-
Green, R.: Making visible hidden relationships in the Dewey Decimal Classification : how relative index terms relate to DDC classes (2008)
0.12
0.1188876 = product of:
0.1783314 = sum of:
0.15013684 = weight(_text_:index in 2236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15013684 = score(doc=2236,freq=8.0), product of:
0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.67591333 = fieldWeight in 2236, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2236)
0.028194554 = product of:
0.05638911 = sum of:
0.05638911 = weight(_text_:classification in 2236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05638911 = score(doc=2236,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.34832728 = fieldWeight in 2236, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2236)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Content
- Relative Index (RI) terms in the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) system correspond to concepts that either approximate the whole of the class they index or that are in standing room there. DDC conventions and shallow natural language processing are used to determine automatically whether specific RI terms approximate the whole of or are in standing room in the classes they index. Approximately three-quarters of all RI terms are processed by the techniques described.
-
Foskett, D.J.: Classification for a general index language: a review of recent research by the Classification Research Group (1970)
0.12
0.118014835 = product of:
0.17702225 = sum of:
0.12868872 = weight(_text_:index in 3403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12868872 = score(doc=3403,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.5793543 = fieldWeight in 3403, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3403)
0.048333526 = product of:
0.09666705 = sum of:
0.09666705 = weight(_text_:classification in 3403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09666705 = score(doc=3403,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.5971325 = fieldWeight in 3403, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3403)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
-
Fugmann, R.: ¬An interactive classaurus on the PC (1990)
0.08
0.07867655 = product of:
0.11801483 = sum of:
0.08579248 = weight(_text_:index in 2222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08579248 = score(doc=2222,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.3862362 = fieldWeight in 2222, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2222)
0.03222235 = product of:
0.0644447 = sum of:
0.0644447 = weight(_text_:classification in 2222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0644447 = score(doc=2222,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.39808834 = fieldWeight in 2222, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2222)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Both classification systems and thesauri have their specific strengths and weaknesses. Through properly combining both approaches one can eliminate the latter and largely preserve the strenghts. 'Classauri' which originate in this well-known way are most effective if they are constructed and applied during computer-aided indexing. A special variety of classaurus is described which is characterized by the employment of simple bur highly effective conceptual and technical devices and by the renunciation of attempts to generate the wording of index entries algorithmically
- Source
- International classification. 17(1990) no.3/4, S.133-137
-
Tudhope, D.; Binding, C.; Blocks, D.; Cuncliffe, D.: Representation and retrieval in faceted systems (2003)
0.05
0.04524047 = product of:
0.0678607 = sum of:
0.0536203 = weight(_text_:index in 2703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0536203 = score(doc=2703,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.24139762 = fieldWeight in 2703, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2703)
0.014240401 = product of:
0.028480802 = sum of:
0.028480802 = weight(_text_:classification in 2703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028480802 = score(doc=2703,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.17593184 = fieldWeight in 2703, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2703)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This paper discusses two inter-related themes: the retrieval potential of faceted thesauri and XML representations of fundamental facets. Initial findings are discussed from the ongoing 'FACET' project, in collaboration with the National Museum of Science and Industry. The work discussed seeks to take advantage of the structure afforded by faceted systems for multi-term queries and flexible matching, focusing in this paper an the Art and Architecture Thesaurus. A multi-term matching function yields ranked results with partial matches via semantic term expansion, based an a measure of distance over the semantic index space formed by thesaurus relationships. Our intention is to drive the system from general representations and a common query structure and interface. To this end, we are developing an XML representation based an work by the Classification Research Group an fundamental facets or categories. The XML representation maps categories to particular thesauri and hierarchies. The system interface, which is configured by the mapping, incorporates a thesaurus browser with navigation history together with a term search facility and drag and drop query builder.
-
Unesco thesaurus : a structured list of descriptors for indexing and retrieving literature in the fields of education, science, social science, culture and communication (1977)
0.03
0.028597495 = product of:
0.08579248 = sum of:
0.08579248 = weight(_text_:index in 6424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08579248 = score(doc=6424,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.3862362 = fieldWeight in 6424, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6424)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- v. 1. Introduction, classified thesaurus, permuted index, hierarchical display.--v. 2. Alphabetical thesaurus.
