-
Smiraglia, R.P.: Classification interaction demonstrated empirically (2014)
0.04
0.037153862 = product of:
0.074307725 = sum of:
0.074307725 = sum of:
0.031872902 = weight(_text_:online in 1420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031872902 = score(doc=1420,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.05220068 = queryNorm
0.20118743 = fieldWeight in 1420, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1420)
0.042434826 = weight(_text_:22 in 1420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042434826 = score(doc=1420,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05220068 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1420, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1420)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- There is greater depth in knowledge organization systems beyond the surface of hierarchically-structured concepts. Deconstructed elements of a knowledge organization system share network-like relationships that might be used in interaction with the characteristics of documents to provide "classification interaction" as a means of identifying previously undiscovered relationships. A random sample of UDC call numbers from the online catalog of the Catholic University of Leuven (KU Leuven) is analyzed to discover interactions among conceptual classification, instantiation, and bibliographic demographic characteristics. The associations demonstrated represent ways in which predictable interactions occur among classified bibliographic entities and the components of the rich UDC classification.
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Beak, J.; Smiraglia, R.P.: Contours of knowledge : core and granularity in the evolution of the DCMI domain (2014)
0.01
0.010608707 = product of:
0.021217413 = sum of:
0.021217413 = product of:
0.042434826 = sum of:
0.042434826 = weight(_text_:22 in 1415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042434826 = score(doc=1415,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05220068 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1415, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1415)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Leazer, G.H.; Smiraglia, R.P.: Bibliographic families in the library catalog : a qualitative analysis and grounded theory (1999)
0.01
0.008840589 = product of:
0.017681178 = sum of:
0.017681178 = product of:
0.035362355 = sum of:
0.035362355 = weight(_text_:22 in 107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035362355 = score(doc=107,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05220068 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 107, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=107)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: Shifting intension in knowledge organization : an editorial (2012)
0.01
0.008840589 = product of:
0.017681178 = sum of:
0.017681178 = product of:
0.035362355 = sum of:
0.035362355 = weight(_text_:22 in 630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035362355 = score(doc=630,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05220068 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 630, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=630)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.2013 11:09:49
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: ISKO 12's bookshelf - evolving intension : an editorial (2013)
0.01
0.008840589 = product of:
0.017681178 = sum of:
0.017681178 = product of:
0.035362355 = sum of:
0.035362355 = weight(_text_:22 in 636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035362355 = score(doc=636,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05220068 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 636, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=636)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.2013 11:43:34
-
Graf, A.M.; Smiraglia, R.P.: Race & ethnicity in the Encyclopedia of Milwaukee : a case study in the use of domain analysis (2014)
0.01
0.008840589 = product of:
0.017681178 = sum of:
0.017681178 = product of:
0.035362355 = sum of:
0.035362355 = weight(_text_:22 in 1412) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035362355 = score(doc=1412,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05220068 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1412, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1412)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: Uniform titles for music : an exercise in collocating works (1989)
0.01
0.0079682255 = product of:
0.015936451 = sum of:
0.015936451 = product of:
0.031872902 = sum of:
0.031872902 = weight(_text_:online in 441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031872902 = score(doc=441,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.05220068 = queryNorm
0.20118743 = fieldWeight in 441, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=441)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Simultaneously published as Authority Control in the Online Environment: Considerations and Practices
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: Subject access to archival materials using LCSH (1990)
0.01
0.0079682255 = product of:
0.015936451 = sum of:
0.015936451 = product of:
0.031872902 = sum of:
0.031872902 = weight(_text_:online in 490) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031872902 = score(doc=490,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.05220068 = queryNorm
0.20118743 = fieldWeight in 490, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=490)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper takes for granted that archival materials will be entered into a catalog in which Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) will be used to provide access. The purposes of subject access are discussed. The matter of selecting the appropriate extent of subject cataloging for archival entities is raised. Archival entities will generally require more detailed subject cataloging than published materials. A scheme for subject analysis of archival materials is presented. LCSH is described briefly, and several archival entities are analyzed and provided with LCSH access points to illustrate the methodology employed. The chief advantages of using LCSH for archival materials are its availability, and its ability to cause archival materials to collocate topically with published materials in integrated online systems.
