-
Taylor, A.G.: On the subject of subjects (1995)
0.03
0.028289884 = product of:
0.05657977 = sum of:
0.05657977 = product of:
0.11315954 = sum of:
0.11315954 = weight(_text_:22 in 6087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11315954 = score(doc=6087,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05220068 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6087, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6087)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 11. 1.1997 19:22:24
-
Taylor, A.G.: Enhancing subject access in online systems : the year's work in subject analysis, 1991 (1992)
0.02
0.0212486 = product of:
0.0424972 = sum of:
0.0424972 = product of:
0.0849944 = sum of:
0.0849944 = weight(_text_:online in 1504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0849944 = score(doc=1504,freq=8.0), product of:
0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.05220068 = queryNorm
0.5364998 = fieldWeight in 1504, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1504)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The research literature published in 1991 in the following categories is examined: users and subject searching, subject access in online catalogs, subject cataloging and indexing, information retrieval, thesaurus and indexing approaches, classification, and specialized subjects and materials. The preponderance of the research dealt with improving subject access in online systems. This seems to have been the result of acceptance by many researchers of a number of previously researched hypotheses that, taken together, indicate that improving online systems holds more promise than trying to perfect the processes of subject analysis
-
Taylor, A.G.: Authority files in online catalogs : an investigation of their value (1984)
0.01
0.0131469015 = product of:
0.026293803 = sum of:
0.026293803 = product of:
0.052587606 = sum of:
0.052587606 = weight(_text_:online in 326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052587606 = score(doc=326,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.05220068 = queryNorm
0.33194235 = fieldWeight in 326, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=326)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Authority control is discussed from two viewpoints: The need for bibliographic records relating to a name to be brought together under one form of the name; and the need for cross references to direct a user to a heading from variant forms of the name. Data from two research projects that support the need for choosing one form of name are summarized. The author's study of user requests that resulted in no "hits" in an online catalog is described. Data are given to show that for only 6.4% of these requests would our current methods of cross referencing in authority records have been helpful, and that two system programs would have given much greater assistance.
-
Gross, T.; Taylor, A.G.; Joudrey, D.N.: Still a lot to lose : the role of controlled vocabulary in keyword searching (2015)
0.01
0.0131469015 = product of:
0.026293803 = sum of:
0.026293803 = product of:
0.052587606 = sum of:
0.052587606 = weight(_text_:online in 2007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052587606 = score(doc=2007,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.05220068 = queryNorm
0.33194235 = fieldWeight in 2007, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2007)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In their 2005 study, Gross and Taylor found that more than a third of records retrieved by keyword searches would be lost without subject headings. A review of the literature since then shows that numerous studies, in various disciplines, have found that a quarter to a third of records returned in a keyword search would be lost without controlled vocabulary. Other writers, though, have continued to suggest that controlled vocabulary be discontinued. Addressing criticisms of the Gross/Taylor study, this study replicates the search process in the same online catalog, but after the addition of automated enriched metadata such as tables of contents and summaries. The proportion of results that would be lost remains high.
- Theme
- Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
-
Taylor, A.G.: Implementing AACR and AACR2 : a personal perspective and lessons learned (2012)
0.01
0.012376824 = product of:
0.024753649 = sum of:
0.024753649 = product of:
0.049507298 = sum of:
0.049507298 = weight(_text_:22 in 2546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049507298 = score(doc=2546,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05220068 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2546, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2546)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Taylor, A.G.: ¬The information universe : will we have chaos of control? (1994)
0.01
0.0106243 = product of:
0.0212486 = sum of:
0.0212486 = product of:
0.0424972 = sum of:
0.0424972 = weight(_text_:online in 1644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0424972 = score(doc=1644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.05220068 = queryNorm
0.2682499 = fieldWeight in 1644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1644)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Presents evidence to suggest that the online world needs the bibliographic skills of librarians but that the term bibliographic control is likely to be associated specifically with libraries and liable to misinterpretation. Suggests that it may be time to start talking about information organization which may be described as having the following 4 aspects: making new information bearing entities known; acquiring such entities at certain points of accumulation; providing name, title and subject access to the entities; and providing for the physical location of copies. Urges librarians rapidly to adapt their skills to this increasing need for information organization
-
Taylor, A.G.: Research and theoretical considerations in authority control (1989)
0.01
0.0106243 = product of:
0.0212486 = sum of:
0.0212486 = product of:
0.0424972 = sum of:
0.0424972 = weight(_text_:online in 438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0424972 = score(doc=438,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.05220068 = queryNorm
0.2682499 = fieldWeight in 438, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=438)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Simultaneously published as Authority Control in the Online Environment: Considerations and Practices
-
Taylor, A.G.; Joudrey, D.N.: Cataloging (2009)
0.01
0.009296263 = product of:
0.018592525 = sum of:
0.018592525 = product of:
0.03718505 = sum of:
0.03718505 = weight(_text_:online in 3758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03718505 = score(doc=3758,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.05220068 = queryNorm
0.23471867 = fieldWeight in 3758, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3758)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Bibliographic control, the larger field of which cataloging is a part, is discussed in order to provide the context for cataloging. A major product of the process of cataloging, the catalog, is explained in order to underscore why cataloging is needed. The processes for completing original cataloging are delineated, followed by a brief look at cooperative and copy cataloging. Methods for encoding metadata records for online storage and display are outlined. A look at new initiatives and trends for the future of cataloging conclude the discussion.
-
Wynar, B.S.; Taylor, A.G.: Introduction to cataloging and classification (1985)
0.01
0.0066401875 = product of:
0.013280375 = sum of:
0.013280375 = product of:
0.02656075 = sum of:
0.02656075 = weight(_text_:online in 2576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02656075 = score(doc=2576,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.05220068 = queryNorm
0.16765618 = fieldWeight in 2576, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2576)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- After 25 years of service, this professional text has been updated in line with developments in the field of library science. Since the seventh edition of this standard text was published in 1985, there have been changes in virtually every area of bibliographic control. "AACR2 Revised" (AACR2R) has been implemented; new editions of or supplements to LCSH, LC classification, and DDC, and "Sears" have appeared; OCLC has adopted the PRISM format; and networking and online catalogues have become a way of life. Taylor addresses these and other changes in this edition. Consequently, many chapters of this text are entirely new, such as "Cataloguing in Context" and "Subject Arrangement of Library Materials", or fully revised such as "Development of Cataloguing Codes", which has been expanded to show the continuity in the development leading to publication of AACR2R. Two appendices have been added: an introduction to USMARC format and instructions for typing catalogue cards, including a detailed analysis of the punctuation and spacing to be used when conforming to the International Standard Bibliographic Description (ISBD).
