-
Markey, K.; Demeyer, A.N.: Dewey Decimal Classification online project: evaluation of a library schedule and index integrated into the subject searching capabilities of an online catalog : final report to the Council of Library Resources (1986)
0.09
0.09048094 = product of:
0.1357214 = sum of:
0.1072406 = weight(_text_:index in 3472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1072406 = score(doc=3472,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.48279524 = fieldWeight in 3472, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3472)
0.028480802 = product of:
0.056961603 = sum of:
0.056961603 = weight(_text_:classification in 3472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056961603 = score(doc=3472,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 3472, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3472)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
-
Bell, J.: ¬The far north and beyond : an index to Canadian science fiction and fantasy in english-language genre magazines and other selected periodicals of the pulp era, 1896-1955 (1998)
0.07
0.07004927 = product of:
0.21014781 = sum of:
0.21014781 = weight(_text_:index in 3727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21014781 = score(doc=3727,freq=12.0), product of:
0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.94608164 = fieldWeight in 3727, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3727)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Aims to provide an accurate and comprehensive bibliographic description of Canadian science fiction and fantasy literature in english language pulp magazines published between 1896 and 1955, a fragile and increasingly elusive periodical genre which contains a virtually unknown selection of popular fiction and art by Canadians. The arrangement is alphabetical under the following headings: author index; title index; artist index; magazine index; and series index
-
McCormick, A.; Sutton, A.: Open learning and the Internet in public libraries (1998)
0.06
0.056670345 = product of:
0.085005514 = sum of:
0.06434436 = weight(_text_:index in 3685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06434436 = score(doc=3685,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.28967714 = fieldWeight in 3685, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3685)
0.020661155 = product of:
0.04132231 = sum of:
0.04132231 = weight(_text_:22 in 3685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04132231 = score(doc=3685,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3685, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3685)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Presents the findings of the South Ayrshire Libraries OPen Learning and the Internet project, Sep 1997 to Oct 1998. The objective was to demonstrate how open learning materials available on the Internet could be integrated with the provision of local open learning resources to provide an enhanced learning environment in public libraries. The main areas of concentration within the project were information skills support to public library users and the provision of WWW based independent materials to learners. The organisation and retrieval of Web based resources for local use was a major issue throughout the project. Recommends the adoption of Dublin Core metadata standards, the connection of databases of resources with searchable wen pages, and the development of thesauri of terms used to index the Web based resources locally. Sstaff training, and the new skills which will need to be developed, were identified as issues. Cost was also identified as a related issue, extending to issues such as access to open learning material and the Internet
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 18:55:19
-
Peters, H.J.: User reactions to PRECIS indexes (1981)
0.05
0.050045617 = product of:
0.15013684 = sum of:
0.15013684 = weight(_text_:index in 383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15013684 = score(doc=383,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.67591333 = fieldWeight in 383, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=383)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Theme
- Preserved Context Index System (PRECIS)
-
Aitchison, T.M.: Comparative evaluation of index languages : Part I, Design. Part II, Results (1969)
0.05
0.050045617 = product of:
0.15013684 = sum of:
0.15013684 = weight(_text_:index in 561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15013684 = score(doc=561,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.67591333 = fieldWeight in 561, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=561)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Sykes, J.: Making solid business decisions through intelligent indexing taxonomies : a white paper prepared for Factiva, Factiva, a Dow Jones and Reuters Company (2003)
0.04
0.036192376 = product of:
0.054288562 = sum of:
0.04289624 = weight(_text_:index in 721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04289624 = score(doc=721,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.1931181 = fieldWeight in 721, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=721)
0.0113923205 = product of:
0.022784641 = sum of:
0.022784641 = weight(_text_:classification in 721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022784641 = score(doc=721,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.14074548 = fieldWeight in 721, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=721)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- In 2000, Factiva published "The Value of Indexing," a white paper emphasizing the strategic importance of accurate categorization, based on a robust taxonomy for later retrieval of documents stored in commercial or in-house content repositories. Since that time, there has been resounding agreement between persons who use Web-based systems and those who design these systems that search engines alone are not the answer for effective information retrieval. High-quality categorization is crucial if users are to be able to find the right answers in repositories of articles and documents that are expanding at phenomenal rates. Companies continue to invest in technologies that will help them organize and integrate their content. A March 2002 article in EContent suggests a typical taxonomy implementation usually costs around $100,000. The article also cites a Merrill Lynch study that predicts the market for search and categorization products, now at about $600 million, will more than double by 2005. Classification activities are not new. In the third century B.C., Callimachus of Cyrene managed the ancient Library of Alexandria. To help scholars find items in the collection, he created an index of all the scrolls organized according to a subject taxonomy. Factiva's parent companies, Dow Jones and Reuters, each have more than 20 years of experience with developing taxonomies and painstaking manual categorization processes and also have a solid history with automated categorization techniques. This experience and expertise put Factiva at the leading edge of developing and applying categorization technology today. This paper will update readers about enhancements made to the Factiva Intelligent IndexingT taxonomy. It examines the value these enhancements bring to Factiva's news and business information service, and the value brought to clients who license the Factiva taxonomy as a fundamental component of their own Enterprise Knowledge Architecture. There is a behind-the-scenes-look at how Factiva classifies a huge stream of incoming articles published in a variety of formats and languages. The paper concludes with an overview of new Factiva services and solutions that are designed specifically to help clients improve productivity and make solid business decisions by precisely finding information in their own everexpanding content repositories.
