Search (10 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Zhang, Y."
  1. Zhang, Y.: Developing a holistic model for digital library evaluation (2010) 0.04
    0.037153862 = product of:
      0.074307725 = sum of:
        0.074307725 = sum of:
          0.031872902 = weight(_text_:online in 2360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031872902 = score(doc=2360,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05220068 = queryNorm
              0.20118743 = fieldWeight in 2360, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2360)
          0.042434826 = weight(_text_:22 in 2360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042434826 = score(doc=2360,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05220068 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2360, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2360)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article reports the author's recent research in developing a holistic model for various levels of digital library (DL) evaluation in which perceived important criteria from heterogeneous stakeholder groups are organized and presented. To develop such a model, the author applied a three-stage research approach: exploration, confirmation, and verification. During the exploration stage, a literature review was conducted followed by an interview, along with a card sorting technique, to collect important criteria perceived by DL experts. Then the criteria identified were used for developing an online survey during the confirmation stage. Survey respondents (431 in total) from 22 countries rated the importance of the criteria. A holistic DL evaluation model was constructed using statistical techniques. Eventually, the verification stage was devised to test the reliability of the model in the context of searching and evaluating an operational DL. The proposed model fills two lacunae in the DL domain: (a) the lack of a comprehensive and flexible framework to guide and benchmark evaluations, and (b) the uncertainty about what divergence exists among heterogeneous DL stakeholders, including general users.
  2. Zhang, Y.; Liu, J.; Song, S.: ¬The design and evaluation of a nudge-based interface to facilitate consumers' evaluation of online health information credibility (2023) 0.04
    0.036462463 = product of:
      0.07292493 = sum of:
        0.07292493 = sum of:
          0.037562575 = weight(_text_:online in 993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037562575 = score(doc=993,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05220068 = queryNorm
              0.23710167 = fieldWeight in 993, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=993)
          0.035362355 = weight(_text_:22 in 993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035362355 = score(doc=993,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05220068 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 993, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=993)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Evaluating the quality of online health information (OHI) is a major challenge facing consumers. We designed PageGraph, an interface that displays quality indicators and associated values for a webpage, based on credibility evaluation models, the nudge theory, and existing empirical research concerning professionals' and consumers' evaluation of OHI quality. A qualitative evaluation of the interface with 16 participants revealed that PageGraph rendered the information and presentation nudges as intended. It provided the participants with easier access to quality indicators, encouraged fresh angles to assess information credibility, provided an evaluation framework, and encouraged validation of initial judgments. We then conducted a quantitative evaluation of the interface involving 60 participants using a between-subject experimental design. The control group used a regular web browser and evaluated the credibility of 12 preselected webpages, whereas the experimental group evaluated the same webpages with the assistance of PageGraph. PageGraph did not significantly influence participants' evaluation results. The results may be attributed to the insufficiency of the saliency and structure of the nudges implemented and the webpage stimuli's lack of sensitivity to the intervention. Future directions for applying nudges to support OHI evaluation were discussed.
    Date
    22. 6.2023 18:18:34
  3. Zhang, Y.; Li, X.; Fan, W.: User adoption of physician's replies in an online health community : an empirical study (2020) 0.02
    0.015936451 = product of:
      0.031872902 = sum of:
        0.031872902 = product of:
          0.063745804 = sum of:
            0.063745804 = weight(_text_:online in 4) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.063745804 = score(doc=4,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05220068 = queryNorm
                0.40237486 = fieldWeight in 4, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Online health question-and-answer consultation with physicians is becoming a common phenomenon. However, it is unclear how users identify the most satisfying reply. Based on the dual-process theory of knowledge adoption, we developed a conceptual model and empirical method to study which factors influence adoption of a reply. We extracted 6 variables for argument quality (Ease of understanding, Relevance, Completeness, Objectivity, Timeliness, Structure) and 4 for source credibility (Physician's online experience, Physician's offline expertise, Hospital location, Hospital level). The empirical results indicate that both central and peripheral routes affect user's adoption of a response. Physician's offline expertise negatively affects user's adoption decision, while physician's online experience positively affects it; this effect is positively moderated by user involvement.
  4. Zhang, Y.: Understanding the sustained use of online health communities from a self-determination perspective (2016) 0.01
    0.013280375 = product of:
      0.02656075 = sum of:
        0.02656075 = product of:
          0.0531215 = sum of:
            0.0531215 = weight(_text_:online in 3216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0531215 = score(doc=3216,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05220068 = queryNorm
                0.33531237 = fieldWeight in 3216, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3216)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Sustained use of an information source is sometimes important for achieving an individual's long-term goals, such as learning and self-development. It is even more important for users of online health communities because health benefits usually come with sustained use. However, little is known about what retains a user. We interviewed 21 participants who had been using online diabetes communities in a sustained manner. Guided by self-determination theory, which posits that behaviors are sustained when they can satisfy basic human needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness, we identified mechanisms that help satisfy these needs, and thus sustain users in online health communities. Autonomy-supportive mechanisms include being respected and supported as a unique individual, feeling free in making choices, and receiving meaningful rationales about others' decisions. Competence-cultivating mechanisms include seeking information, providing information, and exchanging information with others to construct knowledge. Mechanisms that cultivate relatedness include seeing similarities between oneself and peers, receiving responses from others, providing emotional support, and forming small underground groups for closer interactions. The results suggest that, like emotions, information and small group interactions also play a key role in retaining users. System design and community management strategies are discussed based on these mechanisms.