-
Friedman, A.; Smiraglia, R.P.: Nodes and arcs : concept map, semiotics, and knowledge organization (2013)
0.01
0.007072471 = product of:
0.014144942 = sum of:
0.014144942 = product of:
0.028289884 = sum of:
0.028289884 = weight(_text_:22 in 770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028289884 = score(doc=770,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05220068 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 770, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=770)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl. auch den Beitrag: Treude, L.: Das Problem der Konzeptdefinition in der Wissensorganisation: über einen missglückten Versuch der Klärung. In: LIBREAS: Library ideas. no.22, 2013, S.xx-xx.
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: Derivative bibliographic relationships among theological works (1999)
0.01
0.0066401875 = product of:
0.013280375 = sum of:
0.013280375 = product of:
0.02656075 = sum of:
0.02656075 = weight(_text_:online in 6676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02656075 = score(doc=6676,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.05220068 = queryNorm
0.16765618 = fieldWeight in 6676, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6676)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Derivative bibliographic relationships are the primary relationships that exist among the members of a bibliographic family--the set of interrelated works where the relationships among entities express shared semantic or linguistic activity. Derivative bibliographic relationships exist between any new conception of a work and its original source (the progenitor), or its successor, or both. Discipline was a poor predictor of derivative relationships in prior studies of derivative bibliographic relationships. For the present study random samples of works were drawn from the catalogs of the Bobst Library, New York University, and the Burke Library, Union Theological Seminary, New York. Two sites were chosen to allow a test of the differences in collection development patterns between a university research library and a theological library. Bibliographic families were compiled for each work. Results indicate: 1) derivative bibliographic relationships exist for somewhere between one-half and two-thirds of theological works in this study; 2) there is little difference in proportions of derivative bibliographic relationships or in the size of bibliographic families between the two collections; 3) there is a positive correlation between the age of the progenitor work and the size of the bibliographic family); 4) there are significant gaps in coverage of theological bibliographic families online; 5) there is some evidence of differing patterns of derivation between Judaic and Islamic literature and Christian literature; 5) forms and genres are useful in a limited way for predicting the incidence of derivative relationships in theological literature
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: ¬The history of "The Work" in the modern catalog (2003)
0.01
0.0066401875 = product of:
0.013280375 = sum of:
0.013280375 = product of:
0.02656075 = sum of:
0.02656075 = weight(_text_:online in 5631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02656075 = score(doc=5631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.05220068 = queryNorm
0.16765618 = fieldWeight in 5631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5631)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- From a historical perspective, one could consider the modern library catalog to be that bibliographical apparatus that stretches at least from Thomas Hyde's catalog for the Bodleian Library at Oxford to the near present. Mai and other recent authors have suggested postmodern approaches to knowledge organization. In these, we realize that there is no single and unique order of knowledge or documents but rather there are many appropriate orders, all of them contextually dependent. Works (oeuvres, opera, Werke, etc.), as are musical works, literary works, works of art, etc., are and always have been key entities for information retrieval. Yet catalogs in the modern era were designed to inventory (first) and retrieve (second) specific documents. From Hyde's catalog for the Bodleian until the late twentieth century, developments are epistemologically pragmatic--reflected in the structure of catalog records, in the rules for main entry headings, and in the rules for filing in card catalogs. After 1980 developments become empirical-reflected in research conducted by Tillett, Yee, Smiraglia, Leazer, Carlyle, and Vellucci. The influence of empiricism on the pragmatic notion of "the work" has led to increased focus on the concept of the work. The challenge for the postmodern online catalog is to fully embrace the concept of "the work," finally to facilitate it as a prime objective for information retrieval.
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: ¬The history of "The Work" in the modern catalog (2003)
0.01
0.0066401875 = product of:
0.013280375 = sum of:
0.013280375 = product of:
0.02656075 = sum of:
0.02656075 = weight(_text_:online in 5652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02656075 = score(doc=5652,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.05220068 = queryNorm
0.16765618 = fieldWeight in 5652, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5652)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- From a historical perspective, one could consider the modern library catalog to be that bibliographical apparatus that stretches at least from Thomas Hyde's catalog for the Bodleian Library at Oxford to the near present. Mai and other recent authors have suggested postmodern approaches to knowledge organization. In these, we realize that there is no single and unique order of knowledge or documents but rather there are many appropriate orders, all of them contextually dependent. Works (oeuvres, opera, Werke, etc.), as are musical works, literary works, works of art, etc., are and always have been key entities for information retrieval. Yet catalogs in the modern era were designed to inventory (first) and retrieve (second) specific documents. From Hyde's catalog for the Bodleian until the late twentieth century, developments are epistemologically pragmatic--reflected in the structure of catalog records, in the rules for main entry headings, and in the rules for filing in card catalogs. After 1980 developments become empirical-reflected in research conducted by Tillett, Yee, Smiraglia, Leazer, Carlyle, and Vellucci. The influence of empiricism on the pragmatic notion of "the work" has led to increased focus on the concept of the work. The challenge for the postmodern online catalog is to fully embrace the concept of "the work," finally to facilitate it as a prime objective for information retrieval.
