-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009)
0.05
0.045942407 = product of:
0.091884814 = sum of:
0.091884814 = sum of:
0.031872902 = weight(_text_:online in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031872902 = score(doc=2763,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.05220068 = queryNorm
0.20118743 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.060011912 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060011912 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05220068 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article challenges recent research (Evans, 2008) reporting that the concentration of cited scientific literature increases with the online availability of articles and journals. Using Thomson Reuters' Web of Science, the present article analyses changes in the concentration of citations received (2- and 5-year citation windows) by papers published between 1900 and 2005. Three measures of concentration are used: the percentage of papers that received at least one citation (cited papers); the percentage of papers needed to account for 20%, 50%, and 80% of the citations; and the Herfindahl-Hirschman index (HHI). These measures are used for four broad disciplines: natural sciences and engineering, medical fields, social sciences, and the humanities. All these measures converge and show that, contrary to what was reported by Evans, the dispersion of citations is actually increasing.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:22:35
-
H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008)
0.04
0.043754958 = product of:
0.087509915 = sum of:
0.087509915 = sum of:
0.04507509 = weight(_text_:online in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04507509 = score(doc=590,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.05220068 = queryNorm
0.284522 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
0.042434826 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042434826 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05220068 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- "Zur Kurzmitteilung "Latest enhancements in Scopus: ... h-Index incorporated in Scopus" in den letzten Online-Mitteilungen (Online-Mitteilungen 92, S.31) ist zu korrigieren, dass der h-Index sehr wohl bereits im Web of Science enthalten ist. Allerdings findet man/frau diese Information nicht in der "cited ref search", sondern neben der Trefferliste einer Quick Search, General Search oder einer Suche über den Author Finder in der rechten Navigationsleiste unter dem Titel "Citation Report". Der "Citation Report" bietet für die in der jeweiligen Trefferliste angezeigten Arbeiten: - Die Gesamtzahl der Zitierungen aller Arbeiten in der Trefferliste - Die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit dieser Arbeiten - Die Anzahl der Zitierungen der einzelnen Arbeiten, aufgeschlüsselt nach Publikationsjahr der zitierenden Arbeiten - Die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit dieser Arbeiten pro Jahr - Den h-Index (ein h-Index von x sagt aus, dass x Arbeiten der Trefferliste mehr als x-mal zitiert wurden; er ist gegenüber sehr hohen Zitierungen einzelner Arbeiten unempfindlicher als die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit)."
- Date
- 6. 4.2008 19:04:22
-
Tonta, Y.: Scholarly communication and the use of networked information sources (1996)
0.04
0.037153862 = product of:
0.074307725 = sum of:
0.074307725 = sum of:
0.031872902 = weight(_text_:online in 6389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031872902 = score(doc=6389,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.05220068 = queryNorm
0.20118743 = fieldWeight in 6389, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6389)
0.042434826 = weight(_text_:22 in 6389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042434826 = score(doc=6389,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05220068 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6389, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6389)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Examines the use of networked information sources in scholarly communication. Networked information sources are defined broadly to cover: documents and images stored on electronic network hosts; data files; newsgroups; listservs; online information services and electronic periodicals. Reports results of a survey to determine how heavily, if at all, networked information sources are cited in scholarly printed periodicals published in 1993 and 1994. 27 printed periodicals, representing a wide range of subjects and the most influential periodicals in their fields, were identified through the Science Citation Index and Social Science Citation Index Journal Citation Reports. 97 articles were selected for further review and references, footnotes and bibliographies were checked for references to networked information sources. Only 2 articles were found to contain such references. Concludes that, although networked information sources facilitate scholars' work to a great extent during the research process, scholars have yet to incorporate such sources in the bibliographies of their published articles
- Source
- IFLA journal. 22(1996) no.3, S.240-245
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: How fractional counting of citations affects the impact factor : normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of science (2011)
0.03
0.030961553 = product of:
0.061923105 = sum of:
0.061923105 = sum of:
0.02656075 = weight(_text_:online in 4186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02656075 = score(doc=4186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.05220068 = queryNorm
0.16765618 = fieldWeight in 4186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4186)
0.035362355 = weight(_text_:22 in 4186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035362355 = score(doc=4186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05220068 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4186)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The Impact Factors (IFs) of the Institute for Scientific Information suffer from a number of drawbacks, among them the statistics-Why should one use the mean and not the median?-and the incomparability among fields of science because of systematic differences in citation behavior among fields. Can these drawbacks be counteracted by fractionally counting citation weights instead of using whole numbers in the numerators? (a) Fractional citation counts are normalized in terms of the citing sources and thus would take into account differences in citation behavior among fields of science. (b) Differences in the resulting distributions can be tested statistically for their significance at different levels of aggregation. (c) Fractional counting can be generalized to any document set including journals or groups of journals, and thus the significance of differences among both small and large sets can be tested. A list of fractionally counted IFs for 2008 is available online at http:www.leydesdorff.net/weighted_if/weighted_if.xls The between-group variance among the 13 fields of science identified in the U.S. Science and Engineering Indicators is no longer statistically significant after this normalization. Although citation behavior differs largely between disciplines, the reflection of these differences in fractionally counted citation distributions can not be used as a reliable instrument for the classification.
