Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Furner, J."
  1. Ellis, D.; Furner, J.; Willett, P.: On the creation of hypertext links in full-text documents : measurement of retrieval effectiveness (1996) 0.03
    0.025276855 = product of:
      0.075830564 = sum of:
        0.075830564 = weight(_text_:index in 4214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.075830564 = score(doc=4214,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05083213 = queryNorm
            0.3413878 = fieldWeight in 4214, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4214)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    An important stage in the process or retrieval of objects from a hypertext database is the creation of a set of internodal links that are intended to represent the relationships existing between objects; this operation is often undertaken manually, just as index terms are often manually assigned to documents in a conventional retrieval system. In an earlier article (1994), the results were published of a study in which several different sets of links were inserted, each by a different person, between the paragraphs of each of a number of full-text documents. These results showed little similarity between the link-sets, a finding that was comparable with those of studies of inter-indexer consistency, which suggest that there is generally only a low level of agreement between the sets of index terms assigned to a document by different indexers. In this article, a description is provided of an investigation into the nature of the relationship existing between (i) the levels of inter-linker consistency obtaining among the group of hypertext databases used in our earlier experiments, and (ii) the levels of effectiveness of a number of searches carried out in those databases. An account is given of the implementation of the searches and of the methods used in the calculation of numerical values expressing their effectiveness. Analysis of the results of a comparison between recorded levels of consistency and those of effectiveness does not allow us to draw conclusions about the consistency - effectiveness relationship that are equivalent to those drawn in comparable studies of inter-indexer consistency
  2. Furner, J.: On Recommending (2002) 0.02
    0.02144812 = product of:
      0.06434436 = sum of:
        0.06434436 = weight(_text_:index in 5243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06434436 = score(doc=5243,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05083213 = queryNorm
            0.28967714 = fieldWeight in 5243, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5243)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    By "recommending'' Furner refers to collaborative filtering where multiple user rankings of items are used to create a single new ranking for a user, or to a system itself generating rankings of items for its users. This would include document retrieval systems as a subset recommending systems in the second instance, but in the first would make document retrieval system and recommending system synonyms. Information seeking actions are classified either as evaluative (determining the worth of an item), recommending (expressing perceived worth), or informative (examining the content of an item). The task of the information retrieval system is to be to predict the particular ordering that the user would specify in a given context, given complete knowledge of the collection. Citations may be considered as the result of evaluative and recommending decisions by the author, and assigned index terms may be considered as the same sort of decisions by the indexer. The selection of relevant documents by a searcher from a list also involves evaluative and recommending decisions. This suggests that searchers should have the opportunity to bring multiple ranking techniques to bear.
  3. Furner, J.: Definitions of "metadata" : a brief survey of international standards (2020) 0.02
    0.02144812 = product of:
      0.06434436 = sum of:
        0.06434436 = weight(_text_:index in 5912) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06434436 = score(doc=5912,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05083213 = queryNorm
            0.28967714 = fieldWeight in 5912, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5912)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    A search on the term "metadata" in the International Organization for Standardization's Online Browsing Platform (ISO OBP) reveals that there are 96 separate ISO standards that provide definitions of the term. Between them, these standards supply 46 different definitions-a lack of standardization that we might not have expected, given the context. In fact, if we make creative use of Simpson's index of concentration (originally devised as a measure of ecological diversity) to measure the degree of standardization of definition in this case, we arrive at a value of 0.05, on a scale of zero to one. It is suggested, however, that the situation is not as problematic as it might seem: that low cross-domain levels of standardization of definition should not be cause for concern.
  4. Furner, J.; Dunbar, A.W.: ¬The treatment of topics relating to people of mixed race in bibliographic classification schemes : a critical race-theoretic approach (2004) 0.01
    0.014859837 = product of:
      0.04457951 = sum of:
        0.04457951 = product of:
          0.08915902 = sum of:
            0.08915902 = weight(_text_:classification in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08915902 = score(doc=2640,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05083213 = queryNorm
                0.55075383 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The classification of documents about topics relating to people of mixed race is problematic, partly because of the obscurity of racial categorization in general, and partly because of the limitations and inherent biases of bibliographic classification schemes designed primarily for usage in non-digital environments. Critical race theory is an approach that may prove useful in deterrnining how classification systems such as the Dewey Decimal Classification should most appropriately be stuctured.
