Search (30 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Bibliographische Software"
  1. Perez, E.: Industrial strength database publishing : Inmagic DB/Textworks WebPublisher (1997) 0.09
    0.08684497 = product of:
      0.13026746 = sum of:
        0.10616278 = weight(_text_:index in 679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10616278 = score(doc=679,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05083213 = queryNorm
            0.4779429 = fieldWeight in 679, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=679)
        0.02410468 = product of:
          0.04820936 = sum of:
            0.04820936 = weight(_text_:22 in 679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04820936 = score(doc=679,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05083213 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 679, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=679)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The availability of powerful indexing and database products with easy Web connections means that libraries able to gather and edit their own data are emancipated from the large vendors. The Oregon State Library staff used the Data Magician translation utility as part of a complex, but speedy, database converison project. The Oregon Index database of approximately 300.000 records was converted from a BRS database host over to the Inmagic WebPublisher system. Describes the planning and action stepts used in producing the Web accessible index database of considerable size. Participants have high ratings to effectiveness of both the translation utility and the database engine
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  2. Kim, T.C.-w.K.; Zumstein, P.: Semiautomatische Katalogisierung und Normdatenverknüpfung mit Zotero im Index Theologicus (2016) 0.05
    0.04953232 = product of:
      0.14859696 = sum of:
        0.14859696 = weight(_text_:index in 3064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14859696 = score(doc=3064,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05083213 = queryNorm
            0.6689808 = fieldWeight in 3064, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3064)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Im Folgenden soll aufgezeigt werden, wie derzeit das Literaturverwaltungsprogramm Zotero innerhalb des Index Theologicus genutzt wird, um unselbstständige Literatur in einem bibliothekarischen Katalogisierungssystem zu erfassen. Die modulare und flexible Architektur der Open Source Software erlaubt es, die bereits kollaborativ zusammengetragene Programmierarbeit zur Datenextraktion mitzunutzen. Das vorgestellte semiautomatische Verfahren bringt auch bei der Verknüpfung von Normdaten erhebliche Vorteile für die Medienbearbeitung.
    Object
    Index Theologicus
  3. Sieverts, E.G.; Hofstede, M.; Groeniger, B.O.: Software for information storage and retrieval tested, evaluated and compared : pt.4: indexing and full-text retrieval programs (1992) 0.03
    0.030332223 = product of:
      0.09099667 = sum of:
        0.09099667 = weight(_text_:index in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09099667 = score(doc=2051,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05083213 = queryNorm
            0.40966535 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In this article, the fourth in a series on microcomputer software for information storage and retrieval, test results of six indexing and full-text retrieval programs are presented and various properties and qualities of these programs are discussed. The common faeture of programs in these categories is that they are primarily meant to retrieve words (or combination of them) in large text files. To do this they either simply index existing text files in one or more formats (indexing programs), or they store and index them in their own database format (full-text retrieval programs). The programs reviewed in this issue are the indexing programs Ask-it, Texplore and ZYindex and the full-text retrieval programs KAware, textMaster and WordCruncher. All programs run under MS-DOS. In addition ZYindex has a Windows and a Unix version and TextMaster is also available for for Unix. For each of the six programs almost 100 facts and test results are tabulated. The programs are also discussed individually
  4. Sieverts, E.: ProCite voor de eingebruiker (1997) 0.03
    0.028597495 = product of:
      0.08579248 = sum of:
        0.08579248 = weight(_text_:index in 90) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08579248 = score(doc=90,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05083213 = queryNorm
            0.3862362 = fieldWeight in 90, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=90)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    For literature searchers who create extensive bibliographies, special software is available. Among the most popular of these packages is ProCite from Research Information Systems. The system uses workforms with predefined fields for author, title etc. Through its BilioLink conversion program ProCite enables data to be downloaded from other files. Advantages of the package are its ease of use and links to WWW applications. However, index browsing is clumsy and there is little control over input errors
  5. Siegling, I.: Dateien auf dem Index : Dokumentenmanagement zu Hause (2000) 0.03
    0.028597495 = product of:
      0.08579248 = sum of:
        0.08579248 = weight(_text_:index in 5320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08579248 = score(doc=5320,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05083213 = queryNorm
            0.3862362 = fieldWeight in 5320, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5320)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  6. Dell'Orso, F.: Micro CDS/ISIS : analisi di un information retrieval system per personal computer (1995) 0.03
    0.028597495 = product of:
      0.08579248 = sum of:
        0.08579248 = weight(_text_:index in 2231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08579248 = score(doc=2231,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05083213 = queryNorm
            0.3862362 = fieldWeight in 2231, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2231)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Continuing a previous article on CDS/ISIS Micro functions and procedures, illustrates other aspects by recapitulating the strong and weak points of the system. Defects include lack of user firendliness, the search and cataloguing functions, index management, and import/export. Favourable features are total file definition, the formatting language, alphabetical sorting, commands, and data transfer to/from other software environments. ISIS, developed by UNESCO, is a good product, and although demanding for the user, repays the effort made
  7. Ewers, A.: ¬A review of new developments in text retrieval systems (1994) 0.03
    0.025022808 = product of:
      0.07506842 = sum of:
        0.07506842 = weight(_text_:index in 1063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07506842 = score(doc=1063,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05083213 = queryNorm
            0.33795667 = fieldWeight in 1063, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1063)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reports a review of current and planned developments of the leading suppliers of text retrieval software, aimed at trying to establish trends in the industry. The products evaluated are those from minicomputer and mainframe computer backgrounds and can be best described as fully functional text information management systems, the majority of which operate in inverted file structures which index every word. The survey was conducted by means of interviews with senior executives of the suppliers concerned and the suppliers and systems reviewed were: Information Dimensions (BASISplus); BRS Dataware (BRS/Search); Excalibur Technologies (EFS); Status/IQ (Status/IQ); and Verity (TOPIC)
  8. Kulkarni, M.; Gupta, V.K.; Viswanathan, T.: ¬An automatic index generation and information retrieval system for bibliographic database developed at the Indian National Scientific Documentation Centre (1996) 0.03
    0.025022808 = product of:
      0.07506842 = sum of:
        0.07506842 = weight(_text_:index in 4525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07506842 = score(doc=4525,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05083213 = queryNorm
            0.33795667 = fieldWeight in 4525, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4525)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  9. Griffith, C.: Creating full-text databases with ISYS (1997) 0.03
    0.025022808 = product of:
      0.07506842 = sum of:
        0.07506842 = weight(_text_:index in 624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07506842 = score(doc=624,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05083213 = queryNorm
            0.33795667 = fieldWeight in 624, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=624)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews ISYS for Windows from Odyssey Development / The Denver Technological Center of Greenwood Village, CO. Explains how it can help users identify documents and create a full text index of the words in each document. This allows the user to create a full text database of the documents, for both personal and Web based use. The database can be created either manually or by using a wizard, which prompts the user with questions that moves them through the creation process. It provides a number of retrieval options, including Boolean searching and proximity options. It is easy to update, using built-in reindexing utilities. Reports no significant complaints
  10. Valas, G.: Comparison of some widespread CD-ROM information retrieval software packages (1994) 0.03
    0.025022808 = product of:
      0.07506842 = sum of:
        0.07506842 = weight(_text_:index in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07506842 = score(doc=2419,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05083213 = queryNorm
            0.33795667 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reports the results of a study, conducted at the National Technical Information Centre and Library (OMIKK), Hungary, to compare 5 popular proprietary CD-ROM searching software packages: OPTIWARE; BRS/Search; ProQuest; SPIRS; and Dialog OnDisc Manager. Software evaluation was based on analysis of a range of CD-ROM bibliographic databases (with the exception of BRS/Search for which the library held no bibliographic databases) and focused on: response times for various activities (logging on, searching, retrieval, display); other performance factors; direct searching features (Boolean operators, proximity operators, arithmetic relations, truncation); index browsing; search strategy handling; display possibilities; output possibilities; and ergonomic and user friendliness factors. No general conclusions are drawn and users are left to draw their own conclusions
  11. Kelly, J.A.: Downloading information using bibliographic management software (1997) 0.02
    0.018365473 = product of:
      0.055096414 = sum of:
        0.055096414 = product of:
          0.11019283 = sum of:
            0.11019283 = weight(_text_:22 in 3254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11019283 = score(doc=3254,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05083213 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3254, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3254)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.59, [=Suppl.22]
  12. EndNote X7 : bibliographies made easy [= Version 17] (2013) 0.01
    0.0137741035 = product of:
      0.04132231 = sum of:
        0.04132231 = product of:
          0.08264462 = sum of:
            0.08264462 = weight(_text_:22 in 1808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08264462 = score(doc=1808,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05083213 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1808, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1808)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    17. 9.2018 18:19:22
  13. Matthews, J.R.; Parker, M.R.: Microcomputer-based automated library systems : new series (1993) 0.01
    0.01147842 = product of:
      0.03443526 = sum of:
        0.03443526 = product of:
          0.06887052 = sum of:
            0.06887052 = weight(_text_:22 in 3073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06887052 = score(doc=3073,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05083213 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3073, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3073)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    30.11.1995 20:53:22
  14. Matthews, J.R.; Parker, M.R.: Microcomputer-based automated library systems : new series (1993) 0.01
    0.01147842 = product of:
      0.03443526 = sum of:
        0.03443526 = product of:
          0.06887052 = sum of:
            0.06887052 = weight(_text_:22 in 3074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06887052 = score(doc=3074,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05083213 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3074, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3074)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    30.11.1995 20:53:22
  15. Freese, E.; Göbel, E.: Literaturdokumentation mit LIDOS und Archivierung am Beispiel des Spezialarchives Arbeit und Gesundheit : Handlungsanleitung (1998) 0.01
    0.01147842 = product of:
      0.03443526 = sum of:
        0.03443526 = product of:
          0.06887052 = sum of:
            0.06887052 = weight(_text_:22 in 8) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06887052 = score(doc=8,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05083213 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 8, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    17. 7.2002 15:38:22
  16. Pro-Cite 2.0 for the IBM and Biblio-Link to USMARC comunications format records (1993) 0.01
    0.011392321 = product of:
      0.034176964 = sum of:
        0.034176964 = product of:
          0.06835393 = sum of:
            0.06835393 = weight(_text_:classification in 5618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06835393 = score(doc=5618,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05083213 = queryNorm
                0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 5618, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5618)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Cataloging and classification quarterly 16(1993) no.2, S.125-127
  17. Wurangian, N.: Using the OCLC Cataloging Micro Enhancer to produce a bibliography list (1993) 0.01
    0.009182736 = product of:
      0.027548207 = sum of:
        0.027548207 = product of:
          0.055096414 = sum of:
            0.055096414 = weight(_text_:22 in 5055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055096414 = score(doc=5055,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05083213 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5055, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5055)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    OCLC systems and services. 9(1993) no.1, S.22-24
  18. Laegreid, J.A.: SIFT: a Norwegian information retrieval system (1993) 0.01
    0.009182736 = product of:
      0.027548207 = sum of:
        0.027548207 = product of:
          0.055096414 = sum of:
            0.055096414 = weight(_text_:22 in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055096414 = score(doc=7701,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05083213 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    23. 1.1999 19:22:09
  19. Bellarby, L.: ¬A comparison of two personal bibliographic software packages : EndNote and Pro-Cite (1993) 0.01
    0.009182736 = product of:
      0.027548207 = sum of:
        0.027548207 = product of:
          0.055096414 = sum of:
            0.055096414 = weight(_text_:22 in 561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055096414 = score(doc=561,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05083213 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 561, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=561)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Law librarian. 24(1993) no.1, S.22-23
  20. Knauth, M.: Bibliographies made easy : a look at PRO-CITE (1989) 0.01
    0.009182736 = product of:
      0.027548207 = sum of:
        0.027548207 = product of:
          0.055096414 = sum of:
            0.055096414 = weight(_text_:22 in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055096414 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05083213 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Computers in libraries. 9(1989) no.4, S.22-24