = fieldWeight in 259, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=259)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The paper presents the possibilities offered by poly-hierarchical conceptual structures as knowledge organizers, starting from the FRBR entity-relation model. Of the ten entities defined in the FRBR model, the first six, the bibliographic entities plus those representing the intellectual responsibilities, are clearly described by their attributes. Unlike those the other four representing subjects in their own right: concepts, objects, events and places only have the term for the entity as attribute. Subjects have to be more extensively treated in a revised version of the FRBR model, with particular attention for the semantic and syntactic relations between concepts representing subjects themselves and between these concepts and terms used in indexing. The conceptual model of poly-hierarchical thesauri is regarded as an entity-relation model, one capable to accommodate both conceptually and relationally subjects in the bibliographic universe. Polyhierarchical thesauri are considered as frameworks or templates meant to enhance knowledge representation and to support information searching.
  8. Madalli, D.P.; Chatterjee, U.; Dutta, B.: ¬An analytical approach to building a core ontology for food (2017) 0.02 
    0.021149796 = product of:
  0.04229959 = sum of:
    0.04229959 = product of:
      0.08459918 = sum of:
        0.08459918 = weight(_text_:plus in 3362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08459918 = score(doc=3362,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.27274144 = fieldWeight in 3362, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3362)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the construction of a core ontology for food. To construct the core ontology, the authors propose here an approach called, yet another methodology for ontology plus (YAMO+). The goal is to exhibit the construction of a core ontology for a domain, which can be further extended and converted into application ontologies. Design/methodology/approach To motivate the construction of the core ontology for food, the authors have first articulated a set of application scenarios. The idea is that the constructed core ontology can be used to build application-specific ontologies for those scenarios. As part of the developmental approach to core ontology, the authors have proposed a methodology called YAMO+. It is designed following the theory of analytico-synthetic classification. YAMO+ is generic in nature and can be applied to build core ontologies for any domain. Findings Construction of a core ontology needs a thorough understanding of the domain and domain requirements. There are various challenges involved in constructing a core ontology as discussed in this paper. The proposed approach has proven to be sturdy enough to face the challenges that the construction of a core ontology poses. It is observed that core ontology is amenable to conversion to an application ontology. Practical implications The constructed core ontology for domain food can be readily used for developing application ontologies related to food. The proposed methodology YAMO+ can be applied to build core ontologies for any domain. Originality/value As per the knowledge, the proposed approach is the first attempt based on the study of the state of the art literature, in terms of, a formal approach to the design of a core ontology. Also, the constructed core ontology for food is the first one as there is no such ontology available on the web for domain food.
  9. Wirklichkeit und Wissen : Realismus, Antirealismus und Wirklichkeits-Konzeptionen in Philosophie und Wissenschaften (1992) 0.02 
    0.021149796 = product of:
  0.04229959 = sum of:
    0.04229959 = product of:
      0.08459918 = sum of:
        0.08459918 = weight(_text_:plus in 4606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08459918 = score(doc=4606,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.27274144 = fieldWeight in 4606, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4606)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: KUTSCHERA, F. von: Der erkenntnistheoretische Realismus; FRANZEN, W.: Idealismus statt Realismus? Realismus plus Skeptizismus!; KREISER, L.: Bruno Bauchs idealistischer Realismus. Votum im Anschluß an Winfried Franzen; DIEDERICH, W.: Probleme und Grenzen des Anti-Realismus; RHEINWALD, R.: Der Schluß auf die beste Erklärung und das Induktionsproblem. Votum zu Werner Diederich; BÜHLER, A.: Antirealismus und Verifikationismus; RHEINWALD, R.: Bemerkungen zu einem bedeutungstheoretischen Argument gegen den Realismus. Votum zu Axel Bühler; ERPENBECK, J.: Psychologie: Gratwanderung zwischen Realismus und Konstruktivismus; ROTH, G. u. H. SCHWEGLER: Kognitive Referenz und Selbstreferentialität des Gehirns. Ein Beitrag zur Klärung des Verhältnisses zwischen Erkenntnistheorie und Hirnforschung; Voten dazu von: H. TETENS, M. BOENKE u. L. LÄSKER; WILDGEN, W.: Semantischer Realismus und Antirealismus in der Sprachtheorie; BECKERMANN, A.: Wie real sind intentionale Zustände? Dennett zwischen Fodor und den Churchlands; ENGEL, P.: Teleosemantics: realistic or anti-realistic? Votum; HOLENSTEIN, E.: Ein Grund, kein Epiphänomenalist zu sein. Votum; SANDKÜHLER, H.J.: Epistemologischer Realismus und die Wirklichkeit des Wissens. Eine Verteidigung des Philosophie des Geistes gegen Naturalismus und Reduktionismus; PÄTZOLD, D.: Intellectus effabilis. Votum zu Hans Jörg Sandkühler; METSCHER, T.: 'Episteme': Wissen als anthropologisches Datum. Grundsätze einer elementaren Epistemologie. Votum zu Hans Jörg Sandkühler; PASTERNACK, G.: Realismus vs Antirealismus. Ein wissenschaftsphilosophisches Explikationsproblem. Votum