-
Ellis, D.; Furner-Hines, J.; Willett, P.: ¬The creation of hypertext links in full-text documents (1994)
0.03
0.030332223 = product of:
0.09099667 = sum of:
0.09099667 = weight(_text_:index in 1084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09099667 = score(doc=1084,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.40966535 = fieldWeight in 1084, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1084)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- An important stage in the process of retrieval of objects from a hypertext database is the creation of a set of internodal links that are intended to represent the relationships existing between objetcs; an operation that is usually undertaken manually such as the allocation of subject index terms to documents. Reports results of a study in which several different sets of hypertext links were inserted, each by a different person, between the paragraphs of each of a number of full text documents. The similarity between the members of each pair of link sets was then evaluated. Results indicated that little similarity existed among the link sets, a finding comparable with those of studies of inter indexer consistency, which suggests that there is generally only a low level of agreemenet between the sets of index terms assigned to a document by indexers. Concludes with that part of the study designed to test the validity of making these kinds of assumptions in the context of hypertext link sets
-
Anderson, J.D.: Guidelines for indexes and related information retrieval devices (1997)
0.03
0.030332223 = product of:
0.09099667 = sum of:
0.09099667 = weight(_text_:index in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09099667 = score(doc=3807,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.40966535 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This technical report provides guidelines for the content, organization, and presentation of indexes used for the retrieval of documents and parts of documents. It deals with the principles of indexing, regardless of the type of material indexed, the indexing method used (intellectual analysis, machine algorithm, or both), the medium of the index, or the method of presentation for searching. It emphasizes 4 processes essential for all indexes: comprehensive design, vocabulary management, and the provision of systax. It includes definitions of indexes and of their parts, attributes, and aspects; a uniform vocabulary; treatment of the nature and variety of indexes; and recommendations regarding the design, organization, and presentation of indexes. It does not suggest guidelines for every detail or technique of indexing. These can be determined for each index on the basis of factors covered in the technical report
-
Deokattey, S.; Sharma, S.B.K.; Kumar, G.R.; Bhanumurthy, K.: Knowledge organization research : an overview (2015)
0.03
0.029360829 = product of:
0.088082485 = sum of:
0.088082485 = sum of:
0.039873123 = weight(_text_:classification in 2092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039873123 = score(doc=2092,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.24630459 = fieldWeight in 2092, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2092)
0.04820936 = weight(_text_:22 in 2092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04820936 = score(doc=2092,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2092, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2092)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The object of this literature review is to provide a historical perspective of R and D work in the area of Knowledge Organization (KO). This overview/summarization will provide information on major areas of KO. Journal articles published in core areas of KO: (Classification, Indexing, Thesauri and Taxonomies, Internet and Subject approach to information in the electronic era and Ontologies will be predominantly covered in this literature review. Coverage in this overview may not be completely exhaustive, but it succinctly showcases major developments in the area of KO. This review is a good source of additional reading material on KO apart from prescribed reading material on KO
- Date
- 22. 6.2015 16:13:38
-
Robertson, A.M.; Willett, P.: Use of genetic algorithms in information retrieval (1995)
0.03
0.028597495 = product of:
0.08579248 = sum of:
0.08579248 = weight(_text_:index in 2418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08579248 = score(doc=2418,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.3862362 = fieldWeight in 2418, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2418)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Reviews the basic techniques involving genetic algorithms and their application to 2 problems in information retrieval: the generation of equifrequent groups of index terms; and the identification of optimal query and term weights. The algorithm developed for the generation of equifrequent groupings proved to be effective in operation, achieving results comparable with those obtained using a good deterministic algorithm. The algorithm developed for the identification of optimal query and term weighting involves fitness function that is based on full relevance information
-
Davison, K.: Classification practice in Britain : report on a survey of classification opinion and practice in Great Britain, with particular reference to the Dewey Decimal Classification (1966)
0.02
0.02302076 = product of:
0.06906228 = sum of:
0.06906228 = product of:
0.13812456 = sum of:
0.13812456 = weight(_text_:classification in 3469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13812456 = score(doc=3469,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.85322416 = fieldWeight in 3469, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3469)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Wåhlin, E.: Research on classification systems : summarizing report on research on classification systems and their applications (1978)
0.02
0.021481566 = product of:
0.0644447 = sum of:
0.0644447 = product of:
0.1288894 = sum of:
0.1288894 = weight(_text_:classification in 3617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1288894 = score(doc=3617,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.7961767 = fieldWeight in 3617, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3617)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Adler, R.; Ewing, J.; Taylor, P.: Citation statistics : A report from the International Mathematical Union (IMU) in cooperation with the International Council of Industrial and Applied Mathematics (ICIAM) and the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (IMS) (2008)
0.02
0.02144812 = product of:
0.06434436 = sum of:
0.06434436 = weight(_text_:index in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06434436 = score(doc=2417,freq=8.0), product of:
0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.28967714 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Using citation data to assess research ultimately means using citation-based statistics to rank things.journals, papers, people, programs, and disciplines. The statistical tools used to rank these things are often misunderstood and misused. - For journals, the impact factor is most often used for ranking. This is a simple average derived from the distribution of citations for a collection of articles in the journal. The average captures only a small amount of information about that distribution, and it is a rather crude statistic. In addition, there are many confounding factors when judging journals by citations, and any comparison of journals requires caution when using impact factors. Using the impact factor alone to judge a journal is like using weight alone to judge a person's health. - For papers, instead of relying on the actual count of citations to compare individual papers, people frequently substitute the impact factor of the journals in which the papers appear. They believe that higher impact factors must mean higher citation counts. But this is often not the case! This is a pervasive misuse of statistics that needs to be challenged whenever and wherever it occurs. -For individual scientists, complete citation records can be difficult to compare. As a consequence, there have been attempts to find simple statistics that capture the full complexity of a scientist's citation record with a single number. The most notable of these is the h-index, which seems to be gaining in popularity. But even a casual inspection of the h-index and its variants shows that these are naive attempts to understand complicated citation records. While they capture a small amount of information about the distribution of a scientist's citations, they lose crucial information that is essential for the assessment of research.
