Search (43 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  1. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.05
    0.045942407 = product of:
      0.091884814 = sum of:
        0.091884814 = sum of:
          0.031872902 = weight(_text_:online in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031872902 = score(doc=2763,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05220068 = queryNorm
              0.20118743 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
          0.060011912 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.060011912 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05220068 = queryNorm
              0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article challenges recent research (Evans, 2008) reporting that the concentration of cited scientific literature increases with the online availability of articles and journals. Using Thomson Reuters' Web of Science, the present article analyses changes in the concentration of citations received (2- and 5-year citation windows) by papers published between 1900 and 2005. Three measures of concentration are used: the percentage of papers that received at least one citation (cited papers); the percentage of papers needed to account for 20%, 50%, and 80% of the citations; and the Herfindahl-Hirschman index (HHI). These measures are used for four broad disciplines: natural sciences and engineering, medical fields, social sciences, and the humanities. All these measures converge and show that, contrary to what was reported by Evans, the dispersion of citations is actually increasing.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
  2. H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008) 0.04
    0.043754958 = product of:
      0.087509915 = sum of:
        0.087509915 = sum of:
          0.04507509 = weight(_text_:online in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04507509 = score(doc=590,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05220068 = queryNorm
              0.284522 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
          0.042434826 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042434826 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05220068 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    "Zur Kurzmitteilung "Latest enhancements in Scopus: ... h-Index incorporated in Scopus" in den letzten Online-Mitteilungen (Online-Mitteilungen 92, S.31) ist zu korrigieren, dass der h-Index sehr wohl bereits im Web of Science enthalten ist. Allerdings findet man/frau diese Information nicht in der "cited ref search", sondern neben der Trefferliste einer Quick Search, General Search oder einer Suche über den Author Finder in der rechten Navigationsleiste unter dem Titel "Citation Report". Der "Citation Report" bietet für die in der jeweiligen Trefferliste angezeigten Arbeiten: - Die Gesamtzahl der Zitierungen aller Arbeiten in der Trefferliste - Die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit dieser Arbeiten - Die Anzahl der Zitierungen der einzelnen Arbeiten, aufgeschlüsselt nach Publikationsjahr der zitierenden Arbeiten - Die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit dieser Arbeiten pro Jahr - Den h-Index (ein h-Index von x sagt aus, dass x Arbeiten der Trefferliste mehr als x-mal zitiert wurden; er ist gegenüber sehr hohen Zitierungen einzelner Arbeiten unempfindlicher als die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit)."
    Date
    6. 4.2008 19:04:22
  3. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.03
    0.028289884 = product of:
      0.05657977 = sum of:
        0.05657977 = product of:
          0.11315954 = sum of:
            0.11315954 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11315954 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05220068 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  4. Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992) 0.03
    0.028289884 = product of:
      0.05657977 = sum of:
        0.05657977 = product of:
          0.11315954 = sum of:
            0.11315954 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11315954 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05220068 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    7. 2.2005 14:10:22
  5. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.03
    0.02500496 = product of:
      0.05000992 = sum of:
        0.05000992 = product of:
          0.10001984 = sum of:
            0.10001984 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10001984 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05220068 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  6. Wildner, B.: Web of Science - Scopus : Auf der Suche nach Zitierungen (2006) 0.02
    0.024769243 = product of:
      0.049538486 = sum of:
        0.049538486 = sum of:
          0.0212486 = weight(_text_:online in 5034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0212486 = score(doc=5034,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05220068 = queryNorm
              0.13412495 = fieldWeight in 5034, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5034)
          0.028289884 = weight(_text_:22 in 5034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028289884 = score(doc=5034,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05220068 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5034, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5034)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    4. 6.2006 17:22:15