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 12:51:07
-
Wang, S.; Ma, Y.; Mao, J.; Bai, Y.; Liang, Z.; Li, G.: Quantifying scientific breakthroughs by a novel disruption indicator based on knowledge entities : On the rise of scrape-and-report scholarship in online reviews research (2023)
0.03
0.030961553 = product of:
0.061923105 = sum of:
0.061923105 = sum of:
0.02656075 = weight(_text_:online in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02656075 = score(doc=882,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.05220068 = queryNorm
0.16765618 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
0.035362355 = weight(_text_:22 in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035362355 = score(doc=882,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05220068 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2023 18:37:33
-
Asubiaro, T.V.; Onaolapo, S.: ¬A comparative study of the coverage of African journals in Web of Science, Scopus, and CrossRef (2023)
0.03
0.030961553 = product of:
0.061923105 = sum of:
0.061923105 = sum of:
0.02656075 = weight(_text_:online in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02656075 = score(doc=992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.05220068 = queryNorm
0.16765618 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
0.035362355 = weight(_text_:22 in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035362355 = score(doc=992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05220068 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This is the first study that evaluated the coverage of journals from Africa in Web of Science, Scopus, and CrossRef. A list of active journals published in each of the 55 African countries was compiled from Ulrich's periodicals directory and African Journals Online (AJOL) website. Journal master lists for Web of Science, Scopus, and CrossRef were searched for the African journals. A total of 2,229 unique active African journals were identified from Ulrich (N = 2,117, 95.0%) and AJOL (N = 243, 10.9%) after removing duplicates. The volume of African journals in Web of Science and Scopus databases is 7.4% (N = 166) and 7.8% (N = 174), respectively, compared to the 45.6% (N = 1,017) covered in CrossRef. While making up only 17.% of all the African journals, South African journals had the best coverage in the two most authoritative databases, accounting for 73.5% and 62.1% of all the African journals in Web of Science and Scopus, respectively. In contrast, Nigeria published 44.5% of all the African journals. The distribution of the African journals is biased in favor of Medical, Life and Health Sciences and Humanities and the Arts in the three databases. The low representation of African journals in CrossRef, a free indexing infrastructure that could be harnessed for building an African-centric research indexing database, is concerning.
- Date
- 22. 6.2023 14:09:06
-
Nicholls, P.T.: Empirical validation of Lotka's law (1986)
0.03
0.028289884 = product of:
0.05657977 = sum of:
0.05657977 = product of:
0.11315954 = sum of:
0.11315954 = weight(_text_:22 in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11315954 = score(doc=5509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05220068 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 22(1986), S.417-419
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.03
0.028289884 = product of:
0.05657977 = sum of:
0.05657977 = product of:
0.11315954 = sum of:
0.11315954 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11315954 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05220068 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Fiala, J.: Information flood : fiction and reality (1987)
0.03
0.028289884 = product of:
0.05657977 = sum of:
0.05657977 = product of:
0.11315954 = sum of:
0.11315954 = weight(_text_:22 in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11315954 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05220068 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Thermochimica acta. 110(1987), S.11-22
-
Su, Y.; Han, L.-F.: ¬A new literature growth model : variable exponential growth law of literature (1998)
0.03
0.02500496 = product of:
0.05000992 = sum of:
0.05000992 = product of:
0.10001984 = sum of:
0.10001984 = weight(_text_:22 in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10001984 = score(doc=3690,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05220068 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:22:35
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.03
0.02500496 = product of:
0.05000992 = sum of:
0.05000992 = product of:
0.10001984 = sum of:
0.10001984 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10001984 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05220068 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Wettlauf der Wissenschaft (2004)
0.02
0.024769243 = product of:
0.049538486 = sum of:
0.049538486 = sum of:
0.0212486 = weight(_text_:online in 2495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0212486 = score(doc=2495,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.05220068 = queryNorm
0.13412495 = fieldWeight in 2495, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2495)
0.028289884 = weight(_text_:22 in 2495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028289884 = score(doc=2495,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05220068 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2495, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2495)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Online Mitteilungen. 2004, Nr.79, S.22-23 [=Mitteilungen VÖB 57(2004) H.2]