The validity of statistics such as the impact factor and h-index is neither well understood nor well studied. The connection of these statistics with research quality is sometimes established on the basis of "experience." The justification for relying on them is that they are "readily available." The few studies of these statistics that were done focused narrowly on showing a correlation with some other measure of quality rather than on determining how one can best derive useful information from citation data. We do not dismiss citation statistics as a tool for assessing the quality of research.citation data and statistics can provide some valuable information. We recognize that assessment must be practical, and for this reason easily-derived citation statistics almost surely will be part of the process. But citation data provide only a limited and incomplete view of research quality, and the statistics derived from citation data are sometimes poorly understood and misused. Research is too important to measure its value with only a single coarse tool. We hope those involved in assessment will read both the commentary and the details of this report in order to understand not only the limitations of citation statistics but also how better to use them. If we set high standards for the conduct of science, surely we should set equally high standards for assessing its quality.
- Object
- h-index
-
Modelle und Konzepte der Beitragsdokumentation und Filmarchivierung im Lokalfernsehsender Hamburg I : Endbericht (1996)
0.02
0.018365473 = product of:
0.055096414 = sum of:
0.055096414 = product of:
0.11019283 = sum of:
0.11019283 = weight(_text_:22 in 7383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11019283 = score(doc=7383,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7383, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7383)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 2.1997 19:46:30
-
Garrel, J. von; Mayer, J.; Mühlfeld, M.: Künstliche Intelligenz im Studium : eine quantitative Befragung von Studierenden zur Nutzung von ChatGPT & Co. (2023)
0.02
0.017873434 = product of:
0.0536203 = sum of:
0.0536203 = weight(_text_:index in 1006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0536203 = score(doc=1006,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2221244 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.24139762 = fieldWeight in 1006, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1006)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-h-da/frontdoor/deliver/index/docId/395/file/befragung_ki-im-studium.pdf
-
Wheelbarger, J.J.; Clouse, R.W.: ¬A comparision of a manual library reclassification project with a computer automated library reclassification project (1975)
0.02
0.016069788 = product of:
0.04820936 = sum of:
0.04820936 = product of:
0.09641872 = sum of:
0.09641872 = weight(_text_:22 in 3473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09641872 = score(doc=3473,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3473, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3473)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Pages
- 22 S
-
Matthews, J.R.; Parker, M.R.: Local Area Networks and Wide Area Networks for libraries (1995)
0.02
0.016069788 = product of:
0.04820936 = sum of:
0.04820936 = product of:
0.09641872 = sum of:
0.09641872 = weight(_text_:22 in 2656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09641872 = score(doc=2656,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17800546 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2656, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2656)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 30.11.1995 20:53:22
-
Craven, T.C.: Research in document classification and indexing (Canada) 1971-1980 (1981)
0.02
0.015189761 = product of:
0.045569282 = sum of:
0.045569282 = product of:
0.091138564 = sum of:
0.091138564 = weight(_text_:classification in 1211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.091138564 = score(doc=1211,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 1211, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1211)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Richmond, P.A.: Aspects of recent research in the art and science of classification (1953)
0.02
0.015189761 = product of:
0.045569282 = sum of:
0.045569282 = product of:
0.091138564 = sum of:
0.091138564 = weight(_text_:classification in 3544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.091138564 = score(doc=3544,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 3544, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3544)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Gopinath, M.A.: Classification Research (India): 1968-1973 (1974)
0.02
0.015189761 = product of:
0.045569282 = sum of:
0.045569282 = product of:
0.091138564 = sum of:
0.091138564 = weight(_text_:classification in 1540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.091138564 = score(doc=1540,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16188543 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.05083213 = queryNorm
0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 1540, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1540)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
