Search (111 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  1. Horah, J.L.: from cards to the Web : ¬The evolution of a library database (1998) 0.05 
    0.04795946 = product of:
  0.14387839 = sum of:
    0.14387839 = weight(_text_:index in 4842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14387839 = score(doc=4842,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05083213 = queryNorm
        0.64773786 = fieldWeight in 4842, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4842)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    The Jack Brause Library at New York University (NYU) is a special library supporting the curriculum of NYU's Real Estate Institute. The Jack Brause Library (JBL) Real estate Periodical Index was established in 1990 and draws on the library's collection of over 140 real estate periodicals. Describes the conversion of the JBL Index from a 3x5 card index to an online resource. The database was originally created using Rbase for DOS but this quickly became obsolete and in 1993 was replaced with InMagic. In 1997 the JBL Index was made available on NYU's telnet catalogue, BobCat, and the Internet database catalogue, BobCatPlus. The transition of InMagic data to USMARC formatted records involved a 3-step process: data normalization; adding value; and data recording. The Index has been operational through telnet since May 1997 and installing it onto the Web became functional in Oct 1997
  2. Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996) 0.04 
    0.04116246 = product of:
  0.12348738 = sum of:
    0.12348738 = sum of:
      0.045569282 = weight(_text_:classification in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.045569282 = score(doc=2408,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05083213 = queryNorm
          0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
      0.0779181 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0779181 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05083213 = queryNorm
          0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    13. 1.2007 18:31:22
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
  3. El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008) 0.04 
    0.03984704 = product of:
  0.11954111 = sum of:
    0.11954111 = sum of:
      0.0644447 = weight(_text_:classification in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0644447 = score(doc=249,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05083213 = queryNorm
          0.39808834 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
      0.055096414 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055096414 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05083213 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    This paper reviews library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2005-06. It covers pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of cataloging; Functional Requirement for Bibliographic Records (FRBR); metadata and its applications and relation to Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC); cataloging tools and standards; authority control; and recruitment, training, and the changing role of catalogers.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  4. Weber, L.B.: Reading formatting MARC AMC (1990) 0.03 
    0.033555232 = product of:
  0.100665696 = sum of:
    0.100665696 = sum of:
      0.045569282 = weight(_text_:classification in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.045569282 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05083213 = queryNorm
          0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.055096414 = weight(_text_:22 in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055096414 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05083213 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    8. 1.2007 14:22:51
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 11(1990) nos.3/4, S.117-143
  5. Ranta, J.A.: Queens Borough Public Library's Guidelines for cataloging community information (1996) 0.03 
    0.029360829 = product of:
  0.088082485 = sum of:
    0.088082485 = sum of:
      0.039873123 = weight(_text_:classification in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.039873123 = score(doc=6523,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05083213 = queryNorm
          0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
      0.04820936 = weight(_text_:22 in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04820936 = score(doc=6523,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05083213 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.51-69
  6. Aslanidi, M.; Papadakis, I.; Stefanidakis, M.: Name and title authorities in the music domain : alignment of UNIMARC authorities format with RDA (2018) 0.03 
    0.029360829 = product of:
  0.088082485 = sum of:
    0.088082485 = sum of:
      0.039873123 = weight(_text_:classification in 5178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.039873123 = score(doc=5178,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05083213 = queryNorm
