Search (670 results, page 1 of 34)

0.089730985 = product of:
  0.17946197 = sum of:
    0.17946197 = product of:
      0.35892394 = sum of:
        0.35892394 = weight(_text_:plus in 2857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.35892394 = score(doc=2857,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            1.157144 = fieldWeight in 2857, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2857)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Bibliometric analysis based on literature in the Web of Science (WOS) has become an increasingly popular method for visualizing the structure of scientific fields. Keywords Plus and Author Keywords are commonly selected as units of analysis, despite the limited research evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of Keywords Plus. This study was conceived to evaluate the efficacy of Keywords Plus as a parameter for capturing the content and scientific concepts presented in articles. Using scientific papers about patient adherence that were retrieved from WOS, a comparative assessment of Keywords Plus and Author Keywords was performed at the scientific field level and the document level, respectively. Our search yielded more Keywords Plus terms than Author Keywords, and the Keywords Plus terms were more broadly descriptive. Keywords Plus is as effective as Author Keywords in terms of bibliometric analysis investigating the knowledge structure of scientific fields, but it is less comprehensive in representing an article's content.

0.0838783 = product of:
  0.1677566 = sum of:
    0.1677566 = sum of:
      0.12689878 = weight(_text_:plus in 1345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12689878 = score(doc=1345,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05026075 = queryNorm
          0.40911216 = fieldWeight in 1345, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1345)
      0.04085782 = weight(_text_:22 in 1345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04085782 = score(doc=1345,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05026075 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1345, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1345)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Evaluating collections of XML documents without paying attention to the schema they were written in may give interesting insights into the expected characteristics of a markup language, as well as any regularity that may span vocabularies and languages, and that are more fundamental and frequent than plain content models. In this paper we explore the idea of structural patterns in XML vocabularies, by examining the characteristics of elements as they are used, rather than as they are defined. We introduce from the ground up a formal theory of 8 plus 3 structural patterns for XML elements, and verify their identifiability in a number of different XML vocabularies. The results allowed the creation of visualization and content extraction tools that are completely independent of the schema and without any previous knowledge of the semantics and organization of the XML vocabulary of the documents.

Date

22. 8.2014 17:08:49

0.0838783 = product of:
  0.1677566 = sum of:
    0.1677566 = sum of:
      0.12689878 = weight(_text_:plus in 1848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12689878 = score(doc=1848,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05026075 = queryNorm
          0.40911216 = fieldWeight in 1848, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1848)
      0.04085782 = weight(_text_:22 in 1848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04085782 = score(doc=1848,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05026075 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1848, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1848)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The goal of entity linking is to associate references to an entity that is found in unstructured natural language content to an authoritative inventory of known entities. This article describes the construction of 6 test collections for cross-language person-entity linking that together span 22 languages. Fully automated components were used together with 2 crowdsourced validation stages to affordably generate ground-truth annotations with an accuracy comparable to that of a completely manual process. The resulting test collections each contain between 642 (Arabic) and 2,361 (Romanian) person references in non-English texts for which the correct resolution in English Wikipedia is known, plus a similar number of references for which no correct resolution into English Wikipedia is believed to exist. Fully automated cross-language person-name linking experiments with 20 non-English languages yielded a resolution accuracy of between 0.84 (Serbian) and 0.98 (Romanian), which compares favorably with previously reported cross-language entity linking results for Spanish.

0.0798274 = product of:
  0.1596548 = sum of:
    0.1596548 = product of:
      0.47896436 = sum of:
        0.47896436 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.47896436 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4261112 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.

0.07402429 = product of:
  0.14804858 = sum of:
    0.14804858 = product of:
      0.29609716 = sum of:
        0.29609716 = weight(_text_:plus in 806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.29609716 = score(doc=806,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.954595 = fieldWeight in 806, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=806)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.06652284 = product of:
  0.13304567 = sum of:
    0.13304567 = product of:
      0.399137 = sum of:
        0.399137 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.399137 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4261112 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja

0.04656598 = product of:
  0.09313196 = sum of:
    0.09313196 = product of:
      0.27939588 = sum of:
        0.27939588 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.27939588 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4261112 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].