-
Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021)
0.02
0.022426363 = product of:
0.067279086 = sum of:
0.067279086 = product of:
0.20183724 = sum of:
0.20183724 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20183724 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
0.43095535 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
-
Thesaurofacet: a thesaurus and faceted classification for engineering and related subjects (1969)
0.02
0.018603582 = product of:
0.055810746 = sum of:
0.055810746 = product of:
0.11162149 = sum of:
0.11162149 = weight(_text_:classification in 344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11162149 = score(doc=344,freq=12.0), product of:
0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.6895092 = fieldWeight in 344, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=344)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Footnote
- Revision of 'A faceted subject classification for engineering', 3rd ed., 1961
- LCSH
- Classification / Books / Technology
Classification / Books / Engineering
- Subject
- Classification / Books / Technology
Classification / Books / Engineering
-
Austin, D.: ¬The CRG research into a freely faceted scheme (1976)
0.02
0.015189761 = product of:
0.045569282 = sum of:
0.045569282 = product of:
0.091138564 = sum of:
0.091138564 = weight(_text_:classification in 116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.091138564 = score(doc=116,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 116, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=116)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Classification in the 1970s. Rev. ed
-
Root thesaurus. Pt.1.2 (1985)
0.01
0.0137741035 = product of:
0.04132231 = sum of:
0.04132231 = product of:
0.08264462 = sum of:
0.08264462 = weight(_text_:22 in 467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08264462 = score(doc=467,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 467, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=467)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 18. 5.2007 14:22:43
-
Karg, H.: Mapping Dewey and subject authorities : CrissCross (2007)
0.01
0.0137741035 = product of:
0.04132231 = sum of:
0.04132231 = product of:
0.08264462 = sum of:
0.08264462 = weight(_text_:22 in 559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08264462 = score(doc=559,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 559, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=559)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- Vortrag anläasslich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
-
Vickery, B.C.: Classificatory principles in natural language indexing systems (1976)
0.01
0.013291041 = product of:
0.039873123 = sum of:
0.039873123 = product of:
0.07974625 = sum of:
0.07974625 = weight(_text_:classification in 1276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07974625 = score(doc=1276,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 1276, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1276)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Classification in the 1970s: a second look. Rev. ed. Ed.: A. Maltby
-
Scott, D.S.: Subject classification and natural-language processing for retrieval in large databases (1989)
0.01
0.013154721 = product of:
0.03946416 = sum of:
0.03946416 = product of:
0.07892832 = sum of:
0.07892832 = weight(_text_:classification in 967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07892832 = score(doc=967,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.48755667 = fieldWeight in 967, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=967)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- New forms of man-machine interaction are becoming available that have great power for the delivery of information. But the scales of speed and capacity on which the computing machines operate demand new thoughts as to how information can be stored and retrieved. The objective of the discussion in this paper is to argue for a combination of natural-language processing and subject classification to be able to meet the demands
- Source
- Classification theory in the computer age: conversations across the disciplines. Proc. from the Conf. 18.-19.11.1988, Albany, NY
-
Raghavan, K.S.: ¬The general theory of classification as the basis for structuring of subject headings (1985(?))
0.01
0.013154721 = product of:
0.03946416 = sum of:
0.03946416 = product of:
0.07892832 = sum of:
0.07892832 = weight(_text_:classification in 1830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07892832 = score(doc=1830,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.48755667 = fieldWeight in 1830, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1830)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Defines the basic functions of surrogate files in information retrieval. Exemplifies the categories enunciated in the general theory of classification developed in India. Defines the principles for structuring the concepts. Formulates set of general postulates pertaining to the structure of compound subjects. On the basis of these, outlines a procedure for structuring of subject headings. Demonstrates the application of procedure through examples
- Source
- Classification and communication. Papers, presented at the 2nd Regional Conf. of FID/CR, 15.11.1985, New Dehli. Ed.: K. Kumar et al
-
Frâncu, V.: ¬A universal classification system going through changes (2001)
0.01
0.012558854 = product of:
0.03767656 = sum of:
0.03767656 = product of:
0.07535312 = sum of:
0.07535312 = weight(_text_:classification in 1593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07535312 = score(doc=1593,freq=14.0), product of:
0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.46547192 = fieldWeight in 1593, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1593)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- In the early 1990s, indexing with classification codes from the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) in an academic library, going from traditional to automated routines in any and all its activities, suddenly proved insufficient. Under the circumstances of online searching, the possibilities offered by the new OPAC looked much more attractive to indexers and searchers alike. Therefore, a quick shift to indexing with UDC and keywords instead of UDC numbers alone was made. Currency, precision and, more importantly, user-friendliness were strong advantages offered by keyword indexing and searching. But the larger the dictionary of keywords, the more problematic the consequences an information scattering, given the lack of control an terms. The present paper describes the advantages of the UDC in indexing by presenting some of the devices it is provided with: subdivision by analogy, common and special auxiliaries, use of synthesis, and use of connecting symbols. The solution of indexing with both UDC notation and words from a thesaurus based an UDC was prompted by some other characteristics of the schedules: a semi-faceted classification system, hierarchical organisation, richness in terminology and consistency and control of notation. The methodology used in building the thesaurus is conceived according to the international standards (ISO 2788 and 5964) to which some principles have been added, giving the specific approach of harmonising a classification structure with that of a thesaurus. Compatibility and translatability issues are also considered and some problems arising from them are treated in detail. Most of the problems discussed are illustrated with examples.