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: Curating and virtual shelves : an editorial (2006)
0.00
0.004695322 = product of:
0.009390644 = sum of:
0.009390644 = product of:
0.018781288 = sum of:
0.018781288 = weight(_text_:online in 409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018781288 = score(doc=409,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.05220068 = queryNorm
0.11855084 = fieldWeight in 409, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=409)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- "Actions have consequences, and this is certainly true of knowledge organization. One reason our colleague Birger Hjoerland (1998) urges epistemological analysis for the problems of information science is that resources might well serve many different purposes for different users, and thus different user groups might have different epistemological relationships with resources. There is a difference between consulting a dictionary for a definition, reading a text for comprehension to increase your knowledge base, reading for pleasure (which, evidently boosts certain endorphins), and synthesizing a scientific report to generate an hypothesis, just to generate a few scenarios. The only commonality in that list is the consultation of a resource. In each case the purpose dictates the activity and is reliant upon a different epistemological aim. No online source of facts is going to suffice if I want something to read that will give me pleasure; no catalog of fine literature is sufficient for the extraction of scientific theory. Hjoerland also suggests that the names we give - to documents, to categories, even to activities - embodies the action of naming, and thereby also the action of facilitating or obfuscating the use of named resources (Hjoerland 2003, 98). Terminology cannot be neutral because the very selection of terms as names either provides a pathway to understanding or a barrier to usage, depending on the epistemological perspective of the user group. I won't go looking for Miss Marple in your dictionary if you call it a dictionary, even though it might contain a perfectly fine list of motives for murder. Likewise, as an information scientist I am not likely to look for research anywhere except in a database that purports to contain peer-reviewed scientific literature. Names have power, and the action of naming is powerful too. We in knowledge organization need to be aware that no matter how elegant our science, the actions based on our research have consequences. A model generated empirically might make an excellent explanation of a specific reality, but if it migrates into the structure of a system for knowledge organization it has the power to help or hinder assignment to categories, not to mention retrieval from those categories.
Librarianship incorporates the tools of knowledge organization as part of its role as cultural disseminator. Subject headings and classification were both intended by their 19`h century promulgators - perhaps most notably Dewey and Cutter - to facilitate learning by grouping materials of high quality together. We might call this enhanced serendipity if we think it happens by accident or act of fate, or we might call it curatorship if we realize the responsibility inherent in our social role. The cataloger's job always has been to place each work sensitively among other works related to it, and to make the relationships explicit to facilitate and even encourage selection (see Miksa 1983). Schallier (2004) reported on the use of classification in an online catalog to enhance just such a curatorial purpose. UDC classification codes were exploded into linguistic strings to allow users to search, not just for a given term, but for the terms that occur around it - that is, terms that are adjacent in the classification. These displays are used alongside LCSH to provide enhanced-serendipity for users. What caught my attention was the intention of the project (p. 271): UDC permits librarians to build virtual library shelves, where a document's subjects can be described in thematic categories rather than in detailed verbal terms. And: It is our experience that most end users are not familiar with large controlled vocabularies. UDC could be an answer to this, since its alphanumeric makeup could be used to build a tree structure of terms, which would guide end users in their searchers. There are other implications from this project, including background linkage from UDC codes that drive the "virtual shelves" to subject terms that drive the initial classification. Knowledge organization has consequences in both theory and application."
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: On sameness and difference : an editorial (2008)
0.00
0.0044202944 = product of:
0.008840589 = sum of:
0.008840589 = product of:
0.017681178 = sum of:
0.017681178 = weight(_text_:22 in 1919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017681178 = score(doc=1919,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05220068 = queryNorm
0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 1919, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1919)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 12. 6.2008 20:18:22