0.0399137 = product of:
  0.0798274 = sum of:
    0.0798274 = product of:
      0.23948218 = sum of:
        0.23948218 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23948218 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4261112 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.

0.0399137 = product of:
  0.0798274 = sum of:
    0.0798274 = product of:
      0.23948218 = sum of:
        0.23948218 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23948218 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4261112 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.

0.037012145 = product of:
  0.07402429 = sum of:
    0.07402429 = product of:
      0.14804858 = sum of:
        0.14804858 = weight(_text_:plus in 3933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14804858 = score(doc=3933,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.4772975 = fieldWeight in 3933, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3933)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Der Beitrag gibt einen Überblick über die Entstehung und Aufgabe der Europäischen Digitalen Bibliothek Europeana. Im Anschluss beschreibt er ein Evaluationsprojekt zur Untersuchung des "Look & Feel" des Prototypen der Europeana (Stand Dezember 2009), der mit Hilfe der Plus-Minus-Methode von Benutzern beurteilt wird, die Masterstudierende im Fach Kommunikationsdesign sind. Die Ergebnisse werden nach ausgewählten Kriterien vorgestellt, wobei zu jedem Kriterium positive und negative Bewertungen sowie Verbesserungsvorschläge aufgeführt werden, diskutiert und in Bezug gesetzt zum jüngsten User and Functional Testing der Europeana. Der Beitrag schließt mit einer Zusammenfassung.

0.03326142 = product of:
  0.06652284 = sum of:
    0.06652284 = product of:
      0.1995685 = sum of:
        0.1995685 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1995685 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4261112 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.

0.03326142 = product of:
  0.06652284 = sum of:
    0.06652284 = product of:
      0.1995685 = sum of:
        0.1995685 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1995685 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4261112 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.

0.03326142 = product of:
  0.06652284 = sum of:
    0.06652284 = product of:
      0.1995685 = sum of:
        0.1995685 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1995685 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4261112 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>

0.031724695 = product of:
  0.06344939 = sum of:
    0.06344939 = product of:
      0.12689878 = sum of:
        0.12689878 = weight(_text_:plus in 2882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12689878 = score(doc=2882,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.40911216 = fieldWeight in 2882, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2882)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.031724695 = product of:
  0.06344939 = sum of:
    0.06344939 = product of:
      0.12689878 = sum of:
        0.12689878 = weight(_text_:plus in 4352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12689878 = score(doc=4352,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.40911216 = fieldWeight in 4352, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4352)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Im Rahmen des DFG-Projektes "Elektronische Dissertationen Plus" (eDissPlus) entwickeln die Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (HU) und die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek (DNB) Lösungen für eine zeitgemäße Archivierung und Publikation von Forschungsdaten, die im Zusammenhang mit Promotionsvorhaben entstehen. Dabei müssen die unterschiedlichen Anlagerungsformen von Forschungsdaten an eine Dissertation berücksichtigt und in einem Datenmodell abgebildet sowie das von der DNB verwendete Metadatenschema XMetaDissPlus überarbeitet werden. Das ist notwendig, um die Relationen zwischen der Dissertation und den abgelieferten Forschungsdaten-Supplementen sowie den Daten, die auf externen Repositorien verbleiben sollen, nachzuweisen und im Katalog der DNB recherchierbar zu machen. Dieser Beitrag stellt das Datenmodell und die Änderungen im Metadatenschema vor.

0.02991033 = product of:
  0.05982066 = sum of:
    0.05982066 = product of:
      0.11964132 = sum of:
        0.11964132 = weight(_text_:plus in 4472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11964132 = score(doc=4472,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.38571465 = fieldWeight in 4472, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=4472)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Depuis son apparition au début des années 90, le World Wide Web (WWW ou Web) a offert un accès universel aux connaissances et le monde de l'information a été principalement témoin d'une grande révolution (la révolution numérique). Il est devenu rapidement très populaire, ce qui a fait de lui la plus grande et vaste base de données et de connaissances existantes grâce à la quantité et la diversité des données qu'il contient. Cependant, l'augmentation et l'évolution considérables de ces données soulèvent d'importants problèmes pour les utilisateurs notamment pour l'accès aux documents les plus pertinents à leurs requêtes de recherche. Afin de faire face à cette explosion exponentielle du volume de données et faciliter leur accès par les utilisateurs, différents modèles sont proposés par les systèmes de recherche d'information (SRIs) pour la représentation et la recherche des documents web. Les SRIs traditionnels utilisent, pour indexer et récupérer ces documents, des mots-clés simples qui ne sont pas sémantiquement liés. Cela engendre des limites en termes de la pertinence et de la facilité d'exploration des résultats. Pour surmonter ces limites, les techniques existantes enrichissent les documents en intégrant des mots-clés externes provenant de différentes sources. Cependant, ces systèmes souffrent encore de limitations qui sont liées aux techniques d'exploitation de ces sources d'enrichissement. Lorsque les différentes sources sont utilisées de telle sorte qu'elles ne peuvent être distinguées par le système, cela limite la flexibilité des modèles d'exploration qui peuvent être appliqués aux résultats de recherche retournés par ce système. Les utilisateurs se sentent alors perdus devant ces résultats, et se retrouvent dans l'obligation de les filtrer manuellement pour sélectionner l'information pertinente. S'ils veulent aller plus loin, ils doivent reformuler et cibler encore plus leurs requêtes de recherche jusqu'à parvenir aux documents qui répondent le mieux à leurs attentes. De cette façon, même si les systèmes parviennent à retrouver davantage des résultats pertinents, leur présentation reste problématique. Afin de cibler la recherche à des besoins d'information plus spécifiques de l'utilisateur et améliorer la pertinence et l'exploration de ses résultats de recherche, les SRIs avancés adoptent différentes techniques de personnalisation de données qui supposent que la recherche actuelle d'un utilisateur est directement liée à son profil et/ou à ses expériences de navigation/recherche antérieures. Cependant, cette hypothèse ne tient pas dans tous les cas, les besoins de l'utilisateur évoluent au fil du temps et peuvent s'éloigner de ses intérêts antérieurs stockés dans son profil.
Dans d'autres cas, le profil de l'utilisateur peut être mal exploité pour extraire ou inférer ses nouveaux besoins en information. Ce problème est beaucoup plus accentué avec les requêtes ambigües. Lorsque plusieurs centres d'intérêt auxquels est liée une requête ambiguë sont identifiés dans le profil de l'utilisateur, le système se voit incapable de sélectionner les données pertinentes depuis ce profil pour répondre à la requête. Ceci a un impact direct sur la qualité des résultats fournis à cet utilisateur. Afin de remédier à quelques-unes de ces limitations, nous nous sommes intéressés dans ce cadre de cette thèse de recherche au développement de techniques destinées principalement à l'amélioration de la pertinence des résultats des SRIs actuels et à faciliter l'exploration de grandes collections de documents. Pour ce faire, nous proposons une solution basée sur un nouveau concept d'indexation et de recherche d'information appelé la projection multi-espaces. Cette proposition repose sur l'exploitation de différentes catégories d'information sémantiques et sociales qui permettent d'enrichir l'univers de représentation des documents et des requêtes de recherche en plusieurs dimensions d'interprétations. L'originalité de cette représentation est de pouvoir distinguer entre les différentes interprétations utilisées pour la description et la recherche des documents. Ceci donne une meilleure visibilité sur les résultats retournés et aide à apporter une meilleure flexibilité de recherche et d'exploration, en donnant à l'utilisateur la possibilité de naviguer une ou plusieurs vues de données qui l'intéressent le plus. En outre, les univers multidimensionnels de représentation proposés pour la description des documents et l'interprétation des requêtes de recherche aident à améliorer la pertinence des résultats de l'utilisateur en offrant une diversité de recherche/exploration qui aide à répondre à ses différents besoins et à ceux des autres différents utilisateurs. Cette étude exploite différents aspects liés à la recherche personnalisée et vise à résoudre les problèmes engendrés par l'évolution des besoins en information de l'utilisateur. Ainsi, lorsque le profil de cet utilisateur est utilisé par notre système, une technique est proposée et employée pour identifier les intérêts les plus représentatifs de ses besoins actuels dans son profil. Cette technique se base sur la combinaison de trois facteurs influents, notamment le facteur contextuel, fréquentiel et temporel des données. La capacité des utilisateurs à interagir, à échanger des idées et d'opinions, et à former des réseaux sociaux sur le Web, a amené les systèmes à s'intéresser aux types d'interactions de ces utilisateurs, au niveau d'interaction entre eux ainsi qu'à leurs rôles sociaux dans le système. Ces informations sociales sont abordées et intégrées dans ce travail de recherche. L'impact et la manière de leur intégration dans le processus de RI sont étudiés pour améliorer la pertinence des résultats.

0.02723855 = product of:
  0.0544771 = sum of:
    0.0544771 = product of:
      0.1089542 = sum of:
        0.1089542 = weight(_text_:22 in 2851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1089542 = score(doc=2851,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2851, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2851)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22

0.02660913 = product of:
  0.05321826 = sum of:
    0.05321826 = product of:
      0.15965478 = sum of:
        0.15965478 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15965478 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4261112 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.

0.026437245 = product of:
  0.05287449 = sum of:
    0.05287449 = product of:
      0.10574898 = sum of:
        0.10574898 = weight(_text_:plus in 3453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10574898 = score(doc=3453,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.3409268 = fieldWeight in 3453, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3453)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

In this article, we describe the results of an experiment designed to understand the effects of background information and social interaction on image tagging. The participants in the experiment were asked to tag 12 preselected images of Jewish cultural heritage. The users were partitioned into three groups: the first group saw only the images with no additional information whatsoever, the second group saw the images plus a short, descriptive title, and the third group saw the images, the titles, and the URL of the page in which the image appeared. In the first stage of the experiment, each user tagged the images without seeing the tags provided by the other users. In the second stage, the users saw the tags assigned by others and were encouraged to interact. Results show that after the social interaction phase, the tag sets converged and the popular tags became even more popular. Although in all cases the total number of assigned tags increased after the social interaction phase, the number of distinct tags decreased in most cases. When viewing the image only, in some cases the users were not able to correctly identify what they saw in some of the pictures, but they overcame the initial difficulties after interaction. We conclude from this experiment that social interaction may lead to convergence in tagging and that the wisdom of the crowds helps overcome the difficulties due to the lack of information.

0.026437245 = product of:
  0.05287449 = sum of:
    0.05287449 = product of:
      0.10574898 = sum of:
        0.10574898 = weight(_text_:plus in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10574898 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05026075 = queryNorm
            0.3409268 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This study comprises a suite of analyses of words in article titles in order to reveal the cognitive structure of Library and Information Science (LIS). The use of title words to elucidate the cognitive structure of LIS has been relatively neglected. The present study addresses this gap by performing (a) co-word analysis and hierarchical clustering, (b) multidimensional scaling, and (c) determination of trends in usage of terms. The study is based on 10,344 articles published between 1988 and 2007 in 16 LIS journals. Methodologically, novel aspects of this study are: (a) its large scale, (b) removal of non-specific title words based on the "word concentration" measure (c) identification of the most frequent terms that include both single words and phrases, and (d) presentation of the relative frequencies of terms using "heatmaps". Conceptually, our analysis reveals that LIS consists of three main branches: the traditionally recognized library-related and information-related branches, plus an equally distinct bibliometrics/scientometrics branch. The three branches focus on: libraries, information, and science, respectively. In addition, our study identifies substructures within each branch. We also tentatively identify "information seeking behavior" as a branch that is establishing itself separate from the three main branches. Furthermore, we find that cognitive concepts in LIS evolve continuously, with no stasis since 1992. The most rapid development occurred between 1998 and 2001, influenced by the increased focus on the Internet. The change in the cognitive landscape is found to be driven by the emergence of new information technologies, and the retirement of old ones.