  10. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility (1996) 0.02 
    0.017024094 = product of:
  0.03404819 = sum of:
    0.03404819 = product of:
      0.06809638 = sum of:
        0.06809638 = weight(_text_:22 in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06809638 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.11-22
  11. Drewer, P.; Massion, F; Pulitano, D: Was haben Wissensmodellierung, Wissensstrukturierung, künstliche Intelligenz und Terminologie miteinander zu tun? (2017) 0.02 
    0.017024094 = product of:
  0.03404819 = sum of:
    0.03404819 = product of:
      0.06809638 = sum of:
        0.06809638 = weight(_text_:22 in 5576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06809638 = score(doc=5576,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5576, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5576)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    13.12.2017 14:17:22
  12. Tudhope, D.; Hodge, G.: Terminology registries (2007) 0.02 
    0.017024094 = product of:
  0.03404819 = sum of:
    0.03404819 = product of:
      0.06809638 = sum of:
        0.06809638 = weight(_text_:22 in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06809638 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:22:07
  13. Haller, S.H.M.: Mappingverfahren zur Wissensorganisation (2002) 0.02 
    0.017024094 = product of:
  0.03404819 = sum of:
    0.03404819 = product of:
      0.06809638 = sum of:
        0.06809638 = weight(_text_:22 in 3406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06809638 = score(doc=3406,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3406, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3406)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    30. 5.2010 16:22:35
  14. Nielsen, M.: Neuronale Netze : Alpha Go - Computer lernen Intuition (2018) 0.02 
    0.017024094 = product of:
  0.03404819 = sum of:
    0.03404819 = product of:
      0.06809638 = sum of:
        0.06809638 = weight(_text_:22 in 4523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06809638 = score(doc=4523,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4523, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4523)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2018, H.1, S.22-27
  15. Börner, K.: Atlas of knowledge : anyone can map (2015) 0.01 
    0.014445423 = product of:
  0.028890846 = sum of:
    0.028890846 = product of:
      0.057781693 = sum of:
        0.057781693 = weight(_text_:22 in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057781693 = score(doc=3355,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2017 16:54:03
    22. 1.2017 17:10:56
  16. Synak, M.; Dabrowski, M.; Kruk, S.R.: Semantic Web and ontologies (2009) 0.01 
    0.013619275 = product of:
  0.02723855 = sum of:
    0.02723855 = product of:
      0.0544771 = sum of:
        0.0544771 = weight(_text_:22 in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0544771 = score(doc=3376,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    31. 7.2010 16:58:22
  17. OWL Web Ontology Language Test Cases (2004) 0.01 
    0.013619275 = product of:
  0.02723855 = sum of:
    0.02723855 = product of:
      0.0544771 = sum of:
        0.0544771 = weight(_text_:22 in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0544771 = score(doc=4685,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    14. 8.2011 13:33:22
  18. Giunchiglia, F.; Villafiorita, A.; Walsh, T.: Theories of abstraction (1997) 0.01 
    0.013619275 = product of:
  0.02723855 = sum of:
    0.02723855 = product of:
      0.0544771 = sum of:
        0.0544771 = weight(_text_:22 in 4476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0544771 = score(doc=4476,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4476, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4476)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    1.10.2018 14:13:22
  19. Hauff-Hartig, S.: Wissensrepräsentation durch RDF: Drei angewandte Forschungsbeispiele : Bitte recht vielfältig: Wie Wissensgraphen, Disco und FaBiO Struktur in Mangas und die Humanities bringen (2021) 0.01 
    0.013619275 = product of:
  0.02723855 = sum of:
    0.02723855 = product of:
      0.0544771 = sum of:
        0.0544771 = weight(_text_:22 in 318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0544771 = score(doc=318,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 318, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=318)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 5.2021 12:43:05
  20. Priss, U.: Faceted information representation (2000) 0.01 
    0.011916866 = product of:
  0.023833731 = sum of:
    0.023833731 = product of:
      0.047667462 = sum of:
        0.047667462 = weight(_text_:22 in 5095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047667462 = score(doc=5095,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5095, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5095)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:47:06

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 46
  • d 13
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 44
  • el 13
  • x 6
  • m 2
  • n 1
  • r 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications