Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  • × theme_ss:"Social tagging"
  1. Bar-Ilan, J.; Zhitomirsky-Geffet, M.; Miller, Y.; Shoham, S.: ¬The effects of background information and social interaction on image tagging (2010) 0.03
    0.026437245 = product of:
      0.05287449 = sum of:
        0.05287449 = product of:
          0.10574898 = sum of:
            0.10574898 = weight(_text_:plus in 3453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10574898 = score(doc=3453,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3101809 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05026075 = queryNorm
                0.3409268 = fieldWeight in 3453, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.1714344 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3453)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In this article, we describe the results of an experiment designed to understand the effects of background information and social interaction on image tagging. The participants in the experiment were asked to tag 12 preselected images of Jewish cultural heritage. The users were partitioned into three groups: the first group saw only the images with no additional information whatsoever, the second group saw the images plus a short, descriptive title, and the third group saw the images, the titles, and the URL of the page in which the image appeared. In the first stage of the experiment, each user tagged the images without seeing the tags provided by the other users. In the second stage, the users saw the tags assigned by others and were encouraged to interact. Results show that after the social interaction phase, the tag sets converged and the popular tags became even more popular. Although in all cases the total number of assigned tags increased after the social interaction phase, the number of distinct tags decreased in most cases. When viewing the image only, in some cases the users were not able to correctly identify what they saw in some of the pictures, but they overcame the initial difficulties after interaction. We conclude from this experiment that social interaction may lead to convergence in tagging and that the wisdom of the crowds helps overcome the difficulties due to the lack of information.
  2. Niemann, C.: Tag-Science : Ein Analysemodell zur Nutzbarkeit von Tagging-Daten (2011) 0.01
    0.010214455 = product of:
      0.02042891 = sum of:
        0.02042891 = product of:
          0.04085782 = sum of:
            0.04085782 = weight(_text_:22 in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04085782 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05026075 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    ¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a
  3. Yi, K.: Harnessing collective intelligence in social tagging using Delicious (2012) 0.01
    0.008512047 = product of:
      0.017024094 = sum of:
        0.017024094 = product of:
          0.03404819 = sum of:
            0.03404819 = weight(_text_:22 in 515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03404819 = score(doc=515,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05026075 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 515, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=515)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    25.12.2012 15:22:37
  4. Choi, Y.; Syn, S.Y.: Characteristics of tagging behavior in digitized humanities online collections (2016) 0.01
    0.008512047 = product of:
      0.017024094 = sum of:
        0.017024094 = product of:
          0.03404819 = sum of:
            0.03404819 = weight(_text_:22 in 2891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03404819 = score(doc=2891,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05026075 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2891, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2891)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    21. 4.2016 11:23:22
  5. Qin, C.; Liu, Y.; Mou, J.; Chen, J.: User adoption of a hybrid social tagging approach in an online knowledge community (2019) 0.01
    0.008512047 = product of:
      0.017024094 = sum of:
        0.017024094 = product of:
          0.03404819 = sum of:
            0.03404819 = weight(_text_:22 in 5492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03404819 = score(doc=5492,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17600457 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05026075 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5492, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5492)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22