          0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 5178, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5178)
      0.04820936 = weight(_text_:22 in 5178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04820936 = score(doc=5178,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05083213 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5178, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5178)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    19. 3.2019 12:17:22
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 56(2018) no.4, S.354-373
  7. Ede, S.: Fitness for purpose : the future evolution of bibliographic records and their delivery (1995) 0.03 
    0.028597495 = product of:
  0.08579248 = sum of:
    0.08579248 = weight(_text_:index in 3086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08579248 = score(doc=3086,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05083213 = queryNorm
        0.3862362 = fieldWeight in 3086, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3086)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Catalogue and index. 1995, no.116, S.1-3
  8. Hendrix, F.: MARC harmonisation : strategies for the future (1997) 0.03 
    0.028597495 = product of:
  0.08579248 = sum of:
    0.08579248 = weight(_text_:index in 1760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08579248 = score(doc=1760,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05083213 = queryNorm
        0.3862362 = fieldWeight in 1760, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1760)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Catalogue and index. 1997, no.124, S.1-5
  9. Brownrigg, E.; Butler, B.: ¬An electronic library communications format : a definition and development proposal for MARC III (1990) 0.03 
    0.025022808 = product of:
  0.07506842 = sum of:
    0.07506842 = weight(_text_:index in 2326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07506842 = score(doc=2326,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05083213 = queryNorm
        0.33795667 = fieldWeight in 2326, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2326)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    The Memex Research Institute has proposed a research project to describe in machine-readable form all the information needed to create electronic "books" in a standard communications format. Two kinds of extended computer file formats employing the MARC structure will be defined: Access Formats that take into consideration the many existing index and abstract system formats and their associated databases; and Document Formats that provide for storage, representation, transmission, and display of machine-readabie works in text or image form. The formats that emerge can be employed by libraries, publishers, information utilities, and computer users worldwide to convert printed works to electronic forms or to create original works in electric format, and thus foment the creation of networked electronic library collections.
  10. Woods, E.W.; IFLA Section on classification and Indexing and Indexing and Information Technology; Joint Working Group on a Classification Format: Requirements for a format of classification data : Final report, July 1996 (1996) 0.02 
    0.022784643 = product of:
  0.06835393 = sum of:
    0.06835393 = product of:
      0.13670786 = sum of:
        0.13670786 = weight(_text_:classification in 3008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13670786 = score(doc=3008,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05083213 = queryNorm
            0.8444729 = fieldWeight in 3008, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3008)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Object
    USMARC for classification data
  11. Guenther, R.S.: Automating the Library of Congress Classification Scheme : implementation of the USMARC format for classification data (1996) 0.02 
    0.0220407 = product of:
  0.0661221 = sum of:
    0.0661221 = product of:
      0.1322442 = sum of:
        0.1322442 = weight(_text_:classification in 5578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1322442 = score(doc=5578,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05083213 = queryNorm
            0.81689996 = fieldWeight in 5578, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5578)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Potential uses for classification data in machine readable form and reasons for the development of a standard, the USMARC Format for Classification Data, which allows for classification data to interact with other USMARC bibliographic and authority data are discussed. The development, structure, content, and use of the standard is reviewed with implementation decisions for the Library of Congress Classification scheme noted. The author examines the implementation of USMARC classification at LC, the conversion of the schedules, and the functionality of the software being used. Problems in the effort are explored, and enhancements desired for the online classification system are considered.
