-
Yi, K.: Challenges in automated classification using library classification schemes (2006)
0.02
0.018603582 = product of:
0.055810746 = sum of:
0.055810746 = product of:
0.11162149 = sum of:
0.11162149 = weight(_text_:classification in 5810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11162149 = score(doc=5810,freq=12.0), product of:
0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.6895092 = fieldWeight in 5810, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5810)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- A major library classification scheme has long been standard classification framework for information sources in traditional library environment, and text classification (TC) becomes a popular and attractive tool of organizing digital information. This paper gives an overview of previous projects and studies on TC using major library classification schemes, and summarizes a discussion of TC research challenges.
-
Shah, L.; Kumar, S.: Uniform form divisions (common isolates) for digital environment : a proposal (2006)
0.01
0.013291041 = product of:
0.039873123 = sum of:
0.039873123 = product of:
0.07974625 = sum of:
0.07974625 = weight(_text_:classification in 6101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07974625 = score(doc=6101,freq=8.0), product of:
0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 6101, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6101)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The study has proposed unification of three major schemes DDC, UDC and CC and developed uniform table for Form Divisions (Common Isolates), which can be used by any of the schemes of library classification or by a uniform classification scheme devised for digital environment. Paper suggests new postulation for the arrangement of geographical divisions. The paper also suggests for further research to prepare uniform classification code, which can be applied in digital environment. Concludes that IFLA may undertake a uniform classification code projects and its application in electronic environment.
-
Kim, K.-S.; Kim, S.-C.J.; Park, S.-J.; Zhu, X.; Polparsi, J.: Facet analyses of categories used in Web directories : a comparative study (2006)
0.01
0.01151038 = product of:
0.03453114 = sum of:
0.03453114 = product of:
0.06906228 = sum of:
0.06906228 = weight(_text_:classification in 6102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06906228 = score(doc=6102,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.42661208 = fieldWeight in 6102, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6102)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Faceted classification is believed to be suitable for organizing digital information resources. Based on a faceted classification model suggested for Web resources (Zins, 2002), the current study analyzed popular Web directories from different Asian countries/areas and examined cultural differences reflected in their classification systems. Three popular Web directories from four countries/regions (China, Hong Kong, Korea, and Thailand) were selected and their classifications were analyzed and compared: a local Yahoo and two home-grown Web directories from each country/region. Based on the findings, the study suggests a model that might be more suitable to Asian culture.
-
Danskin, A.: "Tomorrow never knows" : the end of cataloguing? (2006)
0.00
0.0037974403 = product of:
0.0113923205 = sum of:
0.0113923205 = product of:
0.022784641 = sum of:
0.022784641 = weight(_text_:classification in 6109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022784641 = score(doc=6109,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.14074548 = fieldWeight in 6109, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6109)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The purpose of this paper is to review the challenges confronting cataloguing as we have known it and to consider how these challenges might be confronted and whether they may be surmounted. The main focus of this paper is on cataloguing rather than the catalogue, although it is obviously difficult to separate one from the other. First of all, what does "cataloguing" mean? For the purposes of this paper I have adopted a broad definition incorporating the following activities: - description of the resource sufficient for purposes of identification and for differentiation from other similar resources - identification and control of access points - identification and control of relationships with other resources - subject analysis of the resource - assignment of subject indexing terms - assignment of classification numbers The challenges facing cataloguing are all too well known. In no particular order, the major challenges are: - Increasing inputs - New kinds of information resource - Competition from other mediation services. - Perception that cataloguing is high cost and offers poor value for money. - Fiscal constraints - Declining workforce This is a daunting list. We have a choice, we could, to paraphrase John Lennon, "Turn off our minds, relax and float down stream", until we retire, take voluntary redundancy, or retrain as marketing consultants; or, we can choose to confront these challenges and consider what they really mean for cataloguing.