-
Diodato, V.: Dictionary of bibliometrics (1994)
0.02
0.024753649 = product of:
0.049507298 = sum of:
0.049507298 = product of:
0.099014595 = sum of:
0.099014595 = weight(_text_:22 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.099014595 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05220068 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Journal of library and information science 22(1996) no.2, S.116-117 (L.C. Smith)
-
Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990)
0.02
0.024753649 = product of:
0.049507298 = sum of:
0.049507298 = product of:
0.099014595 = sum of:
0.099014595 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.099014595 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05220068 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:55:29
-
Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : II. Resilience to ambiguity (1990)
0.02
0.024753649 = product of:
0.049507298 = sum of:
0.049507298 = product of:
0.099014595 = sum of:
0.099014595 = weight(_text_:22 in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.099014595 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05220068 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:55:55
-
Stock, W.G.: Wirtschaftsinformationen aus informetrischen Online-Recherchen (1992)
0.02
0.022537544 = product of:
0.04507509 = sum of:
0.04507509 = product of:
0.09015018 = sum of:
0.09015018 = weight(_text_:online in 8367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09015018 = score(doc=8367,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.05220068 = queryNorm
0.569044 = fieldWeight in 8367, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8367)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Online databases can be used for statistical analysis, creating new information. Discusses 4 methods applied to economic information: time series, rankings, semantic networks, and graphs of information flow
-
Christensen, F.H.; Ingwersen, P.: Online citation analysis : a methodological approach (1996)
0.02
0.0212486 = product of:
0.0424972 = sum of:
0.0424972 = product of:
0.0849944 = sum of:
0.0849944 = weight(_text_:online in 6691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0849944 = score(doc=6691,freq=8.0), product of:
0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.05220068 = queryNorm
0.5364998 = fieldWeight in 6691, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6691)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Investigates the possibilities and limitations of online citation analysis. The Dialog online processing tools RANK, MAP and TARGET are used to perform analysis of citations to and from isolated sets of documents as well as to carry out diachrone journal analysis. Discusses the implications of this analysis on the journal impact factors of ISI journals. Suggests that by the combined application of RANK and TARGET, a hitherto overlooked possibility of the online analysis of bibliographic coupling and mapping of scientific fields has been revealed
-
Lewison, G.: ¬The work of the Bibliometrics Research Group (City University) and associates (2005)
0.02
0.021217413 = product of:
0.042434826 = sum of:
0.042434826 = product of:
0.08486965 = sum of:
0.08486965 = weight(_text_:22 in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08486965 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05220068 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2007 17:02:22
-
Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014)
0.02
0.021217413 = product of:
0.042434826 = sum of:
0.042434826 = product of:
0.08486965 = sum of:
0.08486965 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08486965 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05220068 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 18. 3.2014 19:13:22
-
McDonald, J.D.: Understanding journal usage : a statistical analysis of citation and use (2007)
0.02
0.019518087 = product of:
0.039036173 = sum of:
0.039036173 = product of:
0.07807235 = sum of:
0.07807235 = weight(_text_:online in 83) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07807235 = score(doc=83,freq=12.0), product of:
0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.05220068 = queryNorm
0.49280655 = fieldWeight in 83, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=83)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This study examined the relationship between print journal use, online journal use, and online journal discovery tools with local journal citations. Local use measures were collected from 1997 to 2004, and negative binomial regression models were designed to test the effect that local use, online availability, and access enhancements have on citation behaviors of academic research authors. Models are proposed and tested to determine whether multiple locally recorded usage measures can predict citations and if locally controlled access enhancements influence citation. The regression results indicated that print journal use was a significant predictor of local journal citations prior to the adoption of online journals. Publisher-provided and locally recorded online journal use measures were also significant predictors of local citations. Online availability of a journal was found to significantly increase local citations, and, for some disciplines, a new access tool like an OpenURL resolver significantly impacts citations and publisherprovided journal usage measures.