- Source
- Advances in classification research, vol.10: proceedings of the 10th ASIS SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop. Ed.: Albrechtsen, H. u. J.E. Mai
-
Wilson, T.D.: ¬The work of the British Classification Research Group (1972)
0.01
0.011392321 = product of:
0.034176964 = sum of:
0.034176964 = product of:
0.06835393 = sum of:
0.06835393 = weight(_text_:classification in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06835393 = score(doc=2766,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Frâncu, V.: Metode de armonizare a clasicarii zecimale universale cu un tezaur (2000)
0.01
0.011392321 = product of:
0.034176964 = sum of:
0.034176964 = product of:
0.06835393 = sum of:
0.06835393 = weight(_text_:classification in 6049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06835393 = score(doc=6049,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 6049, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6049)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Footnote
- Übers. des Titels: Harmonizing the universal decimal classification system with an interdisciplinary multilingual thesaurs
-
Aitchison, J.: ¬A classification as a source for a thesaurus : the bibliographic classification of H.E. Bliss as a source of thesaurus terms and structure (1986)
0.01
0.00986604 = product of:
0.029598119 = sum of:
0.029598119 = product of:
0.059196237 = sum of:
0.059196237 = weight(_text_:classification in 1569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059196237 = score(doc=1569,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.3656675 = fieldWeight in 1569, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1569)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The second edition of the Bibliographic Classidication of H.E. Bliss (BC2), being prepared under the editorship of Jack Mills, Vanda Broughton and others, is a rich source of structure and terminology for thesauri covering different subject fields. The new edition employs facet analysis and is thesaurus-compatible. A number of facet-based thesauri have drawn upon Bliss for terms and relationships. In two of these thesauri the Bliss Classification was the source of both systematic and alphabetical displays. The DHSS-DATA thesaurus, published by the United Kingdom Department of Health and Social Security, provides controlled terms and Bliss class numbers for indexing and searching the DHSS-DATA database. The ECOT thesaurus (Educational courses and occupations thesaurus) prepared for the Department of Education and Science, uses the software sedigned for the British Standards Institution ROOT thesaurus to genearte an alphabetical display from the systematic display derived from the Bliss schedules. Problems, benefits, and future prospects of Bliss-based thesaurus construction are discussed
-
Francu, V.: ¬The impact of specificity on the retrieval power of a UDC-based multilingual thesaurus (2003)
0.01
0.00986604 = product of:
0.029598119 = sum of:
0.029598119 = product of:
0.059196237 = sum of:
0.059196237 = weight(_text_:classification in 5518) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059196237 = score(doc=5518,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.3656675 = fieldWeight in 5518, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5518)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The article describes the research done over a bibliographic database in order to show the impact the specificity of the knowledge organising tools may have on information retrieval (IR). For this purpose two multilingual Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) based thesauri having different degrees of specificity are considered. Issues of harmonising a classificatory structure with a thesaurus structure are introduced, and significant aspects of information retrieval in a multilingual environment are examined in an extensive manner. Aspects of complementarity are discussed with particular emphasis on the real impact produced on IR by alternative search facilities. Finally, a number of conclusions are formulated as they arise from the study.
- Content
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Knowledge organization and classification in international information retrieval"
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 37(2003) nos.1/2, S.49-64
-
Aitchison, J.: Bliss and the thesaurus : the bibliographic classification of H.E. Bliss as a source of thesaurus terms and structure (1986)
0.01
0.009493601 = product of:
0.028480802 = sum of:
0.028480802 = product of:
0.056961603 = sum of:
0.056961603 = weight(_text_:classification in 1570) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056961603 = score(doc=1570,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 1570, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1570)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Frâncu, V.: Harmonizing a universal classification system with an interdisciplinary multilingual thesaurus : advantages and limitations (2000)
0.01
0.0082217 = product of:
0.024665099 = sum of:
0.024665099 = product of:
0.049330197 = sum of:
0.049330197 = weight(_text_:classification in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049330197 = score(doc=108,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.3047229 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The case under consideration is a project of building an interdisciplinary multilingual thesaurus (Romanian-English-French) starting from a list of indexing terms based on an abridged version of the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC). The resulting thesaurus is intended for public libraries for both indexing and searching purposes in bibliographic databases covering a wide range of topics but with a fairly low level of specificity. The problems encountered in such an approach fall into two groups: 1) concordance or compatibility problems in terms of the indexing languages considered (between a classification system and a thesaurus); 2) equivalence and, hence, translatability problems in terms of the natural languages involved. Additionally, the question of ambiguity given the co-occurrence of terms in more than one class, will be discussed with reference to homographs and polysemantic words. In a thesaurus with such a wide coverage yet with a low specificity level, the method adopted in the thesaurus construction was to provide as many lead-in terms as possible and post them up to the closest in meaning broader term in order to improve the recall ratio