  5. Furner, J.: Dewey deracialized : a critical race-theoretic perspective (2007) 0.01
    0.010614168 = product of:
      0.031842504 = sum of:
        0.031842504 = product of:
          0.06368501 = sum of:
            0.06368501 = weight(_text_:classification in 1090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06368501 = score(doc=1090,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05083213 = queryNorm
                0.39339557 = fieldWeight in 1090, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1090)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Critical race theory is introduced as a potentially useful approach to the evaluation of bibliographic classification schemes. An overview is presented of the essential elements of critical race theory, including clarifications of the meanings of some important terms such as "race" and "social justice." On the basis of a review of existing conceptions of the just and the antiracist library service, a rationale is presented for hypothesizing that critical race theory may be of use to the library and information sciences. The role of classification schemes as information institutions in their own right is established, and the Dewey Decimal Classification is introduced as the case to be studied. The challenges faced by classification-scheme designers in the construction and reconstruction of racerelated categories are reviewed; and an analysis is presented of one sense in which it might be suggested that recent (2003) revisions in one of the DDC's tables appear not to meet those challenges wholly successfully. An account is given of a further sense in which adoption of a critical race-theoretic approach has the more radical effect of calling into question a fundamental decision recently taken to "deracialize" the DDC. In conclusion, an assessment is made of critical race theory as a framework for evaluating library classification schemes.
  6. Furner, J.: Classification of the sciences in Greco-Roman Antiquity (2021) 0.01
    0.009398185 = product of:
      0.028194554 = sum of:
        0.028194554 = product of:
          0.05638911 = sum of:
            0.05638911 = weight(_text_:classification in 583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05638911 = score(doc=583,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05083213 = queryNorm
                0.34832728 = fieldWeight in 583, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=583)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    A review is undertaken of the contributions of 38 classical authors, from Pythagoras in the 6th century BCE to Isidore in the 6th century CE, to the classification of the sciences. Such classifications include some that are more theoretical in function, some that are more practical (e.g., encyclopedic, bibliographic, or curricular). The emergence of the quadrivium and trivium is charted; the Greek concept of "enkýklios paideía" and the Latin term "artes liberales" are defined; and the ways in which the form, content, and function of science classifications change during this period are assessed.
  7. Furner, J.: ¬A unifying model of document relatedness for hybrid search engines (2003) 0.01
    0.0068870517 = product of:
      0.020661155 = sum of:
        0.020661155 = product of:
          0.04132231 = sum of:
            0.04132231 = weight(_text_:22 in 2717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04132231 = score(doc=2717,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05083213 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2717, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2717)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    11. 9.2004 17:32:22
  8. Ellis, D.; Ford, N.; Furner, J.: In search of the unknown user : indexing, hypertext and the World Wide Web (1998) 0.01
    0.0066455207 = product of:
      0.019936562 = sum of:
        0.019936562 = product of:
          0.039873123 = sum of:
            0.039873123 = weight(_text_:classification in 4714) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039873123 = score(doc=4714,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05083213 = queryNorm
                0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 4714, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4714)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    For the purposes of this article, the indexing of information is interpreted as the pre-processing of information in order to enable its retrieval. The definition thus spans a dimension extending from classification-based approaches (pre-co-ordinate) to keyword searching (post-co-ordinate). In the first section we clarify our use of terminology, by briefly describing a framework for modelling IR systems in terms of sets of objects, relationships and functions. In the following 3 sections, we discuss the application of indexing functions to document collections of 3 specific types: (1) 'conventional' text databases; (2) hypertext databases; and (3) the World Wide Web, globally distributed across the Internet
  9. Furner, J.: FRSAD and the ontology of subjects of works (2012) 0.01
    0.0066455207 = product of:
      0.019936562 = sum of:
        0.019936562 = product of:
          0.039873123 = sum of:
            0.039873123 = weight(_text_:classification in 1915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039873123 = score(doc=1915,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05083213 = queryNorm
                0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 1915, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1915)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 50(2012) no.5/7, S.494-516
  10. Srinivasan, R.; Boast, R.; Becvar, K.M.; Furner, J.: Blobgects : digital museum catalogs and diverse user communities (2009) 0.01
    0.00573921 = product of:
      0.01721763 = sum of:
        0.01721763 = product of:
          0.03443526 = sum of:
            0.03443526 = weight(_text_:22 in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03443526 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05083213 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:52:32
  11. Furner, J.: User tagging of library resources : toward a framework for system evaluation (2007) 0.01
    0.0056961607 = product of:
      0.017088482 = sum of:
        0.017088482 = product of:
          0.034176964 = sum of:
            0.034176964 = weight(_text_:classification in 703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034176964 = score(doc=703,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05083213 = queryNorm
                0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 703, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=703)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich: WORLD LIBRARY AND INFORMATION CONGRESS: 73RD IFLA GENERAL CONFERENCE AND COUNCIL 19-23 August 2007, Durban, South Africa. - 157 - Classification and Indexing