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Cataloging and Classification Standards and Rules"
    Object
    USMARC for classification data
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 21(1996) nos.3/4, S.177-203
  12. Concise UNIMARC Classification Format : Draft 5 (20000125) (2000) 0.02 
    0.021481566 = product of:
  0.0644447 = sum of:
    0.0644447 = product of:
      0.1288894 = sum of:
        0.1288894 = weight(_text_:classification in 4421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1288894 = score(doc=4421,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05083213 = queryNorm
            0.7961767 = fieldWeight in 4421, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4421)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Object
    UNIMARC for classification data
  13. USMARC format for classification data : including guidelines for content designation (1991) 0.02 
    0.021014981 = product of:
  0.06304494 = sum of:
    0.06304494 = product of:
      0.12608989 = sum of:
        0.12608989 = weight(_text_:classification in 4372) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12608989 = score(doc=4372,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05083213 = queryNorm
            0.7788835 = fieldWeight in 4372, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4372)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Format specifications for the communication of MARC classification records, which may be used in online public catalog retrieval systems, in systems to maintain and develop classification schedules, and in online systems for library classifiers. Defines the codes and conventions (tags, indicators, subfield codes, and codes values) that identify the data elements in the records. Developed to support the 2 major US classification schemes: Library of Congress Classification and Dewey Decimal Classification, but also lets you communicate other classification schemes. Includes a glossary of classification terms and full record examples of LCC, DDC, NLM classification and UDC
    Object
    USMARC for classification data
  14. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.02 
    0.019479526 = product of:
  0.058438577 = sum of:
    0.058438577 = product of:
      0.11687715 = sum of:
        0.11687715 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11687715 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05083213 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
  15. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.02 
    0.018365473 = product of:
  0.055096414 = sum of:
    0.055096414 = product of:
      0.11019283 = sum of:
        0.11019283 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11019283 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05083213 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  16. Guenther, R.S.: ¬The Library of Congress Classification in the USMARC format (1994) 0.02 
    0.017582394 = product of:
  0.052747183 = sum of:
    0.052747183 = product of:
      0.105494365 = sum of:
        0.105494365 = weight(_text_:classification in 8864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.105494365 = score(doc=8864,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05083213 = queryNorm
            0.6516607 = fieldWeight in 8864, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8864)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    The paper reviews the development of the USMARC Format for Classification Data, a standard for communication of classification data in machine-readable form. It considers the uses for online classification schedules, both for technical services and reference functions and gives an overview of the format specification details of data elements used and of the structure of the records. The paper describes an experiment conducted at the Library of Congress to test the format as well as the development of the classification database encompassing the LCC schedules. Features of the classification system are given. The LoC will complete its conversion of the LCC in mid-1995
    Object
    USMARC for classification data
  17. Guenther, R.S.: ¬The USMARC Format for Classification Data : development and implementation (1992) 0.02 
    0.01698267 = product of:
  0.05094801 = sum of:
    0.05094801 = product of:
      0.10189602 = sum of:
        0.10189602 = weight(_text_:classification in 2996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10189602 = score(doc=2996,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05083213 = queryNorm
            0.6294329 = fieldWeight in 2996, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2996)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    This paper discusses the newly developed USMARC Format for Classification Data. It reviews its potential uses within an online system and its development as one of the USMARC standards for representing bibliographic and related information in machine-readable form. It provides a summary of the fields in the format, and considers the prospects for its implementation.
    Object
    USMARC for classification data
    Source
    Classification research for knowledge representation and organization. Proc. 5th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Toronto, Canada, 24.-28.6.1991. Ed. by N.J. Williamson u. M. Hudon
  18. Guenther, R.S.: ¬The development and implementation of the USMARC format for classification data (1992) 0.02 
    0.01698267 = product of:
  0.05094801 = sum of:
    0.05094801 = product of:
      0.10189602 = sum of:
        0.10189602 = weight(_text_:classification in 8865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10189602 = score(doc=8865,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05083213 = queryNorm
            0.6294329 = fieldWeight in 8865, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8865)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    This paper discusses the newly developed USMARC Format for Classification Data. It reviews its potential uses within an online system and its development as one of the USMARC standards. It provides a summary of the fields in the format and considers the prospects for its implementation. The papaer describes an experiment currently being conducted at the Library of Congress to create USMARC classification records and use a classification database in classifying materials in the social sciences
    Object
    USMARC for classification data
  19. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.02 
    0.016069788 = product of:
  0.04820936 = sum of:
    0.04820936 = product of:
      0.09641872 = sum of:
        0.09641872 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09641872 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05083213 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  20. Geißelmann, F.: Arbeitsergebnisse der Arbeitsgruppe Codes (2000) 0.02 
    0.016069788 = product of:
  0.04820936 = sum of:
    0.04820936 = product of:
      0.09641872 = sum of:
        0.09641872 = weight(_text_:22 in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09641872 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05083213 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    26. 8.2000 19:22:35

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 92
  • d 16
  • f 1
  • pl 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 97
  • s 7
  • el 4
  • b 2
  • n 2
  • l 1
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Themes