  5. Zhang, Y.: ¬The impact of Internet-based electronic resources on formal scholarly communication in the area of library and information science : a citation analysis (1998) 0.01
    0.01250248 = product of:
      0.02500496 = sum of:
        0.02500496 = product of:
          0.05000992 = sum of:
            0.05000992 = weight(_text_:22 in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05000992 = score(doc=2808,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05220068 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 1.1999 17:22:22
  6. Zhang, Y.; Jansen, B.J.; Spink, A.: Identification of factors predicting clickthrough in Web searching using neural network analysis (2009) 0.01
    0.010608707 = product of:
      0.021217413 = sum of:
        0.021217413 = product of:
          0.042434826 = sum of:
            0.042434826 = weight(_text_:22 in 2742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042434826 = score(doc=2742,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05220068 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2742, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2742)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 17:49:11
  7. Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.: ¬A user-centered functional metadata evaluation of moving image collections (2008) 0.01
    0.009390644 = product of:
      0.018781288 = sum of:
        0.018781288 = product of:
          0.037562575 = sum of:
            0.037562575 = weight(_text_:online in 1884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037562575 = score(doc=1884,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05220068 = queryNorm
                0.23710167 = fieldWeight in 1884, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1884)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In this article, the authors report a series of evaluations of two metadata schemes developed for Moving Image Collections (MIC), an integrated online catalog of moving images. Through two online surveys and one experiment spanning various stages of metadata implementation, the MIC evaluation team explored a user-centered approach in which the four generic user tasks suggested by IFLA FRBR (International Association of Library Associations Functional Requirement for Bibliographic Records) were embedded in data collection and analyses. Diverse groups of users rated usefulness of individual metadata fields for finding, identifying, selecting, and obtaining moving images. The results demonstrate a consistency across these evaluations with respect to (a) identification of a set of useful metadata fields highly rated by target users for each of the FRBR generic tasks, and (b) indication of a significant interaction between MIC metadata fields and the FRBR generic tasks. The findings provide timely feedback for the MIC implementation specifically, and valuable suggestions to other similar metadata application settings in general. They also suggest the feasibility of using the four IFLA FRBR generic tasks as a framework for user-centered functional metadata evaluations.
  8. Zhang, Y.; Wu, M.; Zhang, G.; Lu, J.: Stepping beyond your comfort zone : diffusion-based network analytics for knowledge trajectory recommendation (2023) 0.01
    0.008840589 = product of:
      0.017681178 = sum of:
        0.017681178 = product of:
          0.035362355 = sum of:
            0.035362355 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035362355 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05220068 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2023 18:07:12
  9. Zhang, Y.: ¬The influence of mental models on undergraduate students' searching behavior on the Web (2008) 0.01
    0.0079682255 = product of:
      0.015936451 = sum of:
        0.015936451 = product of:
          0.031872902 = sum of:
            0.031872902 = weight(_text_:online in 2097) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031872902 = score(doc=2097,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05220068 = queryNorm
                0.20118743 = fieldWeight in 2097, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2097)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article explores the effects of undergraduate students' mental models of the Web on their online searching behavior. Forty-four undergraduate students, mainly freshmen and sophomores, participated in the study. Subjects' mental models of the Web were treated as equally good styles and operationalized as drawings of their perceptions about the Web. Four types of mental models of the Web were identified based on the drawings and the associated descriptions: technical view, functional view, process view, and connection view. In the study, subjects were required to finish two search tasks. Searching behavior was measured from four aspects: navigation and performance, subjects' feelings about tasks and their own performances, query construction, and search patterns. The four mental model groups showed different navigation and querying behaviors, but the differences were not significant. Subjects' satisfaction with their own performances was found to be significantly correlated with the time to complete the task. The results also showed that the familiarity of the task to subjects had a major effect on their ways to start interaction, query construction, and search patterns.
  10. Zhang, Y.; Sun, Y.; Xie, B.: Quality of health information for consumers on the web : a systematic review of indicators, criteria, tools, and evaluation results (2015) 0.01
    0.0066401875 = product of:
      0.013280375 = sum of:
        0.013280375 = product of:
          0.02656075 = sum of:
            0.02656075 = weight(_text_:online in 2218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02656075 = score(doc=2218,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05220068 = queryNorm
                0.16765618 = fieldWeight in 2218, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2218)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The quality of online health information for consumers has been a critical issue that concerns all stakeholders in healthcare. To gain an understanding of how quality is evaluated, this systematic review examined 165 articles in which researchers evaluated the quality of consumer-oriented health information on the web against predefined criteria. It was found that studies typically evaluated quality in relation to the substance and formality of content, as well as to the design of technological platforms. Attention to design, particularly interactivity, privacy, and social and cultural appropriateness is on the rise, which suggests the permeation of a user-centered perspective into the evaluation of health information systems, and a growing recognition of the need to study these systems from a social-technical perspective. Researchers used many preexisting instruments to facilitate evaluation of the formality of content; however, only a few were used in multiple studies, and their validity was questioned. The quality of content (i.e., accuracy and completeness) was always evaluated using proprietary instruments constructed based on medical guidelines or textbooks. The evaluation results revealed that the quality of health information varied across medical domains and across websites, and that the overall quality remained problematic. Future research is needed to examine the quality of user-generated content and to explore opportunities offered by emerging new media that can facilitate the consumer evaluation of health information.