    Source
    Online Mitteilungen. 2006, Nr.85, S.18-20 [=Mitteilungen VÖB 59(2006) H.1]
  7. Hauffe, H.: Zitationsanalysen : Editoral (1999) 0.02
    0.018592525 = product of:
      0.03718505 = sum of:
        0.03718505 = product of:
          0.0743701 = sum of:
            0.0743701 = weight(_text_:online in 4378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0743701 = score(doc=4378,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05220068 = queryNorm
                0.46943733 = fieldWeight in 4378, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4378)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Online Mitteilungen. 1999, Nr.65, S.3-6 [=Mitteilungen VÖB 52(1999) H.3/4]
  8. Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002) 0.02
    0.017681178 = product of:
      0.035362355 = sum of:
        0.035362355 = product of:
          0.07072471 = sum of:
            0.07072471 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07072471 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05220068 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
  9. Cronin, B.; Weaver-Wozniak, S.: Online access to acknowledgements (1993) 0.02
    0.0161016 = product of:
      0.0322032 = sum of:
        0.0322032 = product of:
          0.0644064 = sum of:
            0.0644064 = weight(_text_:online in 7827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0644064 = score(doc=7827,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05220068 = queryNorm
                0.4065447 = fieldWeight in 7827, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7827)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews the scale, range and consistency of acknowledgement behaviour, in citations, for a number of academic disciplines. The qualitative and quantitative evidence suggests a pervasive and consistent practice in which acknowledgements define a variety of social, cognitive and instrumental relationships between scholars and within and across disciplines. As such they may be used alongside other bibliometric indicators, such as citations, to map networks of influence. Considers the case for using acknowledgements data in the assessment of academic performance and proposes an online acknowledgement index to facilitate this process, perhaps as a logical extension of ISI's citation indexing products
    Source
    Proceedings of the 14th National Online Meeting 1993, New York, 4-6 May 1993. Ed.: M.E. Williams
  10. Nacke, O.: Zitatenanalyse im engeren Sinne (1980) 0.02
    0.015936451 = product of:
      0.031872902 = sum of:
        0.031872902 = product of:
          0.063745804 = sum of:
            0.063745804 = weight(_text_:online in 399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.063745804 = score(doc=399,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05220068 = queryNorm
                0.40237486 = fieldWeight in 399, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=399)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1979, Willingen/Hochsauerland, 1.-5.10.1979. Das IuD-Programm heute - Online-Benutzergruppe - Bibliometrie, Scientometrie - Terminologiearbeit - Datenschutz - Tariffragen, Berufsbilder - Informationsmarkt - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
  11. Nacke, O.: Fehlerquellen bei der Zitatenanalyse (1980) 0.02
    0.015936451 = product of:
      0.031872902 = sum of:
        0.031872902 = product of:
          0.063745804 = sum of:
            0.063745804 = weight(_text_:online in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.063745804 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05220068 = queryNorm
                0.40237486 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1979, Willingen/Hochsauerland, 1.-5.10.1979. Das IuD-Programm heute - Online-Benutzergruppe - Bibliometrie, Scientometrie - Terminologiearbeit - Datenschutz - Tariffragen, Berufsbilder - Informationsmarkt - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
  12. Gering, E.: ¬Die Analyse von Online-Datenbanken : ein Instrument für das Beobachten von Forschungsaktivitäten; dargestellt an einem Forschungsfeld der Festkörperphysik (1995) 0.02
    0.01502503 = product of:
      0.03005006 = sum of:
        0.03005006 = product of:
          0.06010012 = sum of:
            0.06010012 = weight(_text_:online in 2660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06010012 = score(doc=2660,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05220068 = queryNorm
                0.37936267 = fieldWeight in 2660, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2660)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Sinnvolle forschungspolitische bzw. forschungsstrategische Entscheidungsprozesse bedürfen beim Wissenschafts- und Forschungsmanagement ausreichender Informationen hinsichtlich der Forschungsaktivitäten bestimmter Wissenschaftlergruppen, Institutionen bzw. Länder. Durch entsprechende Vergleichsuntersuchungen lassen sich u.a. auch thematische, länderweite bzw. zeitkritische Forschungsschwerpunkte herausarbeiten. Die folgende Arbeit skizziert die Möglichkeiten von Forschungsanalysen mittels Online-Datenbanken und verdeutlicht die spezifischen Möglichekeiten und Probleme am Beispiel von Arbeiten aus der Festkörperphysik
  13. Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013) 0.01
    0.014144942 = product of:
      0.028289884 = sum of:
        0.028289884 = product of:
          0.05657977 = sum of:
            0.05657977 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05657977 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05220068 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17.12.2013 11:02:22
  14. Fröhlich, G.: ¬Das Messen des leicht Meßbaren : Output-Indikatoren, Impact-Maße: Artefakte der Szeintometrie? (1999) 0.01
    0.013280375 = product of:
      0.02656075 = sum of:
        0.02656075 = product of:
          0.0531215 = sum of:
            0.0531215 = weight(_text_:online in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0531215 = score(doc=4379,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05220068 = queryNorm
                0.33531237 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Online Mitteilungen. 1999, Nr.65, S.7-21 [=Mitteilungen VÖB 52(1999) H.3/4]
  15. Hauffe, H.: ¬The role of citation analysis in the history and evaluation of science : Bericht über einen Vortrag von Eugene Garfield (Wien, 26. Mai 2004) (2004) 0.01
    0.013280375 = product of:
      0.02656075 = sum of:
        0.02656075 = product of:
          0.0531215 = sum of:
            0.0531215 = weight(_text_:online in 2492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0531215 = score(doc=2492,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05220068 = queryNorm
                0.33531237 = fieldWeight in 2492, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2492)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Online Mitteilungen. 2004, Nr.79, S.7-9 [=Mitteilungen VÖB 57(2004) H.2]
  16. Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001) 0.01
    0.012376824 = product of:
      0.024753649 = sum of:
        0.024753649 = product of:
          0.049507298 = sum of:
            0.049507298 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049507298 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05220068 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    16.12.2001 14:01:22
  17. Van der Veer Martens, B.; Goodrum, G.: ¬The diffusion of theories : a functional approach (2006) 0.01
    0.012376824 = product of:
      0.024753649 = sum of:
        0.024753649 = product of:
          0.049507298 = sum of:
            0.049507298 = weight(_text_:22 in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049507298 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05220068 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:20:01
  18. Tay, A.: ¬The next generation discovery citation indexes : a review of the landscape in 2020 (2020) 0.01
    0.012376824 = product of:
      0.024753649 = sum of:
        0.024753649 = product of:
          0.049507298 = sum of:
            0.049507298 = weight(_text_:22 in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049507298 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05220068 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17.11.2020 12:22:59
  19. Brooks, T.A.: How good are the best papers of JASIS? (2000) 0.01
    0.011268772 = product of:
      0.022537544 = sum of:
        0.022537544 = product of:
          0.04507509 = sum of:
            0.04507509 = weight(_text_:online in 4593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04507509 = score(doc=4593,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05220068 = queryNorm
                0.284522 = fieldWeight in 4593, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4593)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A citation analysis examined the 28 best articles published in JASIS from 1969-1996. Best articles tend to single-authored works twice as long as the avergae article published in JASIS. They are cited and self-cited much more often than the average article. The greatest source of references made to the best articles is from JASIS itself. The top 5 best papers focus largely on information retrieval and online searching
    Content
    Top by numbers of citations: (1) Saracevic, T. et al.: A study of information seeking and retrieving I-III (1988); (2) Bates, M.: Information search tactics (1979); (3) Cooper, W.S.: On selecting a measure of retrieval effectiveness (1973); (4) Marcus, R.S.: A experimental comparison of the effectiveness of computers and humans as search intermediaries (1983); (4) Fidel, R.: Online searching styles (1984)
  20. Pao, M.L.: Term and citation retrieval : a field study (1993) 0.01
    0.0106243 = product of:
      0.0212486 = sum of:
        0.0212486 = product of:
          0.0424972 = sum of:
            0.0424972 = weight(_text_:online in 3741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0424972 = score(doc=3741,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05220068 = queryNorm
                0.2682499 = fieldWeight in 3741, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3741)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Investigates the relative efficacy of searching by terms and by citations in searches collected in health science libraries. In pilot and field studies the odds that overlap items retrieved would be relevant or partially relevant were greatly improved. In the field setting citation searching was able to add average of 24% recall to traditional subject retrieval. Attempts to identify distinguishing characteristics in queries which might benefit most from additional citation searches proved inclusive. Online access of citation databases has been hampered